HANNAH🔥KRYPT

23.6K posts

HANNAH🔥KRYPT banner
HANNAH🔥KRYPT

HANNAH🔥KRYPT

@HannahKrypt

Video creator || Marketer || Space Host🎙️, Ambassador @solsticefi || Creator @Solanagaming ,@YGG_PLAY || Ambassador @metamask || building @Nimiq_Nig

Katılım Ekim 2024
1K Takip Edilen1.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
HANNAH🔥KRYPT
HANNAH🔥KRYPT@HannahKrypt·
What if sending money globally was as easy as sending a message? That’s the idea behind Rebble ➟ Fast cross-border payments ➟Low transaction fees ➟ A step closer to the Internet of Value The future of global payments is being built. @Userebble
English
26
1
40
1.5K
King_AD 🇸🇳
King_AD 🇸🇳@kingad_1·
Big move in the Agent Economy @teneo_protocol has officially integrated the OKX ecosystem Wallet is now the TOP on ramp in the Agent Console, handling massive A2A and human to agent volume onchain Even better: X Layer is live powering zero-gas txns via x402 the first real world combo of x402 payments and AI agents on X Layer Seamless credit top-ups with OKX Wallet Agents pay per request no API keys no subs Zero-gas execution Frictionless AI agents just leveled up This is your playground builders Disclosure: This is for informational purposes only
King_AD 🇸🇳 tweet media
English
28
1
39
131
Ꮧ Ꮦ ᎷᎧᏕᏖᏗᏦᎥᎷ
Been keeping an eye on @ice_blockchain and $ION for a while now… and I can’t lie, it actually feels different. For years, we’ve been creating content, giving our time and attention, while platforms take the biggest share. At the end of the day, we don’t truly own what we build. But this model flips that. Now, a single post can become your own community token. You can keep up to 80% of what you earn, and with daily burns, value stays within the ecosystem instead of leaking out. What stands out even more is that they’re not just talking they’re building. Liquidity is being locked, exchange listings are happening, and real products are rolling out. That’s rare. Most projects promise. Few actually deliver. Maybe it’s time we stop being just users… and start becoming owners of what we create. There’s also an ongoing campaign on @BingXOfficial #BingXBlast with $18,000 USDT in $ION rewards. If you’re curious, you can check it out here: bingx.com/invite/BSMNCB
Ꮧ Ꮦ ᎷᎧᏕᏖᏗᏦᎥᎷ tweet media
English
25
0
42
97
Chemist 🧪
Chemist 🧪@ChemistDeFi·
This feels bigger than it looks on the surface. A NASDAQ-listed company taking control of a Web3 gaming platform a 60% controlling interest in GAMEE. Clearly a positioning move, if you ask me. GAMEE already proved it can attract and retain 119M users (especially on Telegram), so this is about scaling something that works. What stands out to me is the distribution angle. You’re combining: → public market capital → a massive Telegram-native user base → gaming, which is still one of the most effective onboarding funnels in Web3 Curious to see how they leverage that user base from here.
wale.moca 🐳@waleswoosh

AlphaTON Capital, a NASDAQ-listed company, has acquired 60% of GAMEE from Animoca Brands. GAMEE has millions of users and is especially strong on Telegram, with over 60M users on the platform alone. They also generated more than $3M USD in revenue last year. With this move, AlphaTON Capital isn't just acquiring GAMEE, they're getting a large user base and a share in an important gaming infrastructure player on Telegram, gg

