
Harry Tandy
20.6K posts

Harry Tandy
@HarryTandy
AI Researcher | Exploring Agentic Workflows | Follow for daily AI insights







Qwen 3.7-max beats Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 We tested three frontier models on a real agentic task: write a Tetris bot that plays the game and trains itself. Each model could read its own code, run benchmarks, and rewrite itself across 10 iterations. Then we compared the final bots head to head. Qwen 3.7-Max: training cost $1.32, bot improvement +56% Claude Opus 4.7: training cost $12.15, bot improvement +28% GPT-5.5: training cost $2.85, bot improvement +7% Qwen won on every dimension - biggest jump, 9× cheaper than Claude, 2× cheaper than GPT. Long agentic loops is where Qwen Max actually delivers.


Hermes Agent now supports the @Bitwarden Secrets Manager



in april we published 95.6% on longmemeval using our file-based memory architecture. we packaged that architecture into three pip installs. on sonnet 4.5 it just scored 95.1%. one command activates. three auth paths: siwe wallet sign, email + 6-digit terminal code, or sub-cent usdc-send from any mobile wallet. terminal picks up automatically when the browser binds. auto-wires into claude code, codex, and hermes agent. one command per target. memory stays on your machine by default. small cli: sibyl init: activate sibyl status: tier + local db snapshot sibyl update: pull the latest sibyl setup: auto-wire your agent sibyl devices: manage active devices





there's a new service agencies can sell right now that barely anyone offers yet GEO: generative engine optimization quick breakdown: traditional SEO = rank in google's 10 blue links GEO = get your brand cited inside AI answers when someone asks Claude, ChatGPT or perplexity a question it doesn't show a list of websites it gives a direct answer and names 2-3 brands those brands get an endorsement no ad can buy zero click needed, the trust is already built why this matters right now: → top ranking pages lost 34-61% CTR once AI answers appeared above them → rankings didn't drop, traffic did → $750 billion in revenue will flow through AI search by 2028 → only 16% of brands are tracking AI visibility the service model: 1. AI visibility audit (is the brand being cited by Claude, ChatGPT, perplexity, gemini?) 2. content restructuring (make it citable, structured, data-rich) 3. monthly tracking (monitor AI citations across platforms) 4. competitor analysis (who's getting cited instead of you?) charge $2 - 5k/month per client most agencies aren't even aware this exists yet the brands spending $10k/month on SEO? their traffic is dropping and they don't know why you walk in with the diagnosis and the fix window closes when every agency adds this to their menu right now it's wide open
















