Brian Ward

3.5 years—3 million typed words—16 fed lawsuits—800 plaintiffs—70 defendants—8 states—7 petitions to the Supreme Court for the purpose of protecting this nation from losing its constitutional guarantees. We're at 43 out of 200 ppl donating $100 to win this case-join the fight!

These cases prove that all COVID-19 mandates were unlawful!!!!

BOOM TIME...The Supreme Court just ordered former Gov. Jay Inslee (WA) and Shriners Hospitals for Children to inform it by what authority they can mandate that individuals accept investigational drugs, when they are under federal contracts not to pressure individuals into such administration. Moreover, by what authority can the State mandate the use of a PREP Act countermeasure when it strips a citizen of their fundamental right to access courts when injured? This is the second case in less than three weeks in which the Court is stepping in to determine whether it will answer the question on the nation's behalf. This is historic!

If you haven't listened to what's taking place in the Court, you can do so here: covidpenalty.com/wp-content/upl…

@ourptrights You are a gem and have the right idea at the right time in history.

A long earned respite sounds good. Enjoy it! I'm hoping I do a good enough job getting my 100% FREE - I DO NOT CONSENT FORM™ known and used to protect hospital patients from receiving unwanted mRNA vaccines that I can go back to everything I sacrificed before Covid. (business projects, relationships, making money, Live comedy, etc) But until then, the mission continues. idonotconsentform.com

For the past 3.5 years, I've had to sit behind a laptop to fight for this nation's right to refuse experimental drugs. Starting this month, I entered a bootcamp, preparing for the next chapter of my life: full-time evangelism. Today, I'm down 20 pounds of the laptop fat, energy levels are through the roof, I'm waking up before the birds, and a joyous song enters my heart daily. Dear Lord, all that I have been missing out on. But I regret nothing and am glad that God chose me to enlighten this nation of its rights. We shall win at the Supreme Court this fall, and we will win the hearts of this nation back to the Lord this year. It's so great to be an American, where one can simply decide who they want to be and then go be it.

The Ninth Circuit held that a state can require you to inject an experimental drug AND also require you to waive your right to sue if injured by that drug as a condition of engaging in economic activity within the state. Communist leader Leon Trotsky stated that “In a country where the sole employer is the State, opposition means death by slow starvation. The old principle: who does not work shall not eat, has been replaced by a new one: who does not obey shall not eat.” This is the goal of Governor Newsom and the Ninth Circuit: obedience until death.

@radiokevin You sound like the Jerry McGuire movie :) it cometh my friend.

@GodsRiddles Good for you!!... wait am I going to make any money? 😀

@scotus_wire Yes, but she refused to issue a show-cause order permitting the plaintiffs to challenge her opinion before entering it. This fact shows bias.

🚨 A federal judge ruled that President Trump's lawsuit against the IRS lacked a real Article III case or controversy. She also issued sanctions to President Trump's attorneys and invited the case's initial amici and 35 former federal judges to seek reimbursement of their fees.

@johndcoyleesq Good news!

I am honored to have been asked to join the Board of Freedom Counsel. FC is an organization of 300+ attorneys and committed freedom fighters who are on the front lines fighting the legal battles that define our times. I will honor and uphold Warner Mendenhall’s legacy.

The Supreme Court just issued a response in Boysen v. PeaceHealth and held for further review Robert’s v Inslee to answer the specific question of whether states can mandate liability shielded products. I encourage you to read my paper, ‘Access to Courts’ at CovidPenalty.com to understand the history behind the truth of that statement. This case will end all vaccine mandates as we know them because of the liability shield.

Liability shields for vaccine manufacturers place them outside the common law that binds everyone else, which is precisely the feudal structure of legal privilege (privata lex, private law — the etymological root of the word "privilege").

The problem with this judge's opinion is summed up in her one statement, "The Court then appointed amici curiae to assist the Court in identifying the applicable law governing an analysis of its subject matter jurisdiction." Courts CANNOT rely on parties not part of the suit at the pleading stage to resolve the case. Moreover, if the judge was honest, she should have called for the plaintiffs to file a memorandum explaining why she should not recommend sanctions. In effect, the judge has issued an opinion outside due process by permitting only her own voice to be heard on the matter. This is the underpinning of a banana court, where only the judge's voice is heard, and the victims must pay the fine and shut up.

