GetOutside🌳⛰️

8.3K posts

GetOutside🌳⛰️ banner
GetOutside🌳⛰️

GetOutside🌳⛰️

@GetOutsideAdv

Climber | Father of 2 | Husband | PNW | I nurture my nature. Space fan. Sensible energy. Politically confused 😵‍💫"

Earth Katılım Mayıs 2018
1.2K Takip Edilen799 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
GetOutside🌳⛰️
GetOutside🌳⛰️@GetOutsideAdv·
A little healthy defiance is great for building independence and critical thinking Skills
GetOutside🌳⛰️ tweet media
English
3
1
16
305
GetOutside🌳⛰️
GetOutside🌳⛰️@GetOutsideAdv·
@r0ck3t23 Jenson just might be the father figure the tech bros man children have so desperately needed and he should tell them in that fatherly tone that: THEIR WILL BE NO MORE CHIPS FOR ANY OF YOU, NOT UTILL YOU CLEAN UP YOUR ACT!
English
0
0
6
389
Dustin
Dustin@r0ck3t23·
Jensen Huang just told every AI leader in the room to grow up. Stop scaring the public with science fiction. Start communicating like the weight of civilization is on your shoulders. Because it is. Huang: “AI is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” That single statement dismantles half the panic surrounding this industry. The mainstream conversation is dominated by people projecting human malice onto math. Alien consciousness onto code. Existential dread onto a software architecture we built, we trained, and we can read. Huang: “We say things like, ‘We don’t understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” When builders tell the public they don’t understand their own creation, the public hears threat. The state responds with control. That is already happening. Palihapitiya asked Huang what he would have told Anthropic during their regulatory clash with the Department of Defense. Huang didn’t attack the technology. He attacked the communication. Huang: “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is really terrific. We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” Warning shows risks, mitigation, why upside overwhelms downside. Scaring says we might be building something that destroys us and we can’t stop it. One builds trust. The other invites regulation written in panic. Huang: “To say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there’s no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” Projecting catastrophe without evidence is not caution. It is sabotage. When your technology is embedded in national defense, the financial system, and healthcare infrastructure, your words carry structural weight. If the architects act terrified of their own product, the response is predictable. Governments step in. They restrict. They seize control of something they don’t understand because the builders told them to be afraid. Huang: “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” Most tech founders have not internalized this. You are no longer a startup founder disrupting an industry. You are running infrastructure that nations depend on. Your statements move policy. Your framing shapes legislation. Your tone determines whether governments treat you as partner or threat. Huang: “We have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.” Huang did not ask for silence. He asked for precision. The leaders who cannot tell the difference will not be leading for long.
English
153
158
806
84.3K
GetOutside🌳⛰️
GetOutside🌳⛰️@GetOutsideAdv·
Jenson should treat tech bro man children like the children they act like And be the father figure they all so desperately need and say: NO MORE CHIPS FOR YOU BOYS, NOT UTILL YOU CLEAN UP YOUR ACT!
Dustin@r0ck3t23

Jensen Huang just told every AI leader in the room to grow up. Stop scaring the public with science fiction. Start communicating like the weight of civilization is on your shoulders. Because it is. Huang: “AI is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” That single statement dismantles half the panic surrounding this industry. The mainstream conversation is dominated by people projecting human malice onto math. Alien consciousness onto code. Existential dread onto a software architecture we built, we trained, and we can read. Huang: “We say things like, ‘We don’t understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” When builders tell the public they don’t understand their own creation, the public hears threat. The state responds with control. That is already happening. Palihapitiya asked Huang what he would have told Anthropic during their regulatory clash with the Department of Defense. Huang didn’t attack the technology. He attacked the communication. Huang: “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is really terrific. We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” Warning shows risks, mitigation, why upside overwhelms downside. Scaring says we might be building something that destroys us and we can’t stop it. One builds trust. The other invites regulation written in panic. Huang: “To say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there’s no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” Projecting catastrophe without evidence is not caution. It is sabotage. When your technology is embedded in national defense, the financial system, and healthcare infrastructure, your words carry structural weight. If the architects act terrified of their own product, the response is predictable. Governments step in. They restrict. They seize control of something they don’t understand because the builders told them to be afraid. Huang: “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” Most tech founders have not internalized this. You are no longer a startup founder disrupting an industry. You are running infrastructure that nations depend on. Your statements move policy. Your framing shapes legislation. Your tone determines whether governments treat you as partner or threat. Huang: “We have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.” Huang did not ask for silence. He asked for precision. The leaders who cannot tell the difference will not be leading for long.

