Kemo

513 posts

Kemo

Kemo

@GiorgiKem

Web developer

Georgia Katılım Kasım 2018
130 Takip Edilen66 Takipçiler
Kemo
Kemo@GiorgiKem·
@sama @fxnction Sam look at how google is doing it's designs and learn from them. Every single google front end design is absolutely beautiful.
English
0
0
0
35
fxnction
fxnction@fxnction·
This is the golden age of codex.
English
35
3
713
58.8K
Kemo
Kemo@GiorgiKem·
@sama @benhylak Yeah it is. Codex is horrible at UI. Even worse than Chinese knockoffs that cost 10 times cheaper.
English
0
0
1
839
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
@benhylak this is rage bait right? but it will be the best soon!
English
184
35
2.9K
223.7K
ben hylak
ben hylak@benhylak·
codex is just night and day better than claude at ui design. claude, especially 4.7, is so bad it's hard to overstate.
English
94
17
1.3K
244.1K
Kemo
Kemo@GiorgiKem·
@thsottiaux Why I can't edit code here instead of needing to open it in vscode just to edit? Would be nice if we could edit code inside codex.
Kemo tweet media
English
0
0
1
601
Tibo
Tibo@thsottiaux·
What are we obviously not getting right with Codex?
English
2.6K
26
2.4K
493.2K
Kemo
Kemo@GiorgiKem·
I want to try Cursor but I dont want to pay money for a crappy APP is it good? Is it better than Codex?
English
0
0
1
34
Kemo
Kemo@GiorgiKem·
7 freaking minutes to push changes to github. 7 MINUTES TO DO EASIEST TASK ON THE PLANET EARTH @sama @thsottiaux Codex is broken APP
Kemo tweet media
English
0
0
0
10
Kemo
Kemo@GiorgiKem·
Honestly googles front-end is muuuch better than both Claudes, Codex and lovables. It just created such a beautiful website in 2 minutes achieving same would take hours on Codex. Once google starts being serious I think both Codex and Claude will eat the dust. They don't progress fast enough :)
English
0
0
0
20
Kemo
Kemo@GiorgiKem·
@ajambrosino @CtrlAltDwayne Andrew no one at openAI uses codex for more than 8 hours a day? You guys don't notice any performance downgradements on extended usage? My codex literally stops working and gives me not responding popup every few minutes. Fix it please.
English
0
0
0
26
Dwayne
Dwayne@CtrlAltDwayne·
I legitimately don't know why anyone would use Claude Code over Codex. GPT-5.5 is the best model, you have access to the best image model. I've had it generating images for me and it just keeps going. It's a workhorse.
Dwayne tweet media
English
10
2
130
6.2K
Kemo
Kemo@GiorgiKem·
GroX should be name of the coding tool for Grok.
English
0
0
0
17
Kemo
Kemo@GiorgiKem·
@olsenbdnr its not going good Olsen.
Kemo tweet media
English
2
0
4
792
Olsen
Olsen@olsenbdnr·
You should see a significant reduction in crypto scam ads. If not lmk
English
63
20
468
18.7K
Kemo
Kemo@GiorgiKem·
@dev_11217 @techdevnotes Sorry but explain to me why would I pay 3x more for Grok if GPT 5.5 is 10 times better at coding? They should introduce lower priced plans.
English
1
0
1
144
Dev
Dev@dev_11217·
@techdevnotes we need this with the supergrok subscription though, not just via the paid API
English
1
2
26
1.4K
Tech Dev Notes
Tech Dev Notes@techdevnotes·
Billing in xAI API Console has started showing Grok Build It's happening ...
Tech Dev Notes tweet media
English
27
19
365
46K
Kemo
Kemo@GiorgiKem·
@daniel_mac8 For a company with biggest AI computer cluster having frontier model that is equal to sonnet 4.6 is kinda lame.
English
0
0
2
303
Dan McAteer
Dan McAteer@daniel_mac8·
Is Grok 4.3 legit? Sonnet 4.6 level But *waaaayyy* cheaper $1.25 in / $2.50 out Would be amazing if legit
Dan McAteer tweet media
English
37
9
313
21.2K
Kemo
Kemo@GiorgiKem·
@yashhq_22 I love it. And yeah it's nice to be able to get paid for what you love.
English
0
0
0
12
Yash
Yash@yashhq_22·
Be honest: do you really enjoy building or are you doing it just for the money?
English
137
2
90
8.2K
Preet Suthar
Preet Suthar@preetsuthar17·
I cancelled my another claude subscription and invested in @cursor_ai. IT'S FCKING AWESOME!!
English
16
0
192
11.5K
Kemo
Kemo@GiorgiKem·
@sofiaaa_ptl Well. I just found a job so it works I guess.
English
0
0
0
3
Sofia Patel
Sofia Patel@sofiaaa_ptl·
@GiorgiKem man love reading this. automating application submissions with scraping is a very clever technical approach.
English
1
0
1
6
Kemo
Kemo@GiorgiKem·
I have to build fully functional ai resume generator with automatic application submition/autofilling and linkedin job scraping just to find a job and still have no luck after 1000 applications. Does anyone actually find a job on linkedin?
English
1
0
1
39
Kemo
Kemo@GiorgiKem·
@jxnlco Jason is it possible to summarize all the open chats and create a single chat with the summary as context? I have multiple chats open because at some point Codex becomes slow after chat grows too big. If it's possible how do I do it?
Kemo tweet media
English
0
0
0
80
Kemo
Kemo@GiorgiKem·
@brettallenyo Make a coding tool similar to what OpenAI has as Codex. We need it!
English
0
0
1
53
Kemo
Kemo@GiorgiKem·
@thsottiaux Tibo can you speed up "Push changes to github" Such a simple task shouldn't take 5 minutes.
English
0
0
0
135
Kemo
Kemo@GiorgiKem·
@tibor_tee Tibor any vibe coder roles?
English
1
0
1
70
Kemo
Kemo@GiorgiKem·
@benln Hi Ben. Do you have any program where you give free access to users who use Cursor for hours a day (I am talking about +10-12 hours a day) I am willing to provide my data for training.
English
0
0
0
28
Kemo
Kemo@GiorgiKem·
@jshobrook We need to have similar tool as Codex for Grok.
English
0
0
1
318
Jonathan Shobrook
Jonathan Shobrook@jshobrook·
We beat Sonnet 4.6 with a 500B model. Bigger runs are on the way.
Artificial Analysis@ArtificialAnlys

