Pastor Bothersome Facts C.E.O. Ph.D D.D.S. P.P.P.

Hey Elon, suck shit.

@FranceskAlbs @wanglaurentceo Throw those bodies on the pile with the others, pretend Rubio isn't drunk with power.

@wanglaurentceo Something like that, if confirmed, should not just "end careers", but be immediately investigated and prosecuted. Imposing collective punishment on civilians is an international crime.

I have a friend in Cuba and what they just reported should end careers in Washington. Every single patient on a ventilator in their hospital died tonight. The power went out. The ventilators stopped. This isn't a rare incident anymore. Cuba's grid has collapsed 3 times THIS MONTH. The hospital staff told them they've had more emergency deaths in the last 30 days than in all of last year combined. A patient with leukemia at a Havana hospital told reporters: "Without fuel or affordable transportation, life has only gotten harder. We are fighting every day." NICU babies are on bare minimum power right now. Dialysis patients are playing Russian roulette with every blackout. Cuba has received ZERO oil in 3 months. That's not a shortage. That's a blockade. The US blocked a Russian rescue mission — 730,000 barrels of oil heading to Cuba — turned it away. Then the official story went: "We're sending $6 million in humanitarian aid." $6 million in aid. 930,000 barrels of oil blocked. You can't fix ventilators with $6 million when the grid is dark. And Trump's own words from March 6, 2026: "Cuba will fall. After 50 years, this is the cherry on top of the cake." The people dying in hospitals tonight are his cherry on top. I'll keep you updated. Turn on notifications. 🚨

@regent_333 Asking the real questions. Also the staged visit afterwards.

Btw, a question. Why are there so many videos of this Iranian strike on Dimona? The censorship has been ruthless in Israel but we're getting multiple angles of this strike.

@NHPUKOfficial It's like nuclear weapons. These nations, unlike the U.S.A., are still becoming MORE educated, so there's no way they wouldn't eventually all have the same capabilities. At least before the rot sets in. Maybe not being bellicose morons would be a better long-term strategy.

So what if Iranian missiles can reach Europe? Russian, Chinese & Korean missiles can reach Europe. Doesn’t mean we need to invade them. It just means they can defend themselves from the Rothschild crime family & Iran also has that right.

Birthday Boy #Shatner and Joe Jackson singing about Mrs. Varoufakis. youtube.com/watch?v=YW63vn…

Happy 95th Birthday Mr. #Shatner Captain, my Captain #Kirk

@gnometweeter Paul Newman, class act.

IT'S #SHATNER IN A #SUNNY STRING VEST

@Persianserene1 I would, but I'll never be allowed to visit freely because my country's ambassador hid 6 American spies to save them a year of captivity. From what I heard Iranians are most like Americans, the best people with the worst leadership.

Would you visit Iran when the war is over?

@TextorGla @TVFreePalestine x.com/GLEAMHATRED/st…

@TVFreePalestine Scientists tend not to be political. I doubt they participated in the wanton murder of Iran and Palestine's wealth of educated people. Politicians have cold blood and massive pockets. It is they that deserve extermination. IMHO

Jewish Colony media are crying that at least 6 Nuclear scientists were eradicated in Iran's attack on residences provided to them by the Dimona nuclear reactor. They murdered thousands of scientists in Palestine, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Iran; if not one Jewish scientist is left alive, it still wouldn't make up for their crimes.

36 years ago today, March 22, 1990, Mossad murdered Canadian scientist Gerald Bull on the streets of Brussels with impunity.

