Hewitt Heiserman

2.1K posts

Hewitt Heiserman banner
Hewitt Heiserman

Hewitt Heiserman

@HewittHeiserman

Author, “It’s Earnings That Count." Next book: "Expected Value: How Superinvestors Decide." Hint: ((BPT - SP) x COS) / ((SP - bPT) x COF) ≥ 3x. 🌲

United States Katılım Mayıs 2018
817 Takip Edilen1K Takipçiler
Hewitt Heiserman
Hewitt Heiserman@HewittHeiserman·
@RealRickRule @intlmandotcom The value of USA's monetary promise has plunged as much as 80 percent in the last 10 years when priced in real money, and as much as 95 percent in the last 30 years. x.com/intlmandotcom/…
Hewitt Heiserman tweet media
Doug Casey's International Man@intlmandotcom

The 10-year Treasury yield is perhaps the most important financial benchmark in the global fiat system, as it drives valuations and market trends worldwide. It is widely—and erroneously—regarded as the risk-free rate of return. The 10-year Treasury yield can be thought of as a key barometer of the US dollar-based fiat system—a critical measure akin to its beating heart. Bond yields move inversely to bond prices. When bond prices fall, bond yields rise. A rising 10-year Treasury yield signals trouble for the US dollar because it means investors are selling Treasuries, which pushes up the US government’s borrowing costs. That is why the 10-year Treasury yield is a major pain point for the US government. The 10-year Treasury yield was 3.97% when the war started. Now it is around 4.60%, an increase of roughly 63 basis points. I expect the 10-year Treasury yield to keep climbing over the coming weeks and months—until it forces the Fed’s hand. At that point, the intervention will be sold as “stability,” but the mechanism will be familiar: suppress yields by debasing the currency. At today’s debt levels, every 1 basis point increase in the government’s average borrowing cost adds roughly $3.9 billion in annual interest expense. So a 63 bps rise is not trivial—it translates to nearly $250 billion in additional yearly interest costs, materially widening a 2025 budget deficit that was already around $1.8 trillion. Higher yields mean the US government must pay tens or even hundreds of billions more in interest on its debt. At the same time, the global economy faces even greater added costs because Treasury rates serve as the benchmark for borrowing worldwide. That is not an insignificant move. However, given all the headwinds I have discussed, I suspect the 10-year Treasury yield is headed much higher because investors will demand higher yields to compensate for rising inflation. Further, if Hormuz remains closed, drastically higher oil prices are all but certain. Higher energy prices mean higher prices across the economy and higher official inflation rates, which means investors will demand still higher yields to compensate. The problem is that interest on the federal debt is already over $1.2 trillion and is now the second-largest item in the budget. The US government cannot afford yields going much higher because the interest expense would push it toward bankruptcy. I am not sure how—or even if—the US government can manage this situation. Something has to give, and we will not have to wait long to find out what. The Iran war may prove to be more than another foreign policy disaster. It could be the trigger that exposes the fragility of the entire dollar-based financial system.

