BlueStateLibertarian

29.9K posts

BlueStateLibertarian banner
BlueStateLibertarian

BlueStateLibertarian

@Hub_Libertarian

Boston Native; Sane person trapped in a land of crazy; Libertarian, not on your team - Boston Sports Fanatic and lover of guns of all kinds.

Northern VA Katılım Şubat 2011
1.4K Takip Edilen697 Takipçiler
BlueStateLibertarian retweetledi
Aleph
Aleph@woke8yearold·
Opposition to data centers is exactly like opposition to fracking. It was a large change that people hated because there is a lot of general opposition to changes to the built environment. You can't reason with this sentiment because it is fundamentally irrational. "I don't like change near me" isn't a position you can reason someone out of it. We didn't listen to it on fracking and society benefited greatly. We did listen to it with nuclear power and did incalculable damage to the West.
Aleph tweet media
English
15
58
370
6.3K
BlueStateLibertarian retweetledi
Matthew Tortora
Matthew Tortora@MatthewTortora_·
It’s beyond frustrating that the anti-ai crowd use electricity concerns (both grid pressure, and emissions) to try and argue against data center construction, when both issues are easily solved via fission power, which we lack because of people with the same degrowth mindset 40 years ago
English
92
53
418
61.5K
BlueStateLibertarian
BlueStateLibertarian@Hub_Libertarian·
@ErinMondays @PresentWitness_ They long have done so and continue to do so. Data centers have been around since the 60's without issue. The AI race is what is causing this, and its the same people who fought fracking using the same playbook to try and stop economic growth in the US.
English
1
0
0
18
Erin Monday
Erin Monday@ErinMondays·
@PresentWitness_ They can bake in public amenities and art into the design. This isn’t an either/or thing, but a way to gain support for much needed infrastructure How can data centers have a real, tangible, physical benefit? Something even a Luddite can grasp?
English
1
0
0
161
J.
J.@PresentWitness_·
‘Building beautiful data centers’ would do nothing to improve quality of life in American cities and would be just another slap in the face to residents who bear the negative externalities of such industrial projects. I’m pro data center, pro nuclear, and pro beauty, but resources should be used intelligently.
English
7
5
77
41.4K
BlueStateLibertarian retweetledi
Omri Ceren
Omri Ceren@omriceren·
Illinois has an incentive program that requires data centers to make at least $250 million in capital investment over a 60-month period. That's the minimum and it doesn't count job creation, including construction jobs. They're keeping the state afloat. The campaign against data centers is an anti-growth moral panic being driven by often anonymous social media accounts and foreign money.
Omri Ceren tweet media
Chicago Sun-Times@Suntimes

AI data centers are driving electric bill costs for ComEd customers up, and customers will experience at least a 12% jump in monthly charges starting in June. chicago.suntimes.com/consumer-affai…

English
22
40
192
14.9K
Henry Honto
Henry Honto@HenryHonto·
@Cernovich "Your bills won't rise." They always do. The data-center pitch runs the same trick as NYC's wealth-tax trigger walking from $5M to $1M. (The 24-month call is in today's Daily Honto: when "we couldn't have predicted" headlines run on Utah bills.)
English
2
1
2
127
Cernovich
Cernovich@Cernovich·
This is what all the data centers say and then the bills do go up and citizens have no remedy. What happens if the data centers are lying?
Jason Chaffetz@jasoninthehouse

