Gov Deeply

9.4K posts

Gov Deeply banner
Gov Deeply

Gov Deeply

@GovDeeply

https://t.co/64Vz2dKnWq: learn more about the people and organizations reinventing government (DOGE & beyond) towards a new era of freedom, prosperity and health.

Katılım Temmuz 2024
3.1K Takip Edilen610 Takipçiler
Gov Deeply
Gov Deeply@GovDeeply·
@IanBaer @xwanyex But that's the fault of the left! - anti-American propaganda - making it harder to succeed via overregulation etc.
English
0
0
1
25
Ian
Ian@IanBaer·
@xwanyex That defense is conditional on their status being perceived as temporary, and many young people do not perceive it that way.
English
2
0
2
450
wanye
wanye@xwanyex·
The idea that a poor person with nothing to personally gain in the short term would defend a rich person’s right to freedom and autonomy is a fundamentally American worldview and one that is not at all well distributed throughout the world. To the extent that we invite the world to this country, we will lose this. And we will miss it.
Rushi@rushicrypto

“tax the rich” offends too many people in a country where 82% of adults make less than $100k a year

English
33
83
1.6K
28.3K
Gov Deeply
Gov Deeply@GovDeeply·
@xwanyex And it's also a rational view in America. Ordinary working class voters can become 'rich' even if that's just being able to afford a nice boat, a small cabin on a lake, an RV and early retirement, etc. Many ways to succeed; many definitions of success.
English
0
2
9
169
Gov Deeply
Gov Deeply@GovDeeply·
@scottmcnealy +1 Once upon a time, tax-breaks for non-profits may have been fine. But that's been weaponized against ordinary Americans. End it.
English
0
0
0
5
Gov Deeply
Gov Deeply@GovDeeply·
@JohnStrandUSA Deport: yes. Zero low quality immigrants? Of course. Zero immigration? Dumb. As a proposal for moving the Overton Window? *shrug* But if you sincerely believe it, then I suggest you don't understand the reality of competitive advantage.
English
0
0
0
8
John Strand
John Strand@JohnStrandUSA·
Mass immigration has been a scam on the American people. When I am in Congress, I will propose the 20/20 Sovereignty Act: 20 years of zero immigration. 20 million deportations. No exceptions. No excuses. It’s time for change.
English
272
884
4.1K
39.4K
Gov Deeply
Gov Deeply@GovDeeply·
@relax_carlos @RobertJSalvador 1. sample thread: x.com/BenSchifman/st… 2. generators etc. are already regulated! If there are legit pollutions issues, best to address those separately not hold data centers hostage. Construction jobs & local taxes will be good for the community.
Ben Schifman@BenSchifman

Narrative violation: with the right policy, new data centers can *lower* electricity prices by spreading the fixed costs of the grid out among more paying customers.

English
0
0
0
23
Carlos Safety
Carlos Safety@relax_carlos·
@GovDeeply @RobertJSalvador 1. Okay, show me an example of that happening. I think it can happen but we need good policy to make it happen. 2. Sharp limits on PFAS and other carcinogens in the water and air, and any on-site power generation needs reasonable pollution controls. That seem fair?
English
1
0
0
12
Robert J Salvador
Robert J Salvador@RobertJSalvador·
These things are unequivocally true: - The AI race is National Security. - The AI winner becomes the global leader of Drones, Space, Energy, Economy (kind of important) - Data centers are not a new invention (you’re posting on an app used by one). - Each one creates thousands of US construction jobs (LOL if you say temp jobs; you don’t understand the AEC industry) - The inference created by data centers powers billions in GDP per data center (Yes billions). - They re-use water via closed loop systems (golf courses use more water). - Long term they’ll improve the electrical grid by investing in it (See Trump’s AI framework) - Amazon warehouse level tax revenue for local economies (AOC hates it). - The loudest haters are: Bloggers, Liberals, NeverTrumpers (all 0 experience in tech) - The biggest supporters are: Trump, Tech builders, Construction workers (see the irony here?) - Data centers are railroad tracks during the Industrial Revolution (imagine if the USA banned railroads then 🤯) - AI is the modern Industrial Revolution (if you’re against it, you’re helping China). Period.
English
75
101
465
17.3K
Gov Deeply
Gov Deeply@GovDeeply·
@relax_carlos @RobertJSalvador 1. Mostly a good attitude, and most data center projects will lower elec bills somewhat by absorbing infrastructure cost. 2. 'no pollution' is silly. Much of our daily activity causes some pollution.
English
1
0
0
5
Carlos Safety
Carlos Safety@relax_carlos·
@RobertJSalvador If a data center opens in my town and my electricity prices don’t go up and my water pressure stays the same and there’s no pollution, I am 110% in favor.
English
2
0
0
33
Cynical Publius
Cynical Publius@CynicalPublius·
In 1954, Brown v. Board of Education ended "separate but equal" in American public schools. In 2026, Louisiana v. Callais ended "separate but equal" in American legislative districts. Black voters will no longer be ghettoized into artificial, concentrated districts so that their concerns can be ignored in the rest of a state. Louisiana v. Callais ended voting apartheid and restored full voting power to black Americans. It's one of the greatest anti-racist decisions in SCOTUS history.
English
116
1.6K
7.1K
77.2K
Gov Deeply
Gov Deeply@GovDeeply·
@JTLonsdale The left pushed a society where everyone goes to college, and 'smarter' people are 'better' than others. But that's nonsense. IQ and morality are separate. We should affirm human dignity at any IQ, and insist on high standards of morality at any IQ.
English
0
0
3
42
Joe Lonsdale
Joe Lonsdale@JTLonsdale·
As a lot of people might see and misunderstand: this doesn’t mean we shouldn’t fight to create opportunity for all, especially inner cities and communities in need. Doesn’t mean discrimination doesn’t exist for some, or wasn’t worse in the past. But reality matters for policy!
English
13
11
307
17K
Joe Lonsdale
Joe Lonsdale@JTLonsdale·
You probably need an IQ over ~105 to understand this… This statistical reality puts to bed 98% of the race-grifting philosophy of the D party, and their allies in fake “studies” humanities courses. Sadly, the politicians and profs are mostly too dumb or too unethical to agree.
John Rain@johnthenoticer

