Harmony Hacker

4.6K posts

Harmony Hacker banner
Harmony Hacker

Harmony Hacker

@HarmonyHacker

The world is crazy and I'm just trying to make sense of it | Futurist | Creative Thinker | AI Enthusiast | Dog lover | Pro 🌍 | Pro Harmony | Anti Chaos

Katılım Kasım 2023
157 Takip Edilen157 Takipçiler
AlphaMFPEFM
AlphaMFPEFM@AlphaMFPEFM·
That can be true, but the datacenters building and power plants will still be useful, and won't be build in just 2-3 years. It'll take decades to build enough datacenter infrastructure for what LLM would need if they were used extensively to try to solve all curent human tasks. Also the GPU used for LLM training are obselete in just 3-4 years. So when the new architectures arrives in a few years, there will still be ways to pivot and we won't have yet an excess of datacenters
English
1
0
1
18
Gary Marcus
Gary Marcus@GaryMarcus·
2025 was all about how OpenAI was supposedly about to achieve AGI. 2026 is all about how Anthropic is supposedly about to achieve AGI. 2027 will be all about how Google is supposedly about to achieve AGI. Rinse, lather, repeat.
Gary Marcus tweet mediaGary Marcus tweet media
English
28
34
261
12K
Harmony Hacker
Harmony Hacker@HarmonyHacker·
@realsidjain @kylegawley "Sure it can do A, B, C, D, E, F, G... ...But it can't do X!" [insert random emoji] The same lines that will be delivered in various ways throughout the next couple of months, possibly years (a year or two max)... until denial is no longer a forgiving comfort space.
English
0
0
0
11
Sid Jain
Sid Jain@realsidjain·
@kylegawley Why won’t he use his own AI to autonomously file his taxes without any human oversight 🤣
English
3
0
0
20
Harmony Hacker
Harmony Hacker@HarmonyHacker·
@beffjezos @martyrdison 'Uncomfortable kinetic interventionism', especially of choice, is the stark polar opposite of what the previous election was about... ...At least if memory serves right.
English
0
0
0
44
Beff (e/acc)
Beff (e/acc)@beffjezos·
@martyrdison This aversion to conflict leads to long-term exploits of pacifist bias by adversaries. Sometimes kinetic intervention is necessary, even if uncomfortable
English
63
17
667
25.7K
mads campbell
mads campbell@martyrdison·
i don’t know about you guys but i really don’t like the thought of war
English
89
7
393
40.8K
Ed
Ed@Eduardopto·
@steipete @imsroch I just did some fixes in my code, and Claude responded: "Your other agent did a great job. Everything is good now."
English
1
0
4
1.4K
Harmony Hacker retweetledi
leo 🐾
leo 🐾@synthwavedd·
So it's time for an update! For March 2026... which agentic code product do you currently prefer, Codex (w/ GPT-5.4 xhigh) or Claude Code (w/ Claude Opus 4.6)?
English
75
26
366
99.6K
Vadim
Vadim@VadimStrizheus·
Codex just one-shotted a bug that Claude Code spent 4 hours trying to fix. WHAT THE HELL?!
English
182
23
1.2K
169.1K
FartingCows&Airplanes
FartingCows&Airplanes@yestradamous·
@dercpa @VigilantFox Yeah, she didn’t need to barricade herself. What would have happened if she came out of her office? She probably would have had a conversation with the guys there. That’s it.
English
1
0
2
46
The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊@VigilantFox·
Democratic Senator gets put on the hot seat after Bill Maher asks if she would take AIPAC money. MAHER: “Would you take AIPAC money?” ELISSA SLOTKIN: “So, actually, it’s interesting. Long before October 7th, I stopped taking AIPAC money… because they were giving money to people who had been participating in January 6th.” MAHER: “Who was giving money?” SLOTKIN: “AIPAC. They give money to both Democrats and Republicans, and people who had been involved in inciting January 6th… And as someone who barricaded herself in her office on January 6th, I didn’t agree with that.” MAHER: “Convenient for you.” Stephen A. Smith raised doubts and pressed her with further questions:
English
577
897
7.1K
844.3K
adi
adi@adonis_singh·
codex existed before claude code btw
English
3
0
64
4.1K
Harmony Hacker
Harmony Hacker@HarmonyHacker·
@Govindtwtt Isn't figma one of the tools that Claude uses? Or is that not common knowledge yet?
English
0
0
0
34
Govind
Govind@Govindtwtt·
AI sucks at frontend, it's so bad frontend engineers ain't losing their jobs any time soon no AI can do 1-1 match with figma design
English
153
19
498
55.1K
Harmony Hacker
Harmony Hacker@HarmonyHacker·
@flowersslop It's good that people think this so they don't ever nerf the actual best model.
English
0
0
0
193
Flowers ☾
Flowers ☾@flowersslop·
Nano Banana Pro was released 4 months ago and is still by far the best image model overall
English
34
9
427
19.8K
Xennial Drift
Xennial Drift@genxdarkfantasy·
@Rothmus The AI bubble isn't bursting. OpenAI is just bad at their business.
English
3
0
18
1.4K
Harmony Hacker
Harmony Hacker@HarmonyHacker·
@andrezorteg @DaveShapi He doesn't care about OpenAI so much he keeps posting about how much he doesn't care about them. Now that's serious.
English
0
0
0
12
David Shapiro (L/0)
David Shapiro (L/0)@DaveShapi·
So this is interesting. Not only did I delete my OpenAI account, I've blocked some of the top OpenAI accounts on here and so I rarely get news directly about OpenAI. And I don't feel like I'm missing out on anything. Shows that OpenAI is increasingly becoming irrelevant. Certainly, not like it used to be. If you wanted to be "in the know" about AI, you had to follow OpenAI very closely. But now they aren't even doing the most interesting stuff.
English
67
13
284
37.1K
Harmony Hacker
Harmony Hacker@HarmonyHacker·
@wariocolosseum The death of the internet has finally started and it's gonna be so unbelievable satisfying watching it all burn down... - Posted from the year 2000
English
0
1
12
951
bONGO 💫
bONGO 💫@wariocolosseum·
the death of generative ai has finally started and its gonna be so unbelievably satisfying to watch it all burn
English
265
5.9K
46.8K
1.1M
Harmony Hacker
Harmony Hacker@HarmonyHacker·
@butstupider @OverDrone @Pangaron @MaMoMVPY The crafting of your post was written the same way. Your neurons were just predicting the next word you would likely say, or that fits the context of this conversation... based off a mountain on information you were trained during formative education years.
English
0
0
0
5
Harmony Hacker
Harmony Hacker@HarmonyHacker·
@OverDrone @Pangaron @MaMoMVPY If you believe LLMs only predict the next word at this point you're not predicting the future, but rather the past. The concept of multimodal models and the concept of agency hasn't registered yet.
English
2
0
4
111
Sergei Karimov
Sergei Karimov@OverDrone·
@Pangaron @MaMoMVPY We predict future, LLM predict just a next word "what would average human say next". Not the same thing.
English
2
0
1
527
Harmony Hacker
Harmony Hacker@HarmonyHacker·
@Scaramucci @novogratz Jensen's response is that these companies lack imagination to do more with more x.com/Ric_RTP/status…
Ricardo@Ric_RTP