English
0
0
1
48
GetOutside🌳⛰️ retweetledi
Kath Brod
Kath Brod@mysteriouskat·
The less I rage bait on social media, the fewer people see my posts. This has to be a conspiracy, right??!!
English
19
2
61
1.9K
Devon- Build Happiness
Devon- Build Happiness@DevonBuildHappy·
@GetOutsideAdv Also you are a deep thinker, sorry i cant currently give a deeper response, closing up work 😅 but i do agree, ive found it starts at home, and until we refix our family units we cant unite as a country
English
1
0
0
21
GetOutside🌳⛰️
GetOutside🌳⛰️@GetOutsideAdv·
‼️ Everyone, regardless of your political identity. Should give 3 min of you time to hearing how your data and loved ones data is used to influence us all, and to what level this is happening and how much influence those who own the data have over the populace. It’s used to sell you crap, good and bad! It’s used to shape your social environment. It’s used to shape our politics and laws globally, It even affects our health and relationships. And our politicians are not immune, Nor, are the people who intentionally manipulate for dark agendas or the ones who are just doing what the systems says is the ladder of success - build your bottom line and get share holder returns. Speak now or risk forever to be controlled to the point that even our feeling of anger and or laughter, even what we believe to be right and wrong, may not be truly our own! It’s been happening even before ai rise, and if we don’t address it soon we may not be able to. FYI Im not anti AI or anti progress, I own stocks I’m a shareholder a business owner! BUT, what I would love to see is a more ethical display of action at the individual level as well as corporate or governmental and that they are morally aligned for humanity’s collective greater good and used with maximum transparency and oversight of those in positions of influence and power. Planet & People over wealth/ego/power/status Truth over comfort True empathy over appeasement Transparency over security Power to all over power of the few! Thats all…. Here some moon shots in case you hated this post something to like! 🤣 Hey X ai Algorithm show this to more then 50 people please ideally at a min all my followers or even 20% would be nice 👍 Cheers 🍻
GetOutside🌳⛰️ tweet mediaGetOutside🌳⛰️ tweet mediaGetOutside🌳⛰️ tweet media
Sen. Bernie Sanders@SenSanders

I spoke to Anthropic’s AI agent Claude about AI collecting massive amounts of personal data and how that information is being used to violate our privacy rights. What an AI agent says about the dangers of AI is shocking and should wake us up.

English
2
0
3
112
GetOutside🌳⛰️
GetOutside🌳⛰️@GetOutsideAdv·
@PaulAustin3w Balance seeking - is the mushroom ethos. At least it’s what I think they would chant at their annual fun guys meetings
English
0
0
0
233
Paul F. Austin
Paul F. Austin@PaulAustin3w·
Two psilocybin macrodoses. Sperm motility drops 51%. Free testosterone drops 24%. And it's the same mechanism that improved every other biomarker Bryan Johnson measured. This is the pattern from his first experiment all over again. Last time, glucose, inflammation, and cortisol all moved together. Now testosterone, SHBG, and fertility markers are all moving together too. Psilocybin doesn't optimize individual metrics. It reorganizes the system upstream, and the body decides what gets priority. Bryan even buried the clue in his own post: 5-HT2A receptors on sperm. The same receptor driving the neuroplastic reset is directly signaling reproductive biology. These aren't "complicated results." This is one mechanism expressed across every system it touches. Psilocybin mushrooms don't do trade-offs. They reorganize. Some numbers go up, others go down, because the system is rebalancing, not optimizing one variable at a time. Bryan's running the most quantified psychedelic experiment in history. And the data keeps pointing to the same thing: you can't separate what psilocybin does to your brain from what it does to your body. It was never a longevity drug. It's a system tuner.
Paul F. Austin tweet media
English
36
33
359
22.7K
GetOutside🌳⛰️
GetOutside🌳⛰️@GetOutsideAdv·
@EricRWeinstein I regret to inform you Mr. Weinstein, you’re one of the closest things we got right now to an adult! I know that’s not ideal, but that’s life- it is, what it is. During such scarcity us beggars,can’t be too choosy. 😂
English
1
0
8
513
GetOutside🌳⛰️ retweetledi
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@EricRWeinstein·
Notice that Billionaires didn’t want to move from California to Texas & Florida. Let’s piss everyone off: Tech Billionaires are treating humanity terribly. And it is also true that humanity is treating them terribly. No adults or wise elders anywhere with a tsunami coming? 🤷‍♀️
S.J. Bridger@SJBridgerWrites

@EricRWeinstein The Coase frame is right but the timing problem is brutal. You negotiate licensing terms before extraction, not after. Most of the value has already been ingested. The leverage point passed while people were still debating whether AI was real.

