Gingeronstun

824 posts

Gingeronstun banner
Gingeronstun

Gingeronstun

@Gingeronstun

Leeds Katılım Nisan 2011
347 Takip Edilen122 Takipçiler
Gingeronstun
Gingeronstun@Gingeronstun·
@TRobinsonNewEra No, they will remand the pound shop fascist Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon, the snowflake who has chosen to identify as Tommy Robinson, for continuing to publicly broadcast something he said before he had any bail conditions, and it is that which is in breach.
English
0
0
1
43
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧@TRobinsonNewEra·
Can you actually believe this , they will remand Tommy for something he said before he had any bail conditions. This again is an attack on free speech, they do not want the public seeing the evidence that shows Tommy did nothing wrong
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
684
1.5K
5.3K
353.5K
Patriotic Restorer
Patriotic Restorer@RestorerPatriot·
You’ve got an MP—someone elected precisely to *represent* the concerns of ordinary people—calling genuine worries from his constituents "a disgrace." Really? Is that where we are now? A smug dismissal? Imagine, just for a second, you wake up one morning and your neighbourhood hotel—previously a quiet, familiar part of your community—is suddenly full of unknown, unvetted strangers. Picture them gathering near your children's school, your daughter feeling uneasy on her walk home, and your elderly neighbours afraid to step outside after dark. And what does this MP do? Does he try to understand? Does he reassure the community, engage with their concerns, provide transparency or solutions? No. He sneers at them from his moral high horse and labels their anxiety "disgraceful." Meanwhile, you have Rupert Lowe, who—whether or not you agree with everything he says—has the guts and honesty to point out what’s *actually happening*. He isn’t spreading fear. He’s simply stating that treating communities this way—throwing vulnerable asylum seekers into hotels without a proper plan, without consultation, without transparency—is an absolute farce. Rupert Lowe’s argument isn’t bigoted. It isn’t hateful. It isn't disgraceful. It’s common bloody sense: if you're going to do something, do it properly. Vet people, involve the locals, communicate openly. That’s not xenophobia, it’s basic competence. So, no—asking tough questions and expressing genuine concern about your family's safety is not "a disgrace." But an MP who dismisses legitimate worries, who insults his own constituents instead of listening to them—that, quite frankly, *is* disgraceful. End of.
English
18
62
611
26.5K
Gingeronstun
Gingeronstun@Gingeronstun·
It's been years since I went to @BurgerKingUK. I'm sure they were reasonably decent, but it seems they've gone rather downhill... I present to you the £10 Peppercorn Angus 'Gourmet' Burger I ordered vs what I received. I've had better from a late night burger van. #dissapoint
Gingeronstun tweet mediaGingeronstun tweet media
English
0
0
0
73
Gingeronstun
Gingeronstun@Gingeronstun·
@AlexHorne @taskmaster @TMTheExperience Hi @AlexHorne, I hope you have a good Xmas and New Year! I was just wondering if you had any updates regarding this? I was told back in September that you were in talks with consultants and I would be kept updated, but I've not heard anything yet.
Gingeronstun tweet mediaGingeronstun tweet media
English
0
0
0
29
Gingeronstun
Gingeronstun@Gingeronstun·
@AlexHorne My wife and I are huge @taskmaster fans and would love to try the @TMTheExperience, so we're hugely disappointed to be told it's still not accessible to anyone who can't stand for prolonged periods (unless you're in a wheelchair). Can you at least explain why?
English
1
0
0
290
Gingeronstun
Gingeronstun@Gingeronstun·
@tudcband @jk_rowling Even if true, neither of those things prove a person's sex. I'd be interested to see those reports though. Could you post links to the original sources please?
English
0
0
0
11
J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling·
Nothing about this feels good, because John Oliver generously gave his time for my charity Lumos and I liked him very much when I met him, but God knows, if you ever need an example of motivated reasoning and confirmation bias, this video's for you. An undoubtedly intelligent person spouts absolute bullshit to support something he wants to be true, but isn't. According to the UN, female athletes have lost nearly 900 medals to trans-identified men competing against them in women’s sporting categories. Girls have been ousted from teams to make way for boys. Women have suffered serious injury playing against trans-identified men (see Payton McNabb, mentioned below). Again and again I've come up against men who argue exactly what Oliver does here, using the very same talking points. With a straight face, the 'believe the science' guys will say 'actually, we don't yet have enough data to say whether men and boys are stronger and faster than women and girls'. The 'be kind' crew can't see what the issue is. 