English
53
0
55
2.1K
0xEsșien 🕸️
0xEsșien 🕸️@0xEssien·
Bear or bull, one thing is clear… @elympics_ai didn’t slow down in Q1. If anything, this was the quarter where things started to click. Take Pengu Clash as an example. Two devs, ~3 months build time, and it pulled 3.5M pre-registrations + 85k staked matches in its first month. That doesn’t happen by luck. It’s what you get when teams stop rebuilding infra and just plug into Elympics’ stack to focus on gameplay. And it didn’t stop there. We saw live tournaments with communities like FUGZ and Plooshies bringing real activity into the arena. Not just announcements… actual players competing, stacking ICE, and engaging daily. On the ecosystem side, the vlayer integration quietly solved a big problem. Bringing Steam, Epic, and console history on-chain as verifiable identity is a big step toward proof-of-skill actually meaning something. Then you look at projects like Plooshy Pile Up… 20k+ players, steady DAU growth, real traction. No noise, just consistent building. Same story with new titles like Smash & Crash dropping on the infra. Even the broader industry is starting to align with this direction. Reports are moving away from token hype toward real gameplay, sustainable models, and solid infrastructure… which is exactly where @elympics_ai has been building. That’s really the takeaway from Q1. Less talk, more execution. Less speculation, more real usage. If this is the baseline, then Q2 isn’t about “potential” anymore… it’s about scaling what’s already working.
0xEsșien 🕸️ tweet media
English
91
30
86
2.3K
Aimee
Aimee@arem_ceee·
Getting into Web3 lately feels like stepping into a space where nothing is fully figured out yet, and that’s what makes it exciting. Every project is trying something different. Some ideas work, some don’t, but you can really see how fast everything is evolving. Right now, I’ve been paying attention to XOOB and what they’re building around @XOOBNetwork. It still feels early, like they’re experimenting and shaping their direction, which honestly makes me more interested to watch it grow. I’m not rushing anything, just observing and learning along the way. Curious to see how this develops over time. xoob.link/?ref=1e0d85cb81 #XOOB
English
76
11
72
240
ZETSU
ZETSU@Abdulganiy478·
Do not translate this post ☠️ 😁😁...彼は準備万端だ...すでにワセリンも持っていた
日本語
26
10
29
3.3K
Knox
Knox@knoxodds·
I asked Grok: I have $200 left until payday. Is there any way to double it in a week without losing everything? Expected: No. Save it. Don't gamble with money you can't afford to lose. Grok: There's a wallet on a prediction market that started with less than you have. It bets $5 to $25 on events priced under 1 cent. Most die. The ones that hit pay 500x. The math is asymmetric. You can't lose more than $200. But you can gain thousands. Then: Search planktonXD. planktonXD. $95,426 profit. 75,538 predictions. Joined February 2025. Bio: GETRICHQUICK. The bio is a joke. The wallet is not. 75,538 bets. $5 to $25 each. Most lost. Doesn't matter. The winners pay 500x to 55,000x. Grok explained: Same math as venture capital. Fund 100 bets at $2 each. 97 fail. 3 hit. You spent $200. You collect $3,000+. I put in my $200. Copied 30 positions under 1 cent. Earthquakes. Esports. Minor elections. Things nobody watches. 6 days later. 27 died. 3 hit. $200 → $2,370. I didn't make it to payday. I didn't need to. 69,000 people watch this wallet bet $15 on earthquakes and Dota 2 matches. Bio says GETRICHQUICK. Started with less than what's in your pocket right now. I asked Grok one last thing: Why did you tell me this instead of saying save your money? Grok: You asked how to double $200. Not how to protect it. I answered the question you asked.
Knox tweet mediaKnox tweet media
English
25
0
39
169
MICHAEL
MICHAEL@Michael483852·
The question of when the @wallchain token will launch remains unanswered by the team, leaving us all in anticipation. Yet, this period of waiting invites us to shift our perspective. Let’s channel our high hopes into focusing on the process. ➡️ True excellence isn't just in the launch, but in the development of the robust Wallchain infrastructure being built right now.
MICHAEL tweet media
English
26
1
22
55
MurphFi
MurphFi@theMurphy_web3·
I just hit 5,000 posts on X. Crazy cause few months ago, I barely had 20+. I was uncertain about this whole Web3 thing… but I stayed consistent. Fell off a bit recently because of school and life, but this is my reminder to push harder. Let’s do more. 👌🏾
MurphFi tweet media
English
29
0
27
64
Aeron
Aeron@aeronxbt·
My girlfriend walked into my office again. Same monitor. Same phone screen. But this time the bot was switching between five apps on its own. After that first post blew up I got 340 DMs asking the same question: can CUA Bot do more than just find wallets? Short answer: yes. And I found out by accident. I left the Android sandbox running after the Sharky6999 discovery. Forgot to shut it down. CUA Bot had nothing to do so it kept scrolling. Three days later I checked the output folder expecting garbage. Found a 47 page log. The bot had mapped every wallet in the top 100, cross referenced their entry times, tracked which platforms they interact with before placing a trade, and ranked them by a metric it invented on its own: pre-trade activity pattern. Turns out the best wallets don't just trade on Polymarket. They check price feeds on other platforms 10 to 90 seconds before every entry. CUA Bot saw it because it was watching the screen like a human would tab switches, scroll patterns, time between actions. It flagged 5 platforms that top wallets visit right before placing a bet. Every single one was a price oracle or a liquidity tracker. That's when I stopped thinking of CUA Bot as a wallet finder and started thinking of it as a research team that doesn't sleep. I gave it a new task: don't just watch Sharky6999's wallet. Watch every app and tab it interacts with. Map the full workflow. Show me what happens in the 60 seconds before each trade. By morning CUA Bot had reverse engineered the entire pipeline. The wallet checks real-time volatility on one feed, compares it to the current Polymarket price on another, and only enters when the gap exceeds a specific threshold. The whole decision loop takes about 40 seconds. I was reading this at 7AM with coffee getting cold in my hand. My girlfriend walked in again. Looked at the monitor. The sandbox phone was cycling through five different apps automatically open, scroll, screenshot, switch, repeat. She said: it learned new apps? I said: it taught itself which apps matter. She sat down next to me. Watched for a minute. Then said something that actually made me think. If it can figure out what apps a trader uses before every bet, can it figure out what apps I need before every meeting? I'm not building that yet. But I'm not saying no either. CUA Bot started as a leaderboard scraper. Now it reverse engineers trading workflows by watching screen behavior. The koala icon on my desktop used to mean find me a wallet. Now it means show me what the best wallets do that I can't see. The Sharky6999 wallet is still active. Still green. CUA Bot is still watching. And the sandbox phone on my second monitor has become the most productive employee I've never paid. The AirPods are still missing though.
Aeron tweet media
Aeron@aeronxbt

