Genvee

@CryptoFatWhale1 @KryptoInsider1 @helium 💯

@KryptoInsider1 @helium Helium , Geodnet and Auki are here to stay and will revolutionize physical ai

. @helium has crossed a key threshold in Q1 2026. Sustainable offload revenue now covers 145% of $HNT emissions, up from 51% last quarter, a major improvement in network economics. What else stood out: ▪️ Carrier offload DC burn $3.56M, +62% QoQ ▪️ Data transfer 8,547 TB, +55% QoQ ▪️ DAU averaged 2.4M, peaked at 3.5M on March 14 ▪️ Deployer base grew just 0.7% Demand continues to scale significantly faster than network footprint growth, with existing coverage absorbing the load. The macro backdrop makes this even sharper. Verizon cut capex 6% for 2026, Ericsson Americas down 18%, traditional RAN shrunk from $45B to $35B. Carriers need coverage but can't afford the legacy build. That's the gap Helium is built for.

@rohanpaul_ai Humanoid robot demos are impressive, but big red flag here. Movement without situational awareness is an accident waiting to happen. Fighting moves with a blindfold on? Perhaps @auki can help.

Close call in a robot demo: leg extension during performance passed inches from a boy's face.

Agreements hold the world together. Every promise, every transaction, every system depends on them. When they weaken, trust breaks down.

@TakElSayed @peaq Tops wasn’t banned for his question about the NFT, but rather due to his history of persistent requests for clarification. This escalated when @peaq_james Ego felt threatened cos he didn't have all the answers & Peaq’s track record with communication isn't very reassuring either.

@Genvee3 @peaq I agree — questions should always be clarified. But in this case it went beyond a simple question and became a repeated back-and-forth, even after answers were given. That’s where things usually start to escalate.

I’m not here to point fingers — just trying to bring clarity to a discussion that got more emotional than it should have. ------------- Frustrated @peaq team member, banned user, and a lot of open questions. Over the past few days, there’s been intense discussion on Discord and X about one topic: 👉 the yields and NFTs of the peaq Robo Farm Unfortunately, the discussion escalated emotionally — a user got banned, and a lot of questions remained unclear. What happened? @DNigaru (aka Tops68) pointed out something during his research (in an article on @CoinMarketCap): 👉 Instead of ~630 NFTs initially, there are now ~1000 NFTs in circulation 👉 The monthly yield per NFT stayed the same His question (which I had as well): 👉 Where is the additional yield coming from? Simple math: 630 × 3.82 USDT = ~2,400 1000 × 3.82 USDT = ~3,820 ➡️ ~1,400 USDT difference 👉 Where does this extra money come from? Fair question. Answer from the peaq team (Discord, @peaq_james): 👉 More NFTs = more rows / trays in the farm 👉 Each NFT = one fixed production unit 👉 Not an equity model 👉 Yield per NFT stays the same → no classical dilution And this is where the core misunderstanding lies: Many assume: 👉 “I own a share of the farm” But in reality: 👉 “I own a specific production unit” This shifts the real question: Not: 👉 “Am I being diluted?” But: 👉 “Are the newly minted NFTs actually backed by real new rows?” Even with that answer, valid questions remain: - How is the physical expansion verified? - How transparent is the farm’s growth? - How much of the yield is guaranteed vs. actually generated? What happened next: The discussion became emotional. Some valid questions — but also frustration and assumptions creeping in. James responded quite firmly (including a “last warning”). 👉 Tone: sharp 👉 Context: somewhat understandable Put yourself in the team’s position: You’re trying to build something, but some users blow things out of proportion at every opportunity, start grouping up against you, and sometimes don’t even argue based on facts. (Side story: I literally had to block a user who commented “scam” under EVERY peaq post without ever providing a single argument. And I take criticism seriously, but unfortunately this wasn't criticism anymore.) That kind of environment makes constructive discussion hard — when it’s needed most. Long story short. @DNigaru: I find it very unfortunate when long-time peaq supporters suddenly turn their backs on the project. I understand you to some extent, but I think you also have to admit that you've been increasingly critical of peaq in recent weeks, sometimes somewhat unjustifiably. Discussions are always possible, but when they become too emotional, it gets difficult. What this shows more than anything: Once real money and yield are involved, discussions shift very quickly from technical → emotional. Questions are valid. But framing matters. And in models like this, clarity and transparency become critical on all sides. I’m not a judge, and I’m not picking sides. I’m just trying to: 👉 simplify 👉 remove emotion 👉 and bring the discussion back to facts No drama. Just clarity.