'Why are you bothered, it only affects a tiny minority of females?' To prove to their progressive credentials - and (coincidentally, I'm sure) indemnify themselves against repercussions from cultural elites in the media, academia and publishing who've showed themselves more than ready to kick people to the kerb for failing to mouth the approved mantras - people with a lot to lose are currently prepared to make idiots of themselves. They'll stare unabashedly into a camera and insist that their audiences' eyeballs are incapable of seeing what's plain as day, and that there's something wrong with the great unwashed for believing that girls are being robbed of opportunities and put at physical risk. If you want to tell the world you're happy to watch females suffer injury, humiliation and the loss of sporting opportunities to bolster an elitist post-modern ideology embraced by a minute fraction of the world's population, fair enough; you're allowed your opinion. But if you've just told girls they don't deserve fair sport, maybe rethink using all too real and common sexual predation against young women as a punchline for your 'edgy' closing joke.
English
3.6K
14.7K
93.1K
7.7M
Gingeronstun
Gingeronstun@Gingeronstun·
Wow @Tesco, I didn't think it was possible, but you've actually managed to make automated checkouts even more rage-inducing.
Gingeronstun tweet media
English
0
0
0
89
Gingeronstun
Gingeronstun@Gingeronstun·
@TheLastLeg Given the IPC is rightfully keen for the Paralympics & its athletes to be seen as equal to those of the Olympics, #IsItOk that Paralympic athletes receive up to 75% less medal reward money than their Olympic counterparts?
English
1
0
1
46
Gingeronstun
Gingeronstun@Gingeronstun·
@jk_rowling If only you had a fraction of the grace, decency and respect of the person you claim to be defending, the world would be a better place. You do not speak for her. You make her sad.
Gingeronstun tweet mediaGingeronstun tweet media
English
0
0
0
15
J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling·
A young female boxer has just had everything she’s worked and trained for snatched away because you allowed a male to get in the ring with her. You’re a disgrace, your ‘safeguarding’ is a joke and #Paris24 will be forever tarnished by the brutal injustice done to Carini.
English
4.3K
27.7K
141.4K
10.1M
Gingeronstun
Gingeronstun@Gingeronstun·
@jk_rowling Your hate for the trans community has become so rabid you've now turned on those you claim to stand up for. Khelif is not a man, she is what you call a 'biological woman'. The only body to disagree is corrupt, Russian owned & no issue with her competing until she beat a Russian.
English
0
0
0
21
J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling·
Watch this (whole thread), then explain why you’re OK with a man beating a woman in public for your entertainment. This isn’t sport. From the bullying cheat in red all the way up to the organisers who allowed this to happen, this is men revelling in their power over women.
English
13K
40.6K
218.2K
22.8M
Gingeronstun
Gingeronstun@Gingeronstun·
@AlexHorne @taskmaster @TMTheExperience Can you explain why the experience couldn't be designed to allow people to sit down at all for over an hour? It makes it completely inaccessible to so many fans. :(
English
1
0
1
188
Gingeronstun
Gingeronstun@Gingeronstun·
@AlexHorne @taskmaster @TMTheExperience Gutted to be told the experience is not accessible to my wife, or most people with an energy limiting illness. "the show does require ticket holders (non-wheelchair users) to remain standing throughout the show (approximately 65 mins)"
English
2
2
1
220
Gingeronstun
Gingeronstun@Gingeronstun·
@Specsavers They gave me a breakdown in store. That's not that that's the issue, it's the fact that your pricing structure means getting replacement lenses costs over £100 more than a new pair of glasses! If you can give me a 50% discount on new glasses, why not on replacement lenses?
English
1
0
0
45
Specsavers
Specsavers@Specsavers·
@Gingeronstun Hi Eddy, if you can send us a DM we'll be able to reach out to the team and ask for a price breakdown for you 😊
English
1
0
0
27
Gingeronstun
Gingeronstun@Gingeronstun·
@Specsavers In a world where we desperately need to reduce waste, how on earth can you justify charging £160 for a brand new pair of glasses, but £280 to have new lenses put into an existing, perfectly good frame? Your decision to do this is genuinely mind boggling.
English
1
0
0
59
Gingeronstun
Gingeronstun@Gingeronstun·
@TMTheExperience @AuthorOfNebulae Especially as tickets will be in high demand, are on a first come first served basis, and there will inevitably be some delay in getting an answer.
English
1
0
0
156