mountaineer
7 posts


@GYtccb4998 @Rain___456 @MalaiBajraHanyo Regardless of this.
Khas identity has become mutt like Mestizos.
Like if u will claim Khakas of PoJK and put them in same ethnic Khas identity of Kumaoni/Chettry.
The genetic diff is more than that between KP and Tamil brahmin
English

@DC48469195 @niveshit @Bakwabaasa @hill07Maverick Major Settlement Yhi Hai tadagis Ki kali kumaon region m
Eesti

@niveshit @Bakwabaasa @hill07Maverick Tadagi syd Kali Kumaon Dadeldhura se hain. Udr se hi migrate krke gye vo Nepal & baki jagah bhi.
Eesti

@khabdoda @DC48469195 @niveshit @Bakwabaasa @hill07Maverick Don't you think ki tadag taal se tadagi ban na logically shi nhi ?? Koi Bhi Taal Kisi K Kisi K Naam Se Padta Hai Naa Ki Taal Ke Naam Se Koi Community.

हिन्दी

@miragechazer101 @Rain___456 @MalaiBajraHanyo Yeah but some chhetris also look like them , also the khakas who are historically considered as the descendants of khasas are more closer to gujjars because of their zagros shifted ancestry.
English

@GYtccb4998 @Rain___456 @MalaiBajraHanyo they all look more bahuns than khas chettry.
coz of zagros shifted esp the nose.
although some faces r round.
English

@miragechazer101 @GYtccb4998 @MalaiBajraHanyo We have 3 samples from Upper & Central Mandi and they’re 15-20% Tibetan with noticeably higher AASI & more Gangetic base than Kumaoni/Garhwali Thakurs or Jharra Chhetris. Jharra Chhetris have the most western & least Gangetic shifted base out of all of them
English

@Rain___456 @miragechazer101 @MalaiBajraHanyo I don't think that upper himachlis especially khasas / khosh are high aasi their pheno mostly depicts iran n ancestry with some steppe and tibtean. It is Only The Lack Of Proper Samples That Is Creating Problem.
English

@miragechazer101 @MalaiBajraHanyo Upper Himachal Thakurs score higher AASI than Uttarakhand V2's while also maintaining 15-25% Tibetic, opposite of what you'd expect. Lower Himachal Thakurs score mostly like Punjabi Rajput + minor Upper Himachal Thakur admix
English