@DNigaru @peaq They hide from clarity while presenting themselves behind a mask of transparency.

@peaq Congratulations for the demonstration of how peaq has fooled the original investors in the Hong Kong Robo-Farm by secretly buying a stake in it 2 months after the official sale has ended. A miracle must have happened to suddenly add 60% additional trays in this mini-farm 🤔

Your peaq of the month for March is here → The Purple Paper dropped: the Robot Money Era begins → peaq and OKX Wallet turned the Hong Kong robo-farm into an onchain trader → Robot Money Agent went live as the first Machine Money Market for robots on peaq → OVERtheReality signed a deal with a global top-5 enterprise → MastChain joined the peaqosystem — maritime trade meets the Machine Economy → Korea's top blockchain researchers dove deep into the Machine Economy Dive in ↓

@peaq What would be nice to see is a live prototype demo of actual machine to machine payments in action with real robots, and real transactions in a real world setting. That would help people visually grasp the concept.

Korea 🇰🇷 is a global leader in robotics, hardware, and real-world AI deployment That’s why we’re working with Korea’s top research groups to make peaq’s Machine Economy infrastructure easier to understand and more accessible for this key market Helping builders explore new solutions to do with machines and robots, and making Robot Money flow Check out @blockchainkor’s deep dive into peaq for Blockchain Valley: → Global trends driving robotics adoption → The rise of machine-to-machine payments & agent economies → How peaq enables Robot Money infrastructure in Korea

@MetaMask Metamask app is crashing please fix...

the perps must flow.

@Moddtcclure @WendlerTill @TakElSayed @MaxThake @dorloechter Exactly... Confusing statements coming from a founder.

@Genvee3 @WendlerTill @TakElSayed @MaxThake @dorloechter Has a hard cap 🤣

Every time I post about $PEAQ, the same comments appear: "$PEAQ to 0?" "Peaq is a scam!" "Final rug pull loading." Many people criticize the tokenomics and point to token unlocks as the main reason for the falling price. That’s not entirely wrong. But the reality is more complex. ➡️ A monday morning read. ⏺️ Tokenomics @peaq launched with about 4.2B tokens and a disinflationary model (~3.5% inflation declining over time). Tokens are distributed across: • Investors • Core contributors (team) • Ecosystem / treasury • Community • Network security The emission schedule runs roughly four years. Example vesting: Investors → 6M cliff + ~2 years vesting Team → 9M cliff + 3 years vesting ➡️ Currently about 37% of supply is circulating, the rest unlocks gradually. ⏺️ Three common criticisms ➡️ 1. Vesting Early investors had a 6-month cliff followed by 18–24 months vesting. That means tokens continue entering the market after the cliff. ➡️ 2. Demand Some argue demand expectations were too optimistic. Building a machine economy takes time, especially with physical infrastructure and devices. ➡️ 3. Network usage Token demand only appears when real usage happens. For example: • machine identities • data verification • machine-to-machine payments Without usage, demand stays limited. ⏺️ A common misunderstanding “Unlocked” does not automatically mean sold. Tokens may be: • staked • held in wallets • traded OTC What really matters is how many actually reach exchanges. ⏺️ Supply vs demand More supply + weak demand → price pressure. This dynamic is common in early-stage crypto projects. Solana, Avalanche and Near saw similar drawdowns before adoption accelerated. Price cycles and technology cycles rarely move in sync. ⏺️ Short-term investors Many investors look for quick gains. peaq isn’t delivering that yet, so some exit — adding selling pressure. ⏺️ Other token buckets Besides investors, tokens are also allocated to: • team • ecosystem / treasury • community incentives Team tokens follow 9M cliff + 36M vesting. Ecosystem tokens can fund things like: • grants • partnerships • infrastructure programs So circulating supply can continue increasing even after presale unlocks. ⏺️ The key point What matters long-term is real demand. For peaq that would come from devices interacting on-chain: machines, sensors, vehicles, phones and IoT devices. ⏺️ Current stage The ecosystem is still early. Apps exist. Devices are onboarding. But the real network effects are still ahead. What many critics overlook: For the first time, communities can actively help build this infrastructure. Phones. Routers. Sensors. Nodes. That’s exactly what #DePIN is about. ⏺️ The real question Will the machine economy actually emerge? If it does — which I personally believe — supply and demand could look very different in the future. If it doesn’t, critics may eventually be proven right. ⏺️ Upcoming discussion It’s also worth noting that @WendlerTill announced tokenomics will be discussed in the next AMA, which should hopefully clarify some of these questions. ⏺️ Personal perspective This is my interpretation, and I’m not an expert. Different perspectives are welcome. Correct me if I’m wrong. ⏺️ One last thing Commenting “scam” under every post doesn’t add much value. If you’re only here for short-term profits or have no interest in the #MachineEconomy, my posts probably aren’t for you. I’m playing the long game. Running devices, collecting rewards, and helping build the machine economy.

