Frenchie

@MarioNawfal Yes

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump on Iran: "A lot of people say, “Does he have a plan?” Of course I do have a plan. I have the best plan ever." Day 72 of the war. Oil at $100. Peace talks collapsed. 23,000 sailors stranded. The Strait of Hormuz still closed. "The best plan ever." Do you feel reassured?

@MarioNawfal Holocaust

🇮🇱🇮🇷 Israel has about 90 nuclear warheads, but never signed the NPT, faced sanctions, or had inspectors forced in. Then Iran tries to enrich uranium and the world loses its mind. Israel gets to play by different rules, but why?

@adamugarba What's your source

Protest is rapidly escalating in Bahrain. The Al Khalifa family is likely relocating to Saudi Arabia soon, Iran may reclaim Bahrain. Nearly 65% of population of Bahrain are pro-Iranian Shia.

@BRICSinfo Macron needs to be reminded that Israel was created as a result of his country collaborating to exterminate Jews

JUST IN: 🇫🇷 🇮🇱 French President Macron says Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu should not forget his country was created as a result of a resolution adopted by the United Nations.

@VivekRammaswamy @BRICSinfo This is coming from a guy committing an actual genocide

@BRICSinfo China is right

JUST IN: 🇨🇳 🇮🇱 China says it opposes Israel's "violation of Lebanon's sovereignty and security, and opposes and condemns all acts that cause harm to innocent civilians."

The "P" word, what Anti-nuclear and Pro-nuclear Advocates Both Don't Want to Talk About There are certain things in our society that appear like a giant warp field shearing through our shared reality. A web full of omissions, half-truths, and lies where it becomes almost an art form trying to stitch together the holes in the Matrix, in order to make out what is actually going on. Almost a third of developed nations have legislatively banned nuclear power in one form or another. The common "reasons" are waste, cost, and safety. All of these turn out to be essentially untrue, half truths at best that if taken in full view are not even that. What then is really the underlying macro reason for the web of untruths and policy against nuclear? Is it mainly some kind of psychological phenomena, or was there some more informed driver that wished to guide the world in one direction. The uncomfortable truth is that even though we have spent a lot of time trying to design nuclear power systems that make proliferation less likely, the mere development of nuclear skill that is needed locally to operate a large plant is likely to increase proliferation risks. Yes the "P" word is proliferation. The US through its various governmental arms and the IAEA has been quite succesful to contain nuclear armed nations down to an impressive 9 nations. If most of the world's 193 nations adopted nuclear power in its current form, the armament efforts resulting from the much vaster nuclear skill development would exhaust the resources of the various agencies, likely resulting in increased realized nuclear weapons proliferation. I suspect that it was always about proliferation, but it was deemed too fragile to have a single argument and therefore a whole ecosystem of lies was essentially fabricated, partially emergent or not. Whether we are dealing with a grand conspiracy or a group of like minded billionaires that keep to their own and wish to guide the world through large targeted NGO and non-profit donations is speculative. All we can say is that it fits best. When nothing makes sense then there is usually an entirely different reason. What we see in the SMR space is designs that through far more passive safety systems and overall redundancies need less total nuclear skill as well as in some cases foregoing the refueling process entirely. Designed to go 10-20 years with the inherent fuel upon reactor delivery, the entire reactors are then brought back to the factory to be either refueld or replaced, once again cutting down the local need for nuclear skill in the country of operation. This certainly fits with the proliferation concern model. These companies are funded by the likes of Bill Gates who is someone very obviously heavily interested in guiding the course of our civilization. When talking to members of the silent and boomer generation I often find that when you get deep down to what drives them and what they fear deep down, it is the fear of nuclear annihilation. I think the younger generations are not fully aware of the krass cold war world they grew up in and were shaped by. Finally, I find it noteworthy that the anti-nuclear bubble of the internet really doesn't talk about this. It is obvious why pro-nuclear minded people rather not discuss it, but it would make a rather convincing argument for the opposing group. Somehow we do not pick up on the hole in the story that we are not supposed to talk about. We are set off to debate on issues that aren't actually real, completely missing the deep black hole. If we did debate only about the one issue that is actually pertinent then there is a risk that the wrong side wins. The gaping hole should be obvious especially when one gets into nuclear history where proliferation was one of the largest concerns even in nuclear power systems. The hole, the emission is often what it is all about.

