Boris Schlossberg
50.2K posts

Boris Schlossberg
@Fxflow
https://t.co/mA47eLi3OE LIVE TRADE M-F 9:00am NY https://t.co/SpE90cpkR5 Tweets info only, not advice
New York Katılım Nisan 2009
888 Takip Edilen43.4K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Boris Schlossberg retweetledi

a former blackjack card counter explained the ONE concept that separates funded traders who collect payouts from funded traders who blow accounts
it took him exactly one sentence:
"you're supposed to lose more hands than you win. the money comes from the SIZING, not the frequency."
I asked him to elaborate
"in blackjack, even with a perfect count, you lose 48-49% of your hands. you WIN by betting small when the count is negative and betting large when the count is positive. over 1,000 hands the sizing difference generates all the profit."
"your funded account is identical. you lose 50-55% of your trades. but your winners pay 3R and your losers cost 1R. the asymmetry is the profit engine. the win rate is irrelevant."
"the traders blowing accounts are the ones who can't accept losing most of the time. they chase a higher win rate by taking more setups, adding more confirmations, switching systems. all of that is trying to win more hands instead of accepting that losing hands is PART OF THE MATH."
here's where it gets uncomfortable:
"card counters who can't handle losing streaks go broke even with perfect strategy. because a losing streak at any count is mathematically inevitable. 8-10 losing hands in a row will happen multiple times per session."
"when it happens, the emotional counter deviates. bets bigger to recover. or leaves the table and misses the positive count that follows."
"the mechanical counter doesn't flinch. same sizing rules. same bet schedule. same process. the losing streak ends. the positive count arrives. the big bets connect. end of session: net positive."
"your funded account will produce 4-6 losing trades in a row at least once per month. mathematically guaranteed at a 48% win rate. that's not a drawdown. that's the model working as designed."
"the traders who survive it don't change anything during the streak. same risk. same model. same session."
"the traders who blow up during it change everything. they size up. they switch sessions. they add a 'confirmation' that's really just doubt dressed up as analysis."
"the losing streak wasn't the problem. their reaction to the losing streak was the problem."
"so the entire skill - in blackjack and in trading is this:
can you execute the same process during a losing streak that you execute during a winning streak?"
"if yes, you make money forever."
"if no, it doesn't matter how good your system is."
the card counter never traded a day in his life. and he described the funded trading mental model more accurately than any trading psychologist I've ever listened to
the money comes from the sizing. not the frequency. stop trying to win more. start surviving the losses better
English

If they tried that they would not exist by Monday.
Craig Shapiro@ces921
If the Houthi's enter the war this weekend and shut down the Red Sea, it's gonna be a black monday
English


Live Trading Futures NQ - Weekend Risk? x.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English


These are totally solid NYC tips
Check out Rubin Team at Douglas Elliman's video! #TikTok tiktok.com/t/ZThoUJp3v/
English


Hey @austinsilverfx Mr I Cant Trade is saying something.
The Inner Circle Trader@I_Am_The_ICT
Remember when VWAP was touted as the game changer? Lmao
English
Boris Schlossberg retweetledi

One Day Left! Apex Trader Funding 85% off sale ENDS soon.
Grab them while you can!
$25K evals for $17.70
$50K evals for $19.70
$100K evals for $29.70
bit.ly/bkapex (Code: EDGE)

English

I guess he turned it up to 11:)
dhesii@dhesi_trades
FUCK FOMC EVEN BROKE MY BRAND NEW GUITAR THE MARKET IS A SCAM
English







