Gisebcn

CEASEFIRE AT RISK AS HORMUZ BLOCKADE NEARS ⚠️🌍 🔴 Benjamin Netanyahu warns ceasefire with Iran “could end quickly” 🔴 Donald Trump-ordered blockade set to begin within hours 🔴 US Navy expected to target ships linked to Iranian ports, not full shutdown of Strait of Hormuz 🔴 Iran has warned any such move could be seen as act of war / ceasefire violation 🔴 Tehran threatens retaliation across Gulf ports, widening conflict risk 🔴 Strait handles ~20% of global oil — escalation could shock energy markets globally 🟢 Diplomacy still ongoing, but situation is extremely fragile and time-sensitive Key Questions: ❓Will the blockade trigger immediate military retaliation from Iran? ❓Is the current ceasefire effectively already collapsing? #Iran #Israel #USA #Hormuz #Geopolitics #Oil #GlobalMarkets

Pope Leo XIV responded to President Trump’s social media post saying: “I do not look at my role as being political, a politician. I don’t want to get into a debate with him. I don’t think that the message of the Gospel is meant to be abused in the way that some people are doing.”

Israel has no right to exist.

France is on the eve of voting one of the most shameful laws in its history: it would effectively outlaw criticism of Israel and criminalize any speech seen as even remotely sympathetic to whoever the French government chooses to designate a "terrorist group." In effect this law would turn France's foreign policy into unchallengeable dogma backed by prison time. You could literally be sent for 5 years in prison if you, for instance, call what France says are "terrorists" a "resistance group." Think for instance Nelson Mandela during the apartheid (the ANC was on every Western terrorist list) or, heck, France's own Résistance against Nazi Germany - designated as "terrorists" by the Vichy regime and the Nazi occupation. It's frankly absolutely insane. The new law is called "loi Yadan" after its author Caroline Yadan, a MP who represents French expatriates living in Israel. The U.S. has congressmen paid by AIPAC: France has cut out the middleman entirely, we have MPs whose constituency is literally in Israel. The law has already passed committee and heads to a full parliamentary vote on April 16th - 3 days from now - under a very unusual fast-track procedure. Seven of eleven parliamentary groups have said they'll vote yes and the law is expected to pass. What does the law say? Let me quote from it directly (full text here: assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/17/textes/…): 1) Article 1 introduces the concept of "implicit" provocation to terrorism and punishes it with five years imprisonment and a fine of €75,000 That's the one I was speaking about. Under this provision, describing anyone France designates as terrorist as a "resistance movement" - the way France describes its own Résistance against Nazi occupation - could effectively become a crime. The key concept is what does "implicit provocation to terrorism" mean? Nobody knows. And that's the point. It means whatever a prosecutor wants it to mean: a perfectly good case could be made that, for instance, quoting international law on the right of occupied peoples to resist with respect to Hamas is, in fact, "implicit provocation to terrorism." France's most famous anti-terrorism judge, Marc Trévidic, says he has never seen anything like it in his entire career (x.com/CharliesIngall…): "Implicit provocation to terrorism: do you realize what that means? Becoming a censor of other people's thoughts, trying to guess what a person really meant." 2) The same article also expands the terrorism apology offense to include "minimizing or trivializing acts of terrorism in an outrageous manner." This is even crazier: until now, "apology of terrorism" meant actually expressing a favorable judgment of "terrorist acts" (which is already insane because, as we all know, one person's terrorist is another's freedom fighter). Well, under this new provision, a judge could decide that providing context, explaining root causes, or insufficiently condemning an act amounts to "trivializing" terrorism - and that would now be punishable with 5 years in prison. So, for instance, a history teacher explaining the origins of Hamas or Hezbollah is providing context - but a prosecutor could argue that contextualization is trivialization. The same reasoning could apply to a journalist, a researcher, or anyone on social media who says "yes, it was terrible, but here's why it happened." The "but" becomes a crime, as it is trivialization. 3) Article 4 expands Holocaust denial law Under current French law, denying the Holocaust is already a crime. This provision extends that crime by specifying that contestation of crimes against humanity now includes, "whatever its formulation, a negation, minimization, or outrageous trivialization" of those crimes. Again with "outrageous trivialization"! In this instance the very authors of the text - Caroline Yadan and her colleagues - explain their reasoning explicitly in the law's preamble (assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/17/textes/…): "Comparing the State of Israel to the Nazi regime would thereby be punishable as an outrageous trivialization of the Shoah." So while the provision is written in general terms, its architects are openly saying what it's for: making it a crime to draw any parallel between Israel's actions and those of the Nazis. 4) Article 2 creates a brand new crime: calling for the destruction of a state. The law adds to an existing 1881 press law a provision punishing anyone who "publicly, in disregard of the right of peoples to self-determination and the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, calls for the destruction of a state recognized by the French Republic." Five years imprisonment, €75,000 fine. The qualifiers about self-determination and the UN Charter are meant to sound reassuring. But what does "destruction" mean? In practice, if you advocate for a one-state solution where Israelis and Palestinians live as equals, you are de-facto calling for the "destruction" of the state of Israel. Well, that would now be punishable by 5 years in prison 🤷 There you go. Absolutely insane: if this new law passes, and it unfortunately very much looks like it will, France - the country that gave the world the Declaration of the Rights of Man, the country whose national identity is built on the Résistance - will have made it illegal to use the word 'resistance' about anyone the government doesn't like. Jean Moulin would be prosecuted. De Gaulle would be prosecuted. The only people who wouldn't be prosecuted are those who stay silent. Which, of course, is the whole point.