English
0
0
0
73
Dirtcheapstocks
Dirtcheapstocks@dirtcheapstocks·
My passion is finding mispriced assets in public markets. Check these two out:
Dirtcheapstocks tweet media
English
9
2
50
17.7K
Hewitt Heiserman
Hewitt Heiserman@HewittHeiserman·
@DavidGFool @steven3ford My eventually-to-be-published book on expected value and how superinvestors decide has an appendix chapter on actors, behaviors, concepts, jargon, laws, memes and phenomenon to know. "Spiffy-pop" is in there. Conratulations @DavidGFool and @steve3ford on $RKLB
Hewitt Heiserman tweet media
English
1
1
5
1.9K
David Gardner
David Gardner@DavidGFool·
@steven3ford It's an out-and-out Rule Breaker and I'm delighted to hear you found it early and have held well past so many others selling! I have done the same. Really happy to hear that, Steven, and Fool on!
English
1
0
16
2K
Michael Burry Stock Tracker ♟
62 years ago today, someone cheated Warren Buffett so he took his entire company At the time, Buffett was just a minority shareholder in Berkshire Hathaway with a simple plan: buy cheap and sell high. But that's not how things turned out In 1964, Berkshire's chairman Seabury Stanton verbally agreed to buy Buffett out at $11.50 per share. Then the letter arrived and it said $11.375. Twelve and a half cents short Buffett didn't sell. Instead, he bought every share he could find Timeline: • 1962: Buffett buys into a dying New England textile mill at $7.50/share • 1964: Stanton asks Buffett his price. Buffett says $11.50. Stanton shakes on it • May 6, 1964: The letter arrives at $11.375. Buffett gets furious and starts buying everything he can • 1965: Buffett owns 38% of the company and takes control. Stanton is out • 1967: Berkshire buys its first insurance company, National Indemnity, for $8.6M. The pivot begins • 1985: The last textile mill closes. Berkshire is now a holding company • Today: BRK-A at $703,435/share Stanton tried to save $28,125 and ended up losing the whole company
Michael Burry Stock Tracker ♟ tweet media
English
26
76
662
75.4K
Eddie Palmgren
Eddie Palmgren@edisonpalmgren·
What started as a fun idea two years ago has now taken physical form: A book about surviving the journey of being an investor, with all the temptations and detours along the way. Written by @chriswmayer, edited by me, published by Partners Media.
Eddie Palmgren tweet mediaEddie Palmgren tweet media
English
7
15
122
8.3K
Hewitt Heiserman
Hewitt Heiserman@HewittHeiserman·
@mr_deepvalue Wa Po is best stock to learn how WEB decides. Reasons: 1) comp advantage (local monopoly), 2) rev model (gross profits royalty), 3) family owned (generational outlook), 4) edge (knew newspaper economics), 5) high EVM, and 6) sold when pricing power disappeared. 104x in 41 years.
English
0
0
0
65
Mr Deep-Value
Mr Deep-Value@mr_deepvalue·
Read through one of Warren Buffett’s early deep-value case studies today. The Washington Post Company in 1973. Market cap <$80m. Replacement cost >$100m. Real asset value >$400m+. Newspaper under-earning, market fixated on short-term margins. Buffett quietly accumulates. This was his bread and butter.
English
6
1
55
6K
Hewitt Heiserman
Hewitt Heiserman@HewittHeiserman·
@mr_deepvalue If Buffett believed Katharine Graham's media company offered $3 or more of upside reward for every dollar of downside risk, adjusted for the time value of money and chance of occurrence, he just needed to get a hit once every four swings of the bat. Here's the math: 1 / (1 + 3).
English
0
0
2
48
Hewitt Heiserman
Hewitt Heiserman@HewittHeiserman·
@mr_deepvalue The higher a stock's EV multiple, the greater the margin of safety to protect against what Ben Graham described as "miscalculation or worse-than-average luck."
English
1
0
1
39
Marcos Milla
Marcos Milla@MarcosMillaYT·
This is why you should stick to buying $VOO $VTI $VT long-term instead of trying to trade stocks like you have some edge… “Nobody Knows Nothing”…. - John Bogle
English
9
21
308
34.5K
Hewitt Heiserman
Hewitt Heiserman@HewittHeiserman·
@BitcoinArchive 18 years ago the U.S. had $10 trillion in debt, 9 years ago $20 trillion, now $40 trillion. At this rate of doubling, we'll have $80 trillion in 2035, $160 trillion in 2044, $320 trillion in 2053...
English
1
1
7
384
Bitcoin Archive
Bitcoin Archive@BitcoinArchive·
SAYLOR: “Every academic before Bitcoin never understood what money was.”
English
56
196
1.7K
99.1K
Gregory Blotnick
Gregory Blotnick@gregoryblotnick·
1886 article on Roosevelt "Fighting is fun for him...this makes him as many friends as anything else. He makes a lot of enemies too, but so does anybody who is fit to live." man if ur wired like that, u had my same reaction: "yo...FUCK this double-edged sword of a trait." lol
Gregory Blotnick tweet media
English
2
0
14
1.3K
Hewitt Heiserman
Hewitt Heiserman@HewittHeiserman·
Congratulations to Tim Cook, who announced today that he's stepping down as $AAPL's longtime CEO. Cook had big shoes to fill following the visionary Steve Jobs--and he delivered.
Hewitt Heiserman tweet media
English
1
1
5
226
Hewitt Heiserman
Hewitt Heiserman@HewittHeiserman·
@mr_deepvalue I enjoy reading your ideas, and I keep them in this binder. That’s three inches of intriguing insights in the last 12 months. I highly recommend your Substack.
Hewitt Heiserman tweet media
English
0
0
1
2.3K
Mr Deep-Value
Mr Deep-Value@mr_deepvalue·
Over the last year: My newsletter ideas beat the market by +8.6%. Not by chasing trends. By buying cash-flowing businesses at prices nobody else wants. That’s the entire strategy.
English
1
0
19
1.3K