Lady Cussalot

@PamelaNTenn @RealCandaceO And yet, here you are!

For clarity, my family absolutely does NOT own 1 million dollar in cars, nor do we own a black TRX pick-up truck. This is categorically false. Nonetheless, Laura Loomer just accurately doxxed my personal car, (a new range rover my husband bought me for my birthday after 7 years of marriage), as well as our family car that we use to drive the kids in. We just received a tip that she is allegedly pulling personal informationvia her soon to be husband. Allegedly, Loomer's husband, who goes by "Jake" at work, is the IT guy for Tameron Auto (owned by Cannon) in Pensacola, FL. The person is alleging that Laura encouraged him to break the law on her behalf, violating the Driver Privacy Protection Act (DPPA) and pulling personal information (home details, financing details, etc) so she can go after her enemies. They claim Andrew "Jacob" Simpson is using his employer's dealer accounts to access personal information regarding LLCS, which would include the new LLC that we used to purchase that car in. They claim the minority partner in Tameron/Cannon Auto has shared the video of Jake & Larry at the White House Hannukah event getting congratulations from Trump on their engagement. He allegedly tells “Jake” to bring that video to all the meetings and share it. If this is true and Laura is using her fiancé to hack user data with the express goal of stalking her adversaries, it is a crime. And a very serious one on that. @AnaKasparian it may have been how she hacked personal information about your husband’s job as well. Car dealers have access to everything you might fill out to get a car— which includes banking information.

I still cannot believe that Erika Kirk actually dressed as an assassin to tell us she isn’t one.

@LauraLoomer @AbdulElSayed x.com/EvanAKilgore/s…

During his rally in Michigan this weekend, Democrat Muslim Michigan US Senate candidate @AbdulElSayed praised pro-Hamas Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib. It’s imperative Michigan voters vote against these jihadist candidates who support Islamic terrorism.

Gas prices are at crazy levels--fire Obama!

@CinemaShogun MERCH, my bitch.

Candace Owens wears shirts with her name and face on them. She drinks from a cup with her name and face on it. She works on a computer with stickers of her face on it. What would you call this?

@DavidFischer @grok 1. Love one another. 2. Go out and spread the Good News to the ends of the earth.

Hey @Grok, according to the Bible, what are the top two things that Jesus called His followers to do? Be concise.

@paramounttactcl Bro... the Op is YOU GUYS!

Of course they want to start a third party. It would ensure Republicans never win an election and leftists take over this country permanently. See the op yet?

Scripture calls us to: - Judge rightly inside the church (1 Cor. 5:12). - Pursue restoration through private confrontation, witnesses, and finally the assembly (Matt. 18:15-20). - Guard the Lord's Supper for those walking in faith and repentance. - Speak truth in love, even when it costs cultural influence. Candace's recent confirmation does not erase the need for her (or any public Christian) to heed the full counsel of God on the tongue, justice, love of neighbor, and fleeing conspiratorial spirits (Prov. 6:16-19; James 3; etc.). If her words qualify as the slander Paul names, faithful churches should address it directly rather than platform or confirm without repentance. Pray for all who name Christ - Protestant, Catholic, or otherwise - that the Spirit would bring true reformation.

The scriptures give us clear instructions on how someone like Candace Owens ought to be dealt with: "But now I am writing to you that you must not associate with anyone who claims to be a brother or sister but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or slanderer, a drunkard or swindler. Do not even eat with such people. What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? God will judge those outside. “Expel the wicked person from among you.” 1 Cor 11:13 Yet in her Catholic church, rather than being expelled and dissasociated from, she is being confirmed and welcomed.

@LemmeReact No sir. Leave them alone. They did their duty and the world murdered him. If I were them, I would be so done with this world - to put it lightly.

Where are Charlie Kirk’s parents? I genuinely feel bad for what they’ve had to endure, But if your kid gets murdered on live TV, it is your duty to stand up for them and speak the TRUTH where there is confusion/questions. We have NO IDEA whatsoever what they think about Erika, who took him out, etc. We need answers.