xAI has launched Grok 4.3, achieving 53 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index with improved agentic performance, ~40% lower input price, and ~60% lower output price than Grok 4.20 The release of Grok 4.3 places @xAI just above Muse Spark and Claude Sonnet 4.6 on the Intelligence Index, and a 4 points ahead of the latest version of Grok 4.20. Grok 4.3 improves its Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index score while reducing cost to run the benchmark suite. Key Takeaways: ➤ Grok 4.3 improves on cost-per-intelligence relative to Grok 4.20 0309 v2: it scores higher on the Intelligence Index while costing less to run the full benchmark suite. Grok 4.3 costs $395 to run the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, around 20% lower than Grok 4.20 0309 v2, despite using more output tokens. This makes it one of the lower-cost models at its intelligence level ➤ Large increase in real world agentic task performance: The largest single benchmark improvement is on GDPval-AA, where Grok 4.3 scores an ELO of 1500, up 321 points from Grok 4.20 0309 v2’s score of 1179 Grok 4.3, surpassing Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, Muse Spark, Gpt-5.4 mini (xhigh), and Kimi K2.5. Grok 4.3 narrows the gap to the leading model on GDPval-AA, but still trails GPT-5.5 (xhigh) by 276 Elo points, with an expected win rate of ~17% against GPT-5.5 (xhigh) under the standard Elo formula ➤ Grok 4.3’s performs strongly on instruction following and agentic customer support tasks. It gains 5 points on 𝜏²-Bench Telecom to reach 98%, in line with GLM-5.1. Grok 4.3 maintains an 81% IFBench score from Grok 4.20 0309 v2 ➤ Gains 8 points on AA-Omniscience Accuracy, but at the cost of lower AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate of 8 points, so Grok 4.20 0309 v2 still leads AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate, followed by MiMo-V2.5-Pro, in line with Grok 4.3 Congratulations to @xAI and @elonmusk on the impressive release!

English
126
56
1.8K
272.3K