Human 1st 🇦🇺 🇺🇦

We had this conversation in a public hearing a week ago and you said it would take “years” to replenish some of these stockpiles. That’s not classified, it’s a quote from you. This war is coming at a serious cost and you and the president still haven’t explained to the American people what the goal is.

@thematrixb0t Concerned is the understatement of the century. Horrified would be much more appropriate.

This is REAL JOURNALISM Netanyahu looks like his head is about to explode

Do you agree with Matt McConaughey?

AOC: "Virginia was an election of 3 million Americans. This court did not overturn a map it overturned an election."

@bennyjohnson Traitor.

Good morning. Christ is King 👑

@TheOmniLiberal Completely true. Trump is a master of using manipulation tactics to cover his ignorance of almost every topic. He deflects, strawmans & DARVOs his way out of every tough question and reporters just move onto the next fucking question without pressing.

Anyone?

🚨 BRITISH HISTORIAN GOES NUCLEAR: “Trump is Putin’s USEFUL IDIOT” Sir Antony Beevor (Sky News): “The Americans are being played. Putin is manipulating the White House and views Trump as a ‘useful idiot’ advancing Moscow’s goals… especially on Ukraine.”

@_sn_n This is the best analogy for the average American voter I've seen.

How people that say “I don’t pay attention to politics” look

Why is Iryna Zarutska the only Ukrainian you MAGAs give a shit about? Thousands of Ukrainians are being killed every day, and you kiss the ass of the dictator who murders them. The ONLY reason you care about Iryna is because her death helps you demonize the entire black race.

Lutnick is a TACTICAL liar, not a pathological liar. A pathological liar can't help themselves, Lutnick is lying about his connections with Epstein because he's also likely connected to Mossad and/or child sex trafficking.

This guy is on point with every damn word. Vote these republicans out. I’m so sick of these ppl cuddling Trump and I know many of you are as well. Your November vote is needed.

It's hard to express the admiration I have for these people Thank you Ukraine, for doing what the West should be doing

James Talarico: “Young people can’t afford to buy a home, but Jeff Bezos has 12. Young people can’t afford to fill up their gas tank, but Mark Zuckerberg is launching helicopters from his mega-yacht. Young people pay more than their fair share of income taxes, but someone like Elon Musk can get away without paying a penny”

3,375 people killed in Iran, 26,500 wounded 2,702 killed in Lebanon, 8,311 wounded 28 killed in Gulf states, 289+ wounded 26 killed in Israel, 7,791 wounded 13 US troops killed, 381 wounded ENOUGH of Trump and Netanyahu's endless wars.

CIA is telling Trump that Russia is definitively losing now and is at risk of military and/or political collapse at any moment. Trump wants to get ahead of this and pretend like he was supporting Ukraine this whole time. Narcissists want to associate themselves with winners.

Americans liking this post are actively rooting for the downfall of their country.

🚨BREAKING: Rep. Ted Lieu says the full Epstein files contain information that Donald Trump RAPED minors. So he started a war to distract us from his crimes. What's your response to Ted Lieu......??👀 MAKE THIS GO VIRAL ON 𝕏. LET’S GO 👏

Hypothetical question: If a President of the USA is a secret Russian asset, what would he do to help Russia? ChatGPT: Interesting thought experiment—and a useful way to think about incentives and power. If someone in that position were secretly acting in another country’s interest, the key wouldn’t be dramatic, obvious betrayals. It would be subtle, deniable, and cumulative. First, they’d likely undermine alliances quietly. The United States’ biggest strategic advantage is its network—especially NATO. So instead of openly pulling out, they might question its value, delay commitments, create distrust among members, or signal unreliability. Even small cracks weaken collective defense. Second, they could shift foreign policy in ways that benefit Russia without looking extreme. That might mean softening sanctions, slowing military aid to countries Russia opposes (like Ukraine), or reframing conflicts to reduce U.S. involvement. None of that needs to look like “helping Russia”—just “putting America first.” Third, damage internal cohesion. A divided country is less effective abroad. Amplifying polarization, discrediting institutions (courts, elections, intelligence agencies), or constantly creating internal crises reduces the ability of the U.S. to act strategically. That’s something adversaries historically benefit from. Fourth, reshape leadership and bureaucracy. Appointing people who are inexperienced, loyal over competent, or sympathetic to certain narratives can gradually shift how decisions are made. Over time, that changes policy outcomes without needing explicit orders. Fifth, control the narrative. Public opinion matters in democracies. Repeating talking points that align with Russian interests—questioning support for allies, portraying adversaries of Russia as corrupt or unworthy—can steer public sentiment in a favorable direction. Finally, they’d avoid anything blatantly illegal or provable. The whole strategy would depend on plausible deniability. If it’s obvious, it fails. The big picture: influence at that level isn’t about one shocking act—it’s about slowly tilting the system so that, over time, outcomes consistently benefit the other side.

Muah ha ha ha ha ha HAAA!😝👊🔥