Alfonso Lopez

Why do cities grow north and how can knowing that make you rich? Here's why one of the most overlooked real estate cheat codes on the planet works so well: The sun sits south - so nuilding north never shadows the buildings already there. Zoning fights push growth that direction for 200 years. The wind blows west to east. Old factories got built south and east of downtowns. Rich people fled the smoke north and west. Even after the factories closed, the pattern stuck. Rivers usually run south of downtown. South side = floodplain. North side = high ground. Premium dirt forever. Highways got built to serve where the wealthy already moved. The rich moved north. The highways made more north growth possible. This becomes a self-reinforcing loop for hundreds of years. North of every city is open farmland. It's the cheapest path of least resistance for developers. DFW is the textbook case. Same play, one exit further up Highway 75 and the tollway every decade: 1920s: Highland Park 1980s: Plano 2000s: Frisco 2020s: Prosper, Celina 2030s: Sherman, Denison 2040s: Oklahoma? Boomers bought 30 miles north of Dallas in 1980 with 12% rates. Today they're rich. Millennials can buy 30 miles north of where development ends today, at 7% rates, wait 20 years and get rich as well. Look how cheap land up there is. Don't be afraid of Oklahoma, either. The map still works. The more things grow north, the less it matters than you're 60+ miles from Dallas proper. I'm under contract on a ranch outside of DFW right now. Guess which direction it's in? Yep. Follow me @mhp_guy if you liked this.

Microsoft is investigating mistralai PyPI package v2.4.6 compromise. Attackers injected code in mistralai/client/__init__.py that executes on import, downloads hxxps://83[.]142[.]209[.]194/transformers.pyz to /tmp/transformers.pyz, and launches a second-stage payload on Linux. The file name transformers.pyz appears deliberately chosen to mimic the widely used Hugging Face Transformers library and blend into ML/dev environments. The main payload is a credential stealer, but it also includes country-aware logic; it avoids Russian-language environments and contains a geo fenced destructive branch that has 1-in-6 chance of executing rm -rf / when the system appears to be in Israel or Iran. To mitigate this threat: isolate affected Linux hosts, block 83[.]142[.]209[.]194, hunt for /tmp/transformers.pyz, pgmonitor[.]py, and pgsql-monitor.service, and rotate exposed credentials.

In the hood dogs gets jumped with compassion and empathy 😭

Twitter is starting to feel like the dead internet. AI posting, AI replying

“Let me throw in my codebase and scan for vulnerabilities how bad can it be?”

Unitree CEO Wang Xingxing just unveiled a real-life mecha. Marketed as the world’s first mass-produced manned robot, this machine can transform into a quadrupedal civilian vehicle. The unit weighs roughly 500 kg (1,100 lb), including the pilot.

You guys aren't going to believe this (I had to double check it was real). Unitree has made an actual mecha like Gundam, the GD01.

The best education in human history can be found for free online at a cost of $0.

“Good men no longer exist. If you ever wanna see a good man, go look in the mirror and be one. Don’t ever be sorry, be better. And always remember it is what it is, just adapt and overcome.”

The problem isn’t empathy. The problem is systems that reward intentions and ignore results. No proof. No limits. No consequences. Just feelings and paperwork. “Suicidal empathy” is a t-shirt slogan. The real fix is boring: measure outcomes, verify eligibility, enforce consequences. Fix the plumbing. Stop arguing about the water.

Worth reading

@hthieblot LMAO FACTS IM HOPING ITS A SHE. Lololol

The next billion-dollar founder has 9 followers on X rn. I will find you & fund you!

@KaiXCreator Did the carpenter build the house or his hammer and tools?

Can you call yourself a founder if your entire product was built by Claude?

@TheTriceRozay LMAOO

Bro to Bro: build your x account now Just say “hello” and gain 600 mutuals here.

@icanvardar A vast amount of agent AI niches are about to be born. AGI is about to be launched. The bottleneck is IT NEEDS to be seamless, frictionless, cheap enough it's ignorable by most. And provides economic uplift immediately. Thus grandma should be able to understand it.

gpt 5.5 is already enough for most programming work the bottleneck is no longer the model

@lefthanddraft Voice doesn't work, GTPS is worthless, it lies a lot. If you move from an individual to an enterprise plan your entire data collapses.

Anyone know what this button actually does? If it's on, ChatGPT uses web search. If it's off, ChatGPT uses web search.