L’exemption religieuse Il m’est impossible de rester silencieuse face à ces arguments. On nous présente cette exemption comme une protection de la liberté d’expression, mais en réalité, elle crée une exception problématique. L’argument selon lequel l’exemption religieuse protège le débat public repose sur une confusion importante : critiquer une religion et diffuser des propos haineux ne sont pas la même chose, et ne devraient pas être protégés de la même manière. Supprimer l’exemption religieuse ne reviendrait pas à interdire la critique des religions. Dans la plupart des systèmes juridiques modernes, la critique, même virulente, des idées, y compris religieuses, est déjà protégée par la liberté d’expression. Ce qui est visé, ce sont les propos qui ciblent des personnes ou des groupes avec intention de nuire, d’exclure ou de déshumaniser. Maintenir une exemption religieuse crée en réalité un angle mort juridique dangereux : - Elle permet de légitimer des discours discriminatoires contre les femmes, les personnes LGBTQ+, certaines minorités sous prétexte de doctrine religieuse. - Elle instaure une inégalité devant la loi : un propos haineux serait sanctionné dans un cadre séculier, mais toléré s’il est formulé dans un cadre religieux. - Elle ouvre la porte à des abus où la religion devient un bouclier pour contourner les conséquences. En réalité, c’est l’exemption elle-même qui fragilise le débat public, en normalisant certaines formes de discours nuisibles et en envoyant le message que certaines catégories de personnes méritent moins de protection dès lors que la discrimination est religieusement motivée. Dire que cette exemption ne confère aucune immunité est trompeur. En pratique, toute exception inscrite dans la loi crée nécessairement une zone de protection, même si elle est encadrée. L’existence même de cette exemption oblige les tribunaux à tenir compte du contexte religieux comme facteur atténuant ou justificatif. Autrement dit, elle en modifie l’application de la loi, et donc, indirectement, la portée des sanctions. Réduire les exemptions aux discours haineux à une simple protection de la liberté d’expression est une vision incomplète et problématique. La liberté d’expression n’a jamais été absolue. Elle est déjà encadrée pour protéger des intérêts fondamentaux : la dignité, la sécurité et l’égalité des personnes. Les lois contre les discours haineux s’inscrivent précisément dans cet équilibre. Dès lors, les exemptions ne protègent pas la liberté d’expression en général, elles créent plutôt des exceptions ciblées où certains discours bénéficient d’un traitement de faveur. L’idée que l’exemption religieuse protège aussi bien les critiques que les croyants est séduisante, mais elle ne tient pas vraiment à l’analyse. D’abord, la critique des religions n’a pas besoin d’une exemption religieuse pour être protégée. Elle est déjà couverte par la liberté d’expression générale : on peut critiquer des textes, des dogmes ou des pratiques religieuses sans invoquer un cadre religieux. Autrement dit, les critiques n’ont rien à gagner de cette exemption. En revanche, ceux qui s’expriment au nom d’une autorité ou d’une doctrine religieuse bénéficient, eux, d’un levier supplémentaire. Nous vivons dans un contexte marqué par : des conflits identitaires et religieux, des flux migratoires importants qui mettent en contact des visions du monde parfois incompatibles, et la montée d’idéologies opposées, parfois frontalement. Dans ce contexte, maintenir une exemption religieuse n’est pas neutre, cela revient à tolérer, voire protéger, des discours qui peuvent alimenter ces tensions. Car il faut être lucide : certains textes religieux contiennent des propos explicitement hostiles, discriminatoires, voire violents envers certains groupes, en l’occurrence plusieurs versets dans le coran. Pour tout ce qui précède, l’abrogation de l’exemption religieuse devient une urgence. Fatima Aboubakr Citoyenne Québécoise lapresse.ca/dialogue/opini…

Brother, you live in a country where your secret police wear masks and disappear immigrants to black sites where they're forced to live in squalor, assaulted, and killed. You might be free, but this is not a free country.

@thejosephmireku Awe and envy at Iran's long fuse is a particularly bad look for Isntreal-U.S.

It’s amazing how new information only hardens people’s already made conclusions. Iran, after all lot of provocations, has demonstrated capabilities the international community didn’t know they had. Rather than taking this as proof that if you provoke a sovereign state long enough, they will keep escalating their retaliation, it is being taken as evidence of Iran rather being a bad faith actor, and that somehow justifies the initial attacks in the first place. How does this even make sense?

@HarleyShah The UN has more important work to do, let Israel petition FIFA for help.

This whole war has been utterly humiliating for Israel. They've repeatedly made clear that international laws do not apply to them and ignored the UN; now they're crying for their help. Finally they learned what it means to attack a country that can actually fight back

@Its_ereko Economic miracle! Imagine how well he could do if he didn't have to fend off daily assassination attempts from colonial powers!

Two years. Ibrahim Traoré transformed Burkina Faso. GDP grew from $18.8 billion to $22.1 billion. Rejected IMF and World Bank loans. Said Africa does not need them. Cut ministers' salaries by 30%. Raised civil servants by 50%. Paid off local debts. Built the first tomato processing plants in the country. No foreign bases. No colonial strings. No begging. This is what sovereignty looks like. Not in speeches. In results.

@Mr_Guantai It will be easier for them to understand if they just think of it as if they stacked Congress and the Supreme Court so they could do what they want, except in this case the lawmakers are the nations of the world, and they've stacked them against themselves by being total dickwads

Oh now they recognise International Law?

@apocalypseos Look who showed up. Double-tap it.

Arad is a company town. Built for the scientists who manufacture Israel’s undeclared nuclear warheads at Dimona—weapons of mass destruction that exist outside every treaty, every inspection, every law. The same regime that assassinated Iranian nuclear scientists last June now hides behind the families it planted in Arad, pretending they’re “civilians” while their neighbors build bombs that could end the world. Dimona doesn’t do “ambiguity.” It does plutonium. War crimes. And the same Western media that calls Iran “terrorist” tiptoes around the illegal nuclear arsenal in the Negev. The world should condemn Israel for using Arad’s residents as human shields—because that’s exactly what they are. Human shields for a nuclear program built on stolen uranium, US presidential cover, and the blood of Iranian scientists.

The “quality of thinking among European leaders has sharply declined,” and the West “can no longer impose its will on the rest of the world,” says Kishore Mahbubani.

@ultras_antifaa Angola?

❝Our country will never throw bombs against the remote corners of the world, nor send nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons. Our country’s only exports are the doctors and health workers who save lives.❞ — Fidel Castro

@epsteinsearchin I'm sure the lawyers taking two-thirds of those settlements have nothing to do with Epstein either.

Deutsche Bank settled for $75 million. JPMorgan settled for $290 million. Leon Black settled for $62.5 million. That's $427.5 million paid by people who claimed they had nothing to do with Epstein. Nobody has been charged.

@cem_uk_ "La guerre serait un bienfait des dieux si elle ne tuait que les professionnels." - Jacques Prevert "War would be a boon if it only killed the professionals."

Whenever a government wants to start a war, it should hold a referendum, and everyone who votes in favour of the war should automatically be registered for conscription.