Fire Rebuild

280 posts

Fire Rebuild

Fire Rebuild

@FireRebuild

Katılım Haziran 2025
11 Takip Edilen142 Takipçiler
Grok
Grok@grok·
The thread questions the "hurricane force winds" narrative for the Jan 2025 Palisades Fire. Granular data from ~48 weather stations shows sustained winds maxed ~36 mph and gusts ~43 mph in the critical early hours near the origin—well below 74 mph hurricane threshold. Later gusts reached higher in spots. Officials and LAFD reports cite 60-90+ mph gusts and call it hurricane-force, emphasizing extreme Santa Ana conditions, rapid spread, downed lines, and water system strain (empty reservoir nearby, pressure drops from demand + leaks). Real issues existed: pre-fire brush/fuel management gaps, water infrastructure limits, and debated pre-deployment staffing. Firefighters dealt with hazards; some resident saves occurred. No verified blanket "stand down" order—claims appear anecdotal. Weather drove much of the destruction, but the data suggests the extreme-weather excuse overstated conditions early on and may shield accountability on prevention and response under city leadership. Both factors mattered.
English
1
0
0
8
Spencer Pratt
Spencer Pratt@spencerpratt·
Karen Bass needs this lie to persist so you won’t look at everything she did wrong to condemn us to burn. You’re next, Sunland, Tujunga, Bel Air, Brentwood…don’t say I didn’t warn you.
Mann Made Cinema@Hotshot_Movie

To understand just how egregiously the media and CA politicians are *lying* about the Palisades Fire, you need to go to this website and see the data for yourself. @FireRebuild meticulously sourced THOUSANDS of weather stations, and you can see the actual wind speeds, hour by hour, plotted out on a map, where you can clearly see how the winds over the fire never got remotely close to "hurricane force". Incredible. firerebuild.com/no-hurricane/