In the United States, white people earn significantly more than black people on average. But as soon as you compare blacks and whites with the same IQ, that gap disappears like magic... This is one of the clearest pieces of evidence that systemic racism isn't what's driving the raw overall income disparity between the two groups.

English
116
497
6K
777.1K
Kevin Briggins
Kevin Briggins@KJBrigg·
To summarize what's happening in America: The era of unconstitutional special privileges and considerations put in place for black people following the unjust Jim Crow era has come to an end. We are entering the age of equality under the law. America has spent six decades with laws and practices that gave black Americans advantages in higher education, hiring, federal contracts, business loans, and special protected voting districts. By ruling on affirmative action and now the Voting Rights Act, the Supreme Court has decided that the age of racial preferences and protections is over. Honestly, I believe these policies have hindered the black community. It has been shown that people will meet the standards you hold them to. I believe this is true for black Americans. We will adjust and if Harvard is the goal for our children then we will ensure they shoot for the same standards and is as competitive as anyone else. Black Americans are no longer "bootless," if we ever were. The vast majority are above the poverty line and we have reached the pinnacle of every industry in this country, including the office of President. It's time to remove the crutch and treat black Americans as equal citizens made in the image of God who are capable of achieving like any other group.
English
64
247
1.4K
93.1K
Gov Deeply
Gov Deeply@GovDeeply·
@SigPi_ @glukianoff @Google Time, place & manner. They don't have a legal right to disrupt, which is exactly why they can and should be removed by force. First Amendment: peaceably assemble. Not riotously assemble.
English
0
0
3
72
Greg Lukianoff
Greg Lukianoff@glukianoff·
.@Google's chief scientist and lead for Gemini AI came to UC Berkeley to give a scientific lecture on modern AI research. He wasn’t there to debate Gaza or Google contracts, but protesters disrupted the event anyway, and within 10 minutes, it was shut down.
English
63
198
2.6K
312.1K
Gov Deeply
Gov Deeply@GovDeeply·
> Pretending the rest of the world solved healthcare because they slapped the word “universal” on a rationing scheme is not analysis. Fact check: true. Of course the US healthcare system needs lots of work. But the left has the wrong diagnosis and therefore the wrong cure.
Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA@DrDiGiorgio

This is the ultimate midwit healthcare take. No, 32 countries have not “figured out” universal healthcare. The UK has “free” healthcare, and roughly 1 in 3 cancer patients in England still fail to start treatment within 62 days of urgent referral. Canada has “free” healthcare, and the median wait for neurosurgical treatment is around a year. Australia has “free” healthcare, and over half the country still buys private insurance despite paying for a public universal system with their taxes. Switzerland has universal coverage, because residents are required to buy private insurance. There is no government system where benevolent bureaucrats tuck you in at night with a warm blanket and an MRI appointment. The actual lesson from other wealthy countries is not “they figured it out.” America’s system has huge problems. Our prices are insane, insurance markets are distorted, and hospital systems are cartelized. Our regulations make care more expensive than it needs to be. Yet we still guarantee access to even the 8% who don’t have coverage. We give easy routes to qualify for medicaid for those with disabilities. Pretending the rest of the world solved healthcare because they slapped the word “universal” on a rationing scheme is not analysis. It is bumper sticker policy for people who think access means having a card in your wallet while you wait a year to see the doctor you need.