This actually doesn't really make sense if you understand just the basics of the faith itself. The Catholic Church doesn't claim they wrote the bible at all; the entire point is that it was given to and written by the Jews, and then fulfilled in Christ alone. The Catholic church is the "mother" church, if you will. They aren't perfect (I am not Catholic) but if the Truth is a 12-piece pie, the Catholics hold about 6 pieces of said pie. Part of the issue is that people keep misunderstanding context. This has been true since Jesus walked the earth, and that is exactly when the divide started. Jesus did not do as the Jews thought He should, because He came to FULFILL all of the law that the Lord had given to man through the Jews. ^^ That is the crux. So, the power went from the Jewish people to CHRIST ALONE, and the religious refused to accept that He was the savior even though it is their own people who spelled out EXACTLY what the Savior would look like and do - which Christ did. Since that time, the Jews have persisted in worshipping a God through a religion that Christ fulfilled... but they won't accept their own Messiah. They keep looking for a future one, while their God has already sent Him. So they are in a precarious situation. They don't understand that the promises God promised to Abraham go to THOSE IN CHRIST. That includes anyone of any race or creed. If you accept Christ, you are adopted as Abraham's seed - because of and in CHRIST. In the last 200 years, Christians have been fed false doctrine so that they are bewitched while Israel uses false doctrine to claim land that was never the point or content of the promise. Right now, a lot of Christians are waking up to that bewitching, and coming to understand why the Catholic church maintains that the Jews of today are not promised land from God. They were given Christ as their inheritance and they reject Him and seek LAND instead... that is depraved/without God. But they, and anyone, is still always welcome. I think Christ actually delays His return so more and more can be saved.

Jews wrote the Bible, but the Roman Cathokic Church wants all the credit. Why is that?

We know because of its self-authenticating nature and the internal testimony of the Holy Spirit. The Bible does not depend on external human validation to be true any more than light needs a flashlight to prove it shines. Consider: Unity amid diversity: Written over 1,500+ years by dozens of authors in different languages, cultures, and situations, yet it tells one unfolding covenantal story centered on Christ. The OT points forward to Him (John 5:46; Luke 24:27); the NT reveals Him as the fulfillment. This is not the product of later conspiracy but divine super-intendance. Transforming power: It confronts human sin, offers real forgiveness and new life in Christ, and has reshaped individuals, families, and societies wherever faithfully received. No merely human book does this across centuries. Historical reliability: The Scriptures align with what we know from archaeology, manuscript evidence, and eyewitness testimony far better than skeptical reconstructions allow. The early church suffered and died for this message, not fabricated legends added centuries later. Christ's own view: Jesus treated the OT as unbreakable Scripture and promised the Spirit would guide the apostles into all truth (John 16). The NT is the apostolic deposit of that. Skeptics often assume a naturalistic view: "Humans made it up, so later humans could unmake it." But if the triune God exists, as the Bible everywhere assumes and demonstrates, then He is sovereign over history, inspiration, and canonization. The same God who created the world, parted the sea, raised Christ, and builds His church also preserved His Word. Doubting the canon while claiming to respect Jesus is inconsistent; He quoted and fulfilled Scripture as God's Word. Test all things by Scripture itself!! If you're wrestling with these questions, the answer is not endless skepticism but coming to the Scriptures with an open heart, asking the Spirit who authored them to illumine them. Read them as one story, from creation to new creation, centered on Christ the King. The Bible is not a fragile human document vulnerable to later tampering, it is the living and active sword of the Spirit (Heb. 4:12).

Such a great question!! The canon of Scripture is not a later "scholarly editing project" where fallible men arbitrarily picked and chose what to keep or discard centuries after the fact. This common skeptical framing misunderstands how God has preserved and recognized His own Word through His people. The Bible is the self-attesting, inspired Word of the living God; breathed out by the Holy Spirit through human authors (2 Tim. 3:16-17), coherent from Genesis to Revelation as one story of creation, fall, redemption, and consummation in Christ. The process of recognizing the canon (the books God gave as His authoritative Word) was not "deciding which books were just made up." Early Christians and Jews did not sit down like a modern editorial board and vote books in or out on a whim. Instead, the church recognized what God had already given through the prophets, apostles, and their close associates. The Old Testament canon was largely settled among the Jews long before Christ (as Jesus Himself treated "the Law and the Prophets and the Psalms" as authoritative Scripture, Luke 24:44). The New Testament books were written by apostles or those in their immediate circle, circulated, read in the churches, and received as God's voice because they carried apostolic authority, consistency with prior revelation, and the witness of the Spirit in God's people. What are sometimes called the "removed" books (various Apocrypha/Deuterocanonical writings) were never part of the core Hebrew canon accepted by Jesus and the apostles. They were useful for historical or devotional reading in some traditions, but the Reformed and broader Protestant churches have consistently followed the Jewish canon for the Old Testament, as did many early church fathers. These books contain historical value but also doctrinal and historical inaccuracies that set them apart from the inspired Scriptures. The church did not "ban" them to hide truth but discerned what bore the marks of divine inspiration: prophetic/apostolic origin, doctrinal harmony with the rest of Scripture, and widespread recognition by the covenant community. God did not lose control of His Word. But the question really is, how do we know the whole Bible isn't fabricated? (Con't)

If Biblical scholars hundreds of years after the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ can decide which books of the Bible were "just made up" and removed them from the texts so that we can't learn from them, then how do we know that the entire Bible isn't "just made up"? It's a fair and honest question. Insults will not be tolerated, this is a post for discussion.

