007

@official_Gegeh Omo nah banga soup and starch oh 😂

90% of Nigerians go eat Rice and stew today. E sure me kpa

@Brother_Bear07 @AfricaFactsZone Foreigners are not the cause of unemployment or poverty. They operate within the same system and often contribute to jobs and businesses. The real issue is structural so focus should be on fixing the system and holding government accountable, not blaming individuals.

@AfricaFactsZone I searched for Boko Haram or terrorists on your timeline and found nothing. Today, 50 schoolchildren got kidnapped, and you said nothing about it, but you tweeted about South Africa four times already today. You and your countrymen have a serious problem.

South African School Principal, Bhekisisa Mngadi was attacked by anti-immigration protesters who accused him of being a foreigner. They called him "kwerekwere" (foreigner), falsely accused him of selling drugs and vandalised his car.

@NigeriaStories Trump wey lie pass anything 😂

No foreign soldier participated in the operation that eliminated terrorist commander, Abu Bilal Al-Minuki. ~ Maj.-Gen. Michael Onoja, Director, Defence Media Operations, has said.

@SarkinMota_AMF My bradder enjoy yourself

I left Abuja and went to all the way to Gwagwalada to eat pounded yam

@Member_555 @V81818281 @MostlyLeBrun @ibti_16 Like I said , just like how you’re clinging to the idea of superiority, that same psychological bias exists in all humans. It’s not unique to one group it’s a general human tendency toward in group thinking and status.

@Horlamidea007 @V81818281 @MostlyLeBrun @ibti_16 Yet again that is a trait of being a subspecies. Every point you’re bringing up reinforces the subspecies argument.

The back of a Namibian laborer covered in scar tissue from years of whipping by a German farmer named Ludwig Cramer, (1912–1913). Taken by the Rhenish missionary Johann Jakob Irle.

@Member_555 @V81818281 @MostlyLeBrun @ibti_16 That’s like saying languages being different proves humans are different biological subspecies. You can see structure and variation, but it’s still one interconnected system with continuous mixing not separate biological lineages.

@Member_555 @V81818281 @MostlyLeBrun @ibti_16 In humans, the variation is too continuous and overlapping for that classification to hold.

@Member_555 @V81818281 @MostlyLeBrun @ibti_16 No, those traits alone don’t define subspecies. Subspecies require consistent, genome-wide separation into relatively distinct evolutionary lineages, not just clines, interbreeding, or regional variation.

@Member_555 @V81818281 @MostlyLeBrun @ibti_16 Clines can exist within subspecies, but they don’t define them. Continuous gene flow actually works against subspecies formation because it reduces long term separation. Humans are too interconnected genetically to fit that model.

@Horlamidea007 @V81818281 @MostlyLeBrun @ibti_16 Clines don’t define subspecies alone but they are a part of them. Continuous gene flow is one of the things that classifies an organism as a subspecies.

@Member_555 @V81818281 @MostlyLeBrun @ibti_16 Ancestry groups show real genetic structure, but they don’t meet full subspecies criteria because they overlap widely and don’t form stable, genome-wide isolated lineages. It’s not just terminology humans don’t fit the biological definition of subspecies.

@Horlamidea007 @V81818281 @MostlyLeBrun @ibti_16 Yes but what geneticist call ancestral groups line up with the definition and scientific qualification of a subspecies. They just don’t use that term due to deep rooted social and ethical concerns surrounding an already taboo topic.

@Member_555 @V81818281 @MostlyLeBrun @ibti_16 Clines alone don’t define subspecies. Subspecies require more consistent, genome wide differentiation that’s stable enough to separate populations overall. In humans, variation is clinal but also highly mixed with continuous gene flow, so it doesn’t form clear subspecies units.

@Horlamidea007 @V81818281 @MostlyLeBrun @ibti_16 That’s what I’m saying subspecies don’t have sharp boundaries they have clines. Subspecies and species are 2 different taxonomic groups.

@Member_555 @V81818281 @MostlyLeBrun @ibti_16 That’s why humans are typically described as structured populations or ancestry groups, not subspecies in formal taxonomy.

@Member_555 @V81818281 @MostlyLeBrun @ibti_16 Most modern population genetics shows that human variation is highly continuous, with extensive gene flow and overlapping genetic distributions across many loci, rather than discrete, independently evolving lineages.

@Member_555 @V81818281 @MostlyLeBrun @ibti_16 Human genetic differences exist, but they are mostly continuous and overlapping, not divided into clear subspecies style boundaries.

@Horlamidea007 @V81818281 @MostlyLeBrun @ibti_16 Once again, you’re describing a trait of a subspecies.

@Member_555 @V81818281 @MostlyLeBrun @ibti_16 In humans, the variation is real, but it’s too overlapping and interconnected to form those stable, independent lineages.

@Member_555 @V81818281 @MostlyLeBrun @ibti_16 Subspecies aren’t just “groups that can interbreed,” they’re populations with consistent, diagnosable genetic differences across many traits over long periods of partial isolation.

@Member_555 @V81818281 @MostlyLeBrun @ibti_16 That’s not how subspecies are defined in modern biology. Gene flow being continuous isn’t just a minor detail it’s exactly what prevents populations from forming stable subspecies in most cases.

@Horlamidea007 @V81818281 @MostlyLeBrun @ibti_16 You’re literally pointing out a defining trait of a subspecies. All subspecies can interbreed with one another. You’re not seeming to understand that the things you keep pointing out, like a continuous gene flow is part of what makes a subspecies what it is.