Harry Briggs
3.6K posts

Harry Briggs
@H4ryB
Founder turned AgriFood investor. Previously an early investor in @RevolutApp @TheHut_com @PaddleHQ @GoCardless etc. Pianist. Psychologist. Optimist.

🚨 NEW: The proposed names the Government is considering calling its new towns - Elizabethtown (after the Queen) - Pankhurst (after suffragette Emmeline) - Attleeton (after ex-PM) - Athelstan (first King of England) - Seacole (after nurse Mary) [@thetimes]

This tweet got over 1M views so we made it a video: How much money does Meta make by enabling crimes? "Internal docs leaked to Reuters show: • 10% of all Meta revenue comes from ads for scams & banned goods ($16B/year) • Meta estimates it's involved in 1/3 of all successful scams in the US • That suggests they drive $50B in scam losses for US consumers alone each year • Meta earns ~$3B annually from scam/banned goods ads run by Chinese operations alone..."

No 10 seems to be denying something I didn't write, that Starmer wanted Trump to have the bases for its initial raids. But the PM wanted to get to the position we are in now (where they could be used to hit the missile sites in self defence), and reached on Sunday evening, on Friday evening. I have multiple sources for this. Here's the timeline: 1) Feb 11 - US requests the use of Diego Garcia and RAF Fairford for offensive strikes on Iran 2) Hermer says this would be a breach of international law and Britain cannot facilitate let alone participate. No one in the system seems to have seriously challenged this 3) Trump and Starmer have a series of 'angry' conversations 4) At the NSC on Friday the likely implications were discussed which included Iranian retaliatory raids on allies, as happened last June. 5) Starmer suggested we should let the Americans use the bases for 'defensive' strikes at the missile sites. Healey backed him. 6) This was opposed by Reeves, Cooper, Mahmood and, most aggressively, Miliband. Cooper's argument was that nuclear talks in Oman were making progress. She, Reeves and Mahmood seem to have wanted to wait until retaliatory attacks were happening before the basing request was granted. 7) Attacks begin 0630 Saturday morning 8) Meanwhile the chief of the defence staff, Air Marshal Sir Richard Knighton was in touch with the US joint chiefs and Healey had a series of calls with Pete Hegseth. Knighton's message was (paraphrasing) 'if you frame your formal request this way it ought to be granted once things get going'. 9) Saturday: The US makes its formal ask for the bases to target the missile sites (effectiveky drafted by the MoD) 10) Sunday afternoon: The NSC approves the request and the US begins flying missions from Diego Garcia The interesting things here are: i) Hermer's legal advice WAS central to govt thinking, but Starmer still wanted to get ahead of the game and do more to support the US and he was not strong enough or determined enough to persuade his inner cabinet ii) Just as the PM now struggles to get anything the PLP dislikes through parliament, I can't think of another PM in matters of war or peace who couldn't get what they wanted through cabinet iii) Dislike of Trump seems to have motivated Miliband in particular and the PLP seems delighted, but the procrastination and failure even to match the rhetoric of Canada, Australia has badly damaged the UK with Gulf allies and Cyprus. This ought to matter to Labour MPs who always want a multilateral solution iv) The UK had 16 days from Feb 11th to prepare knowing that attacks on Iran were likely. Some kit, interceptors etc, was sent to the region but the first Type 45 destroyer will not even leave until next week READ THE WHOLE THING HERE spectator.com/article/whose-…



It's difficult to verbally capture this weird, stupid and meaningless collision of styles, materials, dimensions. The closest visual analogy, to my mind, is one of those plates piled high at a hotel buffet by an idiot: with a splodge of curry, some sauerkraut, five potatoes, some lemon pie, a lamb cutlet, smoked herring, and several cheesy crackers, and everything banal and tasteless even before you smush them together. ✍️ Sean Thomas Article | spectator.com/article/we-nee…

🚨 Huge news: The FCDO admits a crucial detail that destroys the government’s basis of their Chagos Islands deal







Why have Hackney Council's planning officers recommended that the council reject the Shoreditch Works scheme, which would add 80,500 square meters of new commercial, lab and office space right next to the City? This piece is a good run-down, but the stuff on design in particular caught my eye. Even though the project is popular with normal people and basically looks pretty good, the Design Review Panel (chaired by an architect from Cazenove Architects) rejected it on taste-based grounds, including because the design was *too* cohesive and they wanted something more eclectic. Here is an example of how the tastes of architectural elites are forced on the world through the planning system. This is one reason new buildings look so bad and are so unpopular: they're the architectural equivalent of being forced to listen to Captain Beefheart against your will, every day.







