KellyMcN

201 posts

KellyMcN

KellyMcN

@Happy2HelpU_

Physical Therapist

Los Angeles, CA Katılım Haziran 2022
9 Takip Edilen1 Takipçiler
KellyMcN
KellyMcN@Happy2HelpU_·
@misraetel Honestly? I think it's incredibly strange how openly and publicly obsessed you are with this topic. God does exist, Mike. We're all going to realize what a huge problem that is. You can only run from Truth in this life. You WILL have to answer to every skeleton you keep. :)
English
2
0
6
97
Dr. Mike Israetel
Dr. Mike Israetel@misraetel·
To me, it’s WHEN AI will be able to have humanlike feelings, not IF. What do you guys think?
English
61
0
41
3.1K
KellyMcN
KellyMcN@Happy2HelpU_·
@dalmaer You're getting STOMPED in these comments and it's hilarious to see. You're going to meet God the moment following the instant you die. I highly suggest you get to know Him. Learn your Bible, girl.
English
12
0
9
14.4K
Dion Almaer
Dion Almaer@dalmaer·
Funny how “God” worked it out for the octopus but not humans. Huh.
Dion Almaer tweet media
English
473
560
16.9K
4.9M
Ks Tech
Ks Tech@nartwu·
Actually the $MSFT sell off makes sense than most of SaaS players. With massive of money burns on $NVDA, $MSFT is the only one who cannot make money from their copilot. Stay away a little bit or make your AI potal work as others.
ImNotHarsh | 📈💸@imnotharsh

The selloff of $MSFT makes no sense. Buy when others are fearful. This fear is rooted in a lack of knowledge or understanding or even ignorance. I used to be a massive Microsoft bull. When it got to $550, it felt like maybe the selloff to $470 made sense. Now, it trades at $370. Fwd P/E under 20. I was less intrigued at $450, even. Now, it feels like a steal. The narrative seems to be that “Anthropic and OpenAI are going to take over everything, so traditional software is dead.” Microsoft owns a massive ~27% stake in OpenAI and has made a multi-billion-dollar investment in Anthropic. They’re seemingly one of the biggest winners in this entire AI trade. Microsoft is deeply integrating both GPT and Claude models directly into Copilot, Excel, Word, PowerPoint, and the entire Microsoft 365 suite. These are the most “in-disruptable” enterprise products on the planet. Companies aren’t ripping out Office and replacing it anytime soon, if at all. Azure is literally one of the cloud backbones powering both OpenAI and Anthropic. Every token these models process is generating massive revenue and compute demand for Microsoft. So the market is selling off the one company that actually owns pieces of the “disruptors” and provides the infrastructure they run on? The narrative will flip soon. Oh and they're an $INTC Intel partner. So, I have to buy.

English
1
0
0
257
KellyMcN
KellyMcN@Happy2HelpU_·
@Alexleaf I know what you said and meant, little one. You were very clear about it. Repeating yourself didn't provide additional clarity. Now, you show me that you understand my point. I'll then show you that you're the one creating a strawman. Go ahead. What was my point?
English
0
0
0
26
Alex Leaf
Alex Leaf@Alexleaf·
Lmao, debate you on what? You aren't even comprehending what I've said. "Reject it as false" is a strawman position that I've never taken. Youre just making shit up. I said the Bible is not a better determinant of truth than the scientific method, and that it does not intrinsically represent truth itself.
English
1
0
0
52
Alex Leaf
Alex Leaf@Alexleaf·
Nah, we have an overwhelming amount of research showing that people generally suck at knowing what they are doing in their life, leading to a ton of confounding, cognitive biases, and other things that cause personal experiences to be unreliable. Best thing is to evaluate one's personal experience within the context of RCTs and other scientific evidence so that you can better figure out the truth value of your experiences and beliefs. So, both matter and both are relevant when the goal is truth seeking.
Nick Norwitz MD PhD@nicknorwitz

Your N = 1 is more relevant to you than any RCT will ever be.

