Frozenshade

@TMB_101 Well they got charged and caught and got life sentences. Justice was served, police didn't handcuff the victim and let the victim die due to race card being played. See the difference now?

No rioting for the monstrous abuse of little Preston. Why? Because the perpetrators are WHITE! Don't fucking tell me you give a shit about abused children when you wouldn't get out of bed to highlight the below. news.sky.com/liveblog-webvi…

@RedPillMediaX @RupertLowe10 Even if it was a 100 it's still despicable and vile and all involved and enabling need to be punished.

So Rupert Lowe’s @RupertLowe10 “Gang Rape Inquiry Report” was a complete lie. The “250,000” rapes number was based on projections from two studies, the Telford Inquiry and Jay Report, both of which reported less than 1,500 rapes since 1997. “250,000” is the new 6 million.

@WolfgangRichtEU We need to fight fascism by... checks notes... having the state seize private assets, control public media algorithms, and force citizens to consume government-approved political influencers. The absolute lack of self-awareness here is breathtaking

People who say we need to confiscate Elon Musk's assets are missing the point. Of course we should, but he still has power over how people think because he owns X. He gets hundreds of millions of views on his posts which he uses to manipulate people into fascist right-wing beliefs. We need to redistribute the millions of views he gets to progressive influencers like Hasan Piker, just as we will redistribute his money to progressive causes. This is the only way we win in the long run. Have a wonderful day, Wolfgang

@SeemaMalhotra1 Ok, well my children are safe with my safguards and parenting apps - I don't need your help. Thanks.

This week the government is taking action to support children’s wellbeing by banning social media platforms from offering services to under 16s. The internet should be a space where parents and carers feel confident to support and empower their children online whilst knowing they are safe. @HounslowHerald @leicesterliz hounslowherald.com/feltham-heston…

@Gugugaga18786 @Th_Angelopoulos @RupertLowe10 You've ignored every logical fallacy pointed out to you, backpedaled on your original premise, and now you're just spamming the same loaded question because your script ran out of responses. If you want to argue with your own imagination, have fun, but I'm done repeating myself

@Frozenshade87 @Th_Angelopoulos @RupertLowe10 You claim race is an important factor when talking about the issue of sexual violence and you’re so not a white supremacist so I’m asking you to tell me what racial observations can we make about white rapists?

.@RupertLowe10 says 250,000 white girls were raped by "primarily Pakistani Muslim men". Here are the official numbers: Casey's national audit (2025): 700 recorded group-based CSE offences in 2023. Police chiefs (NPCC): Pakistani suspects 13.7% of group gangs, white suspects 63%. Run his claim. 700 a year, 13.7% Pakistani, is about 96. Over 25 years, 2,400. The data is under-reported, so I will be generous and multiply it by 10. That's 24,000. And I will double it again to 48,000. Still a fifth of his number, with every assumption stacked in his favour. So either the figure is wrong. Or it is real. And if it is real, it cuts the other way too. White suspects are 63% of group gangs, four and a half times the Pakistani share. On his own number that is more than a million white-gang victims. Lowe says nothing about. And Casey records 500,000 children sexually abused every year in total. The largest group of perpetrators are white men. Either way the headline collapses on its own arithmetic. And more importantly, he appears to be weaponising victims and survivors for political gain. Pathetic.

@Gugugaga18786 @Th_Angelopoulos @RupertLowe10 Still deflecting with loaded questions, I see. You’re trying to force a racial explanation on me because you’re completely incapable of defending your own shifting premises. If you want to argue with the imaginary white supremacist in your head do it. Leave me out of it though.

@Frozenshade87 @Th_Angelopoulos @RupertLowe10 Ok so what’s the racial explanation for white rapists? I’m sure you have some well thought out theories about that since you’re definitely not a white supremacist who only highlights race when rapists are not white.

@Weeto_boy @Confessor_Rob @owlsparliament @Th_Angelopoulos @RupertLowe10 Conceded the 250k number from the Lowe report is a unverified extrapolation. But let's not pretend the thousands of documented cases across Rotherham, Telford and more were "made up to divide us." Argue against the bad data all you want, it's no excuse to erase the actual victims

@Confessor_Rob @owlsparliament @Th_Angelopoulos @Frozenshade87 @RupertLowe10 And again, the 250k number cannot be accurately verified, it’s being inflated to scare you and divide us further

@Gugugaga18786 @Th_Angelopoulos @RupertLowe10 You went from making a broad philosophical claim about gender vs. race, to rewriting your premise, to now furiously hallucinating a "white supremacist agenda" out of thin air because your bad logic got called out. The projection is wild. Take a deep breath.

@Frozenshade87 @Th_Angelopoulos @RupertLowe10 It’s the same thing. You would never talk about the problem with whiteness when talking about white rapists. So I reiterate my point: you do not give a flying fuck about the victims. This is just one angle to advance your white supremacist agenda.

