
Goober
182 posts




Not touching over 20k a year at 34 is definitely a very deliberate choice I’m ngl

There are few things economists agree on more than opposing rent control. A survey of top economists found almost universal agreement that rent control: 1. Wouldn't make middle-income Americans better off 2. Would reduce apartment supply 3. Wouldn't reduce income inequality

The European mind cannot comprehend the coexistence of the bakery section with the baked goods aisle.



It’ll be gay marriage next. Then interracial marriage. Then segregated schools. They’re already working on that. Then whites only public spaces. They’ve already re-segregated the federal work force by firing as many Black people as they could.

Not touching over 20k a year at 34 is definitely a very deliberate choice I’m ngl


$10 per push-up or $1 million?


“We've stopped making babies. We've decided that being distracted by a dopamine hit around Candy Crush might be a good way to spend your time. Not if you're a full human," former Sen. Ben Sasse says in an extended interview. cbsn.ws/4cA1Jrp


Two economists just published a mathematical proof that AI will destroy the economy. Not might. Not could. Will — if nothing changes. The paper is called "The AI Layoff Trap." Published March 2, 2026. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Boston University. Peer reviewed. Mathematically modeled. The conclusion is one sentence. "At the limit, firms automate their way to boundless productivity and zero demand." An economy that produces everything. And sells it to nobody. Here is how you get there. A company fires 500 workers and replaces them with AI. A competitor fires 700 to keep up. Another fires 1,000. Every company is behaving rationally. Every company is following the incentives correctly. And every company is building a trap for itself. Because the workers who were fired were also customers. When they lose their jobs faster than the economy can absorb them, they stop spending. Consumer demand falls. Companies respond by cutting costs — which means automating more workers — which means less spending — which means more falling demand — which means more automation. The loop has no natural exit. The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income. Capital income taxes. Worker equity participation. Upskilling programs. Corporate coordination agreements. Every single one failed in the model. The only intervention that worked: a Pigouvian automation tax — a per-task levy charged every time a company replaces a human with AI, forcing them to price in the demand they are destroying before they pull the trigger. No government has implemented this. No major economy is seriously discussing it. Meanwhile the numbers are already tracking the curve. 100,000 tech workers laid off in 2025. 92,000 more in the first months of 2026. Jack Dorsey fired half of Block's workforce and said publicly: "Within the next year, the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion." Nobody is doing anything wrong. Companies are following their incentives perfectly. That is exactly the problem. Rational behavior. At scale. Simultaneously. With no mechanism to stop it. Two economists built the math. The math leads to one place. Source: Falk & Tsoukalas · Wharton School + Boston University · arxiv.org/pdf/2603.20617


There is little to no correlation between how highly students rate their instructor and how well they have learned the subject. Evaluations are influenced by factors unrelated to teaching quality, including instructor gender and course difficulty. Faculty who teach demanding courses may receive lower ratings, not because they teach poorly, but because students conflate challenge with poor instruction. Instructors who inflate grades and reduce rigor tend to be rewarded with higher scores. chronicle.com/article/teachi…



Good morning ☀️😃

Billie Eilish says eating meat is WRONG and people can’t claim to love animals if they eat meat 😳👀