Data Center in Box Elder County I am fully supportive of the data center project in Box Elder County. When I first learned of the project, I had some of the same questions you might have. I, too, worry about people, water, power, the health of the Great Salt Lake, and why it would be good for Utah. I had an opportunity to meet with the people bringing the project here and to get those questions addressed. I was impressed by their answers so I introduced them to my friend, Kevin O’Leary, who later decided to move forward with the project. I believe it is going to a be huge net positive for the State of Utah. Here’s what was shared with me and why I’m excited about it: Energy · This project is not taking anything out of the existing power grid. · The price Utahns pay for power should not go up because of this development. · More than a decade ago, a 42” pipeline from Wyoming called the Ruby Pipeline, with Natural Gas, was constructed. It’s already there - permitted and installed underground. Regulatory standards are already in place at the state and federal level. · The data center may even feed surplus power back into the grid and other renewable power sources may be deployed. Water · When the developers put the private land under contract, they agreed to paying a premium price, multiple times greater than market rate for the area. They were candid about the potential. The project uses the existing private water rights that were in use by the previous landowners. · It doesn’t need additional water beyond what already belongs to that property. · The water they’ll be using currently does not feed into the Great Salt Lake. · There might be a net increase of water going into the Great Salt Lake by using the water supply and flowing it down to the Great Salt Lake rather than being used for agriculture. · The water available to that property is currently low quality and brackish. · Water put into the Great Salt Lake would need to be higher quality and treated. Those are the concerns. But what is most exciting are the opportunities. Tax revenue · The 40,000 acres was generating roughly $250,000 annually in taxes for Box Elder County. · When fully implemented, it’s anticipated the county will receive more than $100 million annually in tax revenue from those 40,000 acres. Today the Box Elder total budget is less than $80 million. · The state, via sales tax, will receive hundreds of millions of dollars annually when fully developed. All Utahns benefit from that. This is all new revenue to the state. HAFB · The proximity of the data center makes Hill Air Force Base (HAFB) a more attractive asset for the Pentagon. · That accessibility may protect Hill from future BRAC closure threats. In a rapidly changing world, data centers in the USA are safer for Americans. Having them in Utah helps with jobs, viability long-term for Hill, and providing a national security asset. · The data center supports the mission of both HAFB and the Utah Test & Training Range (UTTR). · ”Top of Utah” is heavily dependent on Hill for a whole ecosystem of jobs and businesses. Keeping our economy vibrant in northern Utah is an imperative. That’s good for Utah jobs (thousands of new jobs in Top of Utah), our economy, and national defense. We have to be able to process data. This facility will do so with minimal disruption to the taxpayers who benefit from it. It’s off the beaten path in an area that is hard to make productive. It will also bring additional private sector companies and advanced manufacturing our state can not support because our current energy supplies are not big enough. It can be done cleanly, supporting our state with jobs, revenue, and making Utah a leading place to do business while supporting our quality of life.

English
78
246
1.5K
58.4K
BlueStateLibertarian retweetledi
Sean Frank
Sean Frank@Seanfrank·
I don’t know why data centers have become this generations nuclear power. Unlike nuclear power, there is a 0% chance that a data center can lead to any sort of disaster scenario. This project in Utah is: - in an uninhabited area - bought and repurposed water already in use - is bringing its own power, so it won’t cost citizens anything It’s like being against building a nuclear power plant in the middle of Nevada, except there is no radioactive waste. No fall out. No risk of anything. It’s a big computer in the middle of nowhere, that is self sufficient in all resources. There are a million real problems in America. Data centers just aren’t one.
Quick Thoughts@lthlnkso

I think the big Utah data center is fine.

English
391
246
2.3K
287.8K
BlueStateLibertarian retweetledi
Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful
Why is there suddenly such an aggressive push against American data centers and AI infrastructure? After seeing a major spike in coordinated opposition campaigns around our Utah projects, we conducted a digital audit and traced a large amount of the activity back to an organization called Alliance for a Better Utah, which has been pushing misinformation throughout Box Elder County about our data center developments. What’s even more concerning is where the funding appears to originate. After reviewing IRS Form 990 filings and tracing the network behind it, the money appears tied to Chinese linked funding channels connected through an organization called Arabella. Think about the incentive, if China is racing to dominate AI and compute capacity, why wouldn’t they want to slow American infrastructure down?
English
3.3K
2.2K
7.7K
755.8K
AmericanMade8895
AmericanMade8895@AmericanMade107·
@E__Strobel Because people are waking up and realizing that their utilities are doubled and not coming down anytime soon, if anything going up a lot more
English
4
0
6
105
BlueStateLibertarian retweetledi
E__Strobel
E__Strobel@E__Strobel·
Data centers have been part of American infrastructure for 30+ years. Before about 6 months ago, nobody was talking about them. Now ask why... Why the sudden interest, all over the country, all at once, with clearly choreographed talking points? Does that sound even remotely 'organic', or does it sound more like astroturf?
E__Strobel tweet mediaE__Strobel tweet media
English
44
22
85
6K
BlueStateLibertarian retweetledi
Logan Dobson
Logan Dobson@LoganDobson·
Fracking has contributed so many billions in American revenue and American jobs that even outspoken politicians have had to backtrack on banning it. AI and AI infrastructure will be the same in a few years. Smart politicians will be ahead of the curve.
Logan Dobson tweet media
Steve Everley@saeverley

Attacks on data centers are dominating headlines, ranging from run of the mill environmental claims to obscure and even bizarre issues. The broader dynamic should look familiar, because a very similar playbook was used against fracking. 🧵