Yes, according to the Bible and basic genetics, all humans descend from Adam and Eve. Two people carrying a rich genetic pool (especially with the long lifespans and close intermarriage in the early generations) can produce enormous variety in skin tone, hair, eye color, and facial features within just a few generations. After the Flood and especially after Babel (when God scattered the nations and confused the languages), groups became isolated and certain traits became dominant in different populations. That’s exactly how we see “races” (people groups) develop. This isn’t “white women having black babies randomly.” It’s basic biology + biblical history. Modern genetics has confirmed a single recent origin for all humanity (one mitochondrial “Eve,” one Y-chromosomal “Adam” in the human lineage), even if the secular dates are off. You can flip me off and mock it if you want. But the Bible is consistent from Genesis to Revelation: one human race, fallen in Adam, redeemable in Christ. All ethnicities come from the same original parents, which is why the gospel is for every tribe, tongue, and nation. The mockery doesn’t change the text. The offer still stands: come to the Jewish Messiah who saves sinners from every background. Door’s open.

@GracesSpade @JesusisChristX Yep white women had black babies, black women had asian babies, asian women had white babies, we're all somehow descended from the same person. 🖕 Seriously. Fuck off.

Jews and Christians do not worship the same God. Do you agree with me?

For a small mind, sure. That’s the cartoon version skeptics like to mock. The Bible presents it as deadly serious history: It wasn’t just “a talking snake.” It was Satan appearing in the form of a serpent (Revelation 12:9 calls him “that ancient serpent, who is called the devil and Satan”). It wasn’t a “magical apple.” The text simply says “fruit” from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. The type of fruit is irrelevant. What mattered was that God had clearly forbidden it. This account explains the most important realities in the world: Where sin, death, suffering, and evil came from. Why the creation is cursed and broken. Why every human being is born with a bent toward rebellion against God. And most importantly - the very first promise of the gospel: the Seed of the woman would one day crush the serpent’s head (Genesis 3:15). You can reduce it to “talking snake and magic fruit” if you want the cheap mockery version. But that doesn’t explain why this story has shaped human history, morality, law, and hope for thousands of years. It doesn’t explain why Jesus and the apostles treated it as literal history. The story is about rebellion against the Creator and the catastrophic consequences that followed - followed immediately by God’s promise of redemption. You’re welcome to keep laughing at the Sunday School cartoon version. But if you ever want to talk about what the text actually says and why it matters, I’m still here. The door remains open.

@GracesSpade @JesusisChristX So the story is about a talking snake and a magical apple. Gotcha. Seriously. Sod off. I'm done with this nonsense.

Aaaand this is the Gap Theory (or “ruin-reconstruction” theory), and it doesn’t hold up under the Hebrew text. Genesis 1:2 says: וְהָאָ֗רֶץ הָיְתָ֥ה תֹ֙הוּ֙ וָבֹ֔הוּ (weha’aretz hayetah tohu wabohu) Hayetah (הָיְתָה) is the normal way to say “was” in a circumstantial clause. It is not the normal way to say “became” after a previous creation and catastrophe. Hebrew grammarians across the board (including those who aren’t young-earth) recognize Genesis 1:2 as describing the initial unformed state of the earth right after the summary statement in 1:1, not a later ruined condition. Tohu wabohu (“formless and void” / “waste and empty”) describes raw, unformed material - like clay before the potter shapes it. It is not the result of a previous judgment or angelic war. The same phrase is used in Jeremiah 4:23 to describe coming judgment on Israel - a reversal back to primeval chaos, not a historical gap. The structure of Genesis 1 is straightforward: Verse 1: God created the heavens and the earth (summary). Verse 2: The earth was initially unformed and empty - then God begins to form and fill it over six days. There is no room in the grammar or the flow of the chapter for millions/billions of years, a pre-Adamic world, or destroyed civilizations between verses 1 and 2. The rest of Scripture treats Adam as the first man and the federal head of the entire human race (Romans 5:12–19; 1 Corinthians 15:22, 45; Acts 17:26). This Gap Theory + Serpent Seed combination is a modern patchwork designed to insert extra races and long ages into the text. The Bible doesn’t support it. Genesis is the account of the creation of the world and the beginning of the human race in Adam and Eve. You’re free to believe otherwise, but it’s not what the Hebrew actually says. The straightforward reading has stood for thousands of years for good reason.

@GracesSpade @JesusisChristX Wrong. Genesis wasn't the start of all things on Earth, it was the start of a new race of people. The real translation of Gen 1:2 isn't "And the earth was without form and void" (nonsense), it's "And the earth had been lain to waste."

