Fohg

58 posts

Fohg

Fohg

@Frogs_Logs

Katılım Ocak 2023
23 Takip Edilen2 Takipçiler
Fohg
Fohg@Frogs_Logs·
@MarsBattleKing @Invictus_227 You *are* defending CP though, it's sexual content of a child, doesn't matter if "there's no real person so it's okay" it's normalising CP, do you think it's a good idea to normalise CP?
English
1
0
0
23
MarsBK
MarsBK@MarsBattleKing·
@Invictus_227 I keep saying this and people say I'm defending CP or CSAM when all I'm saying no real people are involved and it's purely art you can't outlaw it.
English
6
1
31
1.1K
Fohg
Fohg@Frogs_Logs·
@eirshy @Le__Joo @NasuMaturi @LimitedThis "One place in the world with a different society, laws and entire structure can do this so OBVIOUSLY it applies everywhere!" Do you see how stupid you sound? There are children molested and raped every day, if you are depicting a child in a sexual situations you're a predator
English
1
0
0
24
eirshy - 🔌🐰🥥🧁
@Frogs_Logs @Le__Joo @NasuMaturi @LimitedThis Like, that's the thing I don't get about this whole "lolicon is pedophilia!" thing. Japan *famously* has kindergarten-aged kids walk unaccompanied to school because it's safe enough for them to do so. Your argument is entirely refuted by reality.
English
1
0
1
33
Fohg
Fohg@Frogs_Logs·
@HipnoAmadeus0 @SkylinesUltra24 @TheEdgey_ YES IT DOES. if you normalise jerking off to children, you normalise pedophilia, this is how people develop genuinely disgusting kinks and disorders, your brain makes the connection that "Appearance of child=Sexual Arousal"
English
1
0
0
10
Fohg
Fohg@Frogs_Logs·
@Theawesomeflix @LucyPyre_ It really is though, because it was Child Porn, she was drawing child porn, which is illegal in the UK first of all, and second of all jerking off to children is criminal, depicting children in a sexual manner is criminal
English
7
0
2
650
Lucy Pyre😈🍟
Lucy Pyre😈🍟@LucyPyre_·
super controversial take apparently but i think arresting artists for drawing fictional characters is bad
English
598
3.4K
30.3K
563.2K
Fohg
Fohg@Frogs_Logs·
@eirshy @Le__Joo @NasuMaturi @LimitedThis The physical victim is society, people, children, people engaging in the content, if you jerk off to the appearance of children, children will start to arouse you, what about that is hard to understand?
English
1
0
0
13
eirshy - 🔌🐰🥥🧁
@Le__Joo @NasuMaturi @LimitedThis 1) yes if it's not "deepfake"-grade realistic (enforcement reasons) 2) no 2) no You don't seem to understand the fundamental difference between drawn and recorded. Drawn has no physical victim. Recorded victimizes a real child.
English
1
1
9
415
Jake Cool
Jake Cool@DoctorJoeCool·
@TheEdgey_ "as long as it's not criminal" And therein lies the issue. They'll just classify taboo art as "criminal", as they did here, and people will justify the abuse.
English
1
0
4
86
SpicyTakesHere
SpicyTakesHere@takes_here·
@TheEdgey_ This isn't just insane, what the UK is doing is evil. I guess the UK is doing a trial run for social credit scores now.
English
2
0
7
565
Fohg
Fohg@Frogs_Logs·
@SkylinesUltra24 @TheEdgey_ They're all fans of the pedophile and pedophiles themselves, their favourite pedo artist got arrested so now they're mad
English
0
0
0
7
Alex Foster
Alex Foster@SkylinesUltra24·
@TheEdgey_ Why are people defending lolicon? Is there something I'm missing??
English
8
0
6
1K
Fohg
Fohg@Frogs_Logs·
@HipnoAmadeus0 @SkylinesUltra24 @TheEdgey_ You really don't get the catalyst effect here, normalise fictional CP that "isn't hurting anyone" so people can jerk it to images that look like children, then people find they start to get aroused by children and not adults, see where that leads?
English
1
0
0
8
HipnoAmadeus0
HipnoAmadeus0@HipnoAmadeus0·
@SkylinesUltra24 @TheEdgey_ If it is not based on a real person, lolis (Note: Not CP because CP heavily, HEAVILY implies real children) should be protected under free speech. The reason is simple: Name a single victim. You cannot. Why are things illegal or legal? To protect victims. Weird how that works
