Genomics Cow

4.3K posts

Genomics Cow

Genomics Cow

@GenomicsCow

Original and probably disagreeable perspectives on genomics. Not sure when I'm joking and when I'm being serious. Opinions my own, not the herd’s.

Katılım Temmuz 2020
75 Takip Edilen3.2K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Genomics Cow
Genomics Cow@GenomicsCow·
#Genomics on social media is mainstream. Kinda boring. Don't follow the herd
Genomics Cow tweet media
English
3
1
16
0
Genomics Cow
Genomics Cow@GenomicsCow·
Roche offer flexibility to pick up small projects with Axelios What this looks like and costs is unclear to me But their instrument cost isn’t going to develop a large enough base to funnel projects upwards And it’s not clear whether market dev is their interest anyway! 🐄
English
0
1
5
931
Genomics Cow
Genomics Cow@GenomicsCow·
Element picked up a lot of small projects. But once the projects grew big the economics and throughput of NovaSeqs meant Illumina could swoop in on Element’s hard work This may be part of why they need Vitari
English
1
1
3
926
Genomics Cow
Genomics Cow@GenomicsCow·
Illumina raves on about their end-to-end workflows as it drives their key NovaSeq business👍 Actually one of their secret moats is their base of low- and mid-throughput platforms that help ppl’s genomics projects grow into NovaSeq-sized ones
English
1
4
16
4.3K
Genomics Cow
Genomics Cow@GenomicsCow·
“So you’re saying I wouldn’t have to worry about emulsion PCR anymore?” Ultima rep: “What’s emulsion PCR?”
English
0
1
30
3.9K
Genomics Cow
Genomics Cow@GenomicsCow·
@OmicsOmicsBlog 10.10 a better fit, but suppose would have been too late to build towards a strong q4
English
0
0
2
235
Genomics Cow
Genomics Cow@GenomicsCow·
After getting mocked for taking up speaking time last year without being able to disclose anything helpful, I wonder how Gustav is feeling - everyone either waiting for him to click the slides or just reading genomeweb 🐮
English
0
0
3
517
Genomics Cow
Genomics Cow@GenomicsCow·
Roche’s value pricing model WOULDN’T have concluded $150/genome, but the team are factoring in a faster uptake than their traditional business model would have wanted from their huge investment Exciting!
English
2
0
8
1.9K
Genomics Cow
Genomics Cow@GenomicsCow·
@Supergecko The problem for CosMx is they scarcely capture enough images through the z axis to get good 3d Hopefully other 3d imaging platforms can use this software though 🤪
English
0
0
2
155
Edoardo Giacopuzzi
Edoardo Giacopuzzi@Supergecko·
More new cool solutions for spatial omics introduced by Bruker: accurate 3D cell segmentation that correct cell assignment for ~20% transcripts, fully integrated AI to talk to your spatial results to enable disease experts to get true biology easily from data. #AGBTGM26
Edoardo Giacopuzzi tweet media
Lake Buena Vista, FL 🇺🇸 English
1
1
8
733
Genomics Cow
Genomics Cow@GenomicsCow·
SMN1/2 isn’t collecting enough💰in many places for a standalone WGS BUT many labs trying to consolidate legacy assays onto WGS, some which collect better💰to reduce TAT for all while being profitable, and for a long time high’ish volume SMN1/2 tests were hard to transfer over👍
Illumina@illumina

@UMCU_Intl Marcel Nelen: TruPath™ Genome is very easy to implement — and even in a notoriously complex region (SMN1/SMN2), it enabled a clear, confident answer in a challenging case — plus megabase scale phasing and clearer complex SV interpretation — one step closer to “one test fits all.” (4/11) #AGBTGM26

English
0
0
2
1.3K
Genomics Cow
Genomics Cow@GenomicsCow·
All the tech update news is out, except for Roche If you struggled to fly out to Orlando for agbt, you can show up on Thursday now when the weather is good again 🐮
English
1
1
4
1.2K
Vega Shah
Vega Shah@dr_alphalyrae·
With human whole genome sequencing outpacing Moore's law, are we going to see more services that provide WGS as a service? Or are we still behind in predicting a large part of physiology from DNA alone? Still feels like 'data wealthy, insight poor' era
Vega Shah tweet media
English
7
7
30
2.7K
Genomics Cow
Genomics Cow@GenomicsCow·
@MariosGeorgakis Lots of drug targets yes, lots of drugs no. But the leads are coming That said, don’t forget many hits are not near genes, and many in genes haven’t proven to impact protein levels (genes themselves aren’t often the target etc etc)
English
1
0
4
93
Marios Georgakis
Marios Georgakis@MariosGeorgakis·
While the genetic revolution promised to return thousands of drug targets, after massive investments in genomic and multi-omic datasets, we still struggle interpreting individual signals👇
Marios Georgakis tweet media
Marios Georgakis@MariosGeorgakis

These comments in Nature Genetics on a GWAS signal for cerebral amyloid angiopathy at APOE are a great case study in the challenges of interpreting genetic associations even with abundant data. Worth reading for anyone interested in translating GWAS hits to drug targets👇

English
4
7
30
12.9K
Genomics Cow
Genomics Cow@GenomicsCow·
What made Jay Flatley are great speaker was that he could talk with his investors, staff, and customers differently and wonderfully Jacob Thaysen seems a little less comfortable in front of his customers. Let’s see if he comes across more relatable at agbt this year than last
English
0
1
7
1.3K
Genomics Cow
Genomics Cow@GenomicsCow·
@OmicsOmicsBlog His was a weird take Assets progressing through trials now based on better selection of patients through genotyping Did we do WGS on them? No and who cares, we interpret genotyping now through the lens of population genomics and all sequencing has dropped becomes WGS has
English
0
1
2
684
Keith Robison
Keith Robison@OmicsOmicsBlog·
Narrator: “the market for Minimal Residual Disease testing was $1.3B last year & for Multi-Cancer Early Detection another $1.5B; rare disease testing may have been $2B”
Bojan Tunguz@tunguz

The whole premise of cheaper genome sequencing was that it would lead to better individualized therapeuticals. I have yet to see *any* evidence that was the case. In my experience the practice of medicine has not changed an iota over the past 26 years.

English
3
2
23
5.8K