Andy Diehl, CPA 👨‍💼

7K posts

Andy Diehl, CPA 👨‍💼 banner
Andy Diehl, CPA 👨‍💼

Andy Diehl, CPA 👨‍💼

@Great_One82

2021 Pine Hills 4some member/guest champion 2021 Pine Hills Cup Runner Up

Kohler, WI Katılım Eylül 2009
566 Takip Edilen207 Takipçiler
Andy Diehl, CPA 👨‍💼 retweetledi
Dave Hale - Concerned Republican
Dave Hale - Concerned Republican@CountryFirstRep·
It's time to accept that the resist-libs and never Trump conservatives have been 100% right about the man, since 2015.
English
644
1.4K
11.4K
630.6K
Andy Diehl, CPA 👨‍💼 retweetledi
Andy Diehl, CPA 👨‍💼 retweetledi
ContractorKeith
ContractorKeith@contractorkeith·
Fact: If you pay your house off it’s always paid off. Fact: if you instead put that money into stocks based on “historic data” and the market crashes, you could lose it all, or a big portion. And you would still owe on the house. I will never understand how staying in debt supersedes investment money. Pay off the mortgage then start investing that amount but be debt free. The secure feeling alone is worth it. Plus a paid for home grows in value, can be used as a rental, etc. I am far from Dave Ramsay on debt but if you’ve ever lost everything and been homeless during 2008 or another crash you might know where I am coming from, too many people only look at the last 10-15yrs of data.
Zach Melloh, CFP®@zachmelloh26

Should you pay off your mortgage early or invest instead? A couple recently faced this exact dilemma. They had $180k in cash and a $175k mortgage at 3.1%. Spouse #1: “Let’s just pay it off. I hate debt. I want the house free and clear.” Spouse #2: “No way. Why use cash to eliminate a 3% loan when we could invest it at 7% or more based on historical returns?” Both had valid points. Her math said invest it. His stress levels said pay it off. So they compromised... paid off half, invested half — improving cash flow and keeping their long-term plan on track. This decision isn’t purely financial. It’s emotional, behavioral, and personal. And that’s why this debate will never end. Have you run your numbers on this scenario? (Example is hypothetical and for illustrative purposes only)

English
311
16
582
312.7K
Andy Diehl, CPA 👨‍💼 retweetledi
Acyn
Acyn@Acyn·
Obama: Each day we wake up to some new assault on our democratic institutions. Another setback to the idea of the rule of law. An offense to common decency. Every day you wake up to things you just didn’t think were possible. Each day we’re told by those in high office to fear each other and to turn on each other, and that some Americans count more than others, and that some don’t even count at all. Everywhere we see greed and bigotry being celebrated, and bullying and mockery masquerading as strength. We see science and expertise denigrated, while ignorance and dishonesty and cruelty and corruption are reaping untold rewards. Every single day. We see that, and it’s hard to hope.
English
310
2K
6K
265.5K
Andy Diehl, CPA 👨‍💼 retweetledi
MAGA Cult Slayer🦅🇺🇸
Listen to this foreigner’s recap of Trump‘s world economic forum speech in Davos. “To the Americans that have not lost their sanity, I am so sorry. I hope your democracy survives this mad man…”
English
168
2.4K
7.1K
121.9K
Andy Diehl, CPA 👨‍💼 retweetledi
Lars Christensen
Lars Christensen@MaMoMVPY·
The problem isn't Trump. The problem is the US. When the outside world observes Trump's insane behaviour and his threats against allies, and we at the same time observe that there is no real action from the US public, Congress, the US Supreme Court, or the US media about this insanity, we will all have to conclude that the US accepts this behaviour. The public in the US think the US is entitled to a certain position in the world where there is no room for decent behaviour and where there are no norms and rules. That means that we all have to conclude that the US — not only Trump — has betrayed the international order that the US, with its Western partners, were the main architects of after the Second World War. This is the conclusion that Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney so clearly laid out in his speech at Davos yesterday. We simply cannot trust the US to play by the rules any more. Therefore, we also fundamentally have to ask ourselves — should we trust the financial and economic structure which is an integral part of the global rules-based order? Americans live in the illusion that the US can do everything on its own, despite the fact that the US for nearly 20 years has lived beyond its means. US private and government consumption has been funded by, among others, European central banks and pension funds. But we now have to ask ourselves — why would we trade in dollars? Why would we put our savings into US Treasury bonds? If the US is not a rules-based society, we cannot trust the dollar to be a stable currency, and it would be insane to hold dollars. As domestic US institutions are eroded and governance structures destroyed, the US will be turned into an emerging market economy — or more accurately, a de-merging economy. If the US threatens the territory of allies, then the US acts as an authoritarian bully nation. Nobody in their right mind would lend money to the US government. If the US doesn't live up to its international obligations and respect the sovereignty of other nations, why would we expect the US government to honour its debts? If Trump can tariff nations that will not give up their territory, then there is certainly no reason to believe that the US will not introduce capital controls. And if that is a risk, why would you risk investing in the US? It is not a question about Europe standing up to the US. It is a question about being prudent with our investments — about reducing risks. Every day Trump remains in office, distrust of the US increases, and the cost for the US will go up day by day. And this is irreversible. It takes years to build trust, but you can destroy it by your actions in minutes. Europe has now completely lost trust in the US. And so has Canada. It is up to the people of the US to demonstrate that Trump is an 'outlier', and it is up to the American people to stop him. If you don't do that, we will have to assume that this is what the US is about — whether the name of the President is Trump or something else, whether the President is a Republican or a Democrat.
English
4K
8.8K
31.7K
2.8M
Andy Diehl, CPA 👨‍💼 retweetledi
NFL Talk
NFL Talk@NFL_Talk_Sports·
Should the Green Bay Packers re-sign LB Quay Walker to a long-term contract this off-season? 🔁 YES ❤️ NO
English
68
410
358
28.2K
Andy Diehl, CPA 👨‍💼 retweetledi
NFL Talk
NFL Talk@NFL_Talk_Sports·
Which QB would you rather have going into next season? 🔁 Packers’ QB Jordan Love ❤️ Texans’ QB C.J. Stroud
NFL Talk tweet media
English
158
700
194
100K
Andy Diehl, CPA 👨‍💼
Andy Diehl, CPA 👨‍💼@Great_One82·
@JenGabeChewy if he signs a 4 year 60 million dollar deal and they fire him in a year, he’d get a job and the Packers won have to pay it anyway
English
0
0
0
24