English
12
8
82
8.6K
KellyMcN
KellyMcN@Happy2HelpU_·
@Alexleaf You're just like a Christian but can't see it. They accept the Bible as true and you reject it as false. What both of you have in common is that you never actually took the time to understand it first. Oh, the irony (and dementia). Remain afraid to debate me. I love it.
English
1
0
0
65
Alex Leaf
Alex Leaf@Alexleaf·
@Happy2HelpU_ What? Saying the Bible represents truth and is more informative than the scientific method is akin to flat Earth thinking. This isn't a debatable point.
English
3
0
2
91
KellyMcN
KellyMcN@Happy2HelpU_·
@Alexleaf Why isn't it debatable? Because you're scared to debate it? Or because you can somehow, magically, verify that you've taken the time to actually learn and understand it and can prove it's false?
English
0
0
0
34
KellyMcN
KellyMcN@Happy2HelpU_·
@Alexleaf Seems like you're running from something. Why so vague? Why do I have to pull teeth and ask you what made it silly? Is there something you're afraid of?
English
1
0
0
83
Alex Leaf
Alex Leaf@Alexleaf·
@Happy2HelpU_ Because what you said was so silly that it made me laugh
English
1
0
1
78
KellyMcN
KellyMcN@Happy2HelpU_·
@Alexleaf Knowing you're Bible illiterate (since you could never verify otherwise), what is the purpose of your laugh?
English
1
0
0
85
KellyMcN
KellyMcN@Happy2HelpU_·
@peanut_buttur @nartwu How about if you go back to kindergarten and start over, you pathetic pumpkinhead. You might just learn something the next time around. 😂
English
1
0
0
12
KellyMcN
KellyMcN@Happy2HelpU_·
@peanut_buttur @nartwu Hey pumpkinhead, why are you giving exercise advice to people when you're obviously not an expert in it? Is it because you're just another immature troll who likes to get involved in other people's debates since you obviously have no life?
English
1
0
0
31
KellyMcN
KellyMcN@Happy2HelpU_·
Brad Schoenfeld posted an excerpt from a recent presentation where he said the following: . The ability to draw strong conclusions on a topic depends on the strength of the evidence. This takes into account: . 1. The number of studies that support the conclusion, 2. The quality of the studies, and 3. The generalizability to a given population. . I couldn't agree more. This is absolutely on point. . I also see it as a major, gigantic, and humongous problem. . Aside from scientists (PhDs) who perform research, how many people (laypeople and professionals) understand how to discern the quality of a study, or even attempt to do so? How about the accuracy of the statistical methods used, or if the researchers used the appropriate statistical methods to help form their conclusion? Very very very few. . How many know the number of studies that support the conclusion, let alone the number of studies on that given topic? Even a recent systematic review and/or meta-analysis won't be truly current, because there are probably studies in the review process that are going to be published soon, and/or studies which have been published following the systematic review that we're not aware of, yet need to be taken into account. How many people are going to consider all this? Just about no one. . How many people understand the potential conflict between internal and external validity -- i.e., controlling the variables in the study to eliminate rival explanations (internal validity) vs applying the findings to "the real world," where we can't control for those variables (external validity)? How many look at this with an unbiased, critical mind when seeing the results of a study that either supports or conflicts with their view? Not many. . Yes, we need to take those three things into account. Very few do. Very few know how. Very few remain unbiased. And this is all a part of "science" as well. . It's one thing for researchers to perform their studies and publish their findings, but the pandemonium (wild and noisy disorder and confusion) that occurs afterwards is the byproduct of everything I said above, and therefore, part of the entire process and picture. . In other words, those 3 things he listed are idealistic, but unrealistic. The pandemonium, confusion, skepticism, and division proves it. . What's the solution? Learn your established textbook time-tested principles (first principles), which won't change, and use them as the foundation of your knowledge and philosophy, to guide your practice. Most of this other stuff is white noise that you're getting all caught up in. . This is science in a nutshell. . You can speak the most amazing language in the world, but if no one understands it, or if everyone is misinterpreting it and disseminating it improperly, it's meaningless.
English
1
0
0
55
Dr. Jason Fung
Dr. Jason Fung@drjasonfung·
American Heart Association - "Obesity is all eating too much and exercising too little. So it's basically all your fault". Are these people for real?
Dr. Jason Fung tweet media
English
51
25
239
22.3K
KellyMcN
KellyMcN@Happy2HelpU_·
@DrJenniferJack1 @drjasonfung So is your cute little bot-like brain, Jennypoo! Care to explain those 2 principles to me, genius? Tell ya what, I'll even let you cheat and use AI to answer my question you brainless ho!
English
0
0
0
30
KellyMcN
KellyMcN@Happy2HelpU_·
@DrJenniferJack1 @drjasonfung What's the matter little Jenny? Didn't you ever learn about the principle of energy balance and law of conservation of mass-energy during all those years of education and professional experience? Maybe you should go back to kindergarten and start over. Genius.
English
1
0
0
31
Jennifer Jackson MD, FACP, IFMCP
Jennifer Jackson MD, FACP, IFMCP@DrJenniferJack1·
@drjasonfung Ironic the entirely of obesity specialists say it’s a complex disease and ultimate cause is poorly understood but AHA has it all figured out 🙄
English
2
0
1
89
Sheikh
Sheikh@Sheikhmustaali·
Me in the timeline seeing racist indians arguing with racist malays.
GIF
English
1
0
0
56
KellyMcN
KellyMcN@Happy2HelpU_·
@misraetel The world is falling apart right before your blind eyes, Mike. It's unreal that you can be so blind.
English
0
0
0
51
Dr. Mike Israetel
Dr. Mike Israetel@misraetel·
You’ll feel better after reading this!
Brivael@brivael

