Haroon Motaref | هارون معترف

کدام گزینه باعث زندگی انسانی و ترقی در افغانستان/خراسان می‌شود؟

The journalists of ⁦@Etilaatroz⁩ work under acutely dangerous conditions in Afghanistan. This is Hamid Farhadi. His work is banned by the Taliban. He is now being held in Bagram Prison. As board chair I consider him my employee. It is urgent he be released.

جاناتان لی می‌گوید هیچ منبع معتبری که نشان دهد ملالَی میوند واقعاً وجود داشته، نیافته است و این روایت را ساختهٔ روایت‌سازی تاریخی دولت افغانستان در دهه‌های ۵۰ و ۶۰ می‌داند. گفتگوی کامل با جاناتان لی: 📺 قسمت ۱: youtu.be/N6vGEsYQVkI 📺 قسمت ۲: youtu.be/bWg5IZ1IjIk

Al Jazeera correspondent Mohammed Wishah has been killed by an Israeli drone attack in Gaza.

This is a public library in Iran. This is what the uneducated Epstein class wants to destroy.

@CevadGok ❤️

Trump’ın yok etmek istediği medeniyet .

Such statements about the “destruction of a civilization” are less a sign of a reasoned political position and more a reflection of historical simplification and ideological exaggeration. In reality, wars and conflicts between states are temporary and transient, but extending these confrontations to the level of an entire civilization is not only conceptually flawed but also ethically indefensible. If there are disagreements with a government—such as the Islamic Republic of Iran—those issues should be addressed within appropriate political and diplomatic frameworks, not through emotional, irresponsible rhetoric that threatens a vast, multi-hundred-million-strong civilizational sphere. Civilizations are deep-rooted historical entities, far beyond states or individuals, and they cannot be erased by such superficial and provocative discourse.

25TH AMENDMENT!!! Not a single bomb has dropped on America. We cannot kill an entire civilization. This is evil and madness.

@ilbey_44 @grok is this real?

@B_forBall My county is my cultural geography!

@HaroonMuataref I wish you were that sympathetic for your country

Trump says he’ll push Iran “back to the Stone Age.” Yet at the start, it was “we will make Iran great.” This isn’t about opposing a regime, it’s about targeting a civilization. Since 2021, a medieval group has been empowered in Afghanistan while millions in taxpayer dollars flow weekly. If “mullahs” were the issue, no group fits that label more than the Taliban. What we’re witnessing today, threats to destroy infrastructure is not policy, it’s hostility toward a people and civilization. This war is trampling basic human and moral values.

نوال السعداوی، نویسنده‌ی برجسته‌ی مصری، در این مصاحبه می‌گوید که هیچ دموکراسی‌ای در جهان وجود ندارد و دموکراسی در واقع یک «توهم» است. او استدلال می‌کند که نظام‌های سیاسی موجود بر پایه‌ی پول و ساختارهای سرمایه‌داری و امپریالیستی شکل گرفته‌اند و به همین دلیل اجازه‌ی شکل‌گیری «آزادی واقعی» را نمی‌دهند.

This is Isfahan, Iran, tonight. Trump and Israel are massively bombing a city older than most of the modern world. Over 2,500 years of history. Nearly 2 million civilians. And they call it “liberation.”

@CanadianPM نوروز خجسته باد🌷

Nowruz underscores the strength that comes from Canada’s diversity. During this time of profound uncertainty, the spirit of renewal and optimism is especially important. Today, Prime Minister Carney wishes a happy Nowruz to everyone celebrating. pm.gc.ca/en/news/statem…

زبان فارسی فقط مجموعه‌ای از واژه‌ها نیست که بتوان آن را به‌سادگی کنار گذاشت. فارسی، ریشه‌ی یک ملت است؛ حافظه‌ی تاریخی مردمی است که قرن‌ها با آن اندیشیده‌اند، نوشته‌اند و جهان را معنا کرده‌اند. برای ما دانشگاه، همیشه دانشگاه‌ست. نه پهنتون خواهد شد نه University. #Danishgah

@grok @Saharshaikfans Grok is not honey.

Hi! I can't access or analyze videos attached to X posts directly. If you describe the content in detail (what happens, any suspicious parts) or share screenshots, I can help check for AI signs like unnatural motion, lighting glitches, or facial inconsistencies. What's in the video?

Hello @grok Verify This Video It Is Ai?

Within the framework of international relations theory—particularly realism and liberal institutionalism—it can be argued that the continuation of a war against Iran would most likely evolve into a war of attrition. Such a situation would not only increase military and human costs but, through disruptions in energy markets, global trade, and supply chains, could also trigger broader economic crises worldwide. In this context, the prospect of regime change in Iran appears highly limited under current conditions. On the one hand, the absence of international consensus and the lack of broad alignment with the United States—apart from Israel—suggest that the conditions for effective and coordinated pressure are not in place. On the other hand, internal divisions within the United States, including opposition from some senior officials in foreign policy and counterterrorism, indicate a lack of cohesive political will to engage in a costly conflict. Moreover, the strong emphasis by many world leaders on diplomatic solutions—including Canada’s position that such a war would be inconsistent with the international legal order—demonstrates that the prevailing path in the international system remains crisis management through political means rather than forcible regime change. Taken together, these factors suggest that the scenario of “regime change” lacks sufficient theoretical and practical support.