@veilandkeys @BaptistClips Last time I checked there's no fixed amount for donations
English
Gospel Logic
569 posts
Gospel Logic
@GospelLogic
🔬 Faith through Logic: Science, history & Scripture prove the Gospel. Apologist | Speaker | 1 Peter 3:15. Think. Believe. Defend. #ChristianApologetics
Nigeria, Africa Katılım Ekim 2025
253 Takip Edilen45 Takipçiler
@BaptistClips It’s for donation not purchasing a baptism. You can visit the website yourself.
Does your pastor not accept donations? He is just independently wealthy?
English
So Orthodox need to pay $$$ to buy a wizard outfit and graven images to complete their sacraments and obtain "salvation" ?
bruv 💀
Jay Dyer@JayDyer
Protestants are making a nothingburger out of a minimal fee many Greek Churches have because baptisms are usually large celebrations, not empty “symbols.” This covers baptismal robe, candles, perhaps icons, and the celebration feast after. Many churches simply ask for a donation. This is nothing, btw, compared to most fundie churches which demand 10% tithe whereas most orthodox churches leave it all voluntary. This is just more ignorant moral gotchas because they have no intellectual arguments for their sects.
English
@JayDyer You tried that and it didn't work, you now want to play the devil's advocate...
English
Telling Avery and IP they need to apologetics IN the Church is not an attack: it’s the loving action since it’s for their good and not based on respecting men, but putting what is right first and foremost. If I was needing clicks, I wouldn’t risk offending them: I would play the nice ecumenist for the broadest appeal.
English
@Kaysuede @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill They were all called a kingdom of priests (Ex 19:6) and the Levitical priesthood was instituted later as judgment (Ex 32). Both are true, universal priesthood is the design, the mediating caste is the curse.
English
@GospelLogic @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill So, yes they were all called priests or no, they weren’t all called priests?
English
Dear Muslims;
I hate heretical modern evangelicalism as much as you do.
Some advice debating them, just bring up church history and the origin of their self interpreted version of Christianity and they’ll fold.
It’s never been so easy in 2026.
English
@C2Antiquity drawing images of white men and worshiping them..
ewww
English
I won’t lie and call Protestants and Catholics my brothers, but I would love for you to enter Christs church and for you to become my brothers!
English
English
English
For all those who say…
“BuT tHe BiBLe WaS wRiTtEn By JeWs!”
This is how Christians should respond.
English
@Kaysuede @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill Exodus 19:6 is God's covenantal design for all Israel, fulfilled in the Church. The Levitical caste was a post-golden-calf judgment (Ex 32:29) for their failure. In Christ, that curse is reversed; the mediating caste is abolished. You're defending a punishment, not the promise.
English
@GospelLogic @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill Were the Israelites all priests or was it just the levites?
English
@Kaysuede @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill Yes, Exodus 19:6 calls Israel a "kingdom of priests" a corporate, non-sacerdotal priesthood. That's precisely my point. Peter applies it to all believers (1 Pet 2:9). You've just nuked your own clerical caste. The whole Church is priestly; no separate episcopate required.
English
@GospelLogic @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill You don’t know what a concession is because you’re too stupid to comprehend. In Exodus 19:5, were they called a Nation of priests, yes or no?
English
English
@GospelLogic @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill How do you have a friggin shadow in a covenant decree stupid? Do you understand when God is making a revelation of a covenant, the typology or shadow claim is not rendered? You have no idea what you’re talking about. Hey dummy does it it call the priests haLevi’im haKohanim?
English
@Kaysuede @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill David's greater Son holds it permanently (Ps 110:4). You can't read typology to save your soul.
English
@Kaysuede @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill The shadow isn't the decree itself but the Levitical institution it established, which Hebrews 10:1 explicitly calls a skian (shadow) of things to come. The covenant decree promises the priesthood's telos is fulfilled in Christ, not your bearded LARPers.