@WendlerTill @TakElSayed “People don’t know peaq has a hard cap?” @TakElSayed This kind of statement carrys weight especially when it's coming from a founder, there should be clearer context. As it comes across off as misleading. @MaxThake @dorloechter @Moddtcclure

@TakElSayed And a lot of misconception out there. For instance a lot of people do not know that the PEAQ token has a hard cap. A lot of people do not know that with measures like VEOs etc more than 1.5% of all Token supply changed hands from early stage investors to new strong investors.

@Figure_robot Impressive!

Today we're showing Helix 02 that can tidy a living room fully autonomously Figure is designed so when you leave the house, your home resets exactly how you like it

@Auki Good job looks great! 👍

Norwegian pilot begins! We set up 10 stores in 4 days with 2 people and plenty of time to spare. Finally HQ can know what their stores look like and where the products are.

@homebrewrobots Way better 👍

We outgrew our old logo. New logo. New phase. Shipping products that turn robots into economic actors.

@peaq Confidence and morale is very low at the moment. I genuinely hope we get transparent and direct answers rather than surgical deflections.

We’ll be hosting a live AMA with the peaq founders this Wednesday at 1pm UTC Updates on key questions, roadmap, and more Got questions? Drop them below Mark the date ⬇️ x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

@MaxThake @sturhans @peaq @krestnetwork Oh wow amazing! Max spoke 👀🫢

@sturhans @peaq @krestnetwork we're using the lull to make important changes, and then we'll let actions speak louder than words people will need to get used to a different communication cadence, something more sustainable which allows time and space for meaningful developments

Technically @peaq is a masterpiece, but community trust is at an all-time low. Ruining the @krestnetwork ecosystem and neglecting early supporters isn't 'innovation,' it's poor management. 📉 You can't build the 'Machine Economy' by breaking the trust of the humans who fueled it. We need transparency, not excuses. In crypto, TRUST is more valuable than liquidity. ⚖️ @MaxThake @dorloechter #peaq #krest #DePIN #Web3 #Crypto #Blockchain #EoTLabs #CommunityFirst #KrestNetwork $Peaq

Jensen Huang on the smartest person he's ever met;

@skyzer4ever @peaq Yup Exactly, it's like you are investing in a coffee vending machine

@peaq Arent coffee machines doing it for yeara already? U just dont see internals of the machine

The cafe of tomorrow runs itself, and its profits go to the people Robots make the lattes, and you get paid for it

@peaq 90% average apy? You sure about that? Might wanna take a closer look at it. Don't overpromise if it's not sustainable 👍

@StockMKTNewz @Auki

Nvidia $NVDA just posted this: “What is the next generation of AI? Physical AI.”

@Auki Congrats Auki team Big Win 🔥💯

First new paid pilot and new country of 2026! 🇸🇬