Jensen Huang just called out every CEO who’s been firing people “because of AI.” Jim Cramer asked him why companies are laying people off if AI is supposed to make everyone MORE productive. Jensen's answer: "For companies with imagination, you will do more with more. For companies where the leadership is just out of ideas, they have nothing else to do. They have no reason to imagine greater than they are. When they have more capability, they don't do more." Read that again. The man who built the most important tech company on Earth just told you that if your CEO is using AI to cut headcount, it means one thing: They have no imagination. They have no vision for what comes next. They got handed the most powerful tool in human history and their FIRST instinct was to fire people. This is the CEO of NVIDIA. The company whose chips power every AI system on the planet. If anyone on Earth has the right to say "AI replaces workers," it's Jensen Huang. And he said the OPPOSITE. He said every carpenter could become an architect. Every plumber could become an architect. AI elevates capability. It doesn't eliminate it. But here's where it gets really interesting... During the same interview, Jensen revealed something nobody's talking about: He said AI startups like OpenAI and Anthropic are seeing their revenues increase by one to two billion dollars a WEEK. And he wishes these companies were public so the world could see what he sees. One to two billion per week. That's a $50 to $100 BILLION annualized run rate. For companies that most people think are burning cash and making nothing. The entire Wall Street narrative that "AI companies aren't profitable" might be completely wrong. Jensen sees their numbers. He sees their compute orders. He sees their growth. And he's saying the revenue is real. So if the money IS real, why are other companies firing people? Because they're not building AI products. They're not creating new revenue streams. They're not using AI to expand into new markets. They're using AI as an EXCUSE to cut costs because they ran out of ideas 3 years ago and need something to tell the board. Jensen's company added $500 billion in new orders in 5 months. He expects $1 trillion in cumulative revenue through 2027 from just two product lines. That number doesn't include the new chips, systems, or partnerships announced this week. And he's not cutting people. He's hiring. Because when you have imagination, more capability means MORE opportunity. Not less headcount. Meanwhile Salesforce cut thousands. Meta cut thousands. Amazon cut thousands. All blaming "AI efficiency." Jensen's response: You're out of imagination. He also said something that stuck with me. Cramer asked if he ever thought he'd build a $10 to $20 trillion company while waiting tables at Denny's. His answer: "I was just trying to make it through the shift." Biggest tip he ever got? Two, three dollars. Now he's building tech that increased computing demand by one million times in two years. He announced OpenClaw, which he says is as big as ChatGPT. And he's got 21 months of new business that isn't even counted in the trillion dollar figure yet. When asked how long he plans to keep working? "I'm hoping to die on the job. And I'm not hoping to die anytime soon." This is a man who believes every single thing he's building. And his message to every CEO using AI to justify layoffs is simple... You're not innovating. You're surrendering. The technology wasn't built to shrink companies. It was built to make them limitless. If your leadership can't see that, the problem isn't AI. It's THEM.

English
0
0
0
175
Anthony Scaramucci
Anthony Scaramucci@Scaramucci·
Dell is reportedly cutting 14,000 people and every single CEO in America right now is looking at Claude and doing the same math.@novogratz If I don't replace jobs with agents — I'm going to get crushed by someone who does. That's the calculation happening in every boardroom in the country. AI is eating white collar jobs and it's just getting started. Here's my prediction: This becomes THE political issue of 2026 and it will absolutely dominate 2028. What do you think the solution is? 👇🏼
English
100
110
508
107.1K
Harmony Hacker
Harmony Hacker@HarmonyHacker·
@kylegawley The great thing is that after you've typed poorly-framed thoughts they'll just go away... receding in the ether of bad takes as life goes on. It is what it is.
English
0
0
0
123
Kyle Gawley
Kyle Gawley@kylegawley·
Anthropic has generated just $5bn in lifetime revenue. That's basically a rounding error for big tech. AI is a niche technology for nerds, nothing more.
English
47
9
222
19.5K