Andrew.pez

@Drain0h_ @elonmusk Caring about the historical accuracy of a modern movie about sword fighting is gay, I'll give you that one. But I stand by it lmao.

@Goodproppername @elonmusk Hella gay

Chris Nolan desecrated the Odyssey so that he would be eligible for an Academy Award …

@Drain0h_ @elonmusk It's an ancient story thats quite sacred to western civilization. Ppl like you have no respect.

@elonmusk It’s a movie not a history textbook. What a freak

@DavidSteadson @NicHulscher It's a meta-analysis. So shouldn't you be calling the 136 studies bullshit instead of the authors?

@NicHulscher Lol. You just need to read the author list to understand what a dishonest piece of grifting BS this is.

BREAKING: LANDMARK PEER-REVIEWED STUDY FINDS VACCINATION IS A MAJOR RISK FACTOR FOR AUTISM We found 79% of studies evaluating vaccines or their components (107 of 136) reported evidence consistent with a vaccine–autism link. After DECADES of censorship and denial, our 50-page analysis of more than 300 studies provides one of the most comprehensive syntheses to date on the possible causes of autism. The paper is now officially PEER-REVIEWED and PUBLISHED in the Journal of Independent Medicine. Autism’s rise is multifactorial—but routine childhood vaccination emerged as a MAJOR modifiable risk factor within the broader causal framework. We found potential determinants of new-onset autism before age 9 to include: 👵 Older parents (>35 years mother, >40 years father) 👶 Premature delivery (<37 weeks) 🧬 Common genetic variants 🧩 Siblings with autism 🔥 Maternal immune activation 💊 In utero drug exposure ☣️ Environmental toxicants 🦠 Gut–brain axis alterations 💉 Combination routine childhood vaccination Of 136 studies evaluating vaccines or their components: ➡️ 107 (79%) found evidence consistent with a vaccine–autism link ➡️ 29 reported “no association,” yet lacked unvaccinated controls and were riddled with major flaws ➡️ 12 studies comparing fully vaccinated vs. completely unvaccinated children found every time that the unvaccinated had superior overall health outcomes and substantially lower autism risk Biologic mechanisms converged on shared pathways—including immune dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and neuroinflammation—triggered by clustered and early-timed vaccination during critical windows of brain development. By evaluating all known risk factors side by side, this analysis uniquely clarifies the relative contribution of vaccination compared to genetic and environmental domains. No prior review has attempted this integrative scope without excluding positive vaccine-association studies or unvaccinated controls—an essential step in determining whether vaccines truly play a role in autism risk, and if so, how significant that role may be within the broader causal landscape. This publication represents a major breakthrough through the longstanding censorship imposed by the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex on the issue of vaccination and autism. It also marks Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s first major return to the peer-reviewed scientific literature in years—after enduring decades of attacks from the vaccine cartel. CONCLUSION: The totality of evidence supports a multifactorial model of ASD in which genetic predisposition, neuroimmune biology, environmental toxicants, perinatal stressors, and iatrogenic exposures converge to produce the phenotype of a post-encephalitic state. Combination and early-timed routine childhood vaccination represents a significant modifiable risk factor for ASD within a broader multifactorial framework, supported by convergent mechanistic, clinical, and epidemiologic findings, and characterized by intensified use, the clustering of multiple doses during critical neurodevelopmental windows, and the lack of research on the cumulative safety of the full pediatric schedule. @McCulloughFund @P_McCulloughMD @DrAndyWakefield @Honest_Medicine @CPriceRogers @KirstinCosgrove @NathanMeadPhD @BreCraven_PA @MilaLRad

@Stigma9Alpha @mfnprincesa @brndxix The trick is saying that rejecting the premise of the hypothetical means you don't understand it. People who accept this clever critique of female sexual selection are ignoring that the guy on the right probly is the one with the better traits.

It isn’t a trick to use a hypothetical, just because you don’t understand it. As for your hypothetical, hypothetical, you would have to demonstrate that in a meaningful way not just come up with it for the sake of argument. Ignoring it proves the point in this case, as it would with your layered hypothetical.

why do incels on here assume that they have a good personality because they’re ugly

@Stigma9Alpha @mfnprincesa @brndxix *and asked who you'd rather hire

@Stigma9Alpha @mfnprincesa @brndxix I see what ur saying. But it feels like a trick to use a hypothetical to prove a point. If they had an urban looking black dude with good traits and a well dressed white dude with bad traits to prove racism I think men would also ignore the hypothetical.

@Stigma9Alpha @mfnprincesa @brndxix Men also find attractive men more ethical and trustworthy if you look at the studys. This is a rare moment the women on here are correct.

@mfnprincesa @brndxix Can you retards just be honest for two seconds and admit that you can't judge a person's character to save your life? No? I guess we'll keep living in lala land then.

@MadeInHeaven64 @libercarpincho They think attractive men are more ethical and trustworthy. But according to the data so do men lol.

