Genevieve Nadeau

Fighting back works. Kudos and thank you to @JennerBlockLLP @WilmerHale @PerkinsCoieLLP @CooleyLLP and Williams & Connolly LLP.

For the women and girls in your lives … m.youtube.com/watch?v=f5WdvB…

This is a big deal, and not in a good way. Says a lot about what a precarious moment the nation is experiencing right now. Institutions like the media should be doing just the opposite in this moment.

Join us in DC on June 4 for a book talk with Robert Kagan about his new book "Rebellion," hosted by Peter Keisler! We'll cover the anti-liberal strain in American history, threats to rule of law, and what can be done about it. Tix limited, register here: eventbrite.com/e/live-event-b…

Will the Supreme Court continue to ignore (or worse) the magnitude of Jan 6th? Key takeaways from oral argument on presidential immunity yesterday.

As former Pres Trump faces several criminal trials, we issued a guide that analyzes precedent, law and policy to answer a critical question: In a democracy, when is it appropriate to prosecute a political leader in close proximity to an election? protectdemocracy.org/work/prosecuti…

My colleague @GCNadeau explain why the law demands speedy trials of Trump, why voters have a right to know whether he committed election crimes before they vote, and why none of this is inconsistent with DOJ policy. /2 lawfaremedia.org/article/the-sp…

Anyone arguing that trying Trump in the Fall would violate DOJ policy is mistaken. And the law favors a speedy trial. /1

My colleague @GCNadeau and I explain in detail here: lawfaremedia.org/article/the-sp… /x

This isn't a "you may be disappointed in the outcome but the Court was just following the law" moment. Denying the original request to skip the Appeals Court was discretionary. Granting cert now is discretionary. The schedule of the argument is discretionary. Delay is a choice.

If SCOTUS was going to take up the case it should have taken it up BEFORE the DC Circuit. It should also have set argument for lots less than 2 months from now. It seems to me clear that a conservative majority is running out the clock for Trump -- /1

NEW valuable resource published by @just_security on the authoritarian threat. Read and share ⬇️

Time is ticking, and we’re keeping track. Trump hopes to delay his federal trial on charges of conspiring to overturn the 2020 election until after the 2024 election – the Supreme Court shouldn’t help him. 🔗 trumptrialdelay.org

Former POTUS Trump’s efforts to delay his trial on federal criminal charges for attempting to overturn the last election is working. @KPNatsFan & @GCNadeau explain why the Special Counsel is right to oppose this strategy, just published in @lawfare (1/5) lawfaremedia.org/article/the-sp…

Genevieve Nadeau and @KPNatsFan from @protctdemocracy argue that a speedy resolution of Trump's Jan. 6 trial is in the public interest in response to @jacklgoldsmith's article warning against Jack Smith's rush to trial. lawfaremedia.org/article/the-sp…

Importantly, DOJ is not rushing Trump to trial. The trial date is not at issue in the appeal at all. What is at issue is a meritless immunity defense that Trump is using to run out the clock and avoid having to go to trial at all. Read our brief: lnkd.in/ei7BeAaR

Breaking News: A fed judge today ruled our lawsuit challenging Escambia County FL’s removal of books by & about people of color and LGBTQ+ people can proceed. We sued Escambia’s school board on behalf of @PENAmerica, @penguinrandom & authors & parents

Republican Former Members of Congress: Courts Should Move ‘As Quickly As Possible’ to Resolve Trump Cases plus.thebulwark.com/p/republican-f…