Doug Hagmann

I see that @OzTheMentalist is trending. Great (and important) stuff. But this is not magic & you have the ability to do this. My forensic passion is non-verbal communication analysis + linguistic analysis (forensic certification of Behavioral Analysis). It has many benefits, including helping you avoid falling for PsyOps, identifying cues of deception, and pre-violence indicators - important today.

@NaturallyFTW @LarryRB524341 Do not comply. So much for “my body, my choice.”

THE FACE OF EVIL. This is Alice Mann. She's responsible for the bill a senate committee passed yesterday that would MANDATE MMR vaccination for All kids in MN. No exceptions. Even for homeschool. This is Effectively saying: vaccination or jail. This woman wants to strap down children & inject them w/severely undertested, Big Pharma GMO concoctions directly into their veins...whether parents agree or not. That's evil. An authoritarian overreach & body violation so severe, it should make any human being shudder with disgust. It goes against the very thing America stands for & holds dear: Freedom. Pro tip: If you want people to vaccinate...make your product safer, test it properly, & educate us on why we should do it. Do not force it. You evil, evil woman. Personally, I don't trust Big Pharma & won't poison my kids. Especially for a natural infection w/a ~100% survival rate, & can be managed naturally. So anyway. Anyone know a good state to move to? (I live in MN 😭)

Worth the read - here is the civil complaint that prompted this black-robed tyrant's decision: downloads.aap.org/AAP/PDF/FiledS…

And this: reduxx.info/transgender-yo…

Until you've walked into a house like this after a lengthy investigation and surveillance, you have no idea how bad things are - the level of depravity - and how deep things go. I've got evidence photographs/video I've personally taken - some used for search warrants (PA, OH) and some shown/played at trials, but none I can post. Given the ongoing censorship, I'm writing to the dozen or so who might see this. To those who DO see this, please don't "look away." Evil must be confronted AND prosecuted. Although the #Epstein files are fashionable to discuss now (displacing the now forgotten various laptops, from Weiner to Biden), consider what might be happening in your city... or even in your neighborhood. I've seen this at ALL levels of society and across the entire political spectrum. Sadly, I've also seen cases of LE brass running interference, DAs laying down, and judges going light. It's only gotten worse. I've concluded that we have a cultural problem that is downstream from a spiritual problem. What we're seeing is the result of spiritual bankruptcy and cultural perversion. We cannot allow the continued assaults on what we've held sacred e.g. Biblical marriage, nor should we permit our children to be indoctrinated by radicalized perverts at any level. Men like @RealCraigSawyer, Vets4CR.org, the ShatterOps team, SaveThem, etc. are in the field saving children. Even though they face incredible pushback, we can support them. We must remember the victims, and those involved in mitigating their lifetime of trauma.

@EricLDaugh This is what both Houses are allowing to happen to our Country. They have the power to fix this but will you @SpeakerJohnson @LeaderJohnThune will you stop the activist judges? PASS THE SAVE AMERICA ACT AND SAVE OUR ELECTIONS IMPEACH ACTIVISTS JUDGES AND CONFIM @POTUS PICKS.

@wakeupusa "...gonna need a bigger boat."

Information vs. content. An important distinction - know the difference.

Remember the wicked who ridiculed people for taking “horse dewormer” when COVID was being effectively treated by Ivermectin‼️ Where are the arrests??

Illegal aliens & human trafficking. In the open, in LA. One case, a big one. This is what the Left wants to protect over U.S. citizens. Why is @AliMayorkas so quiet lately? Where's the justice? @KarenBassLA? @CAgovernor? Accountability? Photo from indictment READ: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco… economiccollapse.report/smuggling-empi…

Extremely important interview - @RealCraigSawyer is doing tremendous & important work. Please watch and share. V4CR.org #V4CR

Ouch. Yeah, that's gonna leave a mark! The reaction by #Walz is confirmatory.

@gothburz I have become a fan of @gothburz. His satirical posts are exceptionally well done and in many cases, his message is delivered better than scholarly attempts. Bravo, sir.

