George AM Ⓜ️🕸

I buy Litecoin & Bitcoin not to make more Fiat, I buy Litecoin & Bitcoin to get out of the corrupt system controlled by the government & wall street mafia. It's simple as that

@zackfromsubway No he did not, you fucking idiot

🚨 Charlie Lee just dropped a brutal truth bomb: 😱😱😱 “Don’t buy $LTC… just stack #Bitcoin and forget everything else.” The creator of Litecoin now says he regrets building it and is telling investors to ditch alts and go all-in on Bitcoin. If even the founder is waving the white flag… what does that say about the rest of the market?

@Pacifica2525 They have an agenda and it clearly shows

#LTC $LTC #Litecoin #BTC Anyone who still follows Coin Bureau (please stop), this is the original, full Coindesk video interview from 7 months ago. For some reason Coin Bureau just now found it, after being out for 7 full months. Now you know how out of touch they .. 1/2

@coinbureau This makes me want to buy Litecoin even more. Thanks! Oh and you took this out of context, this so old too! Very unprofessional of you guys

🚨LTC CREATOR: "JUST BUY BITCOIN AND KEEP IT" Litecoin Creator Charlie Lee says he regrets creating $LTC and urged investors to simply buy $BTC and hold it.

Hard money is riding into Web3. And it's not slowing down 🔥

@ditchthebanks @RivettaGiorgio @litecoin You do have a point there

I don't watch litecoin:native's "Price Action", I watch the amount of hate it gets. When hate peaks, @Litecoin pumps. Lesson here.

Litecoin will always have haters. It’s part of the game. And most of it comes down to one thing: Litecoin is an outlier. It’s almost impossible for altcoins to survive multiple cycles. Litecoin did. And it continues to break usage records every 4 years. Outsiders look at it and think: “this isn’t supposed to happen.” “Litecoin isn’t supposed to still be here.” “Litecoin? does it even have a purpose?” “Why does this coin keep popping up on my feed?” But it does. It keeps popping up. People don’t stop seeing it. Meanwhile, most projects throw money at growth left and right. Whereas Litecoin persists on good old-fashioned community effort. Which also isn’t supposed to happen. How? Because every outlier in society gets critiqued to death. But the critics don’t know what it took to get here.

@twistartups @Jason These people are VCs, major early investors of Solana, of course he would say that about Bitcoin

Is Bitcoin on a decline? @jason seems to think so! Most people who want exposure are already hodling. Stablecoins replaced the “move money” use case, and builders are shipping on newer rails (TAO, SOL, etc.). So where will new buyers come from? Not investment advice!

LITECOIN'S LITVM HITS 8.4M TRANSACTIONS IN TWO WEEKS LiteForge, the public testnet for @LitecoinVM, has demonstrated impressive traction in its first two weeks, already reaching... - 8.4M Transactions - 630,000 Unique Addresses - 40+ Live Apps - 215,000 Contracts Deployed The praiseworthy traction is a reflection of the excitement around LitVM from within and without the @litecoin @LTCFoundation ecosystem.

Using that data, this ranks litecoin:native usage per capita. Hong Kong being the #1 #Litecoin country. Curious what the per capita data is on #LitVM usage.

@WatcherGuru Elon clearly knows Litecoin is one of very few legitimate ones, as he is merge mining it via Dogecoin

JUST IN: Elon Musk says most cryptocurrencies are "scams" during OpenAI court testimony. "Some of them have merit, but most of them are scams."

@litecoin Good days. Had fun with that game

Litebringer was fun. 🎮🕹️

Hard Money Web3 is heating up 🔥

Transaction Utility Litecoin: Network activity has shown gradual growth over time. Transaction counts rose sharply during Bitcoin congestion in late 2017, again in 2020 with the launch of the LiteBringer game, and more recently during periods of LTC and DOGE price volatility. Read More: hubs.li/Q04f2zLd0 @litecoin @LTCFoundation

@bitstoys Well said 🤣

Litecoin sucks send it to $0 Can we get this out of our system already? The reality: Seeing all you wanna be Bitcoin maxis talk shit with 0.1 BTC to your name is pathetic. You are barely in the space in comparison to most Litecoiners who were buying bitcoins at a time while you were still drooling on yourself watching paw patrol.

The reaction to the post-mortem released by the Litecoin Foundation, from entities such as @AlexAuroraDev and @vinibarbosabr, just revealed a big knowledge vaccum in this space. Where does responsibility lie, in an open-source, decentralized protocol such as Litecoin? To begin, the Litecoin Foundation has ZERO obligations to serve as "gatekeepers" or "official disclosers" of any event or development going on in the Litecoin protocol. Their decision to take-on responsibilities to serve thus far, is entirely by choice. This clarification seems trivial, but is very important, and here's why. The mistake of viewing them through such obligatory lenses as one would the Ethereum Foundation or the Near foundation, comes from a complete disregard of the fact that they are not being paid and have never been paid by the Litecoin protocol to function in such capacity, unlike with the other foundations. To break it down simply: - Both Litecoin and MWEB codebases are open-source, - Access to the network and subsequent info is open and decentralized, - Every Litecoin was farily distributed from scratch, thus, Foundation not paid for by the protocol, - Thus, the Litecoin Foundation has no obligatory requirement to serve as a central source of responsibility. On the other hand, - Near and Ethereum code bases are open source, - Access to network and info is decentralized, - They both recieved insider allocations from the presale, thus paid by the protocol, - They have direct obligatory requirements to serve as central sources of responsibilities. @vinibarbosabr called Litecoin an "unserious project" by citing what he percieved as "improper handling" by LF. And this sentiment was also furthered by Alex. I blame neither of them, because as far as I know, they have only worked with projects which have Foundations that are paid for by the protocol, and are therefore centrally obligated to "handle" responsibilities within it. However, it is ignorant for them to point fingers at percieved representations of the authority figures they are used to in their space, when it comes to Litecoin. This is not a moral argument, just a clarification of responsibilities. Litecoin, unlike NEAR, is for every user, and every user, including the Litecoin Foundation, is equally responsible for it. No more, no less. The responsibility of spotting and disclosing bugs is for everyone, including the team responsible for Litecoin's integration in Near intents. Anyone disatisfied with the way LF handled the incidents and/or disclosure, is thereby highlighting the fact that they themselves, failed to contribute their own due diligence.

Claims that Litecoin Foundation considers this behavior “normal” are incorrect. As outlined in our postmortem, the activity occurred on an invalid chain that was later reorged out. Independent platforms such as NEAR Intents operate their own services, facilitate transactions, and generate revenue from those activities. With that comes responsibility for system design, risk management, settlement policies, and monitoring of network conditions. Litecoin is an open, permissionless network. @LTCFoundation is a nonprofit that does not operate the network or custody user funds, does not operate third-party services, and does not determine or influence their confirmation thresholds or risk decisions. Accordingly, the Foundation will not assume financial responsibility for such losses. Service providers executing these transactions, and generating revenue from them, bear responsibility for their outcomes.

@MustStopMurad 10 years in crypto and the Litecoin community has been the best so far

Community is the only thing that matters in Crypto. Nothing else matters.

@davidgokhshtein Its clearly Litecoin when it comes to fundamentals

What’s better than Bitcoin?

@cryptofergani Litecoin, the stats dont lie

ETH is dead BTC is too slow SOL is filled with scammers XRP is for old people What’s the solution?