George M

28.2K posts

George M banner
George M

George M

@GeorgeMo

He/Him. American 1stA Supporter, SEO curator, writer (& playwright), geek, sci-fi addict, coin collector, activist in the TX 33rd Congressional District.

Texas Katılım Nisan 2009
3.2K Takip Edilen716 Takipçiler
George M retweetledi
Hey, Dave!
Hey, Dave!@davegreenidge57·
Light gray is 3-4 times more light reflective than dark blue. Painting it this color will increase the temperature of the water which will support even greater algae growth. Trump isn’t draining the swamp as much as he’s expanding it.
Hey, Dave! tweet media
English
1.2K
2K
12.3K
396.6K
Helena🤍Fiction
Helena🤍Fiction@HelenaFiction·
Oh but yeah, we were doing the PET scan. It was fine, but the best parts were finally getting a coffee and that it was covered by Medicare (so we didn't have to pay). Im glad we have access to all these things though fr, brand new facility too. The health care here is very good
English
1
0
0
29
Jon Cassar
Jon Cassar@joncassar·
In the early 90's I was the camera operator on a TV Series called #ForeverKnight . A cult vampire show that played in syndication. The producer Jim Parriot was bold enough to take a chance on me and gave me my first directing job, I was 35 yrs old. It launched my 30 plus year career as a director.
Jon Cassar tweet mediaJon Cassar tweet media
English
58
46
533
15.3K
George M
George M@GeorgeMo·
Bookmarked for an anecdote to share next #CareerDay
Crazy Vibes@CrazyVibes_1