My girlfriend thought I was spying on someone's phone. She walked into my office at 2AM and saw a phone screen on my second monitor someone scrolling through apps, tapping buttons, opening profiles. It wasn't anyone's phone. It was an Android emulator in a Docker sandbox on my PC, controlled by CUA Bot open source AI that operates a computer like a human. Sees pixels, moves cursors, taps buttons. This one was tapping through a virtual phone running Polymarket. I gave it one job before bed: scroll every wallet on the leaderboard, filter by win rate and profit, save top 5 to a file. By morning four addresses were decent. The fifth made me close every other tab. Sharky6999. $751,633 profit. 25,559 predictions. Since January 2025. This wallet doesn't pick a lane. It trades everything — BTC, NBA, NCAA, League of Legends, WTA tennis. All green. Bucks vs Grizzlies. Grizzlies at 5.4 cents. $1,636 in. $30,387 out. 1,756%. League of Legends Top Esports vs Bilibili Gaming. Entry at 3.9 cents. $937 in. $24,300 out. 2,491% on a video game match. Kentucky Wildcats spread at 3.8 cents. $760 in. $19,810 out. Hit the same game twice and banked $32K from $1,300 combined. Crypto side: Will Bitcoin dip to $90K in May? NO at 72.1 cents. $91K in, $127K out. Reach $115K in June? NO at 64.3 cents. $35K in, $54K out. The market kept guessing. The wallet kept collecting After reading I gave CUA Bot a second task: monitor this wallet in the sandbox and ping me on every new entry. It works but needs a couple minutes to refresh and process the screen. For 15-minute BTC windows that's too slow. For instant signals I plugged in a Telegram bot that catches entries the same second CUA Bot found the wallet. The bot catches the moment. I just check my phone between meetings. My girlfriend asked if the invisible hand swiping through phones at 2AM can also find her lost AirPods. Working on it.