*US MILITARY SAYS IT WILL BEGIN HORMUZ BLOCKADE 10AM ET MONDAY

🇪🇸 Sánchez vs. Netanyahu 🇮🇱 Israel está muy nerviosa con España... Netanyahu acusa cada vez que puede a Sánchez de entablar relaciones con Irán. 💥 La razón de fondo no es esa. Es GEOPOLÍTICA. Hay una lucha abierta por ver quién se convierte en el HUB ENERGÉTICO de Europa 👇🏻 Uno desde África y el otro desde Asia. Toda una lucha geopolítica en acción camuflada con la cuestión iraní. La reciente escalada de tensión entre Israel y España ha trascendido el ámbito diplomático tradicional. Benjamin Netanyahu, ha acusado a Pedro Sánchez de librar una "guerra diplomática" contra Israel. Más allá de los choques por el conflicto en Gaza y Líbano, bajo la superficie existe una rivalidad geoestratégica por el liderazgo energético de Europa, con ambos países aspirando a ser la puerta de entrada de nuevos suministros que sustituyan la dependencia de Rusia. Aquí empieza el duelo de las puertas energéticas 👇🏻 Europa se encuentra en una búsqueda desesperada de diversificación energética. En este tablero, España e Israel representan dos soluciones geográficas distintas: 🇪🇸 España es el nodo del Atlántico y el Mediterráneo Occidental. Su fortaleza reside en su masiva infraestructura de regasificación (la mayor de la UE) y su conexión privilegiada con el gas argelino a través del gasoducto Medgaz. España no sólo aspira a ser el hub del gas natural licuado (GNL) que llega por barco desde América y África, sino que lidera el ambicioso proyecto H2Med, un corredor de hidrógeno verde que conectaría la península con Francia y Alemania para 2030. 🇮🇱 Israel, en cambio, quiere ser la potencia gasística del Levante. En apenas 15 años, Israel ha pasado de importar energía a convertirse en un exportador clave gracias a los megayacimientos marinos de Leviathan y Tamar. Su gran apuesta es el proyecto EastMed, un gasoducto submarino de 1.900 km diseñado para llevar gas desde sus costas hasta Europa (vía Chipre y Grecia). Este proyecto convertiría al Mediterráneo oriental en el nuevo pulmón energético del continente y podría dejar a España en fuera de juego si se acaba dando. 💥 Pero... ¿Cuál es la dimensión geopolítica del conflicto? El nerviosismo de Israel respecto a la postura de España no es solo ideológico. Si España se consolida como el principal receptor de gas de África y líder en hidrógeno, la relevancia estratégica del gas israelí para el norte de Europa se vería atenuada. Mientras España ofrece una ruta estable desde el oeste, Israel promete una alternativa desde el este para romper el monopolio que antes tenía Rusia. España lleva ventaja en la narrativa de la energía del futuro con el hidrógeno renovable, mientras que Israel se enfoca en el gas natural como energía de transición para las próximas décadas. La exclusión de España de mecanismos de supervisión por parte de Netanyahu busca debilitar la influencia política del país en la región, justo cuando España intenta liderar la política energética de la UE. Por lo que ambos países compiten por ser la pieza indispensable en la seguridad energética de Europa. España, aprovechando su geografía entre África y Europa, e Israel, explotando su nueva riqueza mineral en Asia. El choque diplomático actual es el reflejo de esta lucha silenciosa por el control de los flujos de energía que mantendrán encendida a la Unión Europea.