At 65 years old, he sat in his car outside a closed restaurant with $105 in his pocket — his entire life's savings reduced to a single monthly Social Security check. He had failed at more than a dozen careers. He had just lost everything he owned. He could have gone home and stayed there. Instead, he started driving. His name was Harland David Sanders. And the world would come to know him simply as The Colonel. He was born on September 9, 1890, on a small 4-room farm near Henryville, Indiana. The oldest of 3 children. His father died when Harland was just 6 years old, leaving his mother to work long shifts at a canning factory to survive. At 6 years old, Harland Sanders learned to cook. Not as a hobby. As a necessity. His mother left before dawn every morning and came home exhausted every night. Someone had to feed the family. That someone was Harland. He mastered cornbread, vegetables, and meats before most children his age could tie their own shoes. By 7, he could cook a proper meal from scratch. By 10, he had a job working on a nearby farm for a dollar a month. By 12, he had dropped out of school entirely. At 16, he lied about his age and enlisted in the United States Army. He was honorably discharged 1 year later. He came home to Indiana with a military record, a 7th-grade education, and no clear plan. What followed was one of the most spectacularly turbulent careers in American history. He worked for the railroad as a laborer. He got fired after a fistfight with a coworker. He studied law through a correspondence course — then destroyed his legal career by getting into another fight, this time with a client, in the middle of a courtroom proceeding. He sold life insurance. He was fired. He sold tires. He was let go due to company downsizing. He operated a ferry boat service on the Ohio River, then sold it. He used the proceeds to start a lamp manufacturing company. It lost almost everything he put into it. He was 40 years old and had almost nothing to show for 24 years of adult life. Then something happened. In 1930, he leased a small service station in Nicholasville, Kentucky. When travelers stopped for gas, they sometimes mentioned they were hungry. He started feeding them — at his own dining room table, in his own living quarters behind the station. Just whatever he was cooking for himself. Word spread fast. Sanders moved to a larger service station in Corbin, Kentucky in 1934. He took over a motel across the road and converted part of it into a proper restaurant. He spent the next several years obsessively perfecting his fried chicken recipe — developing a unique blend of what he eventually settled on as 11 herbs and spices, and inventing a new cooking method using a pressure fryer that could produce perfectly juicy fried chicken in under 10 minutes. He had found his thing. By the early 1950s, his restaurant in Corbin was famous across Kentucky. The food critic Duncan Hines — yes, the same Duncan Hines whose name still appears on cake mixes today — featured Sanders' restaurant in his respected travel guide Adventures in Good Eating. Governor Lawrence Wetherby of Kentucky gave Harland Sanders the honorary title of Kentucky Colonel in 1950 — a state honor recognizing significant contributions to the community. He had been given the title once before, in 1935. He loved it so much he adopted the white suit, the black string tie, and the silver goatee as his permanent public image. The Colonel was born. In 1952, at age 62, Sanders partnered with a Utah restaurant owner named Pete Harman to open the very first Kentucky Fried Chicken franchise in South Salt Lake, Utah. A sign painter named Don Anderson came up with the name "Kentucky Fried Chicken." Sanders received 4 cents for every piece of chicken sold. It worked brilliantly. Within 1 year, Pete Harman's restaurant had doubled its revenue. Sanders was convinced. This was the future. And then, in 1956, the ground fell out from under him. The state of Kentucky announced a new interstate highway — I-75 — that would bypass Corbin entirely. The steady stream of travelers that had kept his restaurant alive for 20 years evaporated almost overnight. His customer traffic collapsed. In 1956, at age 66, Harland Sanders was forced to auction off his beloved Corbin restaurant. After paying his debts, he was left with almost nothing. His entire net worth at that moment was his Social Security check — $105 a month. Here's what he did next. He loaded his car with a pressure cooker and a bag of his secret spice blend. He started driving from town to town across America, walking into restaurants completely unannounced, cooking his chicken recipe for the owner on the spot, and asking for a handshake deal. The deal was simple. The restaurant would pay him 4 cents per chicken sold. Sanders would supply the spice blend in sealed packets so no one could steal the recipe. Restaurant after restaurant said no. They told him the recipe was too complicated. Too much trouble. Too different. Too risky. They already had their own chicken. They didn't need his. He kept driving. He slept in his car to save money. He cooked in restaurant kitchens for free just to show people what he had. He drove through heat and cold, through small towns and big cities, through 1 rejection and then 10 and then 100 and then hundreds more. By the time he found his second franchisee, he had heard the word "no" from 1,009 different restaurant owners. One thousand and nine times. He kept a tally. He never stopped. The 1,010th restaurant said yes. Then another. Then another. By the early 1960s, Kentucky Fried Chicken had expanded to more than 200 locations across America. By 1964, there were more than 600 franchise locations across the United States and Canada — all built by 1 old man in a white suit driving himself from town to town and cooking chicken for strangers. In 1964, at age 73, Sanders sold Kentucky Fried Chicken to a group of investors for $2 million — the equivalent of more than $20 million today. He retained the rights to the Canadian operations and stayed on as the company's brand ambassador. In 1976, an independent survey ranked Colonel Harland Sanders as the second most recognizable celebrity in the entire world. Second only to Muhammad Ali. The man who had been fired, failed, fought, bankrupted, and bypassed was now 1 of the 2 most recognized faces on the planet. He remained ferociously protective of his recipe for the rest of his life. When the company simplified his gravy recipe to cut costs, he showed up at franchises unannounced to sample it and, if it fell short, pushed it onto the floor in disgust. He publicly called it "slop" and "wallpaper paste." He sued the parent company in 1973 over the use of his image. He lost the lawsuit. He kept complaining anyway. He was still making surprise visits to KFC restaurants at age 89, in 1979, to make sure they were doing it right. On December 16, 1980, Harland David Sanders died of leukemia at the age of 90. At the time of his death, there were more than 6,000 KFC locations in 48 countries generating over $2 billion in annual revenue. He was buried in his white suit and black string tie. The man who dropped out of school at 12, lost more jobs than most people ever have, and received 1,009 rejections while sleeping in his car at age 65 died as 1 of the most successful, recognizable, and beloved entrepreneurs in human history. He never had a single advantage except one. He refused to stop. Share this with someone who is on rejection number 50 or 100 or 500 and needs to remember that 1,009 is not the end of the story — it is just the part before it begins.

English
0
0
0
10
George M
George M@GeorgeMo·
(Sorry, *reSKINNED* DYAC)
English
0
0
0
7
George M
George M@GeorgeMo·
Looks like the #TrumpMobile phone grift is going forward, only at a slightly less profitable level. Apparently, they just resigned a 2 gen old sub-premium device & are fulfilling at least a modicum of orders to avoid lawsuits. The #GrifterInChief strikes again.
Chef Joe Gera 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🇮🇹@redhotnerd

You didn’t design shit. This is an off the shelf rebrand of a device made by Wingtech called the Revvl 7Pro 5G and was available at T-Mobile for $0. The 7Pro has been replaced by the 8Pro because this thing is over 18 months old. And this is old stock that they bought to avoid a lawsuit.