Tout ce qu'on t'a dit sur l'avenir est faux. Le monde n'a jamais été aussi bien et le meilleur est devant. Voici la liste que personne ne veut que tu lises. Espérance de vie. En 1800 : 30 ans. En 1900 : 48 ans. En 2025 : 73 ans au niveau mondial. Chaque décennie on gagne environ 2 à 3 ans. La première personne qui vivra 150 ans est probablement déjà née. Pauvreté. En 1820, 90% de l'humanité vivait dans l'extrême pauvreté. Aujourd'hui moins de 10%. La plus grande réduction de misère de l'histoire de l'espèce humaine. Et personne ne le sait. Hans Rosling l'a testé : les gens répondent plus mal que des chimpanzés qui répondraient au hasard. Mortalité infantile. En 1900, 36% des enfants mouraient avant 5 ans. Aujourd'hui c'est 3.7%. Division par 10. Grâce aux vaccins, à l'hygiène, à la médecine. Tous produits de la croissance et de la technologie. Alphabétisation. En 1820, 12% de l'humanité savait lire. Aujourd'hui 87%. L'accès au savoir n'a jamais été aussi démocratisé. Et avec l'IA, un gamin dans un village au Sénégal a accès au même niveau de tutorat qu'un élève de Stanford. Alimentation. Malthus prédisait la famine pour 1 milliard d'humains. On est 8 milliards. La production alimentaire par habitant n'a jamais été aussi élevée. La Révolution Verte de Norman Borlaug a sauvé un milliard de vies. Un milliard. Un seul homme armé de science et d'optimisme. Énergie. Le coût du solaire a chuté de 99% depuis 1976. La fusion nucléaire n'a jamais été aussi proche. Le jour où elle arrive, l'énergie devient quasi illimitée. Le combustible c'est l'hydrogène, l'élément le plus abondant de l'univers. Violence. Steven Pinker l'a documenté dans The Better Angels of Our Nature : on vit dans la période la plus pacifique de l'histoire humaine. Le taux de morts violentes par habitant n'a jamais été aussi bas. On ne le croit pas parce qu'on a des caméras partout et des algorithmes qui amplifient la peur. Matériaux. GNoME de DeepMind a découvert 2.2 millions de nouveaux cristaux en un seul projet. 800 ans de recherche en matériaux condensés. 528 nouveaux conducteurs lithium-ion. Des batteries, des semi-conducteurs, des supraconducteurs potentiels qu'on ne soupçonnait même pas. Médecine. AlphaFold a prédit la structure de 200 millions de protéines. C'est l'équivalent de plusieurs siècles de recherche biologique. Laurent Alexandre le dit depuis des années : la convergence NBIC (nanotechnologies, biotechnologies, informatique, sciences cognitives) va transformer la médecine d'un art en une science de précision. Le cancer sera une maladie chronique gérable avant 2040. Agents IA scientifiques. On est en train de passer d'une IA qui assiste les chercheurs à une IA qui fait de la recherche. Des agents autonomes capables de formuler des hypothèses, designer des expériences, analyser les résultats et itérer. En boucle. 24h/24. Sans fatigue, sans biais de confirmation, sans politique de laboratoire. Ce que l'humanité mettait 10 ans à découvrir, un agent IA le fera en quelques semaines. La recherche pharmaceutique, la science des matériaux, la physique fondamentale, la biologie, tout va être accéléré d'un ou plusieurs ordres de grandeur. On parle pas d'une amélioration incrémentale. On parle d'un changement de paradigme dans la vitesse de découverte scientifique. Robotique. Optimus de Tesla, Figure, Boston Dynamics, 1X. On est à l'aube d'une révolution robotique qui va faire pour le travail physique ce que l'IA fait pour le travail intellectuel. Musk l'a dit : si Optimus réussit, le PIB mondial pourrait être multiplié par 10. Des milliards de "travailleurs" robotiques qui ne dorment pas, ne tombent pas malades, ne s'épuisent pas. La combinaison agents IA + robotique humanoïde c'est la fin de la rareté du travail. Et la fin de la rareté du travail c'est la fin de la rareté tout court. L'abondance ne sera plus un concept théorique. Espace. Un seul astéroïde de type M contient plus de fer, de nickel et de platine que tout ce qui a jamais été extrait sur Terre. La ceinture d'astéroïdes contient des ressources estimées à des quintillions de dollars. On ne manque pas de ressources. On manque juste d'accès. Les décroissants regardent en arrière. Les optimistes regardent en avant. Et depuis 200 ans, l'histoire donne systématiquement raison aux optimistes. Pas par naïveté. Par la science. Par l'innovation. Par l'obstination de gens qui refusent d'accepter que le monde est figé. Le meilleur pari, individuellement et collectivement, c'est de parier sur l'ingéniosité humaine augmentée par la technologie. Parce que c'est le seul pari qui a toujours payé.

