Genomic Technologies Group

288 posts

Genomic Technologies Group banner
Genomic Technologies Group

Genomic Technologies Group

@GenTechGp

Genomic Technologies Group // The Garvan Institute of Medical Research // Australia's leading long-read sequencing service // Enquiries: [email protected]

Katılım Ağustos 2020
266 Takip Edilen664 Takipçiler
Genomic Technologies Group retweetledi
Jillian Hammond
Jillian Hammond@jil_hammond·
What a throwback!! Our lab has been doing @nanopore since 2017 🤓🤓
Jillian Hammond tweet media
English
1
3
9
1.7K
Genomic Technologies Group retweetledi
Hasindu Gamaarachchi
Hasindu Gamaarachchi@Hasindu2008·
Cornetto v0.2.0 is now released for using programmable selective nanopore sequencing for genome assembly. GitHub: github.com/hasindu2008/co… Paper: nature.com/articles/s4146… Datasets: hasindu2008.github.io/cornetto/docs/… ... and a banner made by Ira @GenTechGp referring to ‘no boring bits’.
Hasindu Gamaarachchi tweet media
Hasindu Gamaarachchi@Hasindu2008

Our cornetto work is now published at nature.com/articles/s4146… Cornetto can do near-T2T assembly using @nanopore adaptive sampling (readfish by @mattloose) & hifiasm by @ChengChhy - with less 💸 - reference agnostic, so works for non-humans - not just blood, even saliva

English
1
14
40
4.4K
Genomic Technologies Group retweetledi
James Ferguson
James Ferguson@Psy_Fer_·
Join us for a day (Nov 13) of fascinating talks and discussions on the latest in long-read sequencing tech and related research in genomics, transcriptomics, and epigenetics. A great opportunity to network and hear from leading experts from around Aus. eventbrite.com.au/e/garvan-long-…
English
0
5
12
1.6K
Genomic Technologies Group
Check out our detailed evaluation of SLOW5 vs POD5 format for raw Nanopore data. TLDR: SLOW5 still the best nanopore data format.
Hasindu Gamaarachchi@Hasindu2008

For many of those who were asking on BLOW5 vs POD5 for nanopore signal data, here is a finally detailed benchmark we did: biorxiv.org/content/10.110… Summary: performance of BLOW5 is >= POD5 (from ~= to 100X, see below), with benefit of having ~3 dependencies instead of >50.

English
0
3
6
578
Genomic Technologies Group
Cut your Nanopore raw data files in half with our new compression method ex-zd. Thanks @Hasindu2008 for leading this project 🧬
Hasindu Gamaarachchi@Hasindu2008

Introducing ex-zd, a lossless+lossy signal compression for @nanopore signal data. While lossless can only save about 1-3% over vbz, lossy can cut the file sizes by almost half with no noticeable impact on basecalling or methylation calling accuracy. biorxiv.org/cgi/content/sh…

English
0
3
4
681
Genomic Technologies Group
@mprous1 @Hasindu2008 @nanopore That’s a good point, however we don’t think this will happen because the bits that are being removed in our 3-bit-reduction appear to encode noise, not signal (see fig 2a). We speculate that if the basecallers were retrained on bit-reduced data they may even perform better.
English
1
0
1
68
Marko Prous
Marko Prous@mprous1·
@Hasindu2008 @nanopore my concern is that with improvements in basecalling in the future there very well might be noticeable differences in accuracy between lossless and lossy compression
English
2
0
2
230
Hasindu Gamaarachchi
Hasindu Gamaarachchi@Hasindu2008·
Introducing ex-zd, a lossless+lossy signal compression for @nanopore signal data. While lossless can only save about 1-3% over vbz, lossy can cut the file sizes by almost half with no noticeable impact on basecalling or methylation calling accuracy. biorxiv.org/cgi/content/sh…
English
3
8
31
6K
Genomic Technologies Group
Genomic Technologies Group@GenTechGp·
@ClarksysCorner Two papers that sat with them for up to 6 months with nothing happening, and no responses to emails. One did end up going to review and eventually published, the other rejected. Complete shambles, and have heard others with similar stories there.
English
1
0
1
46
Mike Clark
Mike Clark@ClarksysCorner·
@GenTechGp What was your experience with Genome Biology?
English
1
0
0
85
Mike Clark
Mike Clark@ClarksysCorner·
How long would you let a journal sit on your submitted paper without rejecting it, or sending it for review, before withdrawing it and submitting it elsewhere? We'll hit 3 months next week. Nb: We've contacted the journal multiple times and got replies, but no progress.
English
4
1
9
1.2K
Clare Holleley (@clareholleley.bsky.social)
New paper out today on the cover of Science!!! Parasitic cuckoos and their hosts are locked in an evolutionary arms-race that is driving speciation. Biological collections can answer big scientific questions – in this case, how do new species form? @CSIRO @MuseumGenomics
Clare Holleley (@clareholleley.bsky.social) tweet media
English
8
49
157
11.5K
Miles Benton
Miles Benton@miles_benton·
Exciting news! I've taken on a new role at @nanopore as the Associate Director of the APAC Commercial Applications team. Looking forward to this new chapter and the opportunities it brings! #OxfordNanopore #NewRole
English
12
3
73
5.5K
Joseph Powell
Joseph Powell@drjosephpowell·
@jodieingles27 That's What one of my PhD students said. So, no boat and house on the harbour, then?
English
1
0
1
295
Joseph Powell
Joseph Powell@drjosephpowell·
During a PhD student coffee chat yesterday, a hypothetical came up. You can choose either a Nobel Prize for a discovery or being listed as the inventor on a patent for the discovery (which gives you $200m in royalties).
English
5
1
4
2.9K
Marcus Stoiber
Marcus Stoiber@Stoibs11·
@hiruna72 @Hasindu2008 The pre-print states "we identify the base that is predicted to be most significant within a given k-mer". This seems to be the very core of the algorithm, but is not expanded upon in the text. Is this done on a per-read level? Or over many reads? Or sites?
English
3
0
0
147
James Ferguson
James Ferguson@Psy_Fer_·
We have released some raw @nanopore data for benchmarking purposes, along with some basecalled outputs. We use the subset of 20k or 500k for benchmarking tools and methods a LOT! We thought they would be helpful to others too. 4/5kHz R10.4.1 & RNA004 gentechgp.github.io/gtgseq/
James Ferguson tweet mediaJames Ferguson tweet media
English
3
30
116
15.4K