@velvetere @KanishkaNarayan I know. It took me 6 months to actually get a substantial reply. After asking for specific information they just stopped replying and my MP had to refer it directly to @KanishkaNarayan - They reply after 20+days if at all

@Frozenshade87 @KanishkaNarayan Yeah they do not care about your privacy and it’s in fact inconvenient for them

16 questions on u16s social media ban. 14: Is this a slippery slope to surveillance? No. Strict laws on privacy, proportionate use of data, comparable to so many walks of life, all to secure our children’s future.

@Gugugaga18786 @Th_Angelopoulos @RupertLowe10 Look how fast those goalposts moved. You went from "if you treat it as a race issue at all, you don't care" to "if your only focus is non-white perpetrators." Glad you admit your first tweet was a massive, flawed generalization.

@Frozenshade87 @Th_Angelopoulos @RupertLowe10 This has nothing to do with the no true Scotsman fallacy. Again, if your only focus is sexual violence when the perpetrators are non white people, it is indeed an indication that your real concern is not sexual violence.

@visegrad24 @laurencefarreng @MoDem @democrats_eu *The Right *The far left - correct it for you bro, no worries

@laurencefarreng @MoDem @democrats_eu The right wing is not shouting its hate for migrants. They are shouting their love for Europe and its people. The left has opened the floodgates of migration, legal and illegal into our continent and is changing it beyond recognition. ENOUGH!

L’extrême-droite🇪🇺 hurle sa haine (send them back) après l’adoption du règlement Retour qui permet aux États UE de déléguer la gestion des migrants dont familles avec enfants à des pays extérieurs.L’alliance des droites a fait perdre tout équilibre à ce texte J ai voté CONTRE

@manus_carlisle *The FAR left replies "Shame on you" - here corrected it for you.

A dark moment that is likely to go down in EU history. Centrists ally with the far-right to establish detention centres for migrant families, to chants of "Send them Back". The Left replies "Shame on You".

@Gugugaga18786 @Th_Angelopoulos @RupertLowe10 This is a textbook combination of the No True Scotsman fallacy and a False Dilemma. Issues like sexual violence don't exist in a vacuum—race and gender intersect. Trying to gatekeep who "actually cares" just to shut down nuance is weak rhetoric.

@Frozenshade87 @Th_Angelopoulos @RupertLowe10 If you treat the issue of sexual violence as a race issue, we know you don’t actually give a fuck about sexual violence. People who actually care view it as gender issue

@uk_islamophobia Ok so since everybody failed her before these guys were absolutely ok to do this then? Those "gangsters" ? Is this a satire account?

Read Chloe's account. Her White British stepfather abused her from age ten. Her mother once found him in the shower with her and closed the door and walked out. Police called her a liar. Social services gave her contraception advice. School put her in isolation. Every adult failed her before a single gang member appears in her account.

@KateCox59582715 With this info you can't take a loan. If your ID leaks (and it will) due to hack someone can take a loan in your name, open bank account in your name and put it in debit etc. Then you have to fight it on your own. Government won't help.

I'm confused about why people are freaking out about children being banned from adult social media from the point of view of 'protecting adult online privacy.' We already give social media platforms access to our names, phone numbers, emails, DOB. They know who we are already.

@SamCKx Tell me, what happens when the data leaks?When my id gets to bad people, they take a loan in my name. Will the government step in and protect me? Or am I in a civil case with a big tech company that had my data stolen? Please tell me. Attached might give you a hint.

The biggest lie being spread about age verification is that it’s some backdoor for the government to see everything you do online. That’s simply not how modern age verification works. I’ve worked with KYC, AML and age verification systems for years. In nearly all cases, the age check acts as a gatekeeper. It confirms you’re old enough to access a service, then keeps that information ring-fenced within a secure, encrypted system. The website gets a “yes” or “no” answer. It doesn’t suddenly hand the government a list of every site you visit or every video you watch. The entire point of modern verification technology is to prove eligibility while sharing as little personal information as possible. In many systems, even the verification provider itself has extremely limited access to user data. People are entitled to debate whether age verification laws are a good idea. But the claim that verifying your age for a website automatically creates a government surveillance database of your browsing history is misinformation from people who either don’t understand the technology or are deliberately trying to create outrage. Argue the policy if you want. Just argue the reality, not the conspiracy theories.

@SteBurke44 @drhicksbakers Ok. What happens if your data leaks? Your on your own against a corporation. Government doesn't give you any form of protection. They don't care. I will use a VPN and circumvent. I won't be putting my details online

@Frozenshade87 @drhicksbakers But that’s just it isn’t it. If it comes to having to make that decision. If you really believe in not showing your ID to use social media. Have some balls and walk away from it and stand on business

Surely the only people arsed about the kids social media bans are beasts and mums and dads who can’t be arsed giving their kids any attention

@KirstieMAllsopp You need to work on reading with understanding as what you say is total nonsense.

The idea that our kids are safer being looked out for by Musk & Zuckerberg than a democratically elected government of the U.K. is the weirdest take I have ever come across in my life.