@libercarpincho Obviamente entienden pero se hacen las boludas para echarle la culpa a la incelada

Me destruye ver los citados y respuestas y que la mayoría de las mujeres no entienden lo que es un escenario hipotético y encima cambian el escenario y asumen cosas de la nada desviandose del ejemplo dado. No, nadie está diciendo que todos los hombres que se vean como Joe tengan las características que le asignaron ni que todos los hombres que se vean como Jack tengan las características que le asignaron, solo te están diciendo: "imagínate el siguiente escenario con estas personas que tengan las siguientes características..." Y fallas en imaginarlo 🫠

@Cocholattem @libercarpincho Their instincts are probly closer to reality then a false hypothetical that men think proves a point.

@libercarpincho Me da gracia porque ven al de la izquierda y automáticamente asumen que "seguramente es un mal tipo, algo malo debió hacer"

@savvistrash @RealRaegus @venom1s Everyone says that but it's the opposite if the truth. Lower income is associated with having more kids. And birth rates for ppl married or co-habitating havnt changed since the 80s. The problem is lots of single men have checked out from dating.

@Goodproppername @RealRaegus @venom1s less and less couples are financially stable in their 20s, starting a family when youre living pay check to pay check with your bf/gf is super selfish and would be horrible for the child. its better to have kids in your 30s

Old feminist women with a high body count will see this and get triggered.

@ComicDaveSmith @KonstantinKisin Go fuck yourself.

@KonstantinKisin The only legitimate complaint about having little kids is that it doesn’t last longer.

It's amazing how many people complain about parenting and their kids. Being a dad is literally the best thing in the world.

@447beatss @JeReinforme Theyll always attack you personally but never say youre wrong.

@JeReinforme En vrai les pelos comme ça vous faites honte à la France, t’es un ptn de raciste et en plus pour toi c’est ok de le crier sur les toits en mode c’est un avis comme un autre, t’es juste une grosse victime mdrrr va chialer ailleurs

- Les hommes sont plus dangereux que les femmes. - Les noirs sont plus dangereux que les blancs. - Les musulmans sont plus dangereux que les chrétiens. - Les jeunes hommes sont plus dangereux que les hommes âgés. Toutes ces affirmations relèvent du bon sens et sont vérifiées statistiquement de mille manières. Tout le monde devrait avoir le droit de le penser et de le dire, il s'agit simplement d'avoir un cerveau qui fonctionne.

@mewtwo75 @JeReinforme Why are you so offended by the truth? Theres actually a lot of data on this.

@JeReinforme Et toi t’es une grosse victime fier de l’être et tu ne représente en aucun cas la France ni même les chrétiens au contraire tu fais honte…

@SargonDinkha1 @EdLatimore That's actually a cool idea

@EdLatimore Or the Chrono Keeper. The piece sits outside of the board and allows the player to immediately rewind their last move. One chrono keeper per match. You cannot receive another one.

This chess piece would make the game more annoying, no doubt lol

@RoeRoeBoat @joeroganhq How much have we spent on the middle east in the last decade and how much of that spending was pushed hard by israeli lobbiests and jewish politicians with dual citizenship.

@joeroganhq Or Ukraine or Israel....bro Google is free you can just look up how much we gave them it is nowhere near enough for free healthcare let alone 10x the amount 🤣

Joe Rogan: "I bet if they took all the money from fraud, it would pay for healthcare 10 times over." Shane Gillis: "Or Ukraine, or Israel."

@its__taylor__13 @LibertyCappy Its men keeping you alive. Who do you think keeps the electricity on, builds a roof over your head, keeps water and sewage on. Those jobs are 99% men. Have some respect for someone other than yourself maybe.

@Goodproppername @LibertyCappy I don’t follow men. I respect myself.

Is she right?

@its__taylor__13 @LibertyCappy I think this is something baked into female biology for survival. Find a man who you trust to lead you or find a temperary man for resources and attempt to mate swap later.

@Goodproppername @LibertyCappy If he does have control over you it’s because you don’t respect yourself 🙃

@its__taylor__13 @LibertyCappy Guys who have lots of options have some control over their women because a good guy is less common then a hot girl. If he doesnt have control over you hes probly a beta or not attractive.

@Goodproppername @LibertyCappy Ew, why would she see him that way?

@its__taylor__13 @LibertyCappy Wouldnt the wife be unhappy if she doesnt see her husband as the authority figure?

@LibertyCappy A company is a hierarchy in which your boss is in a superior position. There is no superior position in a marriage.

@TheHeiseR1 @RealSKeshel God doesnt interfere with free will.

@RealSKeshel Why does god need to give "divine nudges"?. Why doesn't god simply change the mother's mind? Is he not all-powerful? Could the mother's decision to abort her baby not be a "divine nudge" as well? :/

Only an evil person would watch a child do this and not realize it was a Divine nudge. The first being to recognize Christ was an unborn baby who came to be called John the Baptist - see Luke 1:41-44