English
1
0
1
29
George M
George M@GeorgeMo·
Our brains don't really evaluate every object or idea we encounter in life: often, we conserve mental energy by relying on assumptions and pre-determined outcomes. That's why anger at AI can often trigger rejection without evaluation. #AIDystopia
Anish Moonka@anishmoonka

Someone on Twitter posted a Monet painting, claimed an AI made it, and asked the internet to describe everything wrong with it. And hundreds did. The reflections were just splattered noise. There was no depth or cohesion. The background, as one reply put it, was "an egregiously vague algae amalgam." No focal point. The further back you went, the less anything looked like anything. The image was a real Monet. It's one of his late Water Lilies. Every flaw they listed is exactly what makes those paintings hang in museums. He spent the last twelve years of his life trying to kill the horizon line and dissolve the focal point. He painted on canvases big enough to wrap around you. The "mess" was the entire point. One of these paintings sold at Sotheby's in 2014 for $54 million. Monet gave eight more to France as a peace offering the day after the Armistice. They hang in two oval rooms in Paris that he and his architect designed themselves. There's a name for what just happened. In 2023, three researchers at Columbia Business School ran an experiment with almost three thousand people. They showed each person the exact same painting twice, once labeled human-made, once labeled AI-made. People valued the AI-labeled version 62% lower and thought it took 77% less time to make. Same canvas, opposite verdicts. A team at University College London had already shown why this happens. Back in 2009, they put people in a brain scanner and showed them art. Each painting appeared twice. One version was tagged "from a gallery," the other "computer generated." The reward-and-pleasure part of the brain lit up more strongly for the gallery tag. The label was changing how the brain saw the same image. Knowing about the bias doesn't help. Over 70% of participants in the Columbia study said the paintings looked the same to them. They still rated the AI-labeled ones lower. In 2023 a lab at Keio University in Japan tested how accurately people could spot AI art. People got human paintings right only 68% of the time. For AI paintings, the rate was 43%, worse than flipping a coin. A blogger named Scott Alexander ran the same test publicly in 2024 with fifty paintings, museum pieces mixed in with AI ones. The median score was 60%, barely better than guessing. Art professors and curators took the test. Most landed in the same range as everyone else. The "splattered noise" the comments mocked is some of the most-studied brushwork in art history. The "vague blob" is on the walls of a Paris museum. The brain seems to stop seeing the painting the moment it's told a machine made it.

English
0
0
0
9
George M
George M@GeorgeMo·
@aakashgupta How does one create the hole in the stone for a Lewis tool? That seems almost as challenging as the tool's function is graceful.
English
0
0
0
8
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
The Lewis tool has exactly one failure mode: the stone itself breaking. Three iron pieces drop into a dovetail-shaped hole cut into the top of the block. The slot is wider at the bottom and narrower at the top. The two outer pieces are angled to match. The center piece slides in last and locks them in place. A pin through the top holds the assembly. A shackle connects to the crane. Now lift. The outer pieces want to rise with the load. They cannot. The slot narrows above them, and the iron pieces are wider than the opening at the top. The center piece sits between them, so they cannot collapse inward to escape either. The lifting force just presses them harder against the angled walls of the slot. This converts a pulling problem into a wedging problem. The harder you pull up, the more force the wedge pieces apply outward against the stone. Friction scales with that force, so the grip tightens with the load. There is no slip condition. The load is the locking force. Most lifting attachments need active force to hold: clamps need applied pressure, hooks need orientation, ropes need friction wraps around the load. The Lewis uses the weight itself. Lift 1 ton and the gripping force scales to 1 ton. Lift 10 and it scales to 10. There is no separate locking mechanism that can fail because the load and the lock are the same thing. That's why nothing replaced it. Modern stonemasons still use Lewises for monument restoration. The same physics shows up in spring-loaded camming devices for rock climbing, where the harder you fall, the deeper the cam wedges into the crack. It shows up in self-tightening drill chucks. Every chuck on every power drill runs on a version of this geometry. Archaeological evidence puts the first Lewis bolts at Pergamon in Anatolia around 220 BCE in the Hellenistic Greek period. Vitruvius described the device formally in De Architectura in the 1st century BCE. Romans then deployed it at scale: the Colosseum's largest travertine blocks, up to 5 tons each, were lifted with this attachment. Lewis holes are still visible in the surviving Roman stonework. A geometry where the block falling is the same force gripping it tighter. Twenty-three centuries and no cleaner answer.
衝撃bot@minnano_dougaww

