Franz-Herman Krauel 🌲🔥

6.4K posts

Franz-Herman Krauel 🌲🔥 banner
Franz-Herman Krauel 🌲🔥

Franz-Herman Krauel 🌲🔥

@Franzelianism

MA Student Philosophy, BA Philosophy and Political Science I Interests: Neo-Aristotelianism, Analytical Philosophy, Libertarian PoliPhil

Germany Katılım Ocak 2023
760 Takip Edilen958 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Franz-Herman Krauel 🌲🔥
Franz-Herman Krauel 🌲🔥@Franzelianism·
Back on twitter! I'm here to talk about my intellectual/ academic interests and to interact with likeminded people who share those interests.
Franz-Herman Krauel 🌲🔥 tweet media
English
2
1
39
14.4K
antimutualist action
antimutualist action@AntimutualistA·
Rulership requires no explanation in terms of ideology, tons of people being fooled to hold wrong ideas, or any actual process of decepction and propaganda. It just so happens people can believe a divine right of Kings, believe this is a correct percepction
Franz-Herman Krauel 🌲🔥@Franzelianism

@AntimutualistA Tbf, I think that, for some theories of class theory / ruling ideologies, this somewhat reverses the order of explanation or causality. It’s not necessarily that these phenomena are supposed to explain normal individual action but that phenomena like rulership exist and that…

English
2
0
1
131
Franz-Herman Krauel 🌲🔥
@AntimutualistA … but those ideas where adopted as a justifications for power by real monarchs, these monarchs acted as patrons to the philosophers, theologians etc. who developed them… It doesn’t have to be a theory, but regimes tend to justify themselves to secure compliance.
English
2
0
1
27
Franz-Herman Krauel 🌲🔥
@AntimutualistA …we might be able to explain them with reference to ruling ideologies. I mean, we do observe this in history (e.g. with the divine right of kings etc.)
English
0
0
0
12
Franz-Herman Krauel 🌲🔥
@AntimutualistA Tbf, I think that, for some theories of class theory / ruling ideologies, this somewhat reverses the order of explanation or causality. It’s not necessarily that these phenomena are supposed to explain normal individual action but that phenomena like rulership exist and that…
English
1
0
0
143
antimutualist action
antimutualist action@AntimutualistA·
You can frame class theory or a critique of ideology as a non conspiracy. The question still stands is this analysis applicable to the real world, are ideas and positions people hold mainly atributable to class or ideology, or people actually can have a bizarre range of ideas
Franz-Herman Krauel 🌲🔥@Franzelianism

@AntimutualistA Tbf, it doesn’t have to be an active conspiracy. But you could imagine a kind of mutual adjustment between pro-state ideologues and the state in the sense of an emergent order + government incentive structures can encourage/ discourage certain ideological developments.

English
1
0
0
90
Franz-Herman Krauel 🌲🔥
@AntimutualistA Tbf, it doesn’t have to be an active conspiracy. But you could imagine a kind of mutual adjustment between pro-state ideologues and the state in the sense of an emergent order + government incentive structures can encourage/ discourage certain ideological developments.
English
0
0
0
114
antimutualist action
antimutualist action@AntimutualistA·
I hate libertarian or marxists critiques of ideology. It starts by assuming away the fact people hold different values and ideals, because those are obviously wrong. It also assumes intent, a conspiracy and evil behind those conflicting ideas people May hold. To believe ideas do
Philippe Lemieux@NeoRothbardian

According to Murray Rothbard in Anatomy of the State, the State does not preserve itself mainly through force, but through ideology. Since the ruling class is always a minority, it cannot rule permanently by violence alone. It must obtain the passive acceptance of the majority. That is why the State constantly relies on intellectuals, academics, media, court historians, experts, and ideological institutions to convince people that its rule is necessary, inevitable, and morally legitimate. Rothbard argued that intellectuals often become the “opinion molders” of society because the State offers them security, prestige, and institutional power in exchange for ideological support. The alliance between the State and intellectuals is therefore not accidental, but structural. He also explained how States historically use nationalism, fear, tradition, collective guilt, and even “Science” itself as ideological weapons. Wars between ruling classes are transformed into wars between peoples by convincing populations that the rulers and the nation are identical. Independent thinkers are ridiculed as dangerous, irrational, or conspiratorial because the greatest threat to State power is criticism that breaks ideological conformity. Rothbard further argued that modern States replaced the old “divine right of kings” with the cult of experts and technocrats. In previous centuries rulers claimed divine legitimacy; today they claim scientific legitimacy. But the purpose remains the same: convincing the population that centralized power is necessary and that ordinary individuals are incapable of governing themselves. As Rothbard concluded, the State constantly attempts to distinguish itself from ordinary criminality through ideological propaganda, even though most people instinctively understand that government is “a separate, independent, and hostile power” living off the productive population.

English
2
0
0
141
jung. liberal. kapitalistisch
Ayn Rand ist die einzige Philosophin, die Moral nicht willkürlich oder dogmatisch aus einem Buch ableitet, sondern konsequent an der Realität orientiert. Ihre Weltanschauung ist dadurch von der Metaphysik über die Erkenntnistheorie, die Ethik bis hin zur Politik in sich kohärent.
Gabe Kroeger@usmcgruntx

@AP4Liberty Ayn Rand was a godless foreigner who promoted an entirely incoherent and degenerate worldview. She was also a horrible writer. You’ll have about as much success rallying Americans around Ayn Rand as you would rallying them around Vladimir Lenin

Deutsch
1
1
17
407
Follynomics
Follynomics@follynomics·
@sigmahamster2 @NikolaPavkovi18 Noooo no no. I’ve read “Liberalism” a half dozen times. It is one of the only 2 or 3 books I’ve ever read more than once. As a rule I always choose something new to read. HA only once I think summer of 2021 or 22. might try it again 10 or 20 years from now.
English
2
0
3
72
Franz-Herman Krauel 🌲🔥
Franz-Herman Krauel 🌲🔥@Franzelianism·
@sigmahamster2 Decent article. I must admit that I lean more towards the Rothbardian account of utility (for boring "realist assumptions in econ methodology" reasons), but I wouldn’t argue that other conceptions of utility are completely without merit (though I do have some philosophical…
English
1
0
4
81
Philippe Lemieux
Philippe Lemieux@NeoRothbardian·
Benjamin Tucker used to print this Proudhon quote in Liberty: “A free man is one who enjoys the use of his reason and his faculties; who is neither blinded by passion, nor hindered or driven by oppression, nor deceived by erroneous opinions.” A good reminder that anarchism was originally rooted in rational autonomy, not emotional collectivism or blind ideological conformity.
Philippe Lemieux tweet mediaPhilippe Lemieux tweet media
English
3
4
34
728
Philippe Lemieux
Philippe Lemieux@NeoRothbardian·
Is it true that all libertarians are snakes, like on the Gadsden flag?
English
14
1
23
971
Charles G. Koch 🏴
Charles G. Koch 🏴@worst_account·
@Franzelianism When he freaks out and uses AI the night before, the Curb Your Enthusiasm theme will start playing from the sky.
English
1
0
1
40
Franz-Herman Krauel 🌲🔥
@PAHoyeck @SeanTrende Also should‘ve mentioned that the Nazis wanted to put the arc on a plane to germany but Indy prevented that too. Would’ve been a different story if they’d succeeded.
English
1
0
1
157