English
16
29
273
6.5K
Ryan James Girdusky
Ryan James Girdusky@RyanGirdusky·
While there’s a lot more questions to be raised, this is so much more compelling than insisting that anyone who has questions over data centers is being paid by the Chinese… which is basically just what Kevin O’Leary has been screaming for the last week
Jason Chaffetz@jasoninthehouse

Data Center in Box Elder County I am fully supportive of the data center project in Box Elder County. When I first learned of the project, I had some of the same questions you might have. I, too, worry about people, water, power, the health of the Great Salt Lake, and why it would be good for Utah. I had an opportunity to meet with the people bringing the project here and to get those questions addressed. I was impressed by their answers so I introduced them to my friend, Kevin O’Leary, who later decided to move forward with the project. I believe it is going to a be huge net positive for the State of Utah. Here’s what was shared with me and why I’m excited about it: Energy · This project is not taking anything out of the existing power grid. · The price Utahns pay for power should not go up because of this development. · More than a decade ago, a 42” pipeline from Wyoming called the Ruby Pipeline, with Natural Gas, was constructed. It’s already there - permitted and installed underground. Regulatory standards are already in place at the state and federal level. · The data center may even feed surplus power back into the grid and other renewable power sources may be deployed. Water · When the developers put the private land under contract, they agreed to paying a premium price, multiple times greater than market rate for the area. They were candid about the potential. The project uses the existing private water rights that were in use by the previous landowners. · It doesn’t need additional water beyond what already belongs to that property. · The water they’ll be using currently does not feed into the Great Salt Lake. · There might be a net increase of water going into the Great Salt Lake by using the water supply and flowing it down to the Great Salt Lake rather than being used for agriculture. · The water available to that property is currently low quality and brackish. · Water put into the Great Salt Lake would need to be higher quality and treated. Those are the concerns. But what is most exciting are the opportunities. Tax revenue · The 40,000 acres was generating roughly $250,000 annually in taxes for Box Elder County. · When fully implemented, it’s anticipated the county will receive more than $100 million annually in tax revenue from those 40,000 acres. Today the Box Elder total budget is less than $80 million. · The state, via sales tax, will receive hundreds of millions of dollars annually when fully developed. All Utahns benefit from that. This is all new revenue to the state. HAFB · The proximity of the data center makes Hill Air Force Base (HAFB) a more attractive asset for the Pentagon. · That accessibility may protect Hill from future BRAC closure threats. In a rapidly changing world, data centers in the USA are safer for Americans. Having them in Utah helps with jobs, viability long-term for Hill, and providing a national security asset. · The data center supports the mission of both HAFB and the Utah Test & Training Range (UTTR). · ”Top of Utah” is heavily dependent on Hill for a whole ecosystem of jobs and businesses. Keeping our economy vibrant in northern Utah is an imperative. That’s good for Utah jobs (thousands of new jobs in Top of Utah), our economy, and national defense. We have to be able to process data. This facility will do so with minimal disruption to the taxpayers who benefit from it. It’s off the beaten path in an area that is hard to make productive. It will also bring additional private sector companies and advanced manufacturing our state can not support because our current energy supplies are not big enough. It can be done cleanly, supporting our state with jobs, revenue, and making Utah a leading place to do business while supporting our quality of life.

English
0
2
23
6.9K
BlueStateLibertarian retweetledi
BlueStateLibertarian
BlueStateLibertarian@Hub_Libertarian·
@CrusaderTrade AI is basically a new industrial revolution. We absolutely positively want to be both involved and at the forefront.
English
0
0
0
9
American Trade Crusader
American Trade Crusader@CrusaderTrade·
Whatever you think of AI data centers (personally, I suspect they are here for surveillance), I wish they were not the biggest driver of reindustrialization right now. I want to make domestic apparel, steel, aluminum, electronics, vehicles. And block imports thereof.
English
7
3
24
341
Mofay S
Mofay S@MofayS1·
@chrismartenson @kevinolearytv You forgot two important points. 2 they hike energy prices. 3 they use tons of water increasing cost and scarcity.
English
5
0
28
560
FuriaDiDonna
FuriaDiDonna@furiadidonna·
@Cernovich No. Because these things go up in rural or poor areas where there is no ability of locals to fight back. Hundreds of people have COPD and asthma from living next to Musk’s data center in Memphis, and no one cares.
English
2
0
1
147
Cernovich
Cernovich@Cernovich·
What happens if the developers are lying, as every other data center bro has done, when putting up every other data center? Will there be any financial remedies available?
Jason Chaffetz@jasoninthehouse

