Baudrillard Forever

19.3K posts

Baudrillard Forever banner
Baudrillard Forever

Baudrillard Forever

@GroovySciFi

Socks always escape from the dryer.

Epstein's Island (help) Katılım Ocak 2014
2.3K Takip Edilen2.9K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Baudrillard Forever
Baudrillard Forever@GroovySciFi·
I mine, therefore I craft.
English
2
10
101
0
Baudrillard Forever retweetledi
CzłowiekBurger
CzłowiekBurger@czlowiek_burger·
there's a fine line between e-celebrity and lolbovinity
English
0
1
13
333
Sami Gold
Sami Gold@souljagoyteller·
Here at the Museum of the Bible. I know the museum was created by the Hobby Lobby family and its board is mandated to affirm a belief in biblical inerrancy, but it holds a seriously impressive Bible collection. My followers who have been here: what were your takeaways
Sami Gold tweet media
English
7
0
99
5.9K
Baudrillard Forever retweetledi
Santi Ruiz
Santi Ruiz@rSanti97·
They’re making this real on Wednesday
Santi Ruiz tweet media
English
8
361
7.8K
135.2K
Baudrillard Forever
Baudrillard Forever@GroovySciFi·
Coming to the opinion that it might be a waste to have cultivated expertise in esoteric radio lore only to switch to finance. Maybe I can switch to RF engineering instead 🤔 There's still a thesis to write between me and unemployment. Then I'll have to make a decision.
English
4
0
11
440
Baudrillard Forever
Baudrillard Forever@GroovySciFi·
Nick Maggiuli wrote a nice response article to this with the following excerpt. Full article below.
Baudrillard Forever tweet media
Lee Roach@leevalueroach

I do not understand, in 2026, why anyone is shorting anything, and I have, over the last several years, watched a generation of intelligent, well-credentialed, technically sophisticated investors set fire to their capital on the short side of a market that has been telegraphing its direction with the subtlety of a marching band, and the only explanation I have ever been able to construct is that none of these people have read a single page of monetary history written before 1990. The setup is not subtle. The federal government is running a 7% structural deficit with no political coalition in either party willing to address it. The Treasury is issuing debt at a pace that will push publicly held debt-to-GDP past 130% within five years, which is the level at which, historically, every government in recorded history has either inflated its way out, defaulted, or both. The Fed is, regardless of what it says in public, the marginal buyer of that debt, and the only mechanism it has to fund the purchases is the creation of new dollars. The money is being printed. The debt is being monetized. The currency is being debased. And asset prices, which are denominated in the currency being debased, are doing the only thing they have ever done in any country that has ever tried this, which is going up. Every country that has run this experiment has produced the same chart. Weimar Germany in 1922 and 1923 produced one of the most violent equity bull markets in recorded history in nominal terms, as the mark collapsed and the Berlin exchange repriced upward by orders of magnitude. Argentina, across four separate inflationary cycles since 1975, produced in each cycle a nominal rally that outran every short thesis published, while the peso lost 99.9% of its purchasing power. Zimbabwe in 2007 and 2008 produced an equity market that rose so violently the exchange had to be closed because the calculations could not keep up. Turkey, right now, in front of the entire world, has produced a Borsa Istanbul up 1,400% in lira terms while the lira has lost 85% against the dollar, and every short of Turkish equities has been carried out in nominal terms even when they were right in real terms. The lesson is not that asset prices are going up because the businesses are getting better. The lesson is that asset prices are going up because the unit they are measured in is getting smaller, and any investor who positions short against this dynamic is betting against the will and capacity of a government to debase its own currency, which is the single most reliable bet you can lose in 4,000 years of recorded monetary history. The government always wins. The government always debases. The currency always loses purchasing power. The assets always reprice upward in nominal terms, on a path the shorts always insist is unsustainable and that always, somehow, sustains. You can short individual frauds. You cannot short the market. You cannot short the currency itself without being on the wrong side of the largest force in modern capital markets, which is the slow, politically inevitable destruction of the dollar’s purchasing power against everything that cannot be printed. The shorts have been wrong for five years. They will be wrong for the next five. The only investors who will, in real terms, preserve and grow their wealth are the ones who understood, early, that the game is not about being right on valuation, it is about being on the right side of monetary debasement, and the right side has always been owning real assets, productive businesses, scarce commodities, and the one monetary metal that has functioned as money continuously for 5,000 years, while the people on the other side continue to insist this time is different. This time has never been different. The math is the math. The shorts will continue to lose. The owners will continue to win.

English
1
0
2
360
Baudrillard Forever retweetledi
Lyman Stone 石來民 🦬🦬🦬
2) Not all countries can have positive net migration at once. Sure, immigration may help America deal with our low fertility issue-- at the expense of totally devastating Uruguay or Kazakhstan or Vietnam or wherever. As a political realist, yes, I'd rather devastate Spain or Japan than America. Hence why I support immigration. But this is clearly not a sustainable or just strategy! What happens when India's population begins aging but the 10% most talented Indians have all moved abroad? It will be a tidal wave of human misery, and of course it will end up somehow being America's problem. We have a duty to the world to try to solve this problem ourselves. Sure, yes, bring in immigrants for any number of reasons, but also make sure we are bringing them into a society with functional family life.
English
4
3
113
43.8K
Baudrillard Forever
Baudrillard Forever@GroovySciFi·
Edgar Allan Poe was the first to suggest a finite age of the Universe as a resolution to Olber's paradox, although he hastily discarded the idea!
Baudrillard Forever tweet media
English
0
1
18
932
Baudrillard Forever retweetledi
Tim Spalding 🇺🇦
Tim Spalding 🇺🇦@librarythingtim·
Romans understood men who were or became Gods—Alexander the Great, the Ptolemies, Caesar, Augustus, etc. Most did terrible things, like murder their friends, and all treated the lowly as disposable and contemptible. Their wealth and power explained their divinity. They were disgusted and baffled why Christianity would celebrate and apparently deify some poor provincial nobody barbarian executed by the state. To celebrate such a human bug was indeed abnormal. It remains so. Sit with that.
ɴᴏɪʀ🇳🇬@mothjrn

The only reason Christianity sounds normal is childhood indoctrination.

English
39
99
2K
136K
Baudrillard Forever
Baudrillard Forever@GroovySciFi·
@BirthGauge @cornu__copia This varies geographically. In Italy, all medieval settlements were incredibly dense due to endemic violence. This shows even in small towns like Volterra, San Gimignano, etc
English
0
0
3
112
Birth Gauge
Birth Gauge@BirthGauge·
@GroovySciFi @cornu__copia This only started to become a thing once cannons were introduced that made it necessary for fortifications to be very strong. Before that, during medieval times, fortifications were less strong and could easily be expanded. Medieval cities in Europe weren‘t that dense.
English
2
0
6
250
Tantric Turanist 🇫🇮🇺🇦
If you let a city grow "organically" in 2026, you get chaotic hypersprawl. Trying to replicate pre-industrial revolution urban patterns in the age of the private car, elevator and mass transit is not "organic", it's extremely artificial.
Wrath Of Gnon@wrathofgnon

The organic way of city growth: mature cities, rather than growing like a cancer out of their bounds and limits, send out colonies to form new ones. Léon Krier illustrated it thus:

English
8
9
252
12.9K