I am an intern in the Office of Legislative Affairs at the Department of State. My job is binders. When the Secretary briefs members of Congress, I prepare the classified briefing packets. I print the cover sheets. I tab the sections with a ruler because my supervisor once told me that a misaligned tab conveys a lack of respect for the classification, and a lack of respect for the classification means you should not be in the building. The ruler is six inches. The tabs are perfect. On March 2, 2026, I prepared eight binders. Not five hundred and thirty-five. Eight. The Gang of Eight. The Speaker, the House Minority Leader, the Senate Majority Leader, the Senate Minority Leader, and the chairs and ranking members of the intelligence committees. Eight people. I printed eight cover sheets. I placed eight binders on eight chairs in a SCIF in the Capitol. The room seats twelve. I removed four chairs and set them in the hallway. They would not be needed. The Constitution says Congress declares war. All of Congress. All five hundred and thirty-five members. I printed materials for eight. My job is counting to eight. Before the classified briefing, the Secretary spoke to reporters on the Capitol steps. I was inside, standing by the door to the room, which was not yet occupied because the eight people had not yet arrived. I could hear him through the hallway. This is what he said, in the order he said it, because the order is the point: "We knew that there was going to be an Israeli action." "We knew that that would precipitate an attack against American forces." "And we knew that if we didn't preemptively go after them before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties." A reporter asked if the United States was forced to strike because of an impending Israeli action. The Secretary said: "No." Then: "Obviously, we were aware of Israeli intentions and understood what that would mean for us, and we had to be prepared to act as a result of it." The answer is no. The next sentence is yes. They are in the same breath. I heard both from the hallway. The Secretary then defined the imminent threat. He said: "The imminent threat was that we knew that if Iran was attacked — and we believed they would be attacked — that they would immediately come after us." Israel attacks Iran. Iran attacks us. We attack Iran first so that when Israel attacks Iran and Iran attacks us, we have already attacked Iran. I stood by the door with a ruler in my pocket and tried to diagram this sentence. It is a circle. The circle is the justification. I have a political science degree from Georgetown. I took Constitutional Law. I took a seminar on the July Crisis of 1914. Austria-Hungary was going to attack Serbia. Russia would mobilize. Germany knew that meant a two-front war, so Germany struck France first. Every country entered because of what another country was about to do. The professor called it an alliance cascade. The cascade killed twenty million people and created the conditions for fascism. He did not tell us what the next one creates. That was a lecture hall. This is a hallway in the Capitol. The binders are new. I wrote my ConLaw final paper arguing that the War Powers Resolution was "effectively unenforceable." My professor wrote in the margin: "Correct, but that's a description, not an argument." I think about that margin note a lot. I thought about it again when the Secretary said, on the steps of the building that wrote the law: "No presidential administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as constitutional — not Republican presidents, not Democratic presidents." He said: "We can't notify 535 people. That's not possible." It is possible. It is called a vote. It is the first power listed in Article I, Section 8. I was inside the building. I had the eight binders. The five hundred and twenty-seven other members would learn what happened the same way you did. A reporter asked about a school in Minab. One hundred and seventy students. Ages seven to twelve. Saturday is a school day in Iran. The Secretary said: "I've seen those reports." He said: "If that was our strike." He said: "It'd be very tragic." Two blocks away, the same morning, the First Lady was chairing a UN Security Council meeting titled "Children, Technology, and Education in Conflict." She said: "The U.S. stands with all of the children throughout the world." She did not mention Minab. The Secretary did not mention Minab. One building said "very tragic." The other building said "imagine the loss of potential." Neither building said the name of the school. The Secretary was asked about regime change. He said: "Not regime change." Then: "We hope that the Iranian people can overthrow this government." On my ConLaw final, the distance between "not the objective" and "we hope it happens" was worth four points. I got them right. In practice the distance is zero and it is not on the exam. The Secretary walked past me. I held the door. He did not look at me. He sat down. Eight people were in the room. The door closed. I stood in the hallway with the four extra chairs. Senator Warner came out forty minutes later. He said: "There was no imminent threat to the United States of America by the Iranians. There was a threat to Israel." He said: "If we equate a threat to Israel as the equivalent of an imminent threat to the United States, then we are in uncharted territory." Senator Schumer said the answers were "totally insufficient." He said they "raised many more questions than it answered." I collected the binders afterward. One had a coffee ring on the cover sheet. One had a margin note I am not permitted to describe. One was untouched. Someone attended a classified briefing on the third day of a war launched without their authorization and did not open the binder. I tabbed that binder with a ruler. I am standing in the hallway. The four chairs are against the wall. The war is in its third day. The Speaker says they have the votes to block the war powers resolution. The vote is this week. The binders are filed. The Secretary said, to the last reporter who shouted a question as he walked away: "The hardest hits are yet to come." I got a B+ on that paper. My professor was right. It was a description, not an argument. It's still a description.