A federal judge has referred members of Trump’s admin and other lawyers for sanctions relating to his IRS lawsuit. First, it is indisputable that Trump was a victim of the IRS improperly disclosing his tax statements. Second, it’s indisputable he holds a right under federal law to sue for that improper disclosure. Third, Supreme Court precedent proves Presidents are bound by law to engage in court cases if sued, so that precedent also extends to the right to sue the executive branch when he is president for damages incurred in his personal capacity. This judge will lose. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

@ValerieAnne1970 Clinics in California are having success in reducing Type II diabetic medication by 50% within 21 days simply by having patients to stop eating after 6 PM daily.

The medical establishment is BURYING a proven cure for diabetes, heart disease, and mental illness! Why aren’t we talking about this? Investigative journalist Nina Teicholz, PhD shares evidence from multiple randomized clinical trials showing a dramatically low-carb diet can REVERSE devastating chronic diseases — in WEEKS, not years. The data is staggering: • Reverse Type 2 Diabetes: Participants reversed their T2D within 10 weeks — including those who had it for an average of eight years. • Reverse Hypertension & Cardiovascular Risk: The vast majority of cardiovascular risk factors can be reversed. • Transform Mental Health: Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder symptoms can be reversed. Depression and anxiety reduced by 79%. This knowledge has existed for a decade, yet it remains buried. 38 million Americans have Type 2 Diabetes. How many headlines have you seen about reversing it with food? Now think of the thousands of articles pushing drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy. The silence on a nutritional cure is DEAFENING. This is a medical revolution being ignored. The tools for healing are already on our plates.

@KristanHawkins I pray that the Almighty God would fill His church with the power of His Spirit, and that His church would demonstrate that power to the world, so that all would look unto Jesus and believe that He is the Son of God, and that the world would be healed from its fallen state.

At least one Christian is killed every 2 hours somewhere in the world for their faith. Pray for the persecuted church.

The Supreme Court stated that the right to judicial remedy is the "highest and most essential privileges of citizenship" that cannot be taken away, directly or indirectly. States mandating the use of PREP Act countermeasures, such as flu shots, take away that right by imposing penalties because the PREP Act inherently waives the user's right to sue if injured by the product. Thus, the penalty applies to a person who refuses to surrender their constitutional guarantee to seek a remedy if injured by another member of society, and the Supreme Court has held for 180 years that states cannot condition public benefits on such a waiver. I'll report on how the Supreme Court reacts to this issue over the next 4 months; follow to not miss any updates.

NC Appellate Court permits a lawsuit against a person who secretly injected a COVID-19 drug into a student against the parent's wishes. The drug was immune from civil liability under the PREP Act, but the court held that the Act could not preempt the state's constitution against bodily integrity. However, the troubling sign is that the same court held that the Act preempted the state's tort law against battery outside the constitutional claim. This means if a government violates your body via secret injections, you have a cause of action, but if a private member of society does the same thing, you do not. As my paper, 'Right to Access' on CovidPenalty.com informs, no state tort cause of action can be preempted under the PREP Act when the injection is nonconsensual, as such a holding deprives a person of their constitutional guarantee to a judicial remedy. So, the ruling is both good and bad news. Read the ruling here: appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=2&…

@JodiTegeler Covidpenalty.com. TY!

@GodsRiddles Where do you donate?

3.5 years—3 million typed words—16 fed lawsuits—800 plaintiffs—70 defendants—8 states—7 petitions to the Supreme Court for the purpose of protecting this nation from losing its constitutional guarantees. We're at 43 out of 200 ppl donating $100 to win this case-join the fight!

The U.S. Supreme Court just ordered the State of Oregon to inform the Court by what authority it can mandate an investigational drug, such as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, while requiring a person to surrender their right to sue if injured. This case will end all vaccine mandates as we now know them. Details here: covidpenalty.com/wp-content/upl…

Michelle says a COVID vaccine injury ended her dentistry career at 46, forcing her to sell her practice and pay $148,000 for U.S. brain surgery. Now living with severe neurological injuries, she says: "There has been no accountability."