古代ローマ人が使ってたとされる、ルイス工具。先人の知恵はガチで凄いよな

English
2
4
21
6.2K
George M retweetledi
Kateri Seraphina
Kateri Seraphina@KateriSeraphina·
Un élève pose cette question à son maitre : « J'ai lu beaucoup de livres et j'en ai oublié la plupart ; mais alors quel est le but de la lecture ? " L'enseignant n'a pas répondu à ce moment-là ; cependant, au bout de quelques jours, alors que lui et le jeune élève étaient assis près d'une rivière, il a dit qu'il avait soif et a demandé à l'enfant de lui apporter de l'eau avec une vieille passoire sale qu'il y avait au sol. L'élève a sursauté parce qu'il savait que c'était une requête sans logique. Cependant, il n'a pas pu contredire son maître et, après avoir pris la passoire, il a commencé à accomplir cette tâche absurde. Chaque fois qu'il plongeait la passoire dans la rivière pour apporter un peu d'eau à son maître, il ne pouvait même pas faire un pas vers lui car il ne restait plus une goutte dans la passoire. Il a essayé et essayé des dizaines de fois mais, même si il a essayé de courir plus vite de la rive jusqu'à son maître, l'eau a continué à traverser tous les trous du tamis et s'est perdue en chemin. Épuisé, il s'est assis à côté du Maître et a dit : - Je ne peux pas trouver de l'eau avec cette passoire ; pardonnez-moi, maître, c'est impossible et j'ai échoué dans mes devoirs. - Non ! Dis le vieil homme souriant - tu n'as pas échoué. Regarde la passoire : maintenant elle brille, elle est propre, comme neuve. L'eau, qui s'infiltre dans ses trous, l'a nettoyée. — Quand tu lis des livres, a poursuivi le vieux Maître, tu es comme une passoire et ils sont comme de l'eau de rivière. Peu importe si tu ne peux pas garder dans ta mémoire toute l'eau qu'ils laissent couler en toi, parce que les livres, avec leurs idées, leurs émotions, leurs sentiments, leurs connaissances et la vérité que tu trouveras entre les pages, nettoiera ton mental et ton esprit, et feront de toi une personne meilleure et renouvelée. Voilà le but de la lecture.
Kateri Seraphina tweet media
Français
48
1.1K
3.1K
94.7K
George M
George M@GeorgeMo·
Add this to my #TravelBucketList The battlefield in Libya sounds worth seeing too, but far less accessible.
Ce jour-là dans l'Histoire@CeJour_Histoire

Ce pont parisien porte le nom d'un point d'eau au milieu du désert de Libye. Et personne ne trouve ça étrange. Pont de Bir-Hakeim, entre les 15e et 16e arrondissements. 237 mètres de long. Deux étages : les voitures et les piétons en bas, le métro ligne 6 en haut, à ciel ouvert, face à la Tour Eiffel. En 1878, il n'y a ici qu'une passerelle piétonne en métal, construite pour l'Exposition universelle. En 1905, on la remplace par un vrai pont à deux niveaux pour faire passer le métro au-dessus de la Seine. Il s'appelle alors le viaduc de Passy. En 1942, dans le désert libyen, 3 700 soldats français libres tiennent un point d'eau face à 90 000 hommes de Rommel et 575 panzers de l'Afrika Korps. Pendant seize jours. Le général Koenig commande. Les deux tiers des troupes viennent des colonies. Un bataillon de la Légion compte 300 républicains espagnols. L'armement est hétéroclite, les chenillettes sont dépassées, mais ils tiennent. Dans la nuit du 10 au 11 juin, ils percent les lignes ennemies. Cette résistance permet aux Britanniques de se replier et de gagner El-Alamein un mois plus tard. La France libre prouve qu'elle sait se battre. Elle sera à la table des vainqueurs. En 1948, le viaduc de Passy est rebaptisé pont de Bir-Hakeim. Un pont parisien qui porte le nom d'une victoire dans le sable.