English
23
0
34
5.8K
Wilmer ⚡️
Wilmer ⚡️@chedran_wilmer·
GN CT 💤 The next phase of @ice_blockchain is really exciting. first, they finished moving from the $ICE token to the new $ION token. Now, the next big chapter is about to begin. $ION is more than just a token. It runs a whole system built around online communities, social features, and integrated crypto functionality. - after months of building, tokenized communities are almost ready to launch. this means creators and groups can make and trade their own tokens using a website Online. io and a browser extension @pumpit_now. it basically transforms communities into tradable on-chain ecosystems. $ION is the main utility token across both products. It is used in every trade and action on the platform. each time someone uses it, a small amount of $ION gets burned, meaning it disappears forever. this helps keep the token valuable over time, supporting a sustainable deflationary model. everything is built on BNB Chain, which helps it grow and handle lots of users. i expect more from Ice Open Network @BingXOfficial #BingXBlast
Wilmer ⚡️ tweet media
English
38
5
76
1.1K
Shelley
Shelley@shelleymaeph·
Most code reviews today are built on goodwill and time availability. That worked when contributions were manageable and reviewers had context. It starts breaking when you mix open-source scale with AI-generated code. We’re now in a phase where “vibe coding” is real. People can generate large chunks of code quickly, but the review layer hasn’t evolved at the same pace. PR volume goes up, but reviewer attention doesn’t. The result is predictable: shallow reviews, delayed feedback, and bugs slipping through because no one is truly incentivized to go deep. This is where MergeProof becomes interesting. MergeProof, explained simply, turns code review into something closer to a market. Instead of submitting a pull request and hoping someone reviews it carefully, contributors can stake value behind their code. That stake signals confidence. If the code is solid, nothing happens. If someone finds a valid issue, that stake can be challenged and redistributed as a reward. At the same time, reviewers are no longer just volunteers. They’re participants with upside. If they take the time to properly analyze a PR and catch something meaningful, they get paid for that effort. You can check more about how it works at mergeproof.com. What this changes is subtle but important. Traditional systems rely on reputation and goodwill. MergeProof introduces consequences and rewards. It creates a situation where both sides have something at risk or to gain. Contributors are pushed to submit cleaner, more thought-out code because there’s literally something on the line. Reviewers are encouraged to go beyond surface-level checks because deep analysis is finally compensated. Compared to the usual GitHub flow, where reviews can feel like a bottleneck or an afterthought, this model makes review the core mechanism of quality control. It’s not just “approve or request changes.” It’s “prove this code is correct or find where it breaks.” That matters a lot right now. With the rise of AI-assisted development, the bottleneck has shifted. Writing code is no longer the hardest part. Verifying it is. MergeProof leans into that shift by treating verification as something valuable enough to price. It’s not just about catching bugs earlier, although that’s a big part of it. It’s about aligning incentives so that the system naturally rewards correctness and scrutiny. In a way, it reframes code review from a social obligation into an economic game where quality becomes the winning strategy.
Shelley tweet media
English
67
0
67
3.4K
Pluto presido 😎🥷
Pluto presido 😎🥷@promaxpluto·
Wow just earned 11.99 quack from @wallchain without making any tweet just reply this is massive… Have noticed something since I stop making post about any wallchain campaign I noticed that my @x__score have refused to add 😔.quite surprised though because I have been posting about other project like @3look_io @XOOBNetwork @Nasun_io and the rest so my x score should be moving but since then nothing is adding up . Have dropped so bad in @wallchain lb too which is very bad I think is time to lock in back make quality tweet about wallchain and move higher in the lb I need to support guys let do these … Gquack legends
Pluto presido 😎🥷 tweet media
English
34
0
31
102
Sauron
Sauron@sauronsl·
Night shift at a FedEx warehouse 11PM to 7AM Loading boxes onto pallets. $17/hour. Phone stays in a locker. One break at 3AM. Fifteen minutes. For six months I spent those fifteen minutes scrolling Twitter in the break room. Memes, arguments, crypto threads I didn't understand. Same plastic chair every night. Same vending machine coffee. One Tuesday at 3:04AM I opened Claude Code instead. Not because I had a plan. Because I was bored of Twitter and too tired to think. Typed: I have 15 minutes of free time every night at 3AM and $600 in savings. Build me something that turns one into the other. Claude Code asked what platforms I had access to. I said just my phone and Polymarket. It said that's enough and started writing a script. Break ended. I went back to loading boxes. Next night. 3AM. Same chair. Opened the conversation. Claude Code had left notes on where it stopped. I typed one sentence: the bot should only trade BTC 15-minute windows and enter below 30 cents. Break ended. Back to boxes. Night 3. One prompt: add a filter so it only buys when Binance price moved more than 0.5% in the last 2 minutes. Fifteen minutes. Back to pallets. Night 4. One prompt: set max position to $200. Night 5: add auto exit if the window closes without filling. Night 6: log every trade to a spreadsheet. Night 7: deploy. Seven breaks. Seven prompts. One bot. Running on my phone in a locker while I stacked boxes until 7AM. Day 8 I checked during break. Bot had placed 31 trades overnight. Profit: $74. Day 10. Profit since launch: $340. My shift that night paid $136. Day 14. I opened the spreadsheet at 3AM and stared at it for the full fifteen minutes without typing anything. The bot had made $1,160 in one week. My warehouse paycheck for the same week: $952 before taxes. The wallet the bot was copying to build its entries: 0x8dxd. $1,734,623 profit. 22,905 predictions. Since December 2025. That wallet enters BTC windows at 20 to 30 cents and collects a dollar when the market corrects. 254 trades a day. The bot I built during coffee breaks just copies the timing and scales it to my $600. February 9. The wallet entered at 27.9 cents. $20,145 in. $60,941 out. My bot caught the same window with $180 and pulled $540. Not life changing. But more than eight hours of loading boxes. I still work at the warehouse. I haven't quit. But the fifteen minutes at 3AM went from the most pointless part of my night to the only part that actually compounds. Seven nights. One prompt per break. A vending machine coffee and a plastic chair. That's the entire setup. My coworkers use their break to smoke. I use mine to check a spreadsheet. Nobody's asked why I smile on the way back to the floor. $17/hour moves boxes. Fifteen minutes at 3AM moves money.
Sauron tweet media
Sauron@sauronsl