English
2
0
26
276
Semple 🇺🇸
Semple 🇺🇸@Semple_Ice·
@TheEdgey_ They made the art criminal over there. Art that is remotely suggestive is a higher crime than rape there.
English
1
0
18
796
Fohg
Fohg@Frogs_Logs·
@TheEdgey_ You contradicted yourself, it was criminal and it is harming people
English
0
0
0
36
Clotho v Melodiam 🎼👑
Clotho v Melodiam 🎼👑@ClothovMelodiam·
These people saying things like "I'm so glad that Mimi got arrested and destroyed by the British government for her drawings!" better be singing the same tune when they begin coming after the things they love that the government finds problematic next.
English
130
765
4.7K
60.8K
Fohg
Fohg@Frogs_Logs·
@HipnoAmadeus0 @xdkloud @LucyPyre_ There's a difference between "Haha I'm playing as a criminal, a character detached from myself doing things I would never do irl" and jerking off to a picture of a child or an animal, because that rewires your brain into being aroused by children and animals, really not that hard
English
1
0
0
7
HipnoAmadeus0
HipnoAmadeus0@HipnoAmadeus0·
@Frogs_Logs @xdkloud @LucyPyre_ It does not normalize anything more than games do. Both are complete fiction. What you are saying is the DIRECT EQUIVALENT of "GTA normalizes going 200mph on a small road while shooting everywhere with an RPG" No, it does not, every single studies show it does not
English
1
0
0
8
Fohg
Fohg@Frogs_Logs·
@LucyPyre_ "just pixels on a screen" you clearly just don't care otherwise you'd see how problematic it is
English
10
0
10
2K
Lucy Pyre😈🍟
Lucy Pyre😈🍟@LucyPyre_·
savethechildren.org and if you can spare the cash, consider donating to help real children in need! it's worth much more to kids than arguing with strangers online about pixels on a screen, i assure you
Lucy Pyre😈🍟 tweet media
English
30
137
2K
61.7K
Fohg
Fohg@Frogs_Logs·
@HipnoAmadeus0 @xdkloud @LucyPyre_ It's impactful because it normalises these subjects, which ARE NOT normal, CP and Beastiality are not "freedom of speech"
English
1
0
0
18
HipnoAmadeus0
HipnoAmadeus0@HipnoAmadeus0·
@xdkloud @LucyPyre_ It isn't impactful because it doesn't impact anyone. What's weird is dictating where freedom of expression ends based on disgust while it doesn't infringe on anyone else's rights, because that is NOT called freedom of expression, it's freedom of YOUR expression and fck the others
English
3
1
101
1.2K
たつき Daisy 👹🐱
たつき Daisy 👹🐱@DaisyTatsuki·
@AlunoLicas @LucyPyre_ Freedom of speech is not one-sided. Just because you aren't fond of some specific form of art that depicts fictional characters, it doesn't mean it should be forbidden.
English
1
1
24
476
Chibi Reviews
Chibi Reviews@ChibiReviews·
IMPORTANT BREAKING NEWS: Artists are now getting arrested by UK Police. Mimi was arrested by UK Police for possession of her artwork, her artwork alone. According to bail conditions. She now is forced to only make SFW artwork or she will violate her bail.
Chibi Reviews tweet media
English
1.5K
4.4K
25.1K
4.4M
Fohg
Fohg@Frogs_Logs·
@Swit_zee To be fair, those four were all dead or presumed dead, katara was publicly still alive
English
1
0
4
1.6K
Goddess🥀
Goddess🥀@Swit_zee·
They all became legendary… except katara
Goddess🥀 tweet media
English
224
1.2K
51.4K
1.1M
Fohg
Fohg@Frogs_Logs·
@thedarkslug @Layyenne They don't care about Arthurian legend, they only care that "TV show didn't end how I WANTED IT TO GRRRR!!!"
English
0
0
3
862
CuquesDeLlum
CuquesDeLlum@thedarkslug·
@Layyenne That’s the Arthurian legend? Excalibur needed to be returned to the lady of the lake so Arthur could be at peace. And it cut to modern day because Arthur is the once and future king destined to return from Avalon and lead the British people once more. It’s perfect 🤷‍♂️
English
7
1
419
64.3K