Artemis 🇺🇸

27K posts

Artemis 🇺🇸

Artemis 🇺🇸

@HuntressofCrete

Conservative, Catholic, retired USAF officer for the most exceptional nation on earth. NO socialism.

Katılım Haziran 2009
905 Takip Edilen240 Takipçiler
Artemis 🇺🇸 retweetledi
Artemis 🇺🇸 retweetledi
Harrison Ford
Harrison Ford@HarrisonFordLA·
May the fourth be with you
GIF
English
2.9K
51K
214.9K
6.1M
Artemis 🇺🇸 retweetledi
David Albright
David Albright@DAVIDHALBRIGHT1·
Listening to this debate on the JCPOA, it also strikes me as an old feud but with a twist to use it to bash Trump and support an anti-war agenda. But more fundamentally, the JCPOA model itself has little relevance today to get a new deal. Others models are needed. It makes no sense to accept the JCPOA premise that would allow Iran to build up a destroyed enrichment program it has no civilian need of. Pressure and war succeeded in ending Iran enriching and in destroying its centrifuge program. The remaining enriched uranium stocks need to be addressed, but it has to be acknowledged that eliminating the means of their production is a positive. Moreover, removing the stocks, blending them down, or IAEA safeguarding them was not invented by the JCPOA. The JCPOA verification mechanisms, despite all their positives, failed to get Iran to cooperate with the IAEA on the most fundamental verification issue: does Iran have a peaceful nuclear program and has it fully declared its nuclear program. In fact, the JCPOA inadvertently tolerated Iran not cooperating and then getting away with it. That issue has been mitigated somewhat by the wars seriously damaging Iran’s capabilities to make the nuclear weapon itself. But this issue needs to be addressed by Iran providing a complete declaration, and the JCPOA model would undermine achieving that goal. I recommend dropping the JCPOA as a model and working on a new one. The JCPOA carries too much baggage and doesn’t have the answers, or offer the modalities, we need today to ensure Iran does not build nuclear weapons, a task that, thank the Lord, is far harder today for Iran to accomplish due to the destruction from the wars than it was just before them. I accept that many Dems and other Trump haters will resist moving on. They will push to use Trump leaving the JCPOA as the basis to make all kinds of attacks, some legitimate, but most outlandish and ideologically motivated. And some of these people are unlikely to be interested in developing a new model, fearful it could help Trump get a win. But we should ignore what increasing looks like carping and focus on a new type of deal, one more suited to the world today.
Phil Gordon@PhilGordonDC

It would be wrong to see the JCPOA debate as merely an old feud. It's the closest thing we have to a test case for how to deal with Iran. The failure of the assumption that maximum pressure would lead to a "better deal" or regime collapse is highly relevant to your questions about what should come next. For example, should we now accept a ceasefire and degree of sanctions relief in exchange for a verifiable agreement to curb Iran's capacity to produce a bomb--for example with a suspension of enrichment for x number of years, prohibitions on HEU production, and limits on a LEU stockpile, even if it doesn't include everything we might want? Or should we expect that a continued blockade and renewed airstrikes will lead to a better deal, in which the regime agrees to end enrichment forever, give up its HEU, open the Strait without tolling, forego ballistic missile development and support for proxies, or possibly even collapse? Do we think Iran will respond to continued pressure by agreeing to all those demands, or is it more likely to counter-escalate, at extraordinary human and financial costs and in the absence of any nuclear constraints? These are hard questions but they should at least be informed by the lessons of recent experience rather than wishful thinking or ideology. That's why continued debate about the JCPOA remains essential. Critics argued for years that more pressure on Iran would produce a "better deal" and we wouldn't have to go to war to get it. So far they've been proven catastrophically wrong and we are now struggling at great cost to end Iran's stranglehold on the world economy--that it didn't have before--let alone get a comprehensive nuclear deal or change the regime. Continuing to act on their flawed assumptions would be to make policy based on hope rather than experience.