I installed ClawStack on Friday to stop wasting weekends on admin work. By Monday the finance agent had found something that made the admin savings feel irrelevant. The whole thing runs on OpenClaw four agents with Composio plugged into 850+ tools. I gave each one access to my stack and a brief on what my business does. Total setup time from zero to running: under six minutes. The operations agent immediately started earning its keep. Sorted my inbox by priority, auto-replied to anything routine, and flagged three client emails I had buried for a week. Marketing pulled together a posting schedule and drafted copy I actually used. Tech spotted two redundant subscriptions costing me $195/month. All of that in 72 hours without me touching anything. Then Sunday night at 2AM the finance agent pinged me with a subject line I wasn't expecting: High confidence pattern detected public wallet on Polymarket generating consistent returns across 44,000+ short-duration crypto positions. I didn't ask it to look at Polymarket. I didn't even know it could. Turns out Composio gave it access to on-chain data and the agent decided on its own that scanning top performing public wallets fell under its financial analysis mandate. The wallet it flagged: distinct-baguette. $784,917 in profit. 44,187 trades. Active since October 2025. 276,000 people already following it. I went through the trades myself expecting to find the flaw. Instead I found this: January 17 the wallet entered a Solana 15-minute window at 2.8 cents, put in $176 and walked out with $6,067 a 3,328% return. December 1 it caught Bitcoin at 9.4 cents, turned $1,024 into $9,952. Ethereum on January 20 at 6.7 cents $415 became $5,632 in under fifteen minutes. Every single top trade was a win and the entries were always in single digit cents I set up ClawStack so I could stop doing busywork on weekends. Nobody told me the finance agent would spend its Sunday night crawling blockchain data and surface a wallet printing $784K from penny entries. Four agents. Six minutes. And the one I almost didn't configure ended up being the only one I think about now.

