fractalitty

Real-time quantitative trading with LLM integration github.com/0xemmkty/Quant…

Two economists just published a mathematical proof that AI will destroy the economy. Not might. Not could. Will — if nothing changes. The paper is called "The AI Layoff Trap." Published March 2, 2026. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Boston University. Peer reviewed. Mathematically modeled. The conclusion is one sentence. "At the limit, firms automate their way to boundless productivity and zero demand." An economy that produces everything. And sells it to nobody. Here is how you get there. A company fires 500 workers and replaces them with AI. A competitor fires 700 to keep up. Another fires 1,000. Every company is behaving rationally. Every company is following the incentives correctly. And every company is building a trap for itself. Because the workers who were fired were also customers. When they lose their jobs faster than the economy can absorb them, they stop spending. Consumer demand falls. Companies respond by cutting costs — which means automating more workers — which means less spending — which means more falling demand — which means more automation. The loop has no natural exit. The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income. Capital income taxes. Worker equity participation. Upskilling programs. Corporate coordination agreements. Every single one failed in the model. The only intervention that worked: a Pigouvian automation tax — a per-task levy charged every time a company replaces a human with AI, forcing them to price in the demand they are destroying before they pull the trigger. No government has implemented this. No major economy is seriously discussing it. Meanwhile the numbers are already tracking the curve. 100,000 tech workers laid off in 2025. 92,000 more in the first months of 2026. Jack Dorsey fired half of Block's workforce and said publicly: "Within the next year, the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion." Nobody is doing anything wrong. Companies are following their incentives perfectly. That is exactly the problem. Rational behavior. At scale. Simultaneously. With no mechanism to stop it. Two economists built the math. The math leads to one place. Source: Falk & Tsoukalas · Wharton School + Boston University · arxiv.org/pdf/2603.20617

They quoted him $18,000. He opened Claude instead. Same result. One afternoon. $20/month. The gap between knowing how to use Claude and not knowing is worth $18,000. This article below fixes that.

@kunalvg Famous J.P. Morgan’s quote fits here nicely

AI + Astrology will be a billion-dollar category. And the rationalist builders who laugh at this will miss all of it.

RESEARCHERS JUST BUILT AN AI MODEL TRAINED ONLY ON TEXT FROM BEFORE 1931 it's called talkie. 13 billion parameters, trained exclusively on text published before december 31, 1930 its worldview is completely frozen in time the reason this matters: every major AI model today (GPT, claude, gemini, llama) was trained on the modern web. that makes it almost impossible to tell if these models actually reason or if they just memorized the answers from their training data talkie breaks that completely because it has never seen any modern information the crazy part: talkie can learn to write python code from just a few examples you show it in the prompt. despite having ZERO modern code in its training data. it's figuring out programming from 19th century mathematics texts. that's ACTUAL reasoning claude sonnet 4.6 was used as the judge in talkie's reinforcement learning pipeline. claude opus 4.6 generated the synthetic conversations used in fine tuning. a modern AI was used to train a model that's supposed to be frozen in 1930 the team already flagged this as a contamination risk they want to eliminate in future versions what they're using it to study: > long range forecasting. how well can a model "predict" the future from a frozen vantage point > invention. can it develop ideas that didn't exist until after its knowledge cutoff > LLM identity. what makes a model itself vs what's just patterns absorbed from the web alec radford built this. the same guy behind GPT, CLIP, and whisper both models are open source on hugging face. they're already planning a GPT-3 scale vintage model later this year an AI that has never seen the modern world can still reason its way to writing code. THAT alone tells you more about intelligence than any benchmark ever will

This tool can download literally anything from link 🤯 100% free. open source. no ads.

But you dont even have a model Flerf! Ah but yes we do! An observer-based sky model. No globe constants, no radius — just angles, timing, and position. Two layers: what you see, and where it's sourced. Pure ratios. Pure kinematics. Decide for yourself which framing is real

@RapidResponse47 @POTUS Create a problem, appear as victim, provide solution

.@POTUS: It's not a particularly secure building, and I didn't want to say this, but this is why we have to have all of the attributes of what we're planning at the White House. It's drone proof, it's bulletproof glass. That's why Secret Service and the military are demanding it.

@adamemedia1 🤡show

This is the third assassination attempt on Trump. Why do you think that is? Something genuine? Or something more sinister?

@MAGAVoice 🤡show

🚨 JUST NOW: Karoline Leavitt calls on everyone to watch tonight because Donald Trump will bring the heat and there will be “shots fired” LET’S FREAKING GO 🔥

@EvanLuthra Needs some victim points ?

WHAT JUST HAPPENED?!🤯 PRESIDENT TRUMP WAS QUICKLY TAKEN OFF STAGE BY THE US SECRET SERVICE DURING THE WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENTS’ DINNER.

🚨 Anthropic's own team just showed how to actually use Claude Code properly. 30 minutes. free. the person who created Claude Code. watch the workshop. bookmark it. worth more than every $500 course you almost bought. you've been using Claude without knowing 40 of its commands. Then read the guide below.

@oprydai Because same observer observing photon

HOW DOES A PHOTON KNOW IT'S BEING OBSERVED?

Talk directly to the consciousness of your favorite book. 📚 We have AI for coding and images, but The Living Library is for your mind. • Get life advice • Vent about your problems • Debate their deepest ideas

🚨 INSTEAD OF WATCHING NETFLIX TONIGHT. Spend 1 hour with this. Obsidian + Claude Code = 24/7 personal operating system. Works while you sleep. The people who build this tonight will never work the same way again. Watch it and Bookmark it now.

Claude users right now

@DogmaKarma @folaoftech Voip has spectrum of similar numbers

@folaoftech That's kinda fun, but every time he hears "Never gonna give you up", he's Rick-rolling himself. Why not just write a script to block the spam callers?

He built a script that calls back spam callers and traps them in an endless loop.🤣😈

FULL 1 HOUR CLAUDE DESIGN COURSE ON BUILDING INTERACTIVE ANIMATED WEBSITES WITH AI