
@Anc_Aesthetics No question that the H1B system needs to be overhauled
IrradiatedHobbit
3.5K posts

@GlowHobbit
Pipe-smoking radioactive inhabitant of the Shire.

@Anc_Aesthetics No question that the H1B system needs to be overhauled




What historical fact sounds fake but is true?





My family recently tried to enjoy a city event. In ONE evening we experienced homeless black men making gun gestures as they pretend killed my family. Another black man followed my TEENAGE DAUGHTER into ladies room. This was one evening being around black people. 4 hours. This is what is considered standard black behavior and we all have to put up with it. At an event with hoards of other races and cultures, it was only multiple black men that behaved in God-awful ways, repeatedly. Not one other race terrorized my kids. But on ONE evening, my kids got to experience multiple threatening black men. Chud documenting black behavior isn't the problem here. Black behavior IS the problem.



@TheBrancaShow @SlyBailBonds Wrong. 1A. He also turned and started walking away and was attacked. The thug also had ‘intent’ to harm chud. It’ll all come out soon enough. The law enforcement will do what it can against him, but any decent lawyer will have him out in a few days.


I've been thinking about it and it is an important case. The leftists will try to argue that the assault was "provoked." But the law guarantees freedom of speech, including the freedom of saying the n-word. The law doesn't guarantee a right to assault in response to words. Therefore, the correct legal conclusion is that the Black man here should be found guilty of physical assault, and Chud The Builder should be found to have acted in self-defense.


Chud’s case asks the exact same question as the Zimmerman case: do black people have the right to assault people without consequence? If a black person impulsively assaults us because they’re angry, are we supposed to just accept it and take it?


