Levi Henze

20.7K posts

Levi Henze banner
Levi Henze

Levi Henze

@HenzeTimon

Economist at @DezernatZ. Mainly Climate, Macro, Fiscal.

Berlin, de Katılım Kasım 2012
2.6K Takip Edilen1.4K Takipçiler
Hanns Koenig
Hanns Koenig@HannsKoenig·
@HenzeTimon @maurerchr @MarcoWuensch Now climate action seems to be less of a priority, so maybe it could happen now. But I’d warn against expecting too much from it: some more domestic production is somewhat good for security of supply, but our gas prices would realistically stay coupled to LNG prices. / fin
English
1
0
1
20
Levi Henze
Levi Henze@HenzeTimon·
I’d bin the general fracking bans across Europe yesterday because they never made sense ecologically and from an externality perspective (at least that’s my understanding). But: E.g. Poland never banned it, had ample incentive to invest and large resources. /.
New Left EViews@NewLeftEViews

Paging @HenzeTimon: just how unrecoverable is Europe’s shale gas? I know it’s economically and politically dead….but how dead? Like dead dead? Asking for a distant friend.

English
3
0
11
841
Infornomics
Infornomics@infornomics·
Honestly I don't find it terribly exotic I general most folk stuff even medieval is still not as weird as algorithmic music imo
Alien Perspective@WigglyAir

English
1
0
2
101
Levi Henze retweetledi
New Left EViews
New Left EViews@NewLeftEViews·
@HenzeTimon Remind me of your disagreement? With Brett and with critics of marginal pricing?
English
1
0
1
182
Levi Henze
Levi Henze@HenzeTimon·
@atrembath Yes, I saw that. This was in direct reference to that, I retweeted yours earlier
English
0
0
1
81
Levi Henze retweetledi
Maia
Maia@maiamindel·
qatar is about to start cutting helium exports... helium is used for chip production... the iran war is about to turn the ai bubble into the hindenburg
English
107
1.9K
19.3K
693.6K
Levi Henze
Levi Henze@HenzeTimon·
@maurerchr Yes. Though to be fair, it is a little less intuitive than Twinkies on the shelf
English
1
0
2
51
Christoph Maurer
Christoph Maurer@maurerchr·
@HenzeTimon Unfortunately, people are uncomfortable with basic laws of supply and demand. Hard to overcome without making things worse
English
1
0
3
93
Christoph Maurer
Christoph Maurer@maurerchr·
Well, that's a new angle. Until now, the questionable, yet nonetheless vehemently put forward argument has been that due to marginal pricing RES earned excessive profits despite low variable cost. Now they are disadvantaged by the very same concept. Would love to understand this.
Montel News@montelnews

The merit order system for setting electricity prices in Europe is “not a good solution” in its current form as it disadvantages renewable energy, Austrian chancellor Christian Stocker said in Brussels on Thursday. montelnews.com/news/949d1144-…

English
4
3
27
2.3K
Levi Henze retweetledi
Ramez Naam
Ramez Naam@ramez·
The fertilizer crisis brewing because of Hormuz is going to be felt predominantly by people in some of the poorest nations on earth. Americans will only barely notice. Why? 1. The US, China, Europe, and other rich regions apply so much fertilizer per acre today that crop yields already show diminishing returns from fertilizer. You can cut back fertilizer application by double digit percentages and see quite small yield impacts. 2. Only maybe 10% of what Americans spend on food pays for what's coming off the farm. Farm commodity price surges get highly diluted before they reach American pocket books. 3. Poorer nations food budgets are much closer to actual farm commodity prices. Percentage changes in crops affect poor nation residents much more directly. 4. Poor nation farmers can afford much less fertilizer already, and are at the usage levels of steep gains, where any fertilizer reduction directly impacts crop yields. They're the ones most likely to cut back. Those poor nations are the ones to see crop yields decline and food spending soar. Rich country residents might see some prices tick up. Poor countries may see hunger and food insecurity directly rise. DOD and the US intelligence community have long warned that risks to food, water, and climate are threat multipliers. They increase the risk of state failure of Least Developed Countries. That in turn creates the conditions for civil war and breeding grounds for extremism and terrorism, along with migration. These things are very hard to predict. We might get lucky. Second order effects may be muted. Or we may see unexpected and unpleasant ripple effects from the developing world.
English
13
122
557
42.6K