LordMuck 🏴‍☠️

Society is a place where people exist together... youtube.com/clip/Ugkxl3y9A…

@musicologydisco @CleansedTweets And they have a strong online presence with Elon and LotusEaters support, plus loads of bots, which is not reflected on the ground, at least where I live...

@CleansedTweets @GuyPhillips Yes I've read a lot from the Restore supporters and they come across as far right. I think this will make them unelectable as a marginal far right party.

I don’t know if I am #ReformUK or #Restore 😔

@CleansedTweets The Restore people I have met have their roots in the BNP etc

@GuyPhillips Some of the restore crowd are no doubt lovely people but, the can be a bit oft

@CrimeLdn Standard for Newham...

Shop thieves at Beckon sainsburys yesterday..

@benonwine Creepy Rupert...

Describe Rupert Lowe in ONE Word?

@LeoKearse And don't start me on the widespread use of the mouse jigger while wfh...

Having worked in the public sector, I can confirm it operates as a mafia. A giant holding pen for mediocre people with mediocre degrees to wear suits and create work for each other so they can steal an ever larger chunk of taxpayers' hard-earned money. Of course they spent £180 million deciding not to build a road tunnel. When I worked in public sector management consultancy, we were tasked with finding efficiencies in the IT department of a large government agency. One man we spoke to had two laptops on his desk. He said one was for forex trading and the other one was to monitor his chicken farm in Ghana. There was no shame as he told us this, no realisation that he was actually being employed to do a job that didn't involve forex trading or managing a chicken farm in Ghana. We were struck by the number of people sitting around doing nothing, even for a public sector organisation. Then we discovered that the man running the IT department also owned an IT recruitment consultancy. Every man he hired into this IT department from his recruitment consultancy put money in his own pocket. So there was a huge incentive for him to just hire as many men as possible to get as rich as possible. Never mind being prosecuted over this - I don't think he actually lost his job. And there's an incentive in the rest of the public sector to hire as many people as possible because the more people you manage, the more important you are, the bigger budget you get, and the greater your salary. (On the plus side, as a management consultant, finding efficiencies in the public sector is a piece of piss.) When you hear about public sector investment, this is money taken from the real economy and given to people to produce very little. This isn't "investment" any more than a bank "invests" in bank robbers. It's not done to make a profit. It holds the real economy back, not just in terms of the tax burden, but also in the huge numbers of workers tied up in this false, public sector Potemkin economy. Those workers should be in the real economy producing something of value. Britain could be a paradise. We could all be rich. There's no need for mass immigration. The workers we need are already here doing nothing, on benefits or in the public sector. We just need to fire everyone in the public sector and scrap all benefits.

@JonathanPieNews Regime stooge...

When she says: "We'll do all the naughty stuff", she means pure undiluted racism, free from the gaze of the press. Hilarious.

@MarkHeath45 Bot

So Restore Britain is now an official political party! Game on! Vote Reform UK in May! 🩵

I read Restore’s mass deportation policy and compared it with Reform’s stated immigration policy, so you didn’t have to. This is not an argument against deportations. It is a question of whether what is being proposed is actually deliverable. On the surface, it sounds decisive. Tough. Exactly what people want to hear. But once you move past the headline and look at how it would work in practice, serious questions emerge. First problem. The law. Restore’s position is to leave the ECHR and reduce legal barriers to enable deportations at scale. Leaving the ECHR requires a formal withdrawal process. More importantly, it would require changes to domestic law, including the framework built around the Human Rights Act. Until those changes are made, the current legal system remains in place, where immigration decisions can be subject to appeal and legal challenge. Reform’s approach also recognises the legal constraint. It proposes a UK Bill of Rights and wider system reform to prioritise deportation where there is no lawful right to remain. Both approaches identify the legal barrier. The difference is how that transition is addressed. Second problem. Capacity. Restore proposes large scale removals but does not set out how the required detention and processing capacity would be created. The current system operates with limited detention capacity and significant backlogs. Reform’s approach places more emphasis on reducing inflow and improving processing efficiency to ease pressure on the system. One approach assumes expanded capacity. The other focuses on reducing system strain. Third problem. Foreign governments. Restore’s proposal assumes individuals can be returned at scale. In practice, removals depend on cooperation with other countries. Returns can be delayed or refused without agreements in place. Reform has proposed third country processing and bilateral agreements to support removals. Without those mechanisms, large scale returns are difficult to sustain. Fourth problem. Cost. Restore presents mass deportation as a decisive solution but does not provide detailed, transparent costings for implementation at scale. Any programme of this size would require substantial public spending across infrastructure, staffing, legal processes, and enforcement. Reform links its approach to reducing long term system pressure by lowering illegal entry and improving removal processes. Without clear financial detail, deliverability remains an open question. The irony is this. A party that constantly attacks Reform over employing Muslims has relied on a British Sikh and a British Turkish Muslim to help shape this very policy. Make that make sense. There is legitimate public concern around illegal migration. That should not be dismissed. But policy should be judged on whether it can be delivered, not just how it sounds. That is where the real test lies.

Be Creative…Who would be a better Prime Minister than Keir Starmer?

@EdwardJDavey Go back to sleep @EdwardJDavey

Starmer’s decision risks repeating the mistakes of Iraq, and follows Donald Trump down a slippery slope. While Badenoch and Farage cheer this on, it is British households who are paying the price.

@KayBurley Great! Unlike you...

Or the most offensive diplomatic gaffe in post war US/Japan history. You decide…

@MontgomeryToms @RestoreBritain_ Silly boy...

🚨: Such incredible news @RestoreBritain_ is officially a political party! We can win the next general election - become a member and let's take back our country - NOW 🔥

@RejoinP No

Do you agree Brexit was a mistake, and it’s time for the UK to rejoin the EU? #ExitBrexit

@MatthewStadlen Bollox

Anti-Muslim prejudice has no place in British society. Nick Timothy, Kemi Badenoch and Nigel Farage should be deeply ashamed of themselves.

@EdwardJDavey It's not illegal...

Why are we rewarding Donald Trump with a state visit from our King? His illegal war is driving up costs for British families and he is belittling our country and insulting our troops. Cancel the visit.

@HumzaYousaf Thank God you are nowhere near politics anymore...

We all know why Nick Timothy MP singles out Muslims celebrating Ramadan in Trafalgar Sq. Not because praying is domination, but because he wants to blow a rabid anti-Muslim dog whistle for political gain. He should be nowhere near politics, let alone the shadow front bench.

@Keir_Starmer Sack yourself you creep...

I’m proud of our tolerant and diverse country. I’m proud that in Trafalgar Square we celebrate all faiths. That’s British values. The comments from Nick Timothy are shameful. Kemi Badenoch should do the right thing and sack him.

@Mofoman360 @elonmusk No

Is Rupert Lowe the most trusted politician in the UK Yes or No? @elonmusk

@elonmusk Wrong...

This is the only way to save Britain. There is no other.