No billionaire is truly self-made. Their wealth comes from operating inside systems that millions of people fund, maintain, and are often failed by. Because they are the largest beneficiaries of that system, there's a powerful argument that they carry a heightened responsibility to strengthen it and protect the people it harms, instead of pretending they did it all alone.

@jxnlco Both.

Do you want more software or better software?

No billionaire is truly self-made. Their wealth comes from operating inside systems that millions of people fund, maintain, and are often failed by. Because they are the largest beneficiaries of that system, there's a powerful argument that they carry a heightened responsibility to strengthen it and protect the people it harms, instead of pretending they did it all alone.

AOC: You can't earn a billion dollars.

How do you explain to an ant that the anthill is not all of existence? The ant survives inside the only world it knows. Its understanding is limited by its experience. That is the tragedy. We the people are screaming into an echo chamber, hoping the message reaches someone with enough resources, access, and power to help create real structural change. But the solution is not just tugging at heartstrings. The solution is helping people realize that being in the 1%, or even the 0.1%, does not make them more human, more deserving, or more capable of seeing the whole system. It means they are standing at the advantaged end of a system that worked in their favor, or in their family’s favor, while failing millions of others. That does not mean every wealthy person is evil. It means wealth comes with a responsibility to question the structure that made their life possible while making survival so difficult for everyone else. So I comment, share, like, and repost. Not because one post fixes the world, but because silence guarantees nothing changes.

✊✊✊✊✊ I’ve worked around wealthy people most of my life while living much closer to, at times even lower than, the reality shown in the first video. So here are my thoughts: TL;DR: Wealth is not proof of superior humanity. Poverty is not proof of personal failure. Both rich and poor people are shaped by systems they often do not fully understand. The tragedy is that the people with the most power to repair the system are usually the most insulated from the damage it creates. I think the creator reposting both videos is pointing at something real, but there is a deeper system issue: wealth often creates a bubble. A lot of wealthy people are not cartoonishly evil. Many simply have the privilege of ignorance. They are insulated from scarcity, desperation, and small acts of survival-level kindness, so they do not always understand what moments like that mean. Some do not even realize these realities exist constantly around them. The suffering is distant from them by function, and sometimes by design. And even when they do see suffering, the default response is often charity, not structural repair. Charity can help people survive. But charity alone does not fix the structure that keeps producing the need for charity in the first place. Sometimes it becomes a pressure valve that lets people feel useful while the same machine keeps running. Privilege creates more than financial distance. It creates emotional, psychological, social, and intellectual distance too. Emotional distance, because some people are not raised around constant instability, survival stress, dysregulated families, or unsafe environments. Psychological distance, because the person who “makes it out” may carry trauma, pressure, and survivor guilt, while their children and descendants grow up in a completely different reality with more safety, stability, support, and access. Intellectual distance, because the best schools, networks, language, credentials, and opportunities usually serve the people who already have access. That distance gives people polished language to rationalize inequality without ever having to experience its weight. It becomes easy to see poverty as a personal failure instead of a system of accumulated friction. But this is not just about wealthy people. All of humanity, regardless of race or class, operates inside systems most people barely understand: school systems, work systems, hospital systems, government systems, financial systems, housing systems, social systems, and family systems. The way people survive inside those systems shapes how they see the world and how they treat others. That is why even a wealthy person who came from nothing can still fail to understand systemic poverty, racism, sexism, and inequality. Their survival becomes their worldview. They think, “I made it, so why didn’t you?” And sometimes their kids repeat the same thing, even though they inherited a completely different starting point. But surviving a system does not mean you fully understand the system. Escaping poverty takes effort. I will never deny that. But effort alone does not explain escape. Timing, health, location, support, luck, access, networks, and fewer invisible penalties matter too. One person making it out does not prove the system is fair. It proves escape is possible under certain conditions. Poverty is not just being broke. Poverty is a thousand tiny walls blocking forward movement. Housing, transportation, food, childcare, education, healthcare, safety, time, stress, paperwork, credit, debt, trauma, and exhaustion all stack on top of each other until maneuvering becomes structurally difficult, sometimes almost impossible. And when people finally scream for help, that scream can accidentally confirm the wealthy person’s bias. They see the desperation and think, “That is a you problem,” instead of asking, “What kind of system keeps producing this much desperation?”

1/12 ✊✊✊✊✊ I’ve worked around wealthy people most of my life while also living much closer to the reality shown in the first video. So this is not resentment. It is what I have seen from both sides.