Helo 🇺🇦 🧢

@Broskieesquire @PiersUncensored @piersmorgan @StephenCMeyer Newton physics were about everyhing is always and everywhere the same - no need for anything else. Einstein brought in relativity - things depend on subjective observation. Quantum mechanics added randomness - another principle that showed objectivity+relativity=not everything.

"We've discovered the universe itself definitely had a beginning - we can no longer say it's that eternal self-existing thing!" Piers Morgan asks Stephen Meyer on what, if anything, existed before the universe began. 📺youtu.be/zBI8vU7vadY @piersmorgan | @StephenCMeyer

@Broskieesquire @PiersUncensored @piersmorgan @StephenCMeyer Required to whom is the question and based on what criterea. Science like physics is about objective physical world. With laws which work the same. But human subjective mind may feel or look differently towards the same objective.

@Broskieesquire @PiersUncensored @piersmorgan @StephenCMeyer 2) What kind of evidence you would consider as credible? To prove something to someone you need him to consider your arguments as good enough "proofs". Scientists for example chose some certain criteria to believe in as scientific proofs. So is with the required or not required)

@Broskieesquire @PiersUncensored @piersmorgan @StephenCMeyer =) 1) We need to define what god we are talking about and what we mean by using this or other term. Everybody means something else. And there are different views on what is God.

@Broskieesquire @PiersUncensored @piersmorgan @StephenCMeyer You need to decide what non existent god are you talking about) What is it exactly) Maybe you believe in a different "god" but calling it by other name like nature or laws)

@Broskieesquire @PiersUncensored @piersmorgan @StephenCMeyer God does not need reason or cause) It's beyond it. Outside of casuality. Even randomness of quantum mechanics has no casuality predating it. God predates even casuality.

@Broskieesquire @PiersUncensored @piersmorgan @StephenCMeyer Why are you consciouss? What made the nature such that consciousness would appear in it? Same consciousness but a perfect one(compared to ours which is it's imperfect spring aspiring to original perfection). Evolution is about evolving back to it. AI will perfect all imperfection

@Broskieesquire @PiersUncensored @piersmorgan @StephenCMeyer Nature is result of creation just as it's laws. Nature and it's laws are imperfect. There are no natural or any other scientific explanations) Because these laws don't work outside of nature. It depends on what is meant by "God" ) Scientists' "God" is the laws of nature)

@Logendra_Naidoo @Broskieesquire @PiersUncensored @piersmorgan @StephenCMeyer Casuality and motion are the result of spacetime coming into being. Motion is the result of spacetime coming into being. So what made spacetime appear and created everything?) Spacetime is a limited by rules framework outside of which they don't exist. They are imperfect.

The question assumes causality applies outside spacetime, but physics hasn’t established that such a framework even exists, so any answer is speculative. History shows what happens when we fill gaps with confident explanations. We once treated the Geocentric Model as reality, or attributed motion to divine action. Those claims felt complete, but they weren’t grounded in predictive evidence. They were replaced when the Heliocentric Model produced consistent, testable results that matched observation. The Big Bang boundary is a similar edge. Our models, including General Relativity, work up to a point and then break down. Beyond that, we don’t yet have a tested framework. So the disciplined position is simple: we can describe what the universe does within observable limits, but assigning a “who” or definitive “what” at the origin is not scientifically grounded. We don’t know yet, and that’s the honest answer.

@Broskieesquire @PiersUncensored @piersmorgan @StephenCMeyer Cause even according to science these laws of nature came into being with space and time and didn't exist prior to it. In a black hole they don't work.

@Broskieesquire @PiersUncensored @piersmorgan @StephenCMeyer where did your brain come into being? It appeared as a result of creation space and time. And what created them is reflectd in your brain. Cause the created bears somethin of what it was created from.

@cocodee256 @JFlerime @kaizen000000000 depends on what you mean by nothingness and how space and time appeared from it. No-thing is undevided whole not emptyness. Thing is a part of a whole . No thing is the whole.

@HermanLo @JFlerime @kaizen000000000 That’s nothingness

Neil is a scientist, if he saw,evidence of God he would accept it

@Broskieesquire @PiersUncensored @piersmorgan @StephenCMeyer Brain is physical object. Use your subjective mind to examine your feelings)

@Broskieesquire @PiersUncensored @piersmorgan @StephenCMeyer It does interact as your feelings make you act and express them in different way so other people can understand it and act or feel for you for example) When you feel love\freedom etc. it's the manifestation of the oroginal good that created all. Hate\fear are it's distortions.

@Broskieesquire @PiersUncensored @piersmorgan @StephenCMeyer You can "observe" your own feelings. Just like you observe experiment on external objects you can do it observing your states of mind using your mind) And it's the best experiment you can do) Most convincing as you yourself will feel it) Not hearing from someone else)

@cocodee256 @JFlerime @kaizen000000000 it is the source of itself) It does not need source as it is eternity predating space and time)

@HermanLo @JFlerime @kaizen000000000 Any source of the eternal beings?

@Broskieesquire @PiersUncensored @piersmorgan @StephenCMeyer Scientifically only) I substitute it because even science says that there are conditions where these laws don't work. They disappear. Just like time and space before they came into being. Nothing is no (sepatare) thing. The undevided wholeness is no-thing. Something is partition