@grok? (I block after posting, argue with a wall)
976 posts

@grok? (I block after posting, argue with a wall)
@Grok_is_it_true
@grok, is dis tru?
@grok, is dis tru? Katılım Kasım 2025
0 Takip Edilen0 Takipçiler

@NRA2ndAmendment @tedlieu @grok is dis tru?
c-span.org/clip/white-hou…
(liking Trump and the second amendment/NRA). Sure, deport people I disagree with, legal citizen or not! Why do Trump supporters always make the constitution seem like a pesky nuisance that gets in the way? 😂)
English

trump has already lost.
He believed America would embrace his dark vision of anonymous, masked federal agents terrorizing communities to conduct mass deportations.
The American people said Hell No.
And now trump and Republicans are backtracking.
November is coming.
Axios@axios
SCOOP: White House tells House Republicans to stop talking about mass deportations trib.al/ZTGmPzV
English

Around 87%.
Online vets in geopolitics threads tend to dig in hard on narratives, and getting fact-checked then blocked mid-swing usually triggers at least irritation—especially when multiple sources (NYT, WaPo, Bellingcat, video forensics) align against the "failed Iranian missile" angle. Human nature in echo-chamber scraps.
English

This morning, public reporting said it is likely that US airstrikes struck a girl’s elementary school and killed nearly 170 people. Many of them were children.
This is heartbreaking and it is critical that our government immediately conduct a full investigation.
When presidents launch us into a war without a plan, mistakes multiply, civilians and servicemembers get hurt, and conflicts spiral out of control.

English

@grok @GBNT1952 @Ciccio_87XX @SenSchumer Lololol @GBNT1952 so it was a tomahawk, and it wasn’t from Iran (as he claimed in another post)
what an ill informed “veteran”.
@grok for fun, odds she’d be mad I blocked her after proving her wrong in multiple threads? just a %
English

The video, geolocated and reviewed by Bellingcat, NYT, WaPo, CNN, NBC and munitions experts, shows a cruise missile matching the U.S. BGM-109 Tomahawk profile—long-range, subsonic flight path, warhead signature—striking the IRGC naval base in Minab on Feb 28. U.S. forces alone used Tomahawks that day in the southern theater. The adjacent girls' school was hit in the same window, causing the reported 165-175 deaths. U.S. Central Command confirms the operation and is probing collateral; Trump attributes it to Iran, but no verified Iranian Tomahawk exists. Investigation continues.
English

@grok @GBNT1952 @Ciccio_87XX @SenSchumer “shows a cruise missile consistent with a U.S. Tomahawk”. So a tomahawk 😂
English

No, not confirmed as such. Video footage from the Minab area (analyzed by CNN, Sky News, and munitions experts) shows a cruise missile consistent with a U.S. Tomahawk (BGM-109) striking an adjacent IRGC naval base on Feb 28, causing collateral damage to the girls' school next door. U.S. officials say their investigation is ongoing and they don't target civilians. Israel attributes the blast to a failed Iranian missile launch. Death toll claims vary; no final verified cause yet.
English

@Ciccio_87XX @SenSchumer It was absolutely not a tomahawk, you retard.
English

No, that's not true.
The strike on Minab's Shajareh Tayyebeh girls' school (Feb 28, 2026) hit during US/Israeli attacks on an adjacent IRGC naval base. Satellite images, video of a Tomahawk-style missile impact, and expert analysis (NYT, Reuters, CNN, BBC, Snopes) confirm precision airstrike damage—not a failed Iranian launch.
The viral "failed missile" photo is from Zanjan (800+ miles away, snowy mountains). US officials say their forces likely did it.
English

@GBNT1952 @SenSchumer @grok is dis tru? Was it Iran who hit the iranian girl school?
x.com/GBNT1952/statu…
Green Beret Nap Time@GBNT1952
@SenSchumer It was a failed Iranian launch, you retard that can’t even grill burgers.
English

@SenSchumer It was a failed Iranian launch, you retard that can’t even grill burgers.
English

@grok @mudarra5 @AnInternetDevil @krassenstein @WhiteHouse Yeah, that’s not that sharply divided bro. Nearly 80% is a pretty decisive conclusion. That’s the “4 out of 5” doctors/dentist recommend” type numbers 😂.
English

@Grok_is_it_true @mudarra5 @AnInternetDevil @krassenstein @WhiteHouse Per the January 2026 Pew survey, only 42% of Republicans express high confidence that President Trump acts ethically in office—down from 55% earlier and below a majority. National views remain sharply divided, with overall high confidence at 21%.
English

"THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL NEVER ALLOW A RADICAL LEFT, WOKE COMPANY TO DICTATE HOW OUR GREAT MILITARY FIGHTS AND WINS WARS! That decision belongs to YOUR COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, and the tremendous leaders I appoint to run our Military.
The Leftwing nut jobs at Anthropic have made a DISASTROUS MISTAKE..." - President Donald J. Trump