English
0
0
0
4
George M retweetledi
James Tate
James Tate@JamesTate121·
In August 2010, Jane Mayer published a long article in The New Yorker called "Covert Operations." It introduced most Americans, for the first time, to two brothers — Charles and David Koch — and the quiet network of foundations, think tanks, and political organizations they had spent decades building to reshape American politics from behind the scenes. The article was meticulously sourced. It named names. It followed the money. A few months later, Mayer started getting strange messages. A blogger asked her how she felt about the private investigator who was looking into her. She thought it was a joke. Then a former reporter told her, at a Christmas party, that he'd been approached and asked to help dig up damaging information on a journalist who had written something two billionaires didn't like. Then, in January 2011, her editor at The New Yorker, David Remnick, forwarded her a query from the New York Post. The Post had been handed material claiming Mayer was a serial plagiarist. The "evidence" was being shopped to multiple outlets at once. It wasn't true. The reporters she had supposedly stolen from confirmed she had cited them properly or asked permission. The Post dropped the story. But the campaign had been real — and Mayer eventually traced it to a firm called Vigilant Resources International, run by Howard Safir, the former NYPD commissioner. The firm had been hired, she would later document, by people connected to Koch business interests. The dirt didn't exist. So someone had tried to manufacture it. That moment told Mayer something about her own work that she has never forgotten. She wasn't being attacked because her reporting was sloppy. She was being attacked because it was accurate. Mayer has spent more than three decades doing this. Before Dark Money, she wrote The Dark Side, the definitive account of how the United States adopted torture as policy after September 11. After Dark Money, she investigated dark money behind Supreme Court confirmations, the network funding election-denial campaigns, and the secret political work of a Supreme Court justice's spouse. Each story has followed the same arc. Reporting comes out. Power responds — not by disputing the facts, but by going after the reporter. Lawyers get involved. Personal information gets leaked. Old colleagues get phone calls. The accusation is always the same in spirit, even when the words change: she went too far. But "too far" has never meant inaccurate. It has meant inconvenient. That's the quiet education buried in Jane Mayer's career: powerful institutions rarely correct the record. They reach for the messenger. They make the cost of telling the truth so high that the next person thinks twice. It only works if it works. Mayer is still reporting. The stories are still landing. The lines, it turns out, were never where we were told they were. Someone just had to be willing to walk past them, and write down what was on the other side.
James Tate tweet media
English
27
932
1.7K
40.3K
George M
George M@GeorgeMo·
@FactsAboutTexas Yep - I went there one time, just before it closed. We were going to a concert at the American Airlines Center, for Simon & Garfunkel's "Old Friends" tour. So, 2004? I remember the cold air coming out of the shaft & wondering how they achieved that effect.
English
0
0
0
30
Facts About Texas
Facts About Texas@FactsAboutTexas·
If you grew up in Dallas, this one is going to stop you cold. Baby Doe’s Matchless Mine. Sitting on the highest point in Dallas — right on Harry Hines behind that famous waterfall billboard — overlooking I-35 and downtown. You walked through an entrance built like a real mineshaft, past rusting mining equipment and narrow gauge rail cars, into a dimly lit dining room that felt like you’d descended into the earth. It was unlike anything else in Texas. From 1976 until it closed in 2005, generations of Dallas families celebrated birthdays, anniversaries, prom nights, and special occasions in that old mine on Goat Hill. Then it was demolished. And just like that — it was gone. Some places you don’t realize you’ll miss until they’re already gone. 🤠🪨
Facts About Texas tweet media
English
120
160
1.8K
115.5K
George M
George M@GeorgeMo·
Interesting perspective on why megacities tend to grow to the North:
Chris Koerner@mhp_guy

Why do cities grow north and how can knowing that make you rich? Here's why one of the most overlooked real estate cheat codes on the planet works so well: The sun sits south - so nuilding north never shadows the buildings already there. Zoning fights push growth that direction for 200 years. The wind blows west to east. Old factories got built south and east of downtowns. Rich people fled the smoke north and west. Even after the factories closed, the pattern stuck. Rivers usually run south of downtown. South side = floodplain. North side = high ground. Premium dirt forever. Highways got built to serve where the wealthy already moved. The rich moved north. The highways made more north growth possible. This becomes a self-reinforcing loop for hundreds of years. North of every city is open farmland. It's the cheapest path of least resistance for developers. DFW is the textbook case. Same play, one exit further up Highway 75 and the tollway every decade: 1920s: Highland Park 1980s: Plano 2000s: Frisco 2020s: Prosper, Celina 2030s: Sherman, Denison 2040s: Oklahoma? Boomers bought 30 miles north of Dallas in 1980 with 12% rates. Today they're rich. Millennials can buy 30 miles north of where development ends today, at 7% rates, wait 20 years and get rich as well. Look how cheap land up there is. Don't be afraid of Oklahoma, either. The map still works. The more things grow north, the less it matters than you're 60+ miles from Dallas proper. I'm under contract on a ranch outside of DFW right now. Guess which direction it's in? Yep. Follow me @mhp_guy if you liked this.

