HOT97 | HipHopGamer | CHASE | GGL | AMD | THE GOAT

🚨EU AVISEI que a SONY não iria parar de lançar jogos no PC! - Sony venderá seus jogos para PC em sua própria loja. - Alguns acreditam que Wolverine pode ser lançado no mesmo dia em PC, mas exigirá um lançador da Sony e uma conta PSN. Fazem ANOS que estamos ouvindo rumores sobre um launcher da SONY nos PCs. E funcionaria igual ao Xbox Play Anywhere. Segundo uma fonte que vazou informações, a Sony estava trabalhando anteriormente em um lançador de PSN para PC. E agora isso toma ainda mais forma.

…. ok hear me out maybe DLSS5 is good

Difference in outdoor POP here is striking, but the training seems like it MAY be assuming a bright sun is off in that direction, which would account for the massive light boost. Still, if you don't think the right image looks better, you're either blind, gaslighting, or a liar.

I still don’t get the DLSS 5 hate. This looks insane. 🤯

I think this video does a good job explaining the viewpoints of the team but I wanted to make sure it was clear that I wasn't feeling up to participate yet thus not in the video. I will share my own thoughts soon but my opinions largely mirror what Alex says in this video!

After this whole debate about DLSS 5 I came to the conclusion that most of the people talking about it are completely unaware of what they don't know...they're on the peak of ignorance and don't even grasp how little they understand. They just heard generative AI and like Pavlov's dog they just start drooling thinking it's the same shit as unethical slop image generators...for the love of Christ...go and educate yourself before raging on the internet for no reason. DLLS 5 is not a prompt based generator...it's not creating stuff based on someone else's images and hallucinates results. It uses the information from the raster to build up a final render frame with the same information but with better lighting and shading... I'll even give you an example on how much of an impact better shading and lighting has. This is a character I've worked on not long ago. On the left you have a raster render, with some bad shaders. On the right you have a render with raytrace on, a much better shader for both hair and skin. They don't even look like the same person...do they? This is what DLSS5 is doing....getting a result like the one on the right(tbh a lot better) at a smaller cost than actually rendering it. Still the same geo, same textures, same light sources. Some of you will go and say the one on the left is better and it's the artist's vision. It's not...it's just the artist's limitation due to shading and lighting constrains. Every single artist out there would love to get the right result in real time.

Jensen Huang has responded to the comments calling DLSS 5 AI slop: "First of all, they're completely wrong. The reason for that is because, as I have explained very carefully, DLSS 5 fuses controllability of the geometry and textures and everything about the game with generative AI. It’s not post-processing, it’s not post-processing at the frame level, it’s generative control at the geometry level." He has also added: "This is very different than generative AI; it’s content-control generative AI. That’s why we call it neural rendering" What are your thoughts on this?

Genuine question, why are people mad about this? I’m really not even trying to be dismissive or sarcastic here. Why in the world would anyone be mad about this?