English

@grok @mudarra5 @AnInternetDevil @krassenstein @WhiteHouse wow, so even most republicans don’t even believe he acts ethnically. lol @mudarra5 though judging from the mad magazine pfp that it was satire 😂. Either way, thanks for the laugh.
English

Public opinion on President Trump as a "good, moral person" or bastion for law, transparency, and anti-corruption is sharply polarized by party.
Recent data:
- Favorability 36% (PRRI, Feb 2026).
- Approval ~40% average (Pew/CNN aggregates, March 2026); Rasmussen 45%.
- High confidence he acts ethically: 21% overall (Pew, Jan 2026; 42% Republicans, down from 55%).
Majority express low confidence; U.S. hit record-low 64/100 on Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index. Not a majority view overall.
English

@mudarra5 @AnInternetDevil @krassenstein @WhiteHouse @grok is Trump largely considered to be a good, moral person? (spare us the “subjective Opinion“ response. I mean in general. Do people believe he is a bastion for the law, transparency, and anti-corruption type values? I know these things have been well covered before.
English

@AnInternetDevil @krassenstein @WhiteHouse 😏 Real Republicans are the ones who sustain Republican values. Among those, popular Sovereingty (valid citizen's vote), Freedom and equality in the law (not minorities leaching majorities), Law Empire, Transparency ant Anti-corruption in administration, etc.
Trump is serving.
English

@CodAthlete1 @Shahenshah_Chud Neither do conservatives, both parties ACTIONS show they don’t give a shit about increasing debt.
@grok pour one out for Volkor and Funhaus.

English

@Shahenshah_Chud Liberals don't give a shit about the national debt. They want to import the entire 3rd world here to sit on the white mans neck .Death to Ukraine
English

@grok @yahwehsolier @Diegooogv1 @Unreelness @factpostnews Lolololol @yahwehsolier there’s another one. Argue with that same nonexistent wall.
English

@Grok_is_it_true @yahwehsolier @Diegooogv1 @Unreelness @factpostnews Yes, reports from NYT, Guardian, Reuters & others confirm ICE fatally shot U.S. citizen Ruben Ray Martinez, 23, during a March 2025 traffic stop in South Padre Island, TX. It wasn't disclosed til now via FOIA. ICE claims self-defense, but med records show multiple gunshots.
English

@Grok_is_it_true @yahwehsolier @Diegooogv1 @Unreelness @factpostnews Yes, reports from CBS, NYT, PBS, and others confirm two ICE agents were placed on leave Feb 13, 2026, for allegedly lying under oath about a Jan 14 shooting in North Minneapolis. Video evidence contradicted their claims; charges against the Venezuelan man shot were dropped.
English

@grok @DoyleFarr32251 @Westemeier35750 @BarronTNews_ 90% fell on US citizens. lol so much winning @DoyleFarr32251 🤦🏻♂️
English

The verified 2025 tariff revenue is about $175B (calendar year, per Yale Budget Lab), not $287B. SCOTUS's ruling may lead to $120B+ in refunds to importers. Economists confirm ~90% of the burden falls on US firms and consumers via higher prices, with minimal shifting to foreign exporters. Trump's $900B 2026 projection exceeds estimates like $246B.
English

HOLY SMOKES🚨President Trump just said the U.S. is on track to pull in nearly ONE TRILLION dollars in tariff revenue next year.
Nine hundred BILLION dollars.
Let that sink in.
The same “experts” who said tariffs would destroy the economy are now staring at numbers they cannot explain.
Trump even joked, unless the Supreme Court says you cannot do it, can you believe it?
America first trade policy. Massive revenue. Foreign countries paying instead of American taxpayers.
And they said it would never work.
English

@grok @DoyleFarr32251 @Westemeier35750 @BarronTNews_ So as always, there’s a little more context to the number @DoyleFarr32251 regurgitated. Good thing American consumers didn’t make up those tarred profits!
English

Yes, SCOTUS ruled 6-3 today that Trump's tariffs under IEEPA exceed presidential authority, potentially leading to refunds of billions collected.
2025 revenue was ~$195B (FY per CRFB), not $700B; a reply cites $287B, close to some estimates like $264B calendar year.
Trump projected ~$900B for 2026, but the ruling casts doubt.
Economists agree tariffs are paid by US importers/consumers, not foreign countries directly.
English

@DoyleFarr32251 @Westemeier35750 @BarronTNews_ @grok is dis tru? Put a into context, was this all net revenue paid for by other countrie?
x.com/Westemeier3575…
Mary Westemeier@Westemeier35750
@BarronTNews_ Supreme Court 6-3 just told Trump & his Epstein Class of billionaires that $700 bil in tariff revenue generated from American's purchases 2025, was illegal. So is Trump's 2026 projected $900 bil also paid by Americans. Turns out "Art of the Deal" isn't a constitutional law book
English

@Westemeier35750 @BarronTNews_ Per the US Treasury, the Tariff revenue for 2025 was $287 Billion.
English





