Heather Ceccoli

🚨🇮🇪 Meanwhile in Ireland Security team made up of most foreign Migrants beat a Farmer trying to access his own land. ‘They’ have imported an army to deploy against indigenous Citizens and it’s begun. You will start seeing more of this everywhere.

Summary of Candace Owens’ Erika Kirk (“Bride of Charlie”) Content: Views, Revenue, and Potential Legal Exposure Candace Owens’ serialized investigative coverage of Erika Kirk and TPUSA (primarily the multi-episode “Bride of Charlie” series plus numerous dedicated Candace podcast episodes from late 2025 into 2026) has generated an estimated 200–500+ million total views/impressions across YouTube, X, TikTok, and other platforms. YouTube accounts for the largest share, with roughly 50–100 million+ views on core related long-form videos (e.g., Episode 1 at ~5.5M, subsequent episodes mostly 2–3.5M each, plus additional focused episodes in the 1.5–4M range). YouTube ad revenue is variable and based on RPM ($2–$6 per 1,000 views typical for political/podcast content like hers). Applying this to the attributable YouTube views yields an estimated $150,000–$500,000+ in direct ad revenue from the Erika Kirk content alone. This figure excludes additional income from sponsorship reads, podcast platform monetization, and indirect benefits such as subscriber growth and cross-platform traffic. Overall, the saga has been one of her strongest-performing and most sustained drivers of engagement. In a hypothetical defamation lawsuit by Erika Kirk and TPUSA (assuming they could prove actual malice, reputational harm, and quantifiable business losses such as reduced donations/sponsorships), a top-tier plaintiff firm like Tom Clare’s Clare Locke LLP would likely file claims seeking $250 million to $1 billion+ in total damages. This would include compensatory damages for personal and organizational harm plus substantial punitive damages, structured across multiple counts tied to individual episodes, statements, and clips. Such a demand would mirror the firm’s strategy in high-profile cases (e.g., Dominion v. Fox) to maximize leverage for settlement while accounting for the massive dissemination scale. These are order-of-magnitude estimates based on visible public data, standard creator economics, and analogous litigation benchmarks. Actual internal analytics, costs, and court outcomes would vary significantly.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Answered by Grok — inserting Tom Clare as representing Erika Kirk/TPUSA.

Charlie Kirk’s full letter to Netanyahu. A must read. I suggest you Share this if the truth matters to you. Dear Mr. Prime Minister, One of my greatest joys as a Christian is advocating for Israel and forming alliances with Jews in the fight to protect Judeo-Christian civilization. Most recently, I am proud to have taken over Ambassador Huckabee’s show on TBN where we continually support Israel and the Jewish people. As Muhammadism spreads into Western societies, it’s critical that Jews and Christians stay united in the effort to contain and roll back radical Islam and Sharia law. I regret to report that anti-Israel and anti-Semitic trends are at record levels on social media. These negative sentiments then flow downstream into college campuses and even seep into the conservative MAGA community. My team and I have spent months analyzing these trends and debating ideas that could help you and your country push back against these disturbing developments. Anti-Israel sentiment can undermine American support for Israel. The purpose of this letter is to lay out our concerns and outline potential remedies. Everything written here is from a place of deep love for Israel and the Jewish people. I think it’s important to be brutally honest with those you love. In my opinion, Israel is losing the information war and needs a “communications intervention.” I’m accused of being a paid apologist for Israel when I defend her; however, if I don’t defend Israel strongly enough, I’m accused of being anti-Semitic. I know you’ve got a 7 front war and my kvetching pales in comparison. But I’m trying to convey to you that Israel is losing support even in conservative circles. This should be a five alarm fire. Here are some suggestions: 1. Establish a rapid response team on X and other platforms similar to that of President Trump’s White House staff. 2. Cultivate pro-Israel experts to fact-check misinformation about the Gaza conflict in real time. 3. Create an “Israel Truth Network” as a repository of reliable information. When you don’t push back, anti-Semitism and anti-Israel propaganda fill the void. A pro-Israel friend recently asked me, “Do Israelis even care how the world perceives their country?” Sending some of the hostages released from Gaza on a speaking tour across the US would be very effective messaging. These hostages and all your spokespersons should be arguing it’s Hamas that is committing genocide on their own people by using civilians as human shields and storing weapons in schools, hospitals etc. I’ve seen your IDF spokesman defend Israel standing at a dimly lit podium. This looks like a scene out of the 1970’s – like some old Walter Cronkite clips of the TV news. You need to tear down your old ways of communicating and start over from scratch. In my opinion, you are losing the information war which will eventually translate into less political and military support from America. The Holy Land is so important to my life, and it pains me to see support for Israel slip away. I would be happy to discuss this further with you or your team. Sincerely, Charlie Kirk