English
0
0
0
17
Gov Deeply
Gov Deeply@GovDeeply·
@AGZC6 @PincherMartin8 You're ignoring the context of the time, and looking backwards based on what we know now rather than what was clear then. Has nothing to do with him winning a landslide; has everything to do with turning the country around after Carter malaise, winning the Cold War, etc.
English
0
0
0
17
Pincher Martin
Pincher Martin@PincherMartin8·
Older Reaganite Republicans need to understand that they were wrong on immigration. Not just wrong, but stupid. It is an important issue, more important than any issue they think about regularly. In 1980, there were two issues that defined the new Republican Party. You couldn't be soft on the Soviets and you had to be for lower taxes. Everything else at the time was negotiable. Yes, even abortion (some 30% of Republican lawmakers at the time were pro-choice). The Reaganites were willing to have a big tent, but not at the expense of either being soft on the Soviets or not lowering taxes. Liberal Republicans took note and either left the party or adapted. The new GOP must define immigration restriction as one of the core tenets of the new party. It's more important than Iran, NATO, lowering taxes, etc. If you're not for immigration restrictionism, you shouldn't be a Republican.
🐺@LeighWolf

I cannot believe we have a major political party that is debating whether or not non-citizens should be allowed to vote. If we're allowing foreign nationals to vote, what's the point of being a citizen?

English
12
104
802
15.6K
Gov Deeply
Gov Deeply@GovDeeply·
@Fotouhia Long form is good -- but please consider posting shorter summaries too.
English
0
0
1
19
Payam Fotouhiyehpour
Payam Fotouhiyehpour@Fotouhia·
Most people outside Iran only know the Pahlavi era through decades of propaganda: "dictatorship," "overthrown democracy," "inevitable revolution." My new long-form article cuts through that noise and shows what actually happened: how the Pahlavi dynasty built the modern Iranian state, challenged clerical power, advanced women’s citizenship, carried out land reform, and protected Iran from Soviet and feudal threats. It’s not nostalgia; it’s history that explains why those foundations still matter for any future secular democracy in Iran. If you have non-Iranian friends, colleagues, academics, journalists, or anyone in your network who is genuinely interested in understanding Iran’s 20th-century transformation (beyond the usual slogans), please share this with them. The real story deserves a wider audience. 🙏
Payam Fotouhiyehpour@Fotouhia

x.com/i/article/2051…

Alderwood Manor, WA 🇺🇸 English
31
533
1.3K
29.8K
Gov Deeply
Gov Deeply@GovDeeply·
@hgurdon And: most who are pushing the creedal line don't actually accept the full creed. Would be great for those who reject the 1st & 2nd Amendments to kindly self-deport, no matter how long their ancestors have been in this country.
English
0
0
0
27
Hugo Gurdon
Hugo Gurdon@hgurdon·
The problem with calling America a creedal nation is that the facile phrase has come to imply that we are ONLY a credal nation, a nation without ethnic roots. But it is not so. America’s ethnic roots as well as its creed are English, and the country damages itself by forgetting or actively expunging that fact, as so many do. Anyone may become an American but to be fully rather than merely legally American they need to adopt the culture derived from America’s English origins, which gave Americans for generations their character. The restraint in the Constitution is derived from English-American culture and character and if we want to keep the republic, we need to retain those things. washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/454696…
David French@DavidAFrench

"And we’re a creedal nation, right, David? I mean, we don’t share a religion, we don’t share a race, we share an idea, OK? And that idea has to be passed down generation to generation through history, as we discussed." Justice Gorsuch with thoughts on our liberal founding, from my interview about his new book: nytimes.com/2026/05/06/opi…

English
5
10
58
4.1K
Gov Deeply
Gov Deeply@GovDeeply·
@BjornLomborg You’ve been a voice of reason for so long. Worth a celebration.
English
0
0
1
64
Gov Deeply
Gov Deeply@GovDeeply·
@wil_da_beast630 @instapundit > On the right and hard-center Good phrase. We need people who consider themselves centrists to deal with some very hard truths. Put differences aside to reclaim our country. Then we can go back to reasonable disagreement about other issues.
English
0
2
18
1.1K
Wilfred Reilly
Wilfred Reilly@wil_da_beast630·
This fire had nothing to do with "the complications of climate change," etc. A fucking left-wing terrorist set it. On the right and hard-center, we need to OWN the frame on crime, migration, welfare, and fraud. Enough of these endless "root causes" distractions. Who cares if it's .6% (I looked) more dry? WE CAUGHT THE ADULT MALE FELON WHO SET THE FIRE!!!
Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼@DrewPavlou

Palisades Fire ends up being one of the most destructive acts of left wing terrorism in modern history. The arsonist Rinderknecht searched “free Luigi Mangione,” “let’s take down all the billionaires” and “let’s kill all the billionaires” before setting the Lachman Fire which ultimately ignored the Palisades conflagration 12 killed, 6,800 homes destroyed

English
41
403
2.4K
166K