English
0
0
0
7
George M
George M@GeorgeMo·
There's something beautiful about writing on rainbows. #WritersOfTwitter #AuthorsOnX #WritingCommunity
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta

This is a real image. This is a real tree. The rainbow eucalyptus is photosynthesizing through its bark. That's why it has color. Eucalyptus deglupta sheds patches of outer bark on a rolling schedule, never the whole trunk at once. Each fresh patch is packed with chlorophyll, the same pigment that makes leaves green. The bark is thin enough that light gets through and the tree photosynthesizes through its trunk. The moment that fresh green hits air and UV, the chemistry starts. Chlorophyll degrades. Tannins accumulate in the transparent outer cells, the same polyphenol family that gives red wine its color and makes biting an unripe persimmon feel like sandpaper. As the layer ages, the tannin mix and oxidation state shift the color: green to blue, blue to purple, purple to orange, orange to maroon, before that patch peels off and a new green layer starts the cycle. Every stripe you see is a different timestamp. The trunk is a literal time-lapse of bark oxidation, every frame on display at once. Eucalyptus deglupta is native to Mindanao, Sulawesi, and New Britain. It's the only eucalyptus species that crosses the equator into the Northern Hemisphere. It grows 250 feet tall with a trunk eight feet thick and buttresses thirteen feet high. The seeds are so small that a kilogram contains two million of them. It's also one of the fastest-growing trees on the planet. The Philippines, Indonesia, and East Africa run massive plantations of it for paper pulp. The world's most colorful tree. Grown to make blank paper.

English
0
0
0
12
George M
George M@GeorgeMo·
Applied perception changes brain structure & function. What are training your brain to do? And what is it costing you?
Ihtesham Ali@ihtesham2005

To get a license to drive a black cab in London, you have to memorize 25,000 streets, 20,000 landmarks, and the fastest route between any two points in a six-mile radius of Charing Cross. It takes most people three to four years. A British neuroscientist asked the obvious question nobody had thought to ask. What does that actually do to a human brain? Her name was Eleanor Maguire. The study changed neuroscience forever. The exam is called The Knowledge. It was introduced in 1865, and the format has barely changed since. Applicants ride a moped around London for years with a clipboard strapped to the handlebars, tracing every possible route between every possible pair of points in the city. They get tested in person by an examiner who can ask them, on the spot, for the shortest legal route between any two addresses in a database of tens of thousands. Half the people who attempt it fail. The ones who pass have spent an average of four years studying full time and have taken the test 12 times before getting through. Maguire was watching a TV movie about it in 1995 when she had the idea. These were not ordinary people. They were people running one of the most extreme spatial memory training programs that exists anywhere on Earth. If the human brain could be reshaped by experience, this was the cleanest natural experiment anyone was ever going to find. She put 16 of them in an MRI machine. Their posterior hippocampi were significantly larger than the brains of matched controls. The longer a driver had been working, the bigger the difference got. A 40-year veteran had a measurably more developed hippocampus than a 5-year veteran, and both had more than someone who had never driven a cab. Here is why that finding broke a century of consensus. Until 2000, every neuroscience textbook in the world taught a version of the same idea. The adult brain is essentially fixed. You are born with a set number of neurons. Childhood is the window where the wiring gets laid down. After puberty, the structure freezes, and the rest of your life is just slow decline. Maguire's study was one of the first pieces of human evidence that this was simply wrong. Adult brains physically remodel themselves in response to what you ask them to do. Not metaphorically. Structurally. With grey matter you can measure on a scan. The skeptics had an obvious objection. Maybe people with bigger hippocampi were just more likely to become taxi drivers in the first place. The brains were not changing. The job was selecting for brains that already looked that way. So Maguire ran the experiment again. Properly this time. She recruited 79 trainees who were just starting to study for The Knowledge and 31 controls who were not. She scanned all of them at the start. Then she waited four years. Of the 79 trainees, 39 eventually passed the exam and 20 failed. She scanned them again. The trainees who passed had grown larger posterior hippocampi over those four years. The trainees who failed had not. The controls who never studied had not. The brain change was not selection. It was construction. The act of memorizing the city had physically rebuilt the part of the brain responsible for spatial memory, and the rebuild only happened in the people who actually did the work. There is a quieter finding from this research that almost nobody quotes, and it is the one I cannot stop thinking about. The drivers had a bigger posterior hippocampus, but they had a smaller anterior hippocampus. The brain had not magically expanded. It had reallocated. Tissue that was being used for one type of memory had been compressed to make room for another. When Maguire ran follow-up cognitive tests, the cabbies were measurably worse than controls at certain visual memory tasks unrelated to navigation. They had paid for The Knowledge with something else. The trade was real. She also ran a second control experiment that is the part of the story most people never hear. She scanned London bus drivers. Same hours behind the wheel. Same city. Same traffic. Same stress. The only difference was that bus drivers follow fixed routes. They do not have to navigate. Their hippocampi looked completely normal. The cab drivers had not grown bigger hippocampi from driving. They had grown them from the constant, active, effortful retrieval of spatial information from memory. That distinction is the entire study. Then in 2020, McGill researchers ran the inverse experiment. They tracked 50 regular drivers and measured how often they used GPS. The participants who relied most heavily on turn-by-turn navigation had measurably weaker spatial memory. When the researchers retested a subset of them three years later, the heavier GPS users had declined fastest. The hippocampus, the same region the cabbies had built up by ignoring shortcuts, was being slowly hollowed out in everyone else by accepting them. The mechanism Maguire spent 25 years documenting works in both directions. Brains grow what you make them grow. They lose what you stop asking them to do. The taxi drivers were running the most intense spatial memory training program on Earth. Most of the rest of us are running the opposite program without realizing it. Maguire died in early 2025. UCL's tribute described the cabbie study as a stroke of creative genius. She had spent her entire career on a single question. What does it physically take to remember something, and what changes inside a person who remembers a lot of it. The answer is the part that should change how you live.