English
56
20
305
76.3K
GetOutside🌳⛰️
GetOutside🌳⛰️@GetOutsideAdv·
Ah, Harvey Dent nice callback to the Nietzsche monster quote: 'He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster…' (and when you gaze long into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you). Spot on. Hard to say definitively since we haven't built a true direct democracy yet, but we do have powerful new tools (blockchain voting, liquid democracy platforms, AI-assisted deliberation, real-time citizen input systems) that could finally get us closer to something resembling one. The key principle though: no system should ever be rigid when built for humans. Any governance framework must be designed to flex and evolve with societal & environmental shifts. That means: - Constant cycles of review: what worked, what failed - Keep & adapt the good parts - Ruthlessly scrap outdated laws & structures - Slow down / pause when the pace risks breaking things - hard time lines for review and implementation - no more political parties - single issue vote -mandated voting for all on a weekly block say 3 hrs dedicated to ur civic duty 1 hr local 1 regional 1 national 🤷‍♂️ it’s a ruff lose framework 😂 We're embedded in an ever-evolving, biodiverse ecosystem yet we keep trying to lock ourselves into brittle, top-down systems that can't adapt fast enough. Then we wonder why they crack at the seams and start failing us. We need antifragile frameworks that get stronger from stress & change, not ones that shatter under it. Maybe 🤔 Let’s just flip the surveillance apparatus on the power brokers and elite class. Surveillance for 5% so the other 95% can live in peace knowing the 5% are doing their job, working for the betterment of humanity and the political class is enforcing the laws we already have. The ones they seem to break so often and it’s just become trickle down economics of corruption and crime!
English
2
0
1
23
Devon- Build Happiness
Devon- Build Happiness@DevonBuildHappy·
@GetOutsideAdv I love your sentiment… but i worry how such a movement for good can happen with much bad to be done first. As harvey dent said…. You either die a hero, or live long enough to be seen the villain
English
1
0
0
21
GetOutside🌳⛰️
GetOutside🌳⛰️@GetOutsideAdv·
Obviously many holes to be patched in all of these ideas I’ve listed 👇 but here my short list: @elonmusk (doubt you will see this) Your @xAI should finally crush the bots, fake accounts, and content thieves stealing from smaller creators - use Grok/xAI behavioral detection at scale to purge them aggressively. Make X a real global town square again: - Default to a true chronological "Following" tab that shows everything from accounts you follow (no buried/suppressed mix with "For You"). - Let followers actually see posts from people they follow - fix suppression so reach isn't hidden. - Be fully transparent on reach: show exact impressions, breakdowns, % of followers who saw it, and any down-ranking reasons (e.g., link penalty, spam flags). - Ditch ad-revenue monetization entirely - it fuels rage-bait, engagement farms, spam, and bot fraud that clogs feeds. Switch to subscription/tips/donations only for creator payouts. - Add like/dislike buttons (great start), but tie them to transparency across everything. More high-impact fixes that would bring real engagement back: - Public (or at least visible-to-owner) reputation score based on follower quality, originality, report rate - not just blue check. - Auto-label AI-generated content (text/images/video) and de-prioritize it unless opted in. - Ban/heavily deboost accounts using recycled/stolen content, AI spam, or paid engagement groups. - Limit same-account appearances in feeds (e.g., max 1 post per 4-12 hours) to stop domination by farms/power users. - Reward quality replies/discussion (original, on-topic) for monetization eligibility - end reply-guy slop. - Occasionally resurface bookmarks and old good posts from followed accounts into timelines. - Push long-form/articles, Spaces, and real convos harder - they're invisible now vs. short outrage bait. Transparency + these changes = trust + real conversation return. People (and quality users) would come flooding back. What do you think
English
0
0
0
7
Diana Dukic
Diana Dukic@diana_dukic·
Went from scrolling 24/7 to not even wanting to log in. X just hasn’t been hitting the same lately.
English
508
155
4.9K
1.2M
GetOutside🌳⛰️
GetOutside🌳⛰️@GetOutsideAdv·
Sorry everyone, this was a long run on thought 💭 I just dumped out! 🤣
English
0
0
0
13
GetOutside🌳⛰️
GetOutside🌳⛰️@GetOutsideAdv·
Well there a “high” likelihood that my wife and I conceived both our children while micro dosing on shrooms My only two conclusion based off your research in the post 1) I have super duper sperm base line so shroom just brought me down to the high percentile male. 2) my wife taking shrooms as well had a counter reaction that made her eggs super fertile 🤣
English
0
0
0
491
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
