
🪐🗼
47.3K posts

🪐🗼 retweetledi

There is something seriously wrong if a body charged with regulating food goes to the police to file FIRs against those who question its performance.
What is the FSSAI really regulating? Food? Or people who question it?
Deeply disturbing
theprint.in/feature/fir-co… via @theprintindia
English
🪐🗼 retweetledi

We need CMs who stand with India not an imaginary country Palestine
Gabbar@Gabbar0099
Only Two CM's in India who firmly stand with Palestine and Iran 🇵🇸🔥 1- Mk Stalin, Tamilnadu 2- Pinarayi Vijayan, Kerala
English
🪐🗼 retweetledi
🪐🗼 retweetledi

Wife is earning: Husband still has to pay maintenance.
Son is earning: Husband still has to pay maintenance.
Husband not earning: Beg, Borrow, Steal but still pay maintenance.
Husband dead: Father in law will pay maintenance.

Live Law@LiveLawIndia
Earning Capacity Of Adult Sons Doesn't Negate Wife's 'Independent' Right To Permanent Alimony: #RajasthanHighCourt | @ISparshUpadhyay livelaw.in/high-court/raj…
English
🪐🗼 retweetledi

Lol nowhere in whole of north India do women cook in Bihar functions. All halwai are males everywhere
कवि: आलोक “अज्ञात”@alokntyl
Don't tell any pahadi they believe in patriarchy. We grow up with this #Uttarakhand
English
🪐🗼 retweetledi
🪐🗼 retweetledi
🪐🗼 retweetledi
🪐🗼 retweetledi

why do some women compare everything to rape? tf is even logic here? obviously that guy is wrong but if u’re even a little bit uncomfortable with him just fckg block him. it’s not that hard but no, they’d rather be performative about it
M♡@_baskarohenry
People who blame girls and say"You should have blocked him na"...are the same people who justify the r*pists by saying "Ladki ki galti hai full kapde pehen kar nikalna chahiye tha" Ik girls should block and be careful but that doesn't justify the wrong-doer.🙏🏻
English
🪐🗼 retweetledi
🪐🗼 retweetledi

Earning Capacity Of Adult Sons Doesn't Negate Wife's 'Independent' Right To Permanent Alimony: #RajasthanHighCourt | @ISparshUpadhyay
livelaw.in/high-court/raj…
English
🪐🗼 retweetledi

For investors in Indian markets:
Short-term capital gains tax (stocks held <1 year) went from 15% to 20% two years ago.
Long-term capital gains tax (held >1 year) went from 10% to 12.5% two years ago.
And FIIs outflow since then:
2025: Record ₹1.66 lakh crore net - the highest annual FII outflow ever recorded in Indian markets.
2026: ₹1.51 lakh crore net just year to date.
Just a 2% increase matters a lot if you are an FII investing billions. FIIs invest in India because of high growth opportunities, but a depreciating rupee and an increase in taxes means they may move out their capital.
And FIIs definitely move their capital when they sense global issues may drag India's growth. We are already seeing this. This causes more stresses to India's economy, currency, and companies.
Even if futures and options keep their increases in STT (for various reasons it can be argued to make sense), for capital gains from equities, this increase in tax definitely needs to be reconsidered by GoI.
An idea I propose is the increases in taxes can be applied (some other way) only for FIIs, and only when they are taking out the capital from the country. Not sure how it can be implemented, or if it is even practical.
If not, the increases in CGT must be reconsidered, and reverted for at least the time being, to incentivize FIIs and DIs in investing in India's growth story.
English
🪐🗼 retweetledi
🪐🗼 retweetledi

3 years ago, it was said that the industry couldn’t be left in the hands of “kids”… well, here’s what these “kids” have delivered in the last three years:
Ranbir Kapoor – Animal (550 Cr)
Shraddha Kapoor – Stree 2 (630 Cr)
Vicky Kaushal – Chhaava (600 Cr)
Ranveer Singh – Dhurandhar (900 Cr), #Dhurandhar2 (900 Cr+ and still running)

English
🪐🗼 retweetledi
🪐🗼 retweetledi

Ye konsi family hai bhai hamesha apne saas - sasur ke saath dikhai deta hai maa baap hai unko kabhi kyu nahi le jata saath
Mufaddal Vohra@mufaddal_vohra
Rohit Sharma enjoying family time. ❤️
हिन्दी
🪐🗼 retweetledi

The Supreme Court said this clearly.
Maintenance is not meant to punish the husband.
That was the Rajnesh vs Neha judgment of 2020.
Courts are supposed to look at the actual income of both spouses.
Both parties must disclose financials honestly.
Maintenance must reflect real need. Not assumption.
6 years later lower courts still routinely grant interim maintenance without verifying the wife’s income.
Without auditing her assets.
Without checking if she is employed.
A Supreme Court guideline that exists on paper but not in courtrooms.
Every married man in India should know this judgment by name.
Rajnesh vs Neha. 2020. Supreme Court of India.
Screenshot this. Save it.

English
🪐🗼 retweetledi
🪐🗼 retweetledi