English
@Kaysuede @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill Track this: the plural Levitical priesthood was a shadow-type abolished at the cross (Heb 7:12). Its fulfillment is the laos, the royal priesthood of all believers (1 Pet 2:5,9). You've resurrected what Christ buried.
Orthodoxy is Anti-Christ
English
@GospelLogic @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill Oh my goodness you really can’t track. The argument isn’t whether Jesus is both the Davidiv King & Melchizedekian priest. The PRIESTHOOD is plural, not singular. The Melchizedek priest is singular Person. haLevi’im haKohanim is plural, which connote to a group of ppl.
English
@Kaysuede @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill "syntax refutes you" but provide zero syntactical analysis, just naked assertion. Christ's dual office as King-Priest is explicit in Zech 6:13. Your perpetual Levitical plural finds its fulfillment not in a sacerdotal caste, but in the royal priesthood of believers (1 Pet 2:9)
English
@GospelLogic @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill You have absolutely no idea what you’re doing. The syntax absolutely refutes your claim
English
@Kaysuede @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill you dumb? You just conceded my point. Israel was called a "kingdom of priests" (Ex 19:6) before the Aaronic priesthood, meaning corporate priesthood is the original, not the exception. Peter applies this to the whole Church (1 Pet 2:9). You've exegeted yourself into a corne
English
@GospelLogic @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill You apparently can’t track to save your life. This refutes your assertion you tried to do with stating that somehow, we are all priests. The point is that we don’t all have that office of priesthood, that you’re taking Heb out of context since Israel were also called priests too
English
@Kaysuede @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill this kid thinks he knows shit.
you argument as been, "Bishops are the christs of this world, we must follow them without question"
retarded gardage
English
@GospelLogic @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill You apparently don’t know how to track logically. Pay attention
English
@JayDyer You don’t get to cry “80IQ pearl clutching” after publicly cheering a guy who doxxes Christians, threatens them, and slanders their wives. If your issue was merely protestants, you wouldn’t be applauding jihadist attacks on fellow Christians just to score points for Orthodoxy.
English
@Kaysuede @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill The condition is explicit: "If you obey My covenant" (Ex 19:5). They broke it at Sinai. The Aaronic priesthood was installed after that breach as a curse, not a blueprint. Christ's Melchizedekian priesthood is unconditional, once-for-all, and nontransferable.
English
@GospelLogic @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill Oh my goodness, you’re quite literally slow. Explain what you mean by it being conditional. You’re not understanding the objection, that w/e the nature of the priesthood is, that also would be the high priest as well
English
@Kaysuede @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill Jer 33:17-22: singular "David" (Messiah) sits on throne, plural "Levitical priests" offer sacrifice. But Christ *is* both, Davidic King and Melchizedek Priest (Zech 6:13, Heb 7). Your Levitical plural is fulfilled typologically in the royal priesthood of all believers (1 Pet 2:9)
English
@GospelLogic @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill You’re an idiot. Jeremiah uses singular grammar for the Messiah and plural grammar for the priesthood.
If they were the same identity, the Hebrew would not distinguish them by number, noun class, and covenant object. You quite literally can’t read. Prove syntactically then
English
@ImThaCreator @ApostateProphet @JoelWebbon Well Luke claims he copied from eye witnesses who are Jews
English
@CertainSpeaks @GodLogic_GL I watched this I can say for sure you edited this, significantly...
And you still don't look good in this clip either, despite the editing
English
Lets watch @GodLogic_GL feign ignorance and go adhominum after rage booting me off the mic for debunking the Trinity in his stream.
English
@Kaysuede @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill Ex 19:6 is conditional "if you obey my covenant" and they broke it with the golden calf. Then came a separate Aaronic caste. 1 Peter 2:9 applies the fulfillment to the Church unconditionally. You're arguing from type to antitype backward. The shadow doesn't nullify the substance.
English
@GospelLogic @Dgeologist1 @patristicpill Also 1 Pet 2:9 doesn’t help you because Israel were called a nation of priests in Exodus 19:6, but guess what the whole nation weren’t? Priests.
English