English
15
50
152
54.1K
Artemis 🇺🇸 retweetledi
Brad Wilcox
Brad Wilcox@BradWilcoxIFS·
Just remember: Your coworkers will NOT be there for you in the last chapter of your life.
Brad Wilcox tweet media
English
237
958
6.3K
789.5K
Artemis 🇺🇸
Artemis 🇺🇸@HuntressofCrete·
The old, reactionary palecons stirred up conspiracies of foreign interests controlling the WH because it's easier to conjure up a distinct enemy than accept the fact that every US President has had to make difficult decisions about the Mideast, a witch's brew of complex rivalries, since WWII. Presidents simply couldn't ignore it because instability threatened to spread beyond the region. But it's easier to shift blame onto 1 country than realize their isolationist policies are untenable in the face of reality.
Will Chamberlain@willchamberlain

Tucker following Buckley here with Russiagate 2.0: the idea that our billionaire real estate magnate turned President is secretly under the thumb of a foreign nation. Honestly, Russiagate, the farce that it was, had more meat behind it than Tuck and Buck's theory. Democrats could at least point to things like Trump Jr. meeting at Trump tower with the crazy Magnitsky Act woman. Tucker's theory is just completely devoid of evidence: "Trump is doing things that don't make sense to me, despite me pleading with him, that means he must be acting under duress." It's a 19-year-old pothead's way of viewing the world. Tucker's view is because Trump doesn't treat Israel like a vassal state that he must be their vassal instead. The reality is just much more simple. We are partners. We are the senior partner, they are the junior partner, and for the most part we have the wheel. But it's 2026, not 1967, and our junior partner has a ton of independent military capability (the second most capable Air Force in the world!) and could, if it absolutely had to, go it alone. It doesn't want to, and the Israelis are very grateful for Trump's actions and the American alliance more generally, so they generally accede to Trump's requests, but they aren't a vassal either. It's not that Israel has anything on Trump. It's that Israel is actually a very powerful country in conventional terms, with a highly capable military and a powerhouse economy that is strategically super important to American interests. But Tucker apparently hasn't picked up a book about Israel in a few decades, is operating on 1980s' conventional wisdom about their capabilities, and thus is constantly surprised about Israeli and American decision making. And the only way he can make sense of it is an obviously retarded conspiracy theory that takes roughly thirty seconds to dismantle if you just ask a few decent questions (see my interrogation of Buckley earlier this week).