Veréis qué risa cuando caiga el malvado ultraderechista Orban y sea sustituido por el otro ultraderechista resentido, pero lameculos de la UE, y ya no haya bloqueo para que Von der Nazin y Kaja Kallate nos puedan meter en guerra contra Rusia.

Lebanon's war death toll has risen to 2,055, according to the country's health ministry.

En @PoliciaSXXI llevamos una década denunciando que nuestro modelo policial es represivo. Se detiene al autor del homicidio o la violación ya consumados. Nadie se ha atrevido a acometer una política criminal preventiva. La izquierda no lo ha permitido, y el PP se ha acobardado.

Por favor, que llegue ya algún adulto a poner orden en el mundo.

El nuevo propietario de la casa del principal sospechosos en el caso ha notificado a la Guardia Civil y al juzgado que ha encontrado un zulo en la vivienda. Estaría debajo unas baldosas en una habitación rtve.es/play/24-horas/

Los genocidas se han empeñado en publicar sus crímenes y los medios occidentales ya no pueden ocultar que Israel es enemigo declarado de la humanidad, un cáncer a extirpar.

Y éste es el que pide un Congreso extraordinario en @vox_es? Espinosa de los peperos y del IBEX de charla con los periodistas más afectos al Sanchismo! Es obvio que el traidor Espinosa no es más que el caballo de Troya del corrupto bipartidismo. Forma parte del engranaje.

¿Cuál es la razón profunda de los crímenes de Israel y USA? Todos los males de la historia tienen una raíz teológica, a saber, los «tres grandes delirios» del hombre: 1. Crear falsos dioses (idolatría). 2. Convertirse en dioses (hybris). 3. Crucificar a Dios (deicidio).

Trump wants to blockade the strait of Hormuz (with other countries) and intercept vessels which have recently paid a toll to Iran. If he follows through with that threat, there will be war, war while US warships are in the Persian gulf.

Without Israel, West Asia would be one of the most peaceful and prosperous places on earth, attracting hundreds of millions of tourists every year: free trade, free human movement, religious freedom, equality for all, no oppression, no puppet regimes, no sectarianism. culture, history, hospitality, food, music, sea, spirituality. Israel has been the ruin of some of the world's most fascinating and precious regions

Their objective was "no deal." They don't work for the US.

I am truly not surprised that these two stooges could not help to deliver a deal. They look dumbfounded even just when opening a door.

Orate total.

À l’occasion du samedi saint orthodoxe « la flamme sacrée » a été amenée au Liban depuis depuis l’église du Saint Sépulcre à Jérusalem -via Chypre- à bord d’un hélicoptère Puma de l’armée libanaise. Cette région est d’une complexité qui devrait forcer l’humilité aux commentateurs