English
0
0
0
10
George M
George M@GeorgeMo·
@archeohistories The biggest problem with the "Spintria as Brass checks" argument is that the numerals are inconsistent w/ pricing. Some deeds would not cost 7x what others cost. And each "deed" has a unique numeral.
GIF
English
0
0
0
13
George M
George M@GeorgeMo·
@archeohistories Personally, I think Spintria were more likely used for something like bath house claim checks. If you left your toga at the Fellatio mural #2, you might get a token w/ that image & number. Roman bathhouses had art that Victorian era archeologists assumed belonged only in brothels
English
1
0
0
21
Archaeo - Histories
Archaeo - Histories@archeohistories·
“Spintria” is the currency used to pay for services in brothel in ancient Roman World.... In theory, it was forbidden to use coins with emperor's effigy in these places, hence use of spintriae. They are bronze "tokens" that have a couple represented in a sexual position on one side (each time different: nine different positions have come down to us) and on the other a number that, depending on the coins, ranges from I to XVI. As there were many brothels in ancient Rome, but standard Roman coins, Serters and Denars, were not used and were even banned from being there. Store-bought Tokens were used for Denar and Serters and images on them were often obscene. Reason is understandable, because on all Roman coins there was a head image of emperor of that period. Even picture of emperor entering the brothel was synonymous with humiliating and cursing him. Of course, punishment was severe. In resorts like Herculaneum and Pompeii, brothels were much busier places. Over time, such places encouraged their customers to use their own currency, called spintriae in Middle Ages. Prevalence of prostitution in Roman culture can be inferred from concentration of this coin in circulation and abundance of examples at these resorts in southern Italy already mentioned. This was a fairly common phenomenon for those dealing with day-to-day money in brothel coins in Rome. On the obverse and reverse of coins were various sexual images, often depicting people making love. One of theories regarding the purpose of these coins was to advertise price of sexual activities. Moreover, the transfer of this money between two people (the buyer and the “seller”) created a certain privacy. This was especially useful for high-status people to hide what kind of work they did at night. According to some experts, price of event was written on back of pictures of these coins. It was a system that helped break down language barriers. If this theory is correct, it means that these coins are more of an ordering tool than a form of payment. For example, when you say "I want number 4" at McDonalds, the corresponding money is given. A Roman brothel coin found in London in 2012 was under investigation. As it is known, Romans set up tents and camps in Ancient Britain. This strengthens the theory that coins in question were used as a tool to cross language boundaries. In Britain the spread of language was even slower, but these coins served to universalize language. #archaeohistories
Archaeo - Histories tweet media
English
10
62
246
14.2K