Data Center in Box Elder County I am fully supportive of the data center project in Box Elder County. When I first learned of the project, I had some of the same questions you might have. I, too, worry about people, water, power, the health of the Great Salt Lake, and why it would be good for Utah. I had an opportunity to meet with the people bringing the project here and to get those questions addressed. I was impressed by their answers so I introduced them to my friend, Kevin O’Leary, who later decided to move forward with the project. I believe it is going to a be huge net positive for the State of Utah. Here’s what was shared with me and why I’m excited about it: Energy · This project is not taking anything out of the existing power grid. · The price Utahns pay for power should not go up because of this development. · More than a decade ago, a 42” pipeline from Wyoming called the Ruby Pipeline, with Natural Gas, was constructed. It’s already there - permitted and installed underground. Regulatory standards are already in place at the state and federal level. · The data center may even feed surplus power back into the grid and other renewable power sources may be deployed. Water · When the developers put the private land under contract, they agreed to paying a premium price, multiple times greater than market rate for the area. They were candid about the potential. The project uses the existing private water rights that were in use by the previous landowners. · It doesn’t need additional water beyond what already belongs to that property. · The water they’ll be using currently does not feed into the Great Salt Lake. · There might be a net increase of water going into the Great Salt Lake by using the water supply and flowing it down to the Great Salt Lake rather than being used for agriculture. · The water available to that property is currently low quality and brackish. · Water put into the Great Salt Lake would need to be higher quality and treated. Those are the concerns. But what is most exciting are the opportunities. Tax revenue · The 40,000 acres was generating roughly $250,000 annually in taxes for Box Elder County. · When fully implemented, it’s anticipated the county will receive more than $100 million annually in tax revenue from those 40,000 acres. Today the Box Elder total budget is less than $80 million. · The state, via sales tax, will receive hundreds of millions of dollars annually when fully developed. All Utahns benefit from that. This is all new revenue to the state. HAFB · The proximity of the data center makes Hill Air Force Base (HAFB) a more attractive asset for the Pentagon. · That accessibility may protect Hill from future BRAC closure threats. In a rapidly changing world, data centers in the USA are safer for Americans. Having them in Utah helps with jobs, viability long-term for Hill, and providing a national security asset. · The data center supports the mission of both HAFB and the Utah Test & Training Range (UTTR). · ”Top of Utah” is heavily dependent on Hill for a whole ecosystem of jobs and businesses. Keeping our economy vibrant in northern Utah is an imperative. That’s good for Utah jobs (thousands of new jobs in Top of Utah), our economy, and national defense. We have to be able to process data. This facility will do so with minimal disruption to the taxpayers who benefit from it. It’s off the beaten path in an area that is hard to make productive. It will also bring additional private sector companies and advanced manufacturing our state can not support because our current energy supplies are not big enough. It can be done cleanly, supporting our state with jobs, revenue, and making Utah a leading place to do business while supporting our quality of life.

English
22
97
611
26.8K
Thomas Welsh
Thomas Welsh@troberts0UG66·
Are there any studies & impacts ? Cancer, quality of life ? Look GE dumped toxic shit in the Hudson - big reason China prices are cheap = environmental & wage arbitrage…dump that shit in the river. Edge compute I/O throughout = quantum (Jay Valentine) = data ctr obsolete. Can any of you hard core SMEs answer?
English
2
0
0
107
Cernovich
Cernovich@Cernovich·
Data centers are a tricky one. I was pro until I saw water and power bills go up. Data center bros claim it’s a “closed loop,” and when that’s a lie, residents hold the back. There must be legal remedies if they lie, and also profit sharing. Or else, nah.
J.@PresentWitness_

‘Building beautiful data centers’ would do nothing to improve quality of life in American cities and would be just another slap in the face to residents who bear the negative externalities of such industrial projects. I’m pro data center, pro nuclear, and pro beauty, but resources should be used intelligently.

English
104
179
1.3K
39.8K
pratok69
pratok69@peterkotar12668·
@Cernovich A decade ago, the debate was about fracking. Petroleum companies said that it would provide cheap abundant energy for the US. I f you point out high energy prices today, they call you ignorant for not understanding that it's a global market.
English
0
0
4
74
Dr M🔫🍊🍊🇺🇸🗑️
@Cernovich The bigger issue is 10 years from now when technology has advanced and all these giant buildings are deemed useless. All the infrastructure and lost farmland will have been in vain.
English
2
0
6
115