Hedric Stonefree

We are the only party putting on regular public events in this campaign. 20,000 people have come along to hear our message so far. What are the others so scared of?

@peanut_astro Indeed we should, we must, make it SO!

A vote for the Tories is a wasted vote. Only Reform UK can beat Labour. ✅

This isn't Beirut or Tehran. This is Macron's France. Images of the destruction caused by riots from Kurdish immigrants in France are making headlines around the world. This is a reality that the mainstream media isn't reporting on. Why?

Letter to CEO of Waitrose calling for their employee Walker Smith to be reinstated and given a bonus - after he was disgracefully sacked for tackling a shoplifter

@Vocal_GenX Nonsense. Both the Conservatives and Labour are heading for a wipeout at the next election. All Restore risks doing is splitting the right-leaning vote, increasing the chances of a hung parliament—and potentially paving the way for a more radical left coalition.

I'll be voting Tory Why would Kemi want to do a deal with a party who offers nothing for the British public and campaigned to annihilate them giving us Starmer Reform will be annihilated once Restore gets running - mark my words

Well said again, Dan Hodges (@DPJHodges)

Over the past 6 months I’ve been working closely with @JournoZak of @Daily_Express .Today’s front page story about the horrors of how the Rochdale children were failed, how they were treated as less than human is not new. It’s what directly led me to resign from @gmpolice in late 2012. I was ashamed to have been part of such a despicable case! I have spoken about it constantly since 2013, I covered it in my book and have supported Amber and Ruby for over 12 years to fight against police and cps to expose how horrifically they were treated. I was grateful that in 2022 the new Chief Constable of @gmpolice finally formally apologised. His predecessor Ian Hopkins QPM very forcefully and for years refused. And @peter1fahy turned away and condoned their treatment whilst Chief Constable. In my opinion both are not fit for office! However even though we had “face to face” meetings with @CPSUK Crown Prosecution Service in London even as recently as 2023, they still refused to apologise, refused to say they won’t use these same what I consider disgusting “tactics” again, and that is very concerning. Where Zak Garner-Purkis has made such great strides is in strengthening what I’ve always said, what Ruby and Amber have always said, by finding direct claims made publicly by Keir Starmer where he owns the decision making on this case! It’s abhorrent to me. Always was and always will be. And that he was Director of Public Prosecutions signing this off says so much about the type of man he is! It speaks for itself tbh. No conscience, no principles, no humanity. For the very first time ever Ruby has shared her story with a journalist. It’s taken huge courage for her to open this box yet again. But she wants everyone to know how she and Amber were treated. I took her to meet Zak and here is the first part of this expose, and more will follow in coming weeks… It knocked me sick from the first day I knew what they did to Amber and Ruby, but in all honesty this is the first time a national newspaper has wanted to go into the detail in this way. Thankyou Zak. X express.co.uk/news/uk/218982…

Trump moves heaven and earth to rescue one downed American pilot. Starmer moves heaven and earth to prosecute British veterans. That is all you need to know about our Prime Minister.

@sales_belinda Is that poster not illegal, its flying the flag ?

@KEdge23 Oh you so funny!!!!!

Only the Conservatives can stop Reform and the Greens.

NEW: more sickening allegations aimed at Keir Starmer and the CPS of the rape gang scandal. These are some of the most horrendous allegations about the treatment of victims, that I’ve ever heard. Including one victim allegedly being called a ‘teenage pimp’ and branded a ‘paedophile’ by the CPS. This is the Rochdale case that Starmer boats he took charge of. How much of it did he sign off on? Incredible work by @JournoZak as ever. Please watch his full report in the comments below.

@MarkHeath45 I doubt Rupert Lowe would do this, if he does then honestly he is finished in my mind.

Can any Restore Britain members, shed any light on the story that is doing the rounds, following discussions in spaces. 🚨Restore supporters are saying they are going to vote green in the may elections just to spite reform...they are basically aligning themselves with people who support the grooming gang types...and its thanks to reform we are able to vote in the elections in may after they went to court! The thinking is, that if greens clear up in May, it would cause a surge in more radical thinking, like the wanting of full remigration, thus helping Restore, further down the line🚨 So 3 questions for you…. 1) What are your initial thoughts? 2) Is there any truth in this, have you come across this story? 3) What would your voting intention be, if there was a local election where you are, no Restore candidate, who gets your X or would you abstain?