This is the classic Serpent Seed teaching, and it’s a serious distortion of the Hebrew text. Genesis 3:13 in the actual Hebrew says: “The serpent deceived me, and I ate.” הִשִּׁיאַ֖נִי (hishshiani) - from the root nasha (נָשָׁא) - means deceived, beguiled, tricked, led astray. It does not mean “seduced sexually” or “had sex with.” That is a forced reinterpretation. וָאֹכֵֽל (va’okhel) - from akal (אָכַל) - simply means “and I ate.” It refers to eating the fruit of the tree, exactly as the whole context of Genesis 3 makes clear. The entire chapter is about the serpent tempting Eve to eat forbidden fruit through deception, not sexual seduction. God immediately curses the serpent for what it did in that conversation, not for some unreported sexual act. The text never hints at sexual relations between Eve and the serpent. This “Eve had sex with Satan and Cain is his literal son” doctrine is not found in the Tanakh, not taught by Jesus, not taught by the apostles, and was rejected by the historic Christian church. It is a fringe teaching that tries to turn spiritual rebellion into a DNA issue. The Bible is clear: Eve is “the mother of all living” (Genesis 3:20). All humans descend from Adam and Eve (Acts 17:26). Cain’s evil came from his own heart and following the way of the devil spiritually (1 John 3:12 - “Cain was of the evil one”). The real battle in Genesis 3:15 is spiritual - between those who belong to Christ (the Seed of the woman) and those who remain in rebellion against God (the seed of the serpent). It is not a literal two-race biology war. You’re welcome to believe this theory, but it’s not what the Hebrew text actually says, and it’s not biblical Christianity. The gospel is for all descendants of Adam - Jew and Gentile, every ethnicity - because we all fell in Adam and can all be saved in the last Adam, Jesus Christ.

@GracesSpade @JesusisChristX And the 2 seedlines is quite literal. "What is this that thou has done? And the woman replied, Satan seduced me, and I did lay with him." Weird how the story changes when you change the translation of 2 little Hebrew words, Nashaw and Awkal, eh?

@isthelenscapoff @JesusisChristX Okay? lol. That has nothing to do with anything. There are Jews all over the world, bro. I know you're scared of them because you are hyper aware of them, but it's okay. I'm not a Jew, I'm not a Fed.

@GracesSpade @JesusisChristX There are racial jews in Italy, actually.

Are you able to converse with people like you have any intelligence? Intelligent people don't call people names while discussing a subject. Intelligent people actually will listen and grow, learning new things with each conversation. Try it some time since you clearly love the feeling of being superior. If you can't just converse, the truth is, you feel angry and bitter and insignificant and powerless... or you wouldn't need to talk to complete strangers the way you do. I mean you are truly pitiful. Are you okay? You seem alone and unloved... As for the actual content of the conversation I am attempting to have with you, despite how embarrassingly childish and inept you are, Your argument here is one of the oldest and weakest objections to the biblical account. It’s easily answered from the text itself. When Cain says, “Whoever finds me will kill me” (Genesis 4:14), he is not talking about some mysterious other race of people outside the garden, lol. He is talking about his own relatives. The Text is Clear: Adam and Eve were the first humans (Genesis 1–2). They had many children. Genesis 5:4 explicitly says after Seth was born, Adam “had other sons and daughters.” By the time Cain murdered Abel (they were both adults, possibly well over 100 years old given the long lifespans before the Flood), the earth was already being populated by their siblings, and those siblings were having children. Cain had every reason to fear vengeance from his own extended family. That’s exactly what God’s response implies when He puts a mark on Cain for protection (Genesis 4:15). The Bible’s Own Testimony: Eve is called “the mother of all living” (Genesis 3:20). “From one man [Adam] he made every nation of men” (Acts 17:26). “Sin entered the world through one man [Adam], and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people” (Romans 5:12). There is no “pre-Adamic race,” no serpent seed biological line, and no mysterious “whoever” people. That idea is a modern invention used to justify racism and deny the unity of the human race. All humans - Black, White, Asian, Jewish, Arab, whatever - descend from Adam and Eve. That’s why the gospel is for all people without exception. That’s why Jesus, the last Adam, can represent and save people from every nation. You keep bringing up these proof-texts, but they don’t hold up when you read the whole chapter and the whole book. The Bible is consistent: one human race, fallen in Adam, redeemable only in Christ. If the CONTEXT is lost on you, then you're just simply lost.

@GracesSpade @JesusisChristX You're such an idiot. All humans are NOT descended from Adam and Eve, and to believe that shows what an imbecile you are. When God cast Cain from the garden for slaying Able, Cain said "...and whoever finds me will kill me." WHO THE FUCK IS "WHOEVER"?????