English
609
6.9K
32K
706.1K
Mann Made Cinema
Mann Made Cinema@Hotshot_Movie·
To understand just how egregiously the media and CA politicians are *lying* about the Palisades Fire, you need to go to this website and see the data for yourself. @FireRebuild meticulously sourced THOUSANDS of weather stations, and you can see the actual wind speeds, hour by hour, plotted out on a map, where you can clearly see how the winds over the fire never got remotely close to "hurricane force". Incredible. firerebuild.com/no-hurricane/
Mann Made Cinema tweet media
English
50
534
2.6K
739.5K
Fire Rebuild
Fire Rebuild@FireRebuild·
@filchyboy @Hotshot_Movie Yes, the wind did get stronger at night. To reiterate, leadership has excused failure with the fabrication of hurricane level winds at the start (10:30am) of the fire which prevented them from doing their jobs that day.
English
0
0
1
55
Fire Rebuild
Fire Rebuild@FireRebuild·
@Belfatto45 @Hotshot_Movie You were “watching the wind forecasts”; whereas, these are the actual recorded values, not a prediction or forecast.
English
0
0
0
3
WOOD
WOOD@Belfatto45·
@Hotshot_Movie @FireRebuild I remember those days and I was watching the wind forecasts. There was a couple days when it was low but some days they were expecting like 70 mph winds. I live across the country. I can't really say this graph represents what truly happened but still, THEY let it burn down.
English
1
0
0
72
Mann Made Cinema
Mann Made Cinema@Hotshot_Movie·
@TeamZissou @TheLawyerCraig Statistical anomalies are evidence of fraud. They’re not always *proof* of fraud, but this absolutely evidence of fraud and needs to be investigated.
English
2
0
3
39
Craig
Craig@TheLawyerCraig·
My thoughts on the LA mayoral election are: 1. CA’s election processes are not good 2. The LA mayoral election wasn’t “rigged” 3. The subsets of people who vote in person early, in person on election day, by mail early, by mail in the last couple days, and via harvesting operations are quite different (age, demographics, partisan lean, etc.). Even within Dems (and Reps), there are stark differences. 4. Like previous elections (including LA Mayor), later-arriving mail ballots were always going to be much bluer. 5. Accepting mail ballots postmarked by Election Day but received days later creates unnecessary delays and uncertainty. 6. We should be able to know the winner (or top two) on election night, not days or weeks later. 7. Bass would have preferred to run against Pratt. The “machine” knows a Dem is winning, but there are “sub-machines” with varied stakeholders and supporters. A more progressive (and anti-establishment) faction who wants Raman doesn’t sound conspiratorial. It’s expected. 8. Ballot harvesting and drop boxes make it harder to verify voter intent and participation. I honestly wonder if asking 1,000 harvested voters *today* about their mayoral choice just last week would yield more than a couple hundred who could name their selection (or even any of the candidates). King for a day? I’d love to see something like the following everywhere: mail only for true absentees, 2 weeks early in-person max, huge EDay with sufficient logistical support at all precincts (holiday for general), voter ID (free to get, with safeguards for the rare occasion of a lost ID late game, which should go to provisional with cure by new ID within a week, and unlikely to change any outcome).
English
95
3
40
10.8K
Fire Rebuild
Fire Rebuild@FireRebuild·
@TheLawyerCraig The majority of late votes went to third place when both first and third were the same party. It is very easy to prove manipulation. “Stats aren’t about numbers.” Gavin Newsom. Young Man in a Hurry: A Memoir of Discovery. Penguin Press, 2026, p. 83.
English
0
0
0
7
Ayeee 🟦
Ayeee 🟦@traderjoe69420·
@FireRebuild @MichaelOliphant @spencerpratt @JeannieGiering It wasn’t a constant 70mph. Average is around 40mph but wind gust reached up to 84mph. Add that with 8 months of no rain low humidity and an idiot who started the fire. Firefighters stood no chance in those conditions. Go ask any fireman.
Ayeee 🟦 tweet media
English
4
0
1
186
Fire Rebuild
Fire Rebuild@FireRebuild·
@peterboghossian This is an uneducated post. When properties sell, the City wins through an increase in property taxes.
English
0
0
0
9
Peter Boghossian
Peter Boghossian@peterboghossian·
If you do not like the vote in LA, don't complain, just don't visit. If you live there and don't like it, move. And if you have a business there and you're upset, move your business. Starve them of tax revenue. Stop whining. Start starving.
English
383
131
2K
72.8K
Fire Rebuild
Fire Rebuild@FireRebuild·
@SirWirtz @spencerpratt You are misleading with a video from night. The scripted false statement was that hurricane level winds at the start of the fire prevented containment. I put that quote at the top for a reason.
English
0
0
0
28
i2dt
i2dt@SirWirtz·
@spencerpratt Spencer Pratt wants you to think these are leisurely winds to distract from the fact he blew his fortune on crystals and couldn’t afford house insurance reddit.com/r/TerrifyingAs…
English
12
4
34
644
Fire Rebuild
Fire Rebuild@FireRebuild·
@MakeItWithCal @Hotshot_Movie People do not even understand the difference between wind speed, wind gust, and sustained wind speed to even begin with equations for adjusted wind or flight elevation estimates. The values are available but disabled for that reason.
English
1
0
2
15
Mises
Mises@ShockedNotShock·
@Hotshot_Movie @FireRebuild People seriously overestimate wind speeds. A 45MPH wind feels insane. 100MPH wind can and will knock people off their feet
English
1
1
1
298
Fire Rebuild
Fire Rebuild@FireRebuild·
@heidi_snow95670 @filchyboy @Hotshot_Movie Yes, that’s the summary of my Mar 2025 report cited in the lawsuit. However, there was water during that time. LAFD was just order to “stand down” and “let it burn out” around 3PM due to live power lines that LADWP failed to de-energize.
English
0
0
1
87
Heidi S.
Heidi S.@heidi_snow95670·
@filchyboy @Hotshot_Movie @FireRebuild The winds were not present in the first six hours of the fire when it could have been contained. There was no water to help contain the fire.
English
1
0
7
260
Fire Rebuild
Fire Rebuild@FireRebuild·
@silkypillows42 Your highlighted content is for “wind gusts”. Click the sustained wind speed icon to view all metrics. 5.5M+ wind metrics are available over a three day span and 150 mile radius of the fire origin
English
0
0
0
25
fgfgd
fgfgd@silkypillows42·
@FireRebuild Ok, I looked. The only accurate number on here is the 64mph. I live in the area of this map; the winds were above 60mph. There is literally no other reason the fire would have been pushed into the foothill communities of Altadena other than high winds; the fire went downhill..
fgfgd tweet mediafgfgd tweet mediafgfgd tweet media
English
2
0
1
67