Once again, this is what our country needs. Javier Milei fired 50,000 government employees, cut the government by 30%, and reduced the government ministries from 18 to 8, and achieved positive fiscal results. Talk about cutting costs. Viva la libertad! @JMilei

@sowelleconomics @JMilei This is exactly what the UK needs.

THIS GOVERNMENT IS INFESTED WITH PAEODOPHILE'S, PERVERTS AND CROOKS. THEY SHOULD ALL BE IN PRISON.

@StevieJenkin They do relise reducing the speed of cars increases polution. I thought they were the Green Party.

Is anyone going to vote for this? Seriously?

Three former soldiers will appear at Belfast magistrates court on April 20th. One is charged with a killing that took place in May 1972. He is not accused of acting outside his orders. He is accused of acting within them. The distinction no longer appears to matter. This is the reality behind Labour's Northern Ireland Troubles Bill, a piece of legislation dressed in the language of reconciliation that functions, in practice, as an engine of persecution. The state that sent these men to Northern Ireland, that gave them their orders, that relied on their judgment in circumstances no minister has ever faced, is now the state that funds the machinery pursuing them through the courts half a century later. That is not a technicality. It is the central fact. Taxpayer money flows to the lawyers challenging the actions of soldiers whose actions were sanctioned by the taxpayer. The government calls this justice. General Sir Peter Wall, who commanded the British Army for four years, calls it something without moral backbone. He is right. The operational consequences are already visible. Elite soldiers are leaving the SAS and SBS rather than face the prospect of prosecution decades hence for missions carried out under government orders. The crisis has become sufficiently acute that reservists are being brought into the regular SAS to fill roles vacated by those walking out. Britain's most capable fighting force is being quietly hollowed out by a bill whose architects appear indifferent to the result. Seven former SAS commanders have warned that the legislation is doing the enemy's work, that operational secrets exposed through inquiries give hostile states a narrative of lawless troops. Moscow, Tehran and Beijing do not need to discredit British special forces. Westminster is doing it for them. The asymmetry at the heart of this legislation is not incidental. It is structural. IRA members were released under the Good Friday Agreement. Many destroyed evidence, stayed silent, or received letters guaranteeing they would not be pursued. Soldiers kept records, gave statements, and remained traceable. Decades later, only one group remains available for scrutiny. Not because they are more culpable, but because they are more reachable. The Coagh ambush of June 1991 illustrates the logic perfectly. Three IRA men were stopped by the SAS on their way to murder someone. A coroner ruled the force used was justified. Years later a family challenged that ruling, arguing the soldier should have paused after each shot to consider whether to fire the next one. A judge described that argument as ludicrous and utterly divorced from reality. The challenge continues, funded by legal aid, heard at the Court of Appeal just days ago. No verdict ends the process. The process is the punishment. Keir Starmer has said publicly he is absolutely confident there will be no vexatious prosecutions. Three soldiers will be in a Belfast court in sixteen days. His confidence has not reached them. The government insists its bill provides robust protections for veterans. General Sir Nick Parker, who oversaw the final operations in Northern Ireland, says ministers do not understand the duty of the state to stand by those who serve it. The duty to stand by those who serve is contractual, not sentimental. A soldier who follows orders in a war the state authorised cannot later be offered up as payment for political convenience. What is being constructed here is not a legacy process. It is a permanent legal industry, sustained by public money, targeting the most traceable participants in a conflict the state itself waged. The soldiers kept their records. That is now their liability. A serious country does not behave this way. This one, apparently, does. "Keir Starmer has said publicly he is absolutely confident there will be no vexatious prosecutions. Three soldiers will be in a Belfast court in sixteen days. His confidence has not reached them."

Labour don’t want you to watch our new Party Political Broadcast. It would be a shame if you retweeted it.