Reviewer 2

Academic in nutshell #AcademicTwitter @AcademicChatter

@PhD_Genie The best papers are the dangerous ones. The ones where I start the review thinking: “Excellent work.” And then panic because if this gets published, my own paper from 2019 becomes “related work.”

For reviewer 2, is a good paper the one that you can reject easily or the one that you need to write a lot of comments before you reject it?

“did you use AI?” has got to be the most insulting writing feedback of the modern age

Reasons to use an em dash: 1) reclaim it from the machines 2) you don't know what a semicolon is for 3) it has incredible vibes

The dean would like to talk to you about your anonymous survey results.

Academics: “be kind” Academics reviewing: “dear idiot…”

We thank the reviewers for their constructive and helpful comments, which have significantly improved the quality of our manuscript

#AcademicChatter #AcademicX

Hear me out, a radical thought though, maybe just write it yourself!

but would your thesis defend YOU?

#AcademicChatter #AcademicX

Staring at my manuscript submission status as if it were the Uber Eats tracker

Reject AI hallucinations - Embrace traditional hallucinations

“we thank the reviewers for their constructive feedback”

Proposal vs Submission

i've seen enough

Please give a warm welcome to our panellists, guy who speaks over time, guy who speaks about unrelated topic, guy who speaks over time about unrelated topic, and radically over prepared Phd student.