English
9
2
65
8.5K
KellyMcN
KellyMcN@Happy2HelpU_·
@john_9574 You seem like you're homosexual Johnny boy. Is that true, weakling?
English
0
0
0
9
KellyMcN
KellyMcN@Happy2HelpU_·
@JacobKinge Bitcoin obsession? LOL You're dumb as a stump, kid.
English
0
0
0
6
Jacob King
Jacob King@JacobKinge·
JUST IN: BINANCE AUSTRALIA FINED $6.9M OVER CLIENT FAILURES. Australia’s federal court imposes penalty on Binance’s derivatives arm in Australia. Regulator finds major lapses in client onboarding processes. Over 85% of users were misclassified, officials said.
English
4
5
55
8.5K
KellyMcN
KellyMcN@Happy2HelpU_·
@BevTchangMD Yeah, you can talk to them about drugs because it's the only language you drug pushing robots know.
English
0
0
0
6
Beverly G. Tchang, MD
Beverly G. Tchang, MD@BevTchangMD·
Helping patients decide if/when to increase their #obesity #medicine dose is a nuanced conversation: 📌2nd generation meds like Contrave and Qsymia had specific escalation and discontinuation recommendations in their package inserts, with plateaus occurring around 9 months 📌3rd gen #GLP1s Wegovy and Zepbound do not have explicit instructions, but squinting at their #weightloss curves, we start to see plateaus at 👉18 months with Wegovy 2.4 mg 👉15-20 months with Zepbound 5/10/15 mg ⭐️In reality, I tend to discuss dose increases sooner than 18-20 months due to patient preference but it's a good reminder to everyone that weight loss is a journey, not a race, and in most instances, there is no reason to rush Ref: STEP UP: thelancet.com/journals/landi… SURMOUNT-1: nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
Beverly G. Tchang, MD tweet mediaBeverly G. Tchang, MD tweet media
English
2
5
26
2.2K