English
0
0
0
16
Artemis 🇺🇸 retweetledi
Yogi
Yogi@Houseofyogi·
Spirit Airlines died tonight at the hands of the socialist crusader, Elizabeth Warren She must be so proud to add another casket to her achievements. Tonight at 3am, Spirit turns off the lights. 14,000 jobs gone. 30+ smaller airports lose service. JetBlue offered $3.8 BILLION in cash to buy Spirit in 2022. Shareholders, flight attendants union, literally everyone voted yes. The combined company would have held 9% of the US market against a Big 4 that already owned 80%. For anyone who understands numbers: 9% isn’t a monopoly against 80%. Warren said no. She wrote letters. She pressured Buttigieg. Biden’s DOJ sued. A federal judge killed the deal in January 2024. Her argument: the merger would cost consumers $1 billion a year. Now look at her collateral damage she dusts under the rug. 510 pilots gone in the months after. 1,800 flight attendants furloughed in December. 14,000 jobs in 2023. 7,500 last week. Zero tonight. And that’s just the people in Spirit uniforms. Catering goes. Fuel guys go. Baggage crews, gate agents, airport coffee shops, hotels and rental cars in 70 cities Spirit flew to. Every airline job carries 3 more on its back. 40,000 people out of work because of one woman’s moronic crusade against the market. And the math ain’t mathing. Spirit abandoned 90 routes during the death spiral. Fares on those routes are up 14% on average. Oakland to Newark: $135 to $288. Fort Myers to San Juan: $92 to $219. Kansas City to Newark up 66%. That’s reality. Not some BS number from a “study.” So @SenWarren tell me how this saves the consumer money? Cheap carriers in a market drop fares 21% across the board. Southwest did this in the 90s and saved Americans $68 BILLION over 20 years. Warren killed it. That’s what moronic politicians led by socialism do. Then with her own blind arrogance, she tweeted Spirit’s collapse is “a Biden win for flyers.” A win. 14,000 people are reading termination letters tonight. And she’s taking credit. This is socialism in 2026. A senator who’s never made payroll thinks she knows how to run a market better than the people who own and work in the company. She saved you a billion on imaginary paper. She cost you ten times that in real life. She didn’t protect consumers from anything. 14,000+ will go from working to welfare. She will make sure to blame billionaires, hardworking tax payers, AI, capitalism and whatever monster they will make up tomorrow hiding under your bed. Higher taxes. Fewer jobs. More expensive everything. She called it a win. I hope you enjoy winning.
English
5.9K
33.5K
124.2K
6.5M
Artemis 🇺🇸 retweetledi
𝗄𝖺𝗄𝗁𝗈𝗓𝖺
𝗄𝖺𝗄𝗁𝗈𝗓𝖺@simphiweyinkoc_·
UNPOPULAR OPINION: Introverts don’t hate socializing. They hate pretending.
English
721
15.6K
97.1K
2.7M
Artemis 🇺🇸 retweetledi
David Albright
David Albright@DAVIDHALBRIGHT1·
That may be true, but it is a small part of story, and I am surprised NYT focuses only on the production of enriched uranium prior to the start of the June 2025 war. Israel and the United States destroyed Iran’s centrifuge program and its ability to make centrifuges and more feed gas. Iran is no longer enriching uranium. The stocks of enriched uranium are believed to be bottled up in underground sites, where attempts at access can be readily detected. Israel attacked at least 8 sites involved in making the nuclear weapon itself, something rarely reported in the media. While the regime is widely publicly perceived as more motivated to decide to make nuclear weapons, its means to do so are severely degraded. While before the June war Iran could have built a nuclear weapon with near certainty in less than six months, it will face a much more difficult struggle to succeed if it tries in the coming months, and the probability of succeeding in six months is now much less technically certain. That real risk of failing to successfully build a nuclear weapon may be a deterrent against trying. Whatever one thinks of the right or wrong of the bombing campaigns, it sure looks like they achieved some real success in significantly setting back Iran’s ability to make nuclear weapons and its confidence in trying, especially regarding the weapon itself.
Peter Baker@peterbakernyt

When Trump pulled out of the international nuclear agreement with Tehran in 2018, Iran lacked even a single bomb's worth of uranium. Since then, it accumulated 22,000 pounds of enriched uranium. @BlackiLi @WilliamJBroad nytimes.com/interactive/20…

English
25
104
387
212.1K
Artemis 🇺🇸
Artemis 🇺🇸@HuntressofCrete·
The War Powers Act is unconstitutional. No President of either party has ever been constrained by it. If Congress does not want war, it cuts off funding.
Ryan Goodman@rgoodlaw

The 60 Day Clock on the Iran War expired today, May 1. @bridgewriter and @oonahathaway explain: The war is now “triply illegal.” And the War Powers Resolution, passed by supermajorities in both congressional chambers, now requires President Trump to terminate hostilities. 1/

English
0
0
1
141
Artemis 🇺🇸 retweetledi
People
People@people·
Pizza Hut's 'BOOK IT!' Summer Reading Program Returns to Provide Voracious Young Readers with Pizza Parties and More people.com/pizza-huts-boo…
English
141
2.7K
9.7K
4.1M
Artemis 🇺🇸 retweetledi
U.S. Central Command
Statement from Adm. Brad Cooper, CENTCOM commander on the success of the U.S. blockade against Iran:
U.S. Central Command tweet media
English
334
1.7K
7.2K
317.2K