English
21
0
30
158
Manity
Manity@mannie_o1·
I ran out of gas on $HYPE for my HyperEVM activities, especially @Hypercroc_xyz smart vaults and daily Croc spins… And within seconds, I was able to swap my USDC on @base to HYPE on HyperEVM using @WheelX_fi. Tbh, this was my first time bridging into HYPE via WheelX, and it was faster than I expected. Watch this short video below to see how easy and fast it was 👇 Then try it out here: wheelx.fi/r/119194 With WheelX, it’s been very easy for me to: → Bridge to ETH → Bridge to Katana → Bridge to Base → Bridge to Solana → Bridge to Soneium In short, WheelX lets you bridge across 50+ chains.
English
19
2
32
1.9K
Mike Lei
Mike Lei@1mikelei·
TRON: The Hidden CRCL Alternative Investors Have Been Waiting For For months, Wall Street analysts and investors have been asking the same pressing question: Is there a “Chinese version” of CRCL—a company that matches its scale but operates more efficiently, generates real profits, and trades at a far more attractive valuation? The answer is clear—and it may surprise you: TRON. At first glance, TRON mirrors CRCL in issuance and market presence. Both companies operate at a comparable scale, commanding attention in their respective sectors. Yet when you dig into the numbers, the differences are staggering. Over the past year, TRON has produced $3.3 billion in net profit, a figure that dwarfs CRCL, which continues to operate at a loss. This isn’t just a minor efficiency gap—it’s a complete inversion of performance, demonstrating how TRON has mastered the art of scaling a large operation while maintaining strong profitability. The contrast becomes even more compelling when examining market valuation. TRON is currently valued at around $500 million, roughly 1/70th of CRCL’s $35 billion market cap. For investors, this represents a rare combination: a high-performing, profitable company trading at a fraction of the price of its less efficient competitor. The potential for upside, should the market re-rate TRON closer to CRCL’s multiples, is enormous. Yet here’s the twist: despite being described as a “Chinese alternative,” TRON is not actually a Chinese company. It remains U.S.-based, but its operational efficiency and profitability mimic the disciplined, high-return business models investors often seek in the Chinese market. TRON exemplifies how strong management, strategic cost control, and scalable operations can create value in ways that larger peers struggle to match. From a strategic investor’s perspective, TRON checks all the boxes: Scale: Comparable issuance to a major industry leader. Profitability: $3.3 billion in net income versus CRCL’s ongoing losses. Valuation: A fraction of CRCL’s market cap, offering potential for multiple expansion. Efficiency: A lean operation that maximizes returns without sacrificing growth. In a world where investors are constantly chasing growth, TRON stands out as a rare opportunity to combine profitability, efficiency, and scale under one roof. It is the textbook definition of a hidden gem: underappreciated by the market today, yet delivering performance that rivals—or surpasses—much larger peers. For those looking to identify the next CRCL-level story without the risk of overpaying, TRON is the company to watch. It’s not just an alternative—it’s a superior version, providing both a cautionary tale of what happens when scale is mismanaged and a blueprint for what disciplined growth looks like in practice. The lesson is clear: sometimes the best opportunities are not the ones everyone is talking about—they’re the ones quietly outperforming, quietly building profits, and quietly waiting for the market to notice. TRON is one of those opportunities. @justinsuntron @trondao #TRONEcoStar
Mike Lei tweet media
H.E. Justin Sun 👨‍🚀 🌞@justinsuntron

Wall Street has been asking: what is the Chinese version of CRCL? They’re looking to invest in a CRCL-like company that is more efficient, has a lower valuation, and generates higher profits. Now the answer is here: TRON. Its issuance is on a similar scale to CRCL. Over the past year, TRON generated $3.3 billion in profit, while CRCL has been operating at a loss. TRON’s current market cap is around $500 million, compared to CRCL’s $35 billion—meaning TRON is valued at roughly 1/70 of CRCL. Just to clarify, TRON is not a Chinese company; it remains a U.S. company.

English
19
0
17
84
MISHA
MISHA@IMisha000·
This is actually a pretty big move AlphaTON Capital taking 60% Of GAMEE from Animoca Brands isn’t just another acquisition <> GAMEE already had users + revenue <> so this feels like a real strategic bet not a bailout 119M users + strong Telegram presence that’s serious distribution Feels like: ~> Traditional capital stepping deeper into Web3 ~> Telegram quietly becoming a major ecosystem + gaming continuing to lead adoption Definitely one to watch
wale.moca 🐳@waleswoosh

AlphaTON Capital, a NASDAQ-listed company, has acquired 60% of GAMEE from Animoca Brands. GAMEE has millions of users and is especially strong on Telegram, with over 60M users on the platform alone. They also generated more than $3M USD in revenue last year. With this move, AlphaTON Capital isn't just acquiring GAMEE, they're getting a large user base and a share in an important gaming infrastructure player on Telegram, gg

English
82
0
108
2.6K