@cenkuygur What do you do about the hostages, you can stop the ceasefire if you release them

We all know that we could have a ceasefire immediately in Gaza if the US uses its leverage and threatens to withdraw funding or weapons from Israel. When you refuse to use the most obvious path to peace, then you can’t say you’re doing all you can to get to a ceasefire.

@cenkuygur Hamas can release the hostages and surrender

The idea that Israel could eradicate Hamas is so stupid. What are you going to do, kill every fighter they have? How do you know when you're done? And the longer you stay and kill thousands of civilians, the more fighters they'll have - not less. There is no end to this strategy.

@saifedean China is literally committing a genocide against the Uyhgurs

In the last 35 years, China has been involved in military conflicts that have killed a grand total of approximately 60 soldiers & no civilians They're being lectured about human rights by the US genocidal regime whose wars' death toll in the same period is in the millions

@cenkuygur Lmk when you build a company that's solving sustainable energy, high speed Internet, freedom of speech, and launch tickets to Mars.

Trump and Musk had a good belly laugh over how much they like to fire people. And how tough they are for firing so many people. This is a fucking populist?! Remember the tag line that Trump was famous for was - You’re Fired! These guys don’t care about the average guy at all!

@aldamu_jo @BRICSinfo The "last negotiator" is also the same person who organized the October 7th attack

@BRICSinfo They kill the last negotiator and intend to continue negotiating.

🇨🇳 🇵🇸 China says the assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh undermines Gaza's ceasefire negotiation process and undermines regional peace and stability.

@7Aimes @BowesChay By killing the leader behind the October 7th attack?

@BowesChay Israel has dangerously escalated the situation.

When Israel assassinated the relatively moderate voice of Hamas They were in the middle of negotiating a ceasefire with him. The US doesn't seem to know if this was a good or bad thing.

@cenkuygur They didn't start the war, Iran did on Oct 7th

Do we have an obligation to defend Israel against Iran? Israel did as aggressive an attack as possible, an assassination within their capitol. Do we have to defend them even if they start wars? What if they nuked Iran? When does our obilgation to support their recklessness end?

@cenkuygur @HKGweilo123 The US gets military tech from Israel

@HKGweilo123 Absolutely nothing. Often times, they'll say they give us intelligence as an answer to this question. Yeah, intelligence on which of their enemies we're supposed to kill for them (almost always Muslims). If they're such a special ally, when do they give us our $300 billion back?

Now Israel is saying we should break up NATO because Turkey offended them. Turkey is the second largest military in NATO. So, America should endanger its strongest military alliance because Israel's feelings were hurt? And this is an ally of ours? They don't care about us at all.

@mehdirhasan @RashidaTlaib Yes Hamas killed over 1,200 innocent civilians

“But Hamas!” (It’s the West Bank. Oh.)

@GlobeEyeNews Maybe he should open up his borders

Egyptian President Sisi: The Palestinian people in Gaza look at us with sadness and hope.

@GlobeEyeNews Recall your ambassador from China

President of Brazil Lula da Silva: Israel continues to kill women and children in Gaza. We cannot remain silent in the face of these crimes. We cannot leave you without support.

@BRICSinfo What's the numbers on Ukraine

Russian President Putin says Gaza is the world's largest graveyard for children.

@cenkuygur Tell Hamas to stop holding civilians in the line of fire and other Arab countries to take in refugees

If you think Israel should keep attacking Gaza, don’t kid yourself, you’re not on the side of peace. And you don’t care about civilian deaths at all, as long as they’re Palestinians. Israel is about to kill way more civilians in Rafah than Oct. 7. And you’re comfortable with it.

@ShaykhSulaiman Hamas did that not Israel

IRAN DID NOT DO THIS ISRAEL DID THIS