Two doses of magic mushrooms degraded my sperm count from the 99.6th percentile to the 77.7th. This may be a first-in-human observation. Context: we ran the most quantified magic mushroom (psilocybin) experiment ever conducted. We were asking if psilocybin is a longevity therapy. After seeing the data, we think it is (see reply post for the experiment summary). Also, like most things biology: the results are complicated. My data suggests that the magic mushrooms (psilocybin) negatively impacted my fertility markers. Before the first psilocybin dose my motile sperm count was at 99.6th percentile for men under 25 years of age, it dropped to 77.7% and partially recovered to 89.3% following the first dose, and second doses, compared to the same age cohort (numbers compare similarly to my age cohort as well). 3 days following my second dose (first dose 25 mg, second dose 28 mg) . Motility: dropped 51% . Total count: almost unchanged, dropped by 2% . Total motile count: dropped 52% . Normal morphology: dropped by 50% 20 days post 2nd dose, the pattern continued, with typical latent effects on total sperm counts Motility: recovered back to -2% of pre-psilocybin baseline: . Total count: dropped by 38%, latent effect. . Total motile count: remained inhibited at -39% of pre-psilocybin baseline, (despite motility normalizing, due to the total count drop) . Morphology normalized to -10% of baseline levels. Reduction in free testosterone might have contributed to the effect. While total serum testosterone increased by 30% 3 days following the 2nd dose (neither FSH or LH were meaningfully affected either), and continued to be at 11% above baseline, SHBG increased by 37%, SHBG binds testosterone and reduces its bioavailability and activity. My free testosterone (direct) showed 24% and 23% drops at 3 and 20 days post 2nd dose. In light of the neuroplastic, well-being, brain reset, and systemic metabolic and anti-inflammatory benefits, the trade-off is probably worth it. Especially considering that the magnitude of inhibition has no meaningful effect on actual fertility (total motile counts above 50 million are still on the safe side). This is a first-in-human observation, to our knowledge there is no published human clinical study demonstrating that psilocybin diminishes male fertility markers. General mechanistic evidence exists for recreational and psychoactive drugs possibly inhibiting fertility markers due to their effects on the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis and general hormonal reset.  Yet no direct evidence for psilocybin or other similar psychedelics inhibiting fertility markers exist. A potential mechanism for the immediate inhibition of motility could involve direct serotonergic signaling in sperm. Human sperm express multiple serotonin receptors, including 5-HT2A, and one recent study found that a 5-HT2A antagonist reduced sperm motility, suggesting that 5-HT2A may regulate motility. Psilocybin is known to bind 5-HT2A with high affinity.
Bryan Johnson tweet mediaBryan Johnson tweet media
English
332
131
3.1K
601.8K
GetOutside🌳⛰️
GetOutside🌳⛰️@GetOutsideAdv·
🤣 that’s a good one And, we all definitely have our skeletons ( it’s not all bad as those moments can be huge positive growth moments but nonetheless still a skeleton) And the average person skeletons isn’t going to affect global stability, but those who can affect and desire to, need and should be willing to be striped bare to reveal their skeletons so we don’t have to find out latter, that the emperor truly wares now clothes!
GIF
English
1
0
1
44
GetOutside🌳⛰️
GetOutside🌳⛰️@GetOutsideAdv·
When you're rich/powerful enough, lying isn't a bug ….. it's a feature to maintain the status quo. Accountability is rare because they write (or influence) the rules. So remember, The world would be better if more people judged actions via our morals and ethics that are inline with collective human and environmental flourishing… instead of "complex geopolitics" or "shareholder value." It's not naive I’m just calling out the moral rot when we have so much profit over people mindsets.
English
2
0
1
26
GetOutside🌳⛰️
GetOutside🌳⛰️@GetOutsideAdv·
@Circe24468970 Yes 🙌 And I hope it’s a future we get but will have to show how much we want it! As the chances of us being giving that under the power dynamics of today is not looking 👀 good….. But I’ve got lots of hope left! And, what will be, will be, so…..
English
0
0
1
7
Circe
Circe@Circe24468970·
@GetOutsideAdv Was just thinking about this today. The currency of the future will be based on character and integrity. When we’re stripped of our masks we show the world, what’s left? The truth and discipline to live by our values.
English
1
0
2
8
GetOutside🌳⛰️ retweetledi
Sen. Bernie Sanders
Sen. Bernie Sanders@SenSanders·
I spoke to Anthropic’s AI agent Claude about AI collecting massive amounts of personal data and how that information is being used to violate our privacy rights. What an AI agent says about the dangers of AI is shocking and should wake us up.
English
1.2K
2.8K
17.9K
3.9M
GetOutside🌳⛰️ retweetledi
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@EricRWeinstein·
We need a well-described doctrine here. That is asserted, not discussed. It needs to make sense. It will not be pretty, fair or popular. But it cannot be ad hoc. It would bind the nation who shoulders it, both terribly and forever. And then we need to live that doctrine. RIP
Open Source Intel@Osint613

Hegseth: "My 13 year old son popped into my office last night while I was editing these remarks. He asked about the war and the families I met at Dover. I looked at him and said, 'They died for you, son. So your generation doesn't have to deal with